HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Irving L. Kron Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kron, I. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kron, I. L. Related Collections Coronary disease Related Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;72:775
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

Invited commentary

^a Thoracic & Cardiovascular Research Laboratory, Lane Rd, Medical Research Bldg 4, Rm 3111, Charlottesville, VA 22908-1359, USA

e-mail: ikron{at}virginia.edu

Ascione and colleagues have reported 42 patients who underwent combined "one-stage" coronary bypass and aortic surgery from 1990 to 1999. The first 20 patients were done on bypass and the subsequent 22 had surgery on the beating heart. The authors had excellent results. With the off-pump technique and the combined procedure there was only one death.

I applaud the authors for these excellent results. I am not convinced that off-pump versus on-pump makes as much difference as the authors would suggest. In fact, we have demonstrated mortality of 5% during these combined procedures using an on-pump approach. We differ somewhat in the technique that the authors describe. They tend to close their chest incisions prior to going onto the abdominal part of the procedure. We, in fact, do the entire incision at one time including aortic exposure. At this point, we heparinize and don’t reverse the heparin until the entire procedure is completed. Not only does this give you excellent exposure, but in the on-pump situation, we leave the cannulas in place which allows easy and quick transfusion of volume if required during the aortic exposure. We also will start the aneurysm surgery as we are rewarming and go off-pump as we are finishing the procedure. We found bleeding to not be an issue. The length of stay for the last 15 patients has been a mean of 6 days.

We have demonstrated an increased rupture rate of aortic aneurysms after coronary artery bypass. Therefore, we are in favor of combined procedures when required. However, technology continues to change. Aortic stent graft repairs are now available and may take the place of open procedures in many of these patients.

Related Article

One-stage coronary and abdominal aortic operation with or without cardiopulmonary bypass: early and midterm follow-up

Raimondo Ascione, Gabriele Iannelli, Kelvin H.H. Lim, Hajime Imura, and Nicola Spampinato
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001 72: 768-774. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Personal Folders Download to citation manager Author home page(s): Irving L. Kron Permission Requests Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kron, I. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Kron, I. L. Related Collections Coronary disease Related Article