ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Joseph M. Forbess
James D. St. Louis
James J. Jaggers
Ross M. Ungerleider
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forbess, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forbess, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ungerleider, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Congenital - cyanotic
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:54-59
© 2001 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original article: cardiovascular

Cryopreserved homografts in the pulmonary position: determinants of durability

Joseph M. Forbess, MDa, Ashish S. Shah, MDa, James D. St. Louis, MDa, James J. Jaggers, MDa, Ross M. Ungerleider, MDa

a Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

Address reprint requests to Dr Forbess, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Children’s Hospital, 300 Longwood Ave, Boston, MA 02115
e-mail: forbess{at}cardio.tch.harvard.edu

Presented at the Poster Session of the Thirty-sixth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, FL, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2000.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background. The cryopreserved homograft has emerged as the pulmonary conduit of choice for the repair of many congenital heart defects. It is also used for pulmonary valve replacement in the Ross procedure. Because of a wide range of patient ages and diagnoses, the risk of homograft failure may vary.

Methods. We reviewed 185 consecutive pulmonary position implants performed between September 1985 and January 1999. We examined three age groups: patients less than 1 year of age (n = 53), patients 1 to 10 years of age (n = 46), and patients more than 10 years of age (n = 86).

Results. Five-year Kaplan-Meier homograft survival was 25%, 61%, and 81% for the groups, respectively (p < 0.02). Smaller homograft size, younger patient age, and truncus arteriosus were risk factors for homograft failure in univariate analysis (p < 0.05). Smaller homograft size was the only predictor for homograft failure in multivariate analysis (p < 0.001). Twenty of 99 implants in patients less than 10 years old underwent transcatheter intervention. The 3-year Kaplan-Meier implant survival of this group (79%) was not different from those who did not undergo intervention (77%, p = 0.84). Survival of aortic and pulmonary homografts in patients less than 10 years of age was not different (p = 0.35). Ross procedure implants appear to have optimal survival (94%) at 5 years. Non-Ross implants in patients more than 10 years of age have 76% 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival, which is not different from Ross patients (p = 0.33).

Conclusions. Small homografts have limited durability. Aortic homografts perform as well as pulmonary homografts in young patients. Once patients receive an "adult-size" homograft, at approximately 10 years of age, risk for implant failure approximates that of patients undergoing the Ross procedure. Transcatheter interventions, when indicated, may prolong homograft life.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The cryopreserved homograft has features that make it a highly desirable valved conduit for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract. Long shelf-life, availability in a wide variety of sizes, and excellent handling characteristics are all favorable qualities of these conduits. Limited overall supply, particularly in pediatric sizes, and increased cost are among the primary disadvantages recognized for homografts. Despite these limitations, the cryopreserved homograft has emerged as the conduit of choice for reconstruction of the pulmonary outlow tract in many repairs of congenital heart defects. In addition, it is widely used to replace the explanted pulmonary valve in the Ross procedure.

Several series have recently reviewed institutional experiences with cryopreserved homografts in the pulmonary position [15]. These reports have included relatively low numbers of infants and neonates, where the durability of any nongrowing conduit will be limited [68]. The published durability of pulmonary position homografts in these reports may not accurately reflect their longevity in these very young, rapidly growing patients. In addition, some institutional experiences contain relatively greater numbers of patients undergoing the Ross procedure [2]. Patients undergoing the Ross procedure are typically fully grown adults with normal pulmonary arteries, and the homograft is placed in the orthotopic position. All of these factors likely favor increased conduit durabilty in these patients versus those with congenital anomalies of the right ventricular outflow tract.

In an attempt to address these limitations, we have undertaken a retrospective evaluation of the durability of cryopreserved pulmonary position homografts at our institution. The analysis of this consecutive series of implants, spanning approximately 15 years of an entire institutional experience, seeks to identify factors associated with homograft failure.


    Material and methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
One hundred eighty-five cryopreserved homografts were implanted in the pulmonary position at our institution between September 1985 and January 1999. These 185 implants form the basis for the subsequent analysis. This population includes homografts placed in an orthotopic position as well as onto the right ventricular free wall. A hood of autologous pericardium or prosthetic material was used to augment the anastomosis between the ventricular wall and the homograft.

On the basis of hypothesized homograft durability differences, the age of the patient receiving the implant was used to stratify the implant population. Group 1 included patients less than 1 year old, group 2 included patients 1 to 10 years of age, and group 3 was comprised of patients more than 10 years old. Table 1 depicts these three patient age groups with the respective anatomic diagnoses of the implant recipients. Table 1 also shows the number of primary implants and conduit changes by age group and anatomic diagnosis.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Anatomic Diagnoses of the Three Homograft Implant Age Groups

 
Hospital records were retrospectively reviewed, including operative records as well as preoperative and postoperative catheterization and echocardiography data. Patient-specific and operative variables analyzed included anatomic diagnosis, donor age, recipient age, recipient weight, homograft size, aortic or pulmonary homograft, and primary implant versus conduit change. The presence of diminutive proximal branch pulmonary arteries was assessed from preoperative studies and graded on a scale from 1 to 4 with 1 indicating normal, 2 mildly diminutive, 3 moderately small, and 4 very small branch pulmonary arteries. Distal (lobar or beyond) pulmonary artery disease was noted as present or absent. Central pulmonary artery pressure was recorded and indexed to simultaneously obtained systemic arterial blood pressure.

Homograft failure was defined as reoperation for homograft replacement or patient death. Homograft obstruction was the universal indication for replacement. No homografts were replaced for isolated homograft regurgitation. Performance of transcatheter interventions on implants was noted. Late follow-up was obtained between March 1 and June 30, 1999, and is 96% complete.

Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica software package (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). Dichotomous variables were compared using the {chi}2 method or Fischer’s exact test where appropriate. Potential differences between more than two groups were assessed using one-way analysis of variance and the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Homograft survival was determined using the Kaplan-Meier method. Comparisons of these survival data were performed using the log-rank test. Univariate analysis of factors associated with homograft failure was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Significant variables were then entered into the multivariate model using stepwise logistical regression. For all tests, a p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Table 1 demonstrates that only primary implants for predominantly non-Ross procedure indications were performed in group 1 (n = 53). In contrast, group 2 (n = 46) contained an almost equivalent number of primary homograft implants (n = 26) and conduit changes (n = 20). More than half of group 3 (n = 86) were primary Ross procedure implants (n = 48), Of note, 11 of the 14 primary implants in the tetralogy of Fallot patients of group 3 were orthotopic pulmonary valve replacements for late postrepair pulmonary regurgitation. When these are combined with the 7 primary implants for isolated pulmonary valve pathology, one notes that 66 of the 70 primary homograft implants in group 3 were placed in the orthotopic position.

Figure 1 depicts the homograft size distributions for the three patient groups. The differences between these populations were significant (p < 0.05). Figure 2A depicts the overall relationship between homograft diameter and recipient patient age. There is a linear increase in homograft diameter up to 10 years of age, at which point the homograft diameter reaches a plateau. Figure 2B shows the similar relationship between homograft diameter and patient weight. Again, there is a relatively rapid increase in homograft diameter up to a body weight of approximately 25 kg. There is a much slower increase in conduit diameter in patients weighing more than this.



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 1. Distribution of homograft diameters for the three patient age groups.

 


View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 2. Scatterplots showing the relationship between homograft diameter and patient age (A), and between homograft diameter and patient weight (B).

 
Figure 3 depicts the Kaplan-Meier homograft survival for the three patient groups. The 5-year homograft survival was 25% for recipients less than 1 year old, 61% for patients between age 1 and 10 years, and 81% for patients older than 10 years. These survival differences were significantly different for all groups (p < 0.02). Figure 4 shows that the Kaplan-Meier survival was also significantly higher in conduit changes than in primary homograft implants (p = 0.008).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 3. Kaplan-Meier homograft failure for the three patient age groups.

 


View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 4. Kaplan-Meier freedom from homograft failure for primary homograft implants and conduit changes.

 
Several previous investigators have demonstrated that aortic homografts in the pulmonary position have limited durability when compared to pulmonary homografts [1, 2, 59]. This has not, however, been a universal finding in the literature [1012]. This earlier aortic failure has largely been attributed to a calcific degeneration, which has been found to occur more rapidly in aortic homografts [1, 13]. Figure 5A depicts the Kaplan-Meier survival for aortic and pulmonary homografts in the entire series. Aortic homografts did, in fact, have significantly reduced longevity compared to pulmonary homografts (p = 0.046). For implant recipients less than 10 years old (see Fig 5B), although there appeared to be a similar trend, there was no significant difference in conduit survival between aortic and pulmonary homografts (p = 0.349).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 5. Kaplan-Meier freedom from homograft failure for aortic and pulmonary homografts for all implants (A) and implants in patients less than 10 years of age (B).

 
The large number of Ross procedure implants in group 3 suggested that a comparison of Ross versus non-Ross implants in this group was appropriate. Figure 6 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival for these homografts. There was no significant difference between these two groups. This conclusion is limited by the fact that the median follow-up time for the Ross implants was 1.6 years.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 6. Kaplan-Meier freedom from homograft failure for Ross procedure and non-Ross procedure implants in patients more than 10 years of age.

 
Twenty of the 99 implants performed in patients less than 10 years old have undergone transcatheter interventions. Twelve patients with homografts underwent dilation of the homograft and central pulmonary arteries with stent implantation. Eight homografts and central pulmonary arterial systems were balloon dilated. These procedures were performed at a mean postimplant interval of 2 ± 1.6 years. Seven patients with homografts, none of which had been stented at the first transcatheter procedure, underwent second interventional procedures at an additional mean interval of 1.1 ± 0.74 years. Stents were deployed in three of these seven conduits or central pulmonary arterial systems. Two patients underwent a third transcatheter intervention. Figure 7 shows the Kaplan-Meier survival of the patients with homografts who underwent interventional procedures compared to those who did not. There was no difference in homograft survival between these two groups.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig 7. Kaplan-Meier freedom from homograft failure for implants in patients less than 10 years old undergoing subsequent transcatheter intervention compared to those implants in patients less than 10 years of age who have not undergone transcatheter intervention.

 
Potential risk factors for homograft failure were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analysis. Table 2 summarizes the results of these analyses. Homograft recipient age less than 1 year, recipient diagnosis of truncus arteriosus, lower recipient body weight, and smaller homograft size were all significant risk factors for earlier homograft failure in the univariate analysis (p < 0.01). Smaller homograft size was the only variable to emerge from the multivariate analysis as a significant risk factor for earlier homograft failure (p < 0.001).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Significant Risk Factors for Pulmonary Position Homograft Failure (p value)

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Previous analyses of pulmonary position cryopreserved homograft durability have reported variable results [112]. The current study seeks to address this variability on several levels. First, pulmonary position homografts are presently used in a wide range of procedures on patients of all ages and sizes. We sought to deal with this heterogeneity by dividing the entire study population into three patient age groups. The data in Table 1 and Figure 1 support the homograft recipient age groups used in this study. Group 1 includes a predominance of primary implants for repairs of critical congenital heart disease. Group 2 contains almost equal numbers of primary implants and conduit changes in a recipient age group with increasing body size and, accordingly, increasing homograft diameter. Group 3 contains a large number of Ross procedure implants and, as mentioned above, a significant number of orthotopic pulmonary implants for non-Ross indications. In addition, as Figures 1 and 2 show, the homograft diameters in this patient age group were relatively constant. Finally, Figure 3 shows that these three groups had significantly different homograft survival, further validating this division of the study population.

Having established that these three patient groups have different homograft survival, one is compelled to explain this difference. A commonly held opinion is that younger patients have decreased homograft durability because they are receiving smaller implants during a period of rapid growth and accumulation of body mass. These data seem to corroborate this proposition. The univariate analysis identified patient age less than 1 year, and lower patient weight as significant risk factors for earlier homograft failure. The statistical strength of smaller homograft size was quite powerful in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.001), and no additional variables achieved significance when entered into the multivariate model.

In addition to patient growth versus homograft size, the pulmonary arterial anatomy and pulmonary vascular resistance could play a significant role in longevity of a pulmonary position homograft. One could speculate that small or distorted pulmonary arteries, or an elevated pulmonary vascular resistance for any reason, could adversely affect the lifespan of a pulmonary position homograft [14]. These concerns bring the issue of anatomic diagnosis to the fore, as it is recognized that certain congenital heart defects, such as truncus arteriosus and tetralogy of Fallot with pulmonary atresia, are much more likely to have pulmonary arterial abnormalities than, for instance, a patient undergoing a Ross procedure for aortic valve dysfunction in the setting of a congenital bicommissural valve. Despite these considerations, in this study, patients identified with diminutive or distorted pulmonary arteries, or elevated pulmonary-to-systemic arterial pressure ratio could not be identified as "at risk" for earlier homograft failure. The presence of truncus arteriosus as a diagnosis was, however, a risk factor for early homograft failure in univariate analysis. The majority of these patients were infants receiving primary implants and children less than 10 years of age undergoing conduit changes. This likely explains the univariate significance of this diagnosis, as truncus arteriosus did not emerge from the multivariate analysis as a statistically significant risk factor for homograft failure.

If the status of the pulmonary arteries has a significant impact on homograft longevity, one would expect patients undergoing the Ross procedure, whose pulmonary artery anatomy and pulmonary vascular resistance are generally normal, to have improved pulmonary position homograft survival. This premise has been borne out in the literature [2, 15, 16]. In the present series, only 2 patients undergoing the Ross procedure have had to undergo pulmonary position homograft replacement. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve for the Ross cohort demonstrates excellent estimated survival but, as shown in Figure 6, there was no statistical difference between this group of implants and the non-Ross implants in group 3. We speculate that this is due to the relatively short follow-up period for many of these implants. We further speculate that continued follow-up of this institutional series of Ross procedure patients will demonstrate pulmonary position homograft survival comparable to that seen in the literature [2, 15, 16]. If so, future comparison between the Ross and non-Ross implants in group 3 could more confidently answer the question whether, in a group of similarly aged patients receiving homografts of similar diameter, the Ross procedure pulmonary implants have increased longevity.

The impact of transcatheter interventions on either the homograft itself or the central pulmonary arteries just distal to the conduit was also evaluated. In all implants in patients less than 10 years of age, we found that the survival of homografts undergoing interventions was not different from those who did not undergo interventions (see Fig 7). Homografts undergoing transcatheter interventions survived a median additional 2.3 years after initial intervention. If one assumes that the majority of these conduits would have been replaced at the time of the first transcatheter procedure in the preinterventional era, it is likely that appropriately indicated transcatheter interventions do prolong homograft survival. This can be particularly beneficial in the growing patient. Adding life to a patient’s homograft in this setting allows the surgeon to place larger conduit in an older, larger patient at the time of conduit change. As we have demonstrated, this will significantly increase the durability of that subsequent pulmonary position homograft.

Previous researchers have found that aortic homografts placed in the pulmonary position have reduced durability compared to homografts of pulmonary origin [1, 2, 59]. This earlier failure has typically been attributed to accelerated calcific degeneration in the aortic homograft [1, 13]. Figure 5A shows that the present series appears to confirm that finding. An examination of all homografts in patients less than 10 years of age (Fig 5B) reveals that there is no significant difference in survival between aortic and pulmonary homografts in patients in this age range. We speculate that in this younger age range the patients simply outgrow their conduit before any underlying difference between aortic and pulmonary homograft durability can become apparent. This finding may have clinical implications with regard to size and availability of cryopreserved homografts. Smaller homografts, as in the size ranges used in infants, are available in limited numbers. Some institutions have advocated the use of alternative conduits, or the downsizing of larger homografts, to address this problem [17]. It is our opinion that the use of aortic homografts in the pulmonary position should be encouraged to effectively expand the availability of infant-sized conduits. We even speculate that the aortic conduit, as it has been "designed" for a higher pressure circulation, may offer superior hemodynamic performance in the neonate or infant with relatively higher right ventricular pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance.

In conclusion, the cryopreserved homograft has proven to be a versatile valved conduit for the reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract or replacement of the pulmonary valve in patients with a wide range of ages and anatomic diagnoses. Small conduits placed in very young patients have predictably limited durability. Aortic homografts appear to function as well as pulmonary homografts in these individuals. Transcatheter interventions likely prolong the lifespan of homografts in patients less than 10 years of age. We believe that this may offer significant benefit to patients in the immediate preadolescent period. If after a transcatheter intervention the patient can continue to grow, he or she might then be able to receive an adult-sized homograft, which would be expected to last considerably longer than a smaller-sized conduit. Patients undergoing the Ross procedure who are older than 10 years appear to have optimal conduit survival. Continued follow-up of the Ross procedure patients in this group is required to determine this conclusively.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Bando K., Danielson G.K., Schaff H.V., et al. Outcome of pulmonary and aortic homografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:509-517.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Niwaya K., Knott-Craig C.J., Lane M.M., et al. Cryopreserved homograft valves in the pulmonary position: risk analysis for intermediate-term failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;117:141-146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stark J., Bull C., Stajevic M., et al. Fate of subpulmonary homograft conduits. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:506-514.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Chan K.C., Fyfe D.A., McKay C.A., et al. Right ventricular outflow reconstruction with cryopreserved homografts in pediatric patients: intermediate-term follow-up with serial echocardiographic assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;24:483-489.[Abstract]
  5. Daenen W., Narine K., Goffin Y., et al. Right ventricular outflow reconstruction with homografts. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:448-451.[Abstract]
  6. Heinemann M.K., Hanley F.L., Fenton K.N., Jonas R.A., Mayer J.E., Castañeda A.R. Fate of small homograft conduits after early repair of truncus arteriosus. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;55:1409-1411.[Abstract]
  7. Clarke D.R., Campbell D.N., Hayward A.R., Bishop D.A. Degeneration of aortic valve allografts in young recipients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1993;105:934-941.[Abstract]
  8. Clarke D.R., Bishop D.A. Allograft degeneration in infant pulmonary valve recipients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1993;7:365-370.[Abstract]
  9. Schorn K., Yankah A.C., Alexi-Meskhishvili V.A., Weng Y., Lange P.E., Hetzer R. Risk factors for early degeneration of allografts in the pulmonary circulation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997;11:62-69.[Abstract]
  10. LeBlanc J.G., Russell J.L., Sett S.S., Potts J.E. Intermediate follow-up of right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with allograft conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S174-S178.
  11. Cleveland D.C., Williams W.G., Razzouk A.J., et al. Failure of cryopreserved homograft valved conduits in the pulmonary circulation. Circulation 1992;86(Suppl 2):150-153.
  12. Hawkins J.A., Bailey W.W., Dillon T., Schwartz D.C. Midterm results with cryopreserved allograft valved conduits from the right ventricle to the pulmonary arteries. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;104:910-916.[Abstract]
  13. Shaddy R.E., Tan L.Y., Sturtevant J.E., Lambert L.M., McCough E.C. Effects of homograft blood type on stenosis regurgitation and calcium in homografts in the pulmonary position. Am J Cardiol 1992;70:392-393.[Medline]
  14. DeLeon S.Y., Tuchek J.M., Bell T.J., et al. Early pulmonary homograft failure from dilatation due to distal pulmonary artery stenosis. Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:234-237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Elkins R.D. The Ross operation. Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:S14-S18.
  16. Oury J.H., Hiro S.P., Maxwell J.M., Lamberti J.J., Duran C.M. The Ross procedure: current registry results. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:S162-S165.
  17. Hiramatsu T., Miura T., Forbess J., Brizard C., Jonas R.A. Downsizing of allografts for use as right heart conduits. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;58:339-342.[Abstract]

Related Article

Invited commentary
David R. Clarke
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2001 71: 59-60. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, and M. W. Turrentine
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction in Ross Patients: Does the Homograft Fare Better?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1607 - 1612.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
C. D. Derby, J. Kolcz, S. Gidding, and C. Pizarro
Outcomes following non-valved autologous reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract in neonates and infants
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 34(4): 726 - 731.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
E. J. Hickey, B. W. McCrindle, E. H. Blackstone, T. Yeh Jr., F. Pigula, D. Clarke, C. I. Tchervenkov, J. Hawkins, and the CHSS Pulmonary Conduit Working Group
Jugular venous valved conduit (Contegra(R)) matches allograft performance in infant truncus arteriosus repair
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., May 1, 2008; 33(5): 890 - 898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
J. E. Mayer
Tissue Engineering for Cardiac Valve Surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2008; 3(2008): 1649 - 1656.
[Full Text]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
E. Troost, B. Meyns, W. Daenen, F. Van de Werf, M. Gewillig, K. Van Deyk, P. Moons, and W. Budts
Homograft survival after tetralogy of Fallot repair: determinants of accelerated homograft degeneration
Eur. Heart J., October 2, 2007; 28(20): 2503 - 2509.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Askovich, J. A. Hawkins, C. T. Sower, L. L. Minich, L. Y. Tani, G. Stoddard, and M. D. Puchalski
Right Ventricle to Pulmonary Artery Conduit Longevity: Is it Related to Allograft Size?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 907 - 912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
N. Sekarski, H. van Meir, M. E.B. Rijlaarsdam, P. H. Schoof, D. R. Koolbergen, J. Hruda, L. K. von Segesser, E. J. Meijboom, and M. G. Hazekamp
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction With the Bovine Jugular Vein Graft: 5 Years' Experience With 133 Patients
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2007; 84(2): 599 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. M. Bashore
Adult Congenital Heart Disease: Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Lesions
Circulation, April 10, 2007; 115(14): 1933 - 1947.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
B. Chiappini, C. Barrea, and J. Rubay
Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction With Contegra Monocuspid Transannular Patch in Tetralogy of Fallot
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2007; 83(1): 185 - 187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
T. Karamlou, E. H. Blackstone, J. A. Hawkins, M. L. Jacobs, K. R. Kanter, J. W. Brown, C. Mavroudis, C. A. Caldarone, W. G. Williams, B. W. McCrindle, et al.
Can pulmonary conduit dysfunction and failure be reduced in infants and children less than age 2 years at initial implantation?
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2006; 132(4): 829 - 838.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. J. Rastan, T. Walther, I. Daehnert, J. Hambsch, F. W. Mohr, J. Janousek, and M. Kostelka
Bovine jugular vein conduit for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: evaluation of risk factors for mid-term outcome.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2006; 82(4): 1308 - 1315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. W. Brown, M. Ruzmetov, M. D. Rodefeld, P. Vijay, and R. K. Darragh
Valved bovine jugular vein conduits for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in children: an attractive alternative to pulmonary homograft.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 909 - 916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. O. Bohm, C. A. Botha, A. Horke, W. Hemmer, D. Roser, G. Blumenstock, F. Uhlemann, and J.-G. Rein
Is the Ross operation still an acceptable option in children and adolescents?
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2006; 82(3): 940 - 947.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. W. Waterbolk, E. S. Hoendermis, I. J. den Hamer, and T. Ebels
Pulmonary valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis. Promising results of 28 procedures in patients with congenital heart disease.
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2006; 30(1): 28 - 32.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
D. M. McMullan, G. Oppido, N. Alphonso, A. D. Cochrane, Y. d. d'Acoz, and C. P. Brizard
Evaluation of downsized homograft conduits for right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery reconstruction
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., July 1, 2006; 132(1): 66 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
L. F. Peng, D. B. McElhinney, A. W. Nugent, A. J. Powell, A. C. Marshall, E. A. Bacha, and J. E. Lock
Endovascular Stenting of Obstructed Right Ventricle-to-Pulmonary Artery Conduits: A 15-Year Experience
Circulation, June 6, 2006; 113(22): 2598 - 2605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
T. Oosterhof, F. J. Meijboom, H. W. Vliegen, M. G. Hazekamp, A. H. Zwinderman, B. J. Bouma, A. P.J. van Dijk, and B. J.M. Mulder
Long-term follow-up of homograft function after pulmonary valve replacement in patients with tetralogy of Fallot
Eur. Heart J., June 2, 2006; 27(12): 1478 - 1484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Z. Tavakkol, S. Gelehrter, C. S. Goldberg, E. L. Bove, E. J. Devaney, and R. G. Ohye
Superior Durability of Synergraft Pulmonary Allografts Compared With Standard Cryopreserved Allografts
Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2005; 80(5): 1610 - 1614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
B. Meyns, R. Jashari, M. Gewillig, L. Mertens, A. Komarek, E. Lesaffre, W. Budts, and W. Daenen
Factors influencing the survival of cryopreserved homografts. The second homograft performs as well as the first
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2005; 28(2): 211 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
E. S. Selamet Tierney, W. M. Gersony, K. Altmann, D. E. Solowiejczyk, L. M. Bevilacqua, C. Khan, E. Krongrad, R. S. Mosca, J. M. Quaegebeur, and H. D. Apfel
Pulmonary position cryopreserved homografts: Durability in pediatric Ross and non-Ross patients
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2005; 130(2): 282 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
H. Feier, F. Collart, O. Ghez, A. Riberi, T. Caus, B. Kreitmann, and D. Metras
Risk Factors, Dynamics, and Cutoff Values for Homograft Stenosis After the Ross Procedure
Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1669 - 1675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
T. Karamlou, R. M. Ungerleider, B. Alsoufi, G. Burch, M. Silberbach, M. Reller, and I. Shen
Oversizing pulmonary homograft conduits does not significantly decrease allograft failure in children
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2005; 27(4): 548 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
J. A. Quintessenza, J. P. Jacobs, V. O. Morell, J. M. Giroud, and R. J. Boucek
Initial Experience With a Bicuspid Polytetrafluoroethylene Pulmonary Valve in 41 Children and Adults: A New Option For Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 924 - 931.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
V. Gober, P. Berdat, M. Pavlovic, J.-P. Pfammatter, and T. P. Carrel
Adverse Mid-Term Outcome Following RVOT Reconstruction Using the Contegra Valved Bovine Jugular Vein
Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2005; 79(2): 625 - 631.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
J Monro
The changing state of surgery for adult congenital heart disease
Heart, February 1, 2005; 91(2): 139 - 140.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
D. Boethig, W.-R. Thies, H. Hecker, and T. Breymann
Mid term course after pediatric right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction: a comparison of homografts, porcine xenografts and Contegras
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., January 1, 2005; 27(1): 58 - 66.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
B. Meyns, L. Van Garsse, D. Boshoff, B. Eyskens, L. Mertens, M. Gewillig, S. Fieuws, E. Verbeken, and W. Daenen
The Contegra conduit in the right ventricular outflow tract induces supravalvular stenosis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2004; 128(6): 834 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
J. L. Monro
The next challenge--adapting to change
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., December 1, 2004; 26(6): 1063 - 1072.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. R. Tiete, J. S. Sachweh, U. Roemer, R. Kozlik-Feldmann, B. Reichart, and S. H. Daebritz
Right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction with the Contegra bovine jugular vein conduit: a word of caution
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2004; 77(6): 2151 - 2156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Card Surg AdultHome page
F. W. H. Sutherland and J. E. Mayer Jr.
Tissue engineering for cardiac surgery
Card. Surg. Adult, January 1, 2003; 2(2003): 1527 - 1536.
[Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
P. Herijgers, S. Ozaki, E. Verbeken, A. Van Lommel, B. Meuris, E. Lesaffre, W. Daenen, and W. Flameng
Valved jugular vein segments for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in young sheep
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2002; 124(4): 798 - 805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. Bove, H. Demanet, P. Wauthy, J. P. Goldstein, H. Dessy, P. Viart, A. Deville, and F. E. Deuvaert
Early results of valved bovine jugular vein conduit versus bicuspid homograft for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2002; 74(2): 536 - 541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]