|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
b Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Accepted for publication March 21, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Albacker, Cardiac Surgery, McGill University, Royal Victoria Hospital, 687 Pine Avenue West, Suite S8.30, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1A1, Canada (Email: dr_turki{at}yahoo.com).
| Cardiothoracic anesthesiology:
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member or an individual non-member subscription to the journal.
|
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A total of 52 patients who presented for elective coronary artery bypass were randomized to receive intraoperative intravenous insulin infusion, titrated to maintain blood glucose concentrations less than 180 mg/dL (group I, n = 25), or receive intraoperative fixed high dose of intravenous insulin infusion (5 mU/kg/min) with dextrose 20% infused separately to maintain a blood glucose level between 70 and 110 mg/dL (group II, n = 27). Blood samples were collected at different time points to determine tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
), interleukin 6 and 8 (IL6 and IL8), and complement factor 3 and 4 (C3 and C4).
Results: Patients in both groups had similar preoperative characteristics. Patients in the high-dose insulin group had higher blood insulin concentrations and tighter blood glucose control. There were lower levels of IL6 (150 pg/dL vs 245 pg/dL, p = 0.03), IL-8 (49 pg/dL vs 74 pg/dL, p = 0.05), and TNF
(2.2 pg/dL vs 3.0 pg/dL, p = 0.04) in group II in the early postoperative period.
Conclusions: High-dose insulin therapy blunts the early postoperative surge in inflammatory response to CPB as reflected by decreased levels of IL6, IL8, and TNF
.
Organ dysfunction after cardiac surgery is attributed in part to the systemic inflammatory response caused by high levels of cytokines released after surgical trauma and when blood is exposed to artificial surfaces during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) [1].
Furthermore, acute hyperglycemia frequently develops in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), usually after CPB [2], and it has been demonstrated in both rats and humans that proinflammatory cytokine concentrations are increased by acute hyperglycemia [3]. Prevention of the inflammatory response after cardiac surgery has been attempted using different strategies such as methylprednisolone, aprotinin, leukocyte depletion, and heparin-bonded circuitry, all with muted success or nondesired side effects [4].
Recent evidence from animal studies suggests that insulin has antiinflammatory properties [5]. Most of the previous studies on insulin therapy in cardiac surgery patients focused on its metabolic effects (ie, increasing glycogen content, decreasing free fatty acid levels, etc) [6] with inconsistent support of its beneficial effects. The results of these studies were difficult to evaluate due to inadequate study design, differences in protocols and inclusion criteria, lack of randomization, the time point of insulin application, and the primary endpoints assessed [7]. Interestingly, there was a trend toward more beneficial effects when glucose and insulin were given in high dosages [6]. We have previously described an insulin clamp technique, which demonstrated that high-dose insulin therapy is safe and effective in maintaining perioperative normoglycemia in CABG patients [8].
The objective of this study was to investigate the role of high-dose insulin therapy using the insulin clamp technique in elective CABG, and we hypothesized that intraoperative implementation of high-dose insulin therapy used for tight glycemic control may have additional benefit of reducing the systemic inflammatory response to surgery and CPB.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Surgical Procedure
All patients had CABG by the same surgeon with the use of CPB, which was conducted with a roller pump, and a membrane oxygenator. Temperature was allowed to drift with active rewarming at the end of CPB. Cardioplegia solution was free of glucose and consisted of high-dose (100 mEq/L) and low-dose (40 mEq/L) potassium used at the discretion of the cardiac surgeon. A single-clamp technique was used and cardioplegia was given in an anterograde fashion with blood in a ratio of 1:4. After rewarming and suturing of all anastomoses prior to the removal of the aortic cross-clamp "a hot shot" of 1 L of warm cardioplegia was administered.
Inflammatory Markers and Sampling Protocol
Inflammatory markers were studied including interleukin 6 and 8 (IL-6 and 8), tumor necrosis factor
(TNF
), and complement factor 3 and 4 (C3 and C4). These markers were collected preoperatively (on arrival to the operating room) and 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. Additionally, the levels of IL-6, IL8, and TNF
were measured intraoperatively at the following time points: prior to pericardiotomy (prior to heparin administration), before starting CPB and immediately after separation from CPB.
Low Systemic Vascular Resistance (SVR) State and Troponin Level
Given the limitations of the clinical criteria to define systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in cardiac surgery patients, we used the indexed systemic vascular resistance (SVRi) described by Kristof and colleagues [9] calculated by the following formula: SVRi = (mean arterial pressure – central venous pressure) x 80/cardiac index. These parameters were obtained preoperatively as well as 0, 4, 8, 12, and 16 hours postoperatively. A low SVR state was defined as SVRi less 1,800 dyne/sec/cm5/m2 at two consecutive hours. The duration and the total amount of vasopressor agents used in those patients to maintain a mean blood pressure greater than 60 mm Hg were collected. The temperature and white blood cell count (WBC) were measured at 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours corresponding to the same time points at which the samples for the inflammatory markers were collected. Troponin level was measured 4 hours postoperatively as an indicator of myocardial injury.
Statistical Analysis
The study was designed to compare the difference in the peak level of antiinflammatory markers as a primary outcome variable. The number of patients needed was calculated based on means and standard deviations obtained from other studies that measured antiinflammatory markers in cardiac surgery. In order to achieve a power level of 80%, with an alpha error of 5% and beta error of 20%, the number needed was 28 patients in each arm. Statistical analysis was performed using NCSS statistical software (2004) (NCSS, Kaysville, Utah). Continuous variables were compared using either the two-sample t test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate by the distribution of data. Categoric variables were compared using the
2 test or Fisher exact test depending on the number of items in each group. Statistical significance for grouped data over time was ascertained using two-way analysis of variance. The statistical analysis was done using the "per-protocol" method and statistical significance was deemed present when p was less than 0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
in either group intraoperatively but started to rise significantly after separation from CPB. The peak level of IL-6 and IL-8 was reached 6 hours postoperatively while the peak level of TNF
was immediate postoperatively (Fig 3). In the clamp group there was significant reduction of the median peak level of IL-6 (150 pg/dL [95% CL = 127 and 340] vs 245 pg/dL [95% CL = 157 and 470], p = 0.03), IL-8 (49 pg/dL [95% CL = 33 and 63] vs 74 pg/dL [95% CL = 43 and 116], p = 0.05), and TNF
(2.2 pg/dL [95% CL = 1.9 and 3.7] vs 3.0 pg/dL [95% CL = 2.2 and 5.0], p = 0.04). The levels of these markers decreased back close to their baseline level 24 to 48 hours postoperatively. Due to the exclusions made after the randomization, the actual power of the study for the peak level of inflammatory markers compared was 77.8%, 76%, and 76.4% for IL-6, IL-8, and TNF
, respectively. There were no differences in the lowest C3 (standard C3 = 0.65 ± 0.04, clamp C3 = 0.63 ± 0.04, p = 0.72) and C4 levels (standard C4 = 0.12 [95% CL = 0.11 and 0.15], clamp C4 = 0.13 [95% CL = 0.11 and 0.18], p = 0.37) between the two groups. There was no difference in the postoperative temperature or WBC between the two groups at all time points.
|
Postoperative Vasopressors Requirement
Norepinephrine was the only vasopressor agent used in all the study patients. Nineteen patients (76%) in the standard group required vasopressor support postoperatively, which was required for greater than 8 hours in 14 patients (56%). In the clamp group, 16 patients (59%) required postoperative vasopressor support and it was required greater than 8 hours in 11 patients (41%). Median duration of vasopressor support was equal to 9 hours (95% CL = 3 and 13) in the standard group compared with 7 hours (95% CL = 0 and 12) in the clamp group (p = 0.46). The mean total amount of vasopressor agent used was 28 µg/minute (95% CL = 7 and 69) in the standard group compared with 21 µg/minute (95% CL = 0 and 65) in the clamp group (p = 0.51).
Postoperative Complications
The incidence of postoperative complications was low and was similar between the two groups (Table 3). No patient in either group developed hypoglycemia intraoperatively or postoperatively.
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In our study we demonstrated that the use of the insulin clamp technique, which titrates glucose infusion to high fixed doses of insulin to maintain tight glucose control, reduces the systemic inflammatory response measured biochemically when compared with standard glucose control with insulin titrated to normoglycemic levels in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Although different glycemic ranges were achieved in the two groups, both ranges are considered normoglycemic ranges (100 to 150 mg/dL [5.6 to 8.3 mmol/L]) according to Portland protocol [12]. The antiinflammatory effect could have resulted from the high doses of insulin infusion in the clamp group or the tighter glycemic control achieved in the same group, or both. The separation of the two effects, although important, may be difficult but warrant further studies.
Rationale for Using Fixed High-Dose Insulin Therapy in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Doenst and colleagues [13] provided evidence that hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of perioperative morbidity and mortality in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Tight glycemic control in diabetic CABG patients improves perioperative outcomes, enhances survival, and decreases the incidence of ischemic events and wound complications, as illustrated in many studies [12, 14, 15].
