ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:1524
© 2000 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Discussion

Discussion

DR ROSS M. UNGERLEIDER (Durham, NC): That was very nice, and you certainly know much more about this than I do, but I just have a procedural question. The last slide that you showed was one of protocol. Was that a protocol that you used throughout this study or was there perhaps a selection bias during the study? That is, were you transplanting all patients regardless of their PRA level or was there perhaps a subset of patients with high PRAs that didn’t get transplanted? I am just curious if your groups included all patients. Was that protocol you described always in effect or did it evolve because of this review?

DR LAU: Thank you, Dr Ungerleider. That is an excellent point. Patients found to have elevated pretransplant PRAs undergo prospective cross-matching. If the cross-match is positive, the patient is not transplanted. If the cross-match is negative we proceed with transplantation. This has been the protocol at our institution since the lung transplant program was started.

DR WILLIAM A. BAUMGARTNER (Baltimore, MD): I was going to ask a similar question to Dr Ungerleider. That was a great presentation, and I just had one other question. I know you alluded to it, but is there a PRA degree that is more significant than another. In other words, do you see a trend towards worse results depending on what the degree of the PRA is?

DR LAU: Thank you, Dr Baumgartner. Your point is very important. We chose a PRA greater than 10% to be high because that is the value used in much of the heart and kidney literature. Additionally Gammie and colleagues in the lung transplant literature used a PRA value of > 10% to define the high PRA group. The 1–10% group usually is not very reproducible. We had 18 patients with PRAs > 10% (median 31%, range 11–76%). We did not attempt to subdivide this high PRA group because the numbers were small, but it will be interesting to see in the future as the number of transplants at our institution increases.


Related Article

Influence of panel-reactive antibodies on posttransplant outcomes in lung transplant recipients
Christine L. Lau, Scott M. Palmer, Katherine E. Posther, David N. Howell, Nancy L. Reinsmoen, H. Todd Massey, Victor F. Tapson, James J. Jaggers, Thomas A. D’Amico, and R. Duane Davis, Jr
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2000 69: 1520-1524. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS