ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Keith S. Naunheim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naunheim, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naunheim, K. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:944
© 2002 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Invited commentary

Keith S. Naunheim, MDa

a Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, 3635 Vista Ave, PO Box 15250, St. Louis, MO 63110-0250, USA

e-mail: naunheim{at}slu.edu

The article by Madden and colleagues describes a small but clinically varied series of patients treated with expandable metallic stents for endobronchial pathology. The results obtained were generally very good with a very high incidence of dyspnea relief and a low incidence of serious complications. This favorable outcome suggests that endobronchial stenting should be in the armamentarium of any thoracic surgeon who deals with serious airway compromise secondary to benign or malignant disease.

However, this article also raises questions. The open mesh portion of the stent becomes incorporated into the respiratory epithelium thus making them difficult, if not impossible, to remove. Is it a good idea to use it, as the authors did, at sites of benign stenosis? Could a silicone stent that could be subsequently removed be utilized instead of a non-removable stent that will persist as a foreign body? Should tracheal tears be treated with covered stents as occurred in two patients in this series (both of whom subsequently died) or is this contraindicated?

There is no question that expandable metallic stents will be of significant benefit in the treatment of endobronchial pathology. However, many questions will only be answered with their continuing use. Will one of the expandable stents (UltraFlex, Gianturco, WallStent) prove to be optimal or will different situations be better handled with different stents? Will there be a continuing role for the use of silicon stents that are potentially removable? When will utilization of covered stents be preferable to uncovered stents? What is certain is that cardiothoracic surgeons should continue to be involved in this form of airway management. Our familiarity with rigid bronchoscopy and critical airway compromise suggests that we are the appropriate physicians to deal with these difficult clinical problems.


Related Article

Experience with ultraflex expandable metallic stents in the management of endobronchial pathology
Brendan P. Madden, Subir Datta, and Nick Charokopos
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2002 73: 938-944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Keith S. Naunheim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Naunheim, K. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Naunheim, K. S.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS