ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Nawid Khaladj
Axel Haverich
Christian Hagl
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khaladj, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hagl, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khaladj, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hagl, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1069
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

Should a Patient With Acute Aortic Dissection Type A Go to the Intensive Care Unit or Operating Room?

Nawid Khaladj, MD, Axel Haverich, MD, Christian Hagl, MD

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Transplantation, and Vascular Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, Hannover, 30625 Germany

(Email: khaladj.nawid{at}mh-hannover.de).

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article by Centofanti and coworkers [1] concerning the treatment of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) patients. During a 24-year interval, 616 patients were operated on for AADA in a single center. In this retrospective study, the authors showed that shock, redo surgery, preoperative coma, acute renal failure, and age were independent preoperative predictors for in-hospital mortality.

By using the International Registry of Aortic Dissection (IRAD) database in conjunction with sophisticated statistical methods they identified 35 patients (5.7% of the entire cohort) with an expected mortality of 65.7%, and they postulated that this subgroup may have benefited from medical treatment instead of surgical treatment. Unfortunately the authors did not mention the exact timeframe of these operations. This is an important consideration, because preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative strategies have strongly improved in recent years [2, 3].

Mortality, permanent neurologic dysfunction, and temporary neurologic dysfunction are the three major adverse outcomes after emergent or elective aortic surgery. In several studies, preoperative as well as intraoperative factors were strongly associated with these events. Therefore extensive research is focused on the reduction of adverse outcomes in these challenging patients [4].

The IRAD database reports indicate an early mortality of 58% in patients who for various reasons were medically treated for AADA. Unfortunately, information concerning the rationale for or against a conservative approach is incomplete (ie, with 32% not documented) [5]. Therefore it remains unclear whether these patients refused surgery or were refused operation due to significant co-morbidity or advanced age.

In our institution, all patients with AADA were accepted for surgery, even when ventilated, receiving inotropic support, or with unknown neurologic status. Our current mortality rate for the entire cohort is 20%. In our opinion, this is acceptable because 20% of these patients were hemodynamically unstable and 15% had new neurologic events.

Unfortunately it is not known how many patients were hospitalized with AADA due to chest pain or unclear neurologic symptoms and received conservative treatment. In case of death, autopsy is not routinely performed in all departments. The IRAD registry only includes patients with a definite diagnosis of AADA. Patients who die in referring hospitals for various complications (eg, cardiac tamponade, myocardial infarction, aortic rupture, and so forth) are missed.

Because the total incidence of AADA is unknown, medical treatment can not be seriously recommended for patients referred for emergency thoracic aortic surgery. We believe that the amount of expertise in the individual center, as well as already published data, do not support the author’s final recommendation. Nevertheless a database of these patients is valuable in this challenging disease.

We strongly believe that age alone should not preclude emergency operation. Medical therapy may be an option in patients with severe brain infarction or end-stage carcinoma, but every single case must be independently evaluated.

In our opinion, surgery in an experienced center is still the standard of care for patients with AADA, until evidence-based facts show advantages of alternative or less invasive treatment methods.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Centofanti P, Flocco R, Ceresa F, et al. Is surgery always mandatory for type A aortic dissection? Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1658-1663discussion 1664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hagl C, Khaladj N, Karck M, et al. Hypothermic circulatory arrest during ascending and aortic arch surgery: the theoretical impact of different cerebral perfusion techniques and other methods of cerebral protection Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;24:371-378.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Kallenbach K, Oelze T, Salcher R, et al. Evolving strategies for treatment of acute aortic dissection type A Circulation 2004;110:II243-II249.[Medline]
  4. Khaladj N, Peterss S, Oetjen P, et al. Hypothermic circulatory arrest with moderate, deep or profound hypothermic selective antegrade cerebral perfusion: which temperature provides best brain protection? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:492-498.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tsai TT, Evangelista A, Nienaber CA, et al. Long-term survival in patients presenting with type A acute aortic dissection: insights from the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) Circulation 2006;114:I350-I356.[Medline]

Related Article

Reply
Paolo Centofanti, Roberto Flocco, Fabrizio Ceresa, Matteo Attisani, Michele La Torre, Luca Weltert, and Antonio M. Calafiore
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 1069-1070. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
P. Centofanti, R. Flocco, F. Ceresa, M. Attisani, M. La Torre, L. Weltert, and A. M. Calafiore
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 1069 - 1070.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Nawid Khaladj
Axel Haverich
Christian Hagl
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khaladj, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hagl, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khaladj, N.
Right arrow Articles by Hagl, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Great vessels
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS