Ann Thorac Surg 2012;94:7. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.073
© 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Original Articles: Adult Cardiac
Invited Commentary
George L. Hicks, MD
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, 601 Elmwood Ave, Rochester, NY 14642
(Email: george_hicks@urmc.rochester.edu).
| The first 20% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The article by Dr Sakamoto and associates
[1] studies retrospectively the outcome of 98 ACS [acute cardiogenic shock] patients who required ECLS [extracorporeal life support] for hemodynamic collapse unresponsive to conventional treatments. The study spans a 10-year period (2000 to 2010) and includes a wide spectrum of patients from cardiogenic shock being treated resistant VF or pulseless VT [ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia] and asystole. Of note, the majority (95.9%) of patients received emergency revascularization; 92 by PCI [percutaneous coronary intervention] and 2 undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting CABG [coronary artery bypass grafting. Successful angioplasty was defined by achieving . . . [Full Text of this Article]
Related Article
-
Extracorporeal Life Support for Cardiogenic Shock or Cardiac Arrest Due to Acute Coronary Syndrome
- Shingo Sakamoto, Norimasa Taniguchi, Shunsuke Nakajima, and Akihiko Takahashi
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2012 94: 1-7.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
Copyright © 2012 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.