The major concerns involving insulin therapy is the presence of insulin resistance (after ischemia and especially after cardiac surgery [16]), which is present in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Such insulin resistance may explain why protocols supplying low doses of insulin have failed to demonstrate significant beneficial effects [17]. It is not yet clear whether such whole-body insulin resistance translates to the heart. It is no secret that large amounts of insulin can be administered after cardiac surgery without significantly causing hypoglycemia [18] and studies using high doses demonstrated impressive reductions in mortality [19]. Additionally, the use of protocol titrating insulin infusions to maintain normoglycemia (like glucose-insulin-potassium [GIK] cocktail infusion) may cause severe disturbances in glucose homeostasis oscillating between hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia. Therefore, the use of a fixed high dose of insulin to maintain glucose homeostasis is a convincing concept. In our protocol, we implemented a new strategy of insulin therapy that is different from GIK solution (which titrates insulin infusion to the blood glucose level) by fixing the insulin infusion at a high concentration, while infusing dextrose to maintain a very tight glycemic control (known as insulin clamp), to stress the importance of hyperinsulinemia while maintaining normoglycemia. The study by Van den Berghe and colleagues [20] showed that in order for tight glucose control to be effective it has to achieved for at least 5 days. We showed in this study that some beneficial effects could be achieved if the high-dose insulin infusion is started early intraoperatively. Whether it is the high-dose insulin that made the early difference or it is the prophylactic use intraoperatively before the damage is inflicted versus the therapeutic dose, as in the Van den Berge and colleagues study, will be an important question yet to be investigated. Gandhi and colleagues [21], from the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, showed that intensive intraoperative insulin therapy is ineffective in reducing postoperative death and morbidity and it may even be harmful. However, the authors admitted that normoglycemia was not achieved intraoperatively. Additionally, the total amount of insulin infusion was not high and was even lower than the amount given postoperatively in the ICU in the same study. Our study focuses attention on the systemic effect of high-dose insulin infusion in addition to its effect in maintaining normoglycemia. We also considered measuring the blood insulin level rather than the amount of infused insulin to control for the naturally produced insulin.
Mechanism of Action of Insulin in Cardiac Surgery Patients
Insulin was initially used as a polarizing agent to promote electrical stability in the form of GIK solution [22]. The mechanistic focus shifted over the years toward insulin-induced changes in metabolism, but there is convincing evidence that the beneficial effects of insulin in cardiac surgery are multifactorial [6] and go far beyond simple metabolic benefits [23]. Yet, the exact underlying mechanisms remain unknown. We demonstrated in our study that high-dose insulin therapy has an antiinflammatory effect post-CABG that may contribute to the beneficial effects of insulin therapy mentioned above. These antiinflammatory properties were demonstrated previously on animal studies and in trauma patients [5]. Visser and colleagues [24] showed that GIK applied as a hyperinsulinemic-normoglycemic clamp reduces postoperative C-reactive protein levels, but no difference was shown in the level of other inflammatory markers such as IL-6, IL-8, and TNF
, which was likely due to their sampling protocol that did not include the time at which these inflammatory cytokines reach their peak; 0 to 6 hours postoperatively, as we have shown in our study and supported by other studies as well [25]. Based on these findings we think that high-dose insulin therapy protocols have to start as early as possible preoperatively or immediately intraoperatively.
Significance of Increased Levels of Inflammatory Markers Post-CABG
Increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines have generally been associated with negative outcomes after cardiac surgery. Recent data allow us to better understand these effects. The IL-6 plays an important role during the acute-phase response. It stimulates the release of immune-competent proteins from the liver (like C-reactive protein) and together with TNF-
and IL-1 causes activation of T cells. The IL-8 is a proinflammatory cytokine released by cells, which has an important influence on the chemotactile activation of T cells and the endothelial barrier function of the endothelium, and has been recognized as a relevant mediator of organ dysfunction based on its major role of recruitment and activation of leukocytes seen in adult respiratory distress syndrome [26]. Interleukin-8 also seems to participate in myocardial ischemic injury. Indeed, a monoclonal antibody directed against IL-8 reduces myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury [27] and the levels of IL-8 correlate positively with the levels of cardiac troponin I, suggesting a role for IL-8 in myocardial injury after cardiac surgery [28]. The TNF-
and IL-1β synergistically depress human myocardial contractile function [29].
Study Limitations
Our study is a biochemical study and was not powered to detect clinical differences. We also included a relatively healthy cohort with a low-risk profile and we demonstrated a trend toward improved clinical markers of SIRS (ie, higher SVR status and lower vasopressor requirement). However, our study demonstrates a point of principle and a large clinical outcome trial is needed to confirm the clinical outcome of this novel therapy, which may even be more evident in high-risk groups (ie, patients with chronic renal failure, congestive heart failure, etc). We did not study the insulin resistance in our patients; therefore, whether diabetic patients would have different response to insulin than nondiabetics in terms of suppression of inflammatory response would need further study. The use of high-dose insulin therapy in our study was associated with a tighter control of blood glucose level. Whether the antiinflammatory effect is related to one or both of these effects is not known yet and it may be very difficult to separate these effects.
Conclusion
High-dose insulin therapy blunts early postoperative surge in inflammatory response to surgery CPB as reflected by decreased levels of IL6, IL8, and TNF
. Early institution of this high-dose regimen intraoperatively is essential to achieve its antiinflammatory effect. Whether the high-dose insulin therapy has a direct antiinflammatory effect or an indirect effect through its tight glycemic control is still to be elucidated.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ski L, Budaj A, Czepiel A, et al. Low-dose glucose-insulin-potassium is ineffective in acute myocardial infarction: results of a randomized multicenter Pol-GIK trial Cardiovasc Drug Ther 1999;13:191-200.[Medline]Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Wan Invited commentary. Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 27 - 28. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |