ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hankins, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hankins, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. S.

Ann Thorac Surg 1984;37:192-196
© 1984 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Articles

Colon Interposition for Benign Esophageal Disease: Experience with 23 Patients

John R. Hankins, M.D.*, Fred N. Cole, M.D., Joseph S. McLaughlin, M.D.

From the Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD

* Address reprint requests to Dr. Hankins, University of Maryland Hospital, Baltimore, MD 21201


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Footnotes
 References
 
Twenty-four colon interpositions were performed in a group of 23 patients comprising both adults and children between 1965 and early 1982. The indications for operation were caustic injury in 13 patients, peptic stricture in 6, congenital atresia or stenosis in 2, and gunshot or foreign body injury in 2. Long colon segments, consisting of isoperistaltic left colon in seven instances, antiperistaltic left colon in four, and right colon in five, were utilized for 16 procedures in 15 patients. Short segments of left colon were used in 8 patients, isoperistaltic in 6 and antiperistaltic in 2. There were no operative deaths. Ischemic complications necessitated removal of the transplant and replacement with another segment in 1 patient and revision or drainage procedures in 2 others. Strictures of the esophagocolic anastomosis occurred in 6 patients. Five of these strictures occurred among the 13 patients with caustic injury and appeared to be due to unrecognized caustic damage in the esophageal segment used for the anastomosis. Three patients died of unrelated causes eight months to 41/2 years after operation, and 3 others were lost to follow-up. Seventeen patients were available for current follow-up 1 to 16 years after operation, including 7 who were followed more than 7 years. When the swallowing ability of these 17 patients was assessed using rigorous criteria, 9 were found to have an excellent to good result; 5, a good to fair result; and 3, a poor result. No patient showed late deterioration of function. We conclude that interposed colon is the ideal esophageal substitute for the patient with benign disease.


    Footnotes
 Top
 Abstract
 Footnotes
 References
 
Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting of the Southern Thoracic Surgical Association, Hilton Head Island, SC, Nov 4-6, 1982.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Footnotes
 References
 

  1. Kelling G. Ösophagoplastik mit Hilfe des Querkolon Zentralbl Chir 1911;38:1209.
  2. Vulliet H. De l'ósophagoplastie et des diverses modifications Sem Med 1911;31:529.
  3. Postlethwait RW. Colonic interposition for esophageal substitution (collective review) Surg Gynecol Obstet 1983;156:377.[Medline]
  4. Turney SZ. Lye stricture of the esophagus in children: the role of colon interposition Am Surg 1974;40:105.[Medline]
  5. Hanna EA, Harrison AW, Derrick JR. Long-term results of visceral esophageal substitutes Ann Thorac Surg 1967;3:111.[Free Full Text]
  6. Joske RA, Benedict EB. The role of benign esophageal obstruction in the development of carcinoma of the esophagus Gastroenterology 1959;36:749.[Medline]
  7. Kiviranta UK. Corrosion carcinoma of the esophagus Acta Otolaryngol 1952;42:89.[Medline]
  8. Orringer MB, Kirsh MM, Sloan H. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977;73:807.[Medline]
  9. Orringer MB, Kirsh MM, Sloan H. New trends in esophageal replacement for benign disease Ann Thorac Surg 1977;23:409.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Skinner DB: Discussion of Mansour et al [13].
  11. Buntain WL, Payne WS, Lynn HB. Esophageal reconstruction for benign disease: a long-term appraisal Am Surg 1980;46:67.[Medline]
  12. Huguier M, Gordin F, Maillard JN, et al. Results of 117 esophageal replacements Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;130:1054.[Medline]
  13. Mansour KA, Hansen II HA, Hersh T, et al. Colon interposition for advanced nonmalignant esophageal stricture: experience with 40 patients Ann Thorac Surg 1981;32:584.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Mullen DC, Postlethwait RW, Dillon ML. Complications of substernal colon interposition Am Surg 1970;36:80.[Medline]
  15. Gregorie HB. Esophagocoloplasty Ann Surg 1972;175:740.[Medline]
  16. Glasgow JC, Cannon JP, Elkins RC. Colon interposition for benign esophageal disease Am J Surg 1979;137:175.[Medline]
  17. Skinner DB. Benign esophageal strictures Adv Surg 1976;10:177.[Medline]
  18. Skinner DB. Esophageal reconstruction Am J Surg 1980;139:810.[Medline]
  19. Belsey R. Reconstruction of the esophagus with left colon J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1965;49:33.[Medline]
  20. Clark J, Moraldi A, Moosa AR, et al. Functional evaluation of the interposed colon as an esophageal substitute Ann Surg 1976;183:93.[Medline]
  21. Wilkins EW. Long-segment colon substitution for the esophagus Ann Surg 1980;192:722.[Medline]
  22. Orringer MB, Sloan H. Esophagectomy without thoracotomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1978;76:643.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Dreuw, J. Fass, S. Titkova, M. Anurov, M. Polivoda, A. P. Ottinger, and V. Schumpelick
Colon interposition for esophageal replacement: isoperistaltic or antiperistaltic? Experimental results
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2001; 71(1): 303 - 308.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
E. A. Davis and R. F. Heitmiller
Esophagectomy for Benign Disease: Trends in Surgical Results and Management
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 1996; 62(2): 369 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Larsson, G. Lycke, and G. Radberg
Replacement of the esophagus by a segment of colon provided with an antireflux valve
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 1989; 48(5): 677 - 682.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. V. Kamath, R. G. Ellison, J. W. Rubin, H. V. Moore, and G. P. Pai
Esophageal Mucocele: A Complication of Blind Loop Esophagus
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 1987; 43(3): 263 - 269.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hankins, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hankins, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by McLaughlin, J. S.