ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Fred H. Edwards
Robert A. Albus
Rostik Zajtchuk
Geoffrey M. Graeber
Michael J. Barry
John D. Rumisek
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Arishita, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, F. H.
Right arrow Articles by Arishita, G.

Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1611-1612
© 1995 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Use of a Bayesian statistical model for risk assessment in coronary artery surgery

Fred H. Edwards, M.D.*, Robert A. Albus, M.D., Rostik Zajtchuk, M.D., Geoffrey M. Graeber, M.D., Michael J. Barry, M.D., John D. Rumisek, M.D., Gary Arishita, M.D.

* Address reprint requests to Dr Edwards, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Florida Health Science Center, 653-2 W Eighth St, Jacksonville, FL 32209-6511.

A computerized statistical model based on the theorem of Bayes was developed to predict mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. From January, 1984, to April, 1987, at our hospital, 700 patients underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. The presence or absence of 20 risk factors was determined for each patient. The first 300 patients formed the initial database of the Bayesian predictive model, and the remaining 400 patients were prospectively evaluated in four groups of 100 each. Each group was prospectively evaluated and then incorporated into the database to update the model. There was good agreement between predicted and observed results. Bayesian theory is particularly suited to this task because it (1) accommodates multiple risk factors, (2) is tailored to one's specific practice, (3) determines individual, rather than group, prognosis, and (4) can be updated with time to compensate for a changing patient population. These flexible attributes are especially valuable in light of recent changes in the coronary artery bypass graft patient profile.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. L. Grunkemeier and N. Payne
Bayesian analysis: A new statistical paradigm for new technology
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2002; 74(6): 1901 - 1908.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
R. E. Shaw, H. V. Anderson, R. G. Brindis, R. J. Krone, L. W. Klein, C. R. McKay, P. C. Block, L. J. Shaw, K. Hewitt, W. S. Weintraub, et al.
Development of a risk adjustment mortality model using the American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) experience: 1998-2000
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 3, 2002; 39(7): 1104 - 1112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS
Copyright © 1995 by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.