ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Peter C. Pairolero
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1933
© 1998 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Invited Commentary

Peter C. Pairolero, MDa

a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St, SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA

Invited commentary

Pulmonary resection for metastatic lung disease has been controversial since the first successful resection of pulmonary metastases by Barney and Churchill in 1938 [1]. Nonetheless, since that time many patients have benefited from this procedure and pulmonary wedge excision eventually has emerged as the procedure of choice. For this procedure to be effective, however, metastatic disease must be limited, the amount of lung removed minimal, mortality near zero, and morbidity low. Using these principles, recent 5-year survival for most cancer sites has consistently averaged 25% to 30%.

If pulmonary wedge excision is the preferred treatment, what then is the indication for pneumonectomy? In my opinion, the only indication is a solitary central lesion in a patient with a previous soft tissue or bone tumor, who has a long tumor-free interval, and who had no previous pulmonary resection for metastatic disease. And then only rarely should pneumonectomy be per-formed. Although Spaggiari and associates did not report isolated results for their 26 patients with central lesions, their operative mortality of 7.1%, complication rate of 9.5%, median survival of 6.5 months, and 5-year survival of 16.8% suggest that pneumonectomy for any more advanced metastatic lung disease should never be done.

References

  1. Barney J.D., Churchill E.D. Adenocarcinoma of the kidney with metastases to the lung: cured by nephrectomy and lobectomy. Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg 1938;31:71.

Related Article

Pneumonectomy for lung metastases: indications, risks, and outcome
Lorenzo Spaggiari, Dominique H. Grunenwald, Philippe Girard, Piergiorgio Solli, and Thierry Le Chevalier
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1998 66: 1930-1933. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Peter C. Pairolero
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pairolero, P. C.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS