|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1768
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Berne,, CH-3010 Berne, Switzerland
e-mail: thierry.carrel{at}insel.ch
One of the main technical difficulties encountered during repair of aortic dissection consists in construction of satisfactory anastomoses between the delicate injured aortic wall and the prosthetic graft. After many technical modifications (eg, using external or internal wall reinforcement or sutureless prosthetic replacement), refixation of the dissected aortic layers with gelatin-resorcin-formalinthe so-called "biologic glue"has been widely accepted as a most reliable, expedient method achieving increased tissue solidity and improving hemostasis while the blood flow is restituted into the true lumen, at least at the level of the distal anastomosis.
Bingley and colleagues report on a series of complications observed in patients in whom different tissue adhesives have been usedmainly during aortic repair. The objective of this article is obviously to draw the attention of the surgical community on those complications and to warn the readership about the hazardous use of those adjuncts. For many reasons, the article itself and the arguments supporting the authors opinion are indeed largely opened to criticism.
Several authors who have described the properties of GRF glue suggested that its use also provided long term aortic wall stability [1,2] without adverse effects. However, early mortality following repair of aortic dissection has not significantly changed whether or not the glue was used. Furthermore, long-term results suggest that the use of GRF glue does not have any impact on the incidence of reoperation but a increased risk of proximal redissection was observed [3]
To obtain the best possible effect on tissue consistency, the adhesiveinclusive the activatorshould be healed to 40°C. The glue is then injected between the dissected layers, with special care directed to not contaminate the LV cavity, the aortic valve leaflets and the coronary ostia. The activator is then addeda few drops onlyto the glue using a cannula tipped syringe. Thereafter the layers of the aorta should be compressed together to improve the polymerization process.
Several precautions have been recommended when biologic GRF-glue has been used because beside toxicity of formalin, glue may escape into the true channel during the sealing process through one or several small re-entries located just distally to the anastomosis or secondary mobilization of glue particles may occur through the stitch channels, especially if the aortic lumen is not completely controlled during the sealing process or when the letter is performed in a wet surgical field [4].
In conclusion, GRF glue has demonstrated efficacy during repair of aortic dissection only. Neglecting this unique indication will unnecessarily lead to the harmful sequelae demonstrated in the present article.
References
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. A. LeMaire, S. A. Carter, T. Won, X. Wang, L. D. Conklin, and J. S. Coselli The Threat of Adhesive Embolization: BioGlue Leaks Through Needle Holes in Aortic Tissue and Prosthetic Grafts Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 106 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |