ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:1617
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Discussion

Discussion

See also page 1609.

DR DANIEL L. MILLER (Louisville, KY): This was an excellent presentation and a great deal of work. First of all, could you explain the selection criteria for the 20 patients who received TNF? Also, have you considered first doing a cytoreductive operation to remove as many of the metastases as possible before giving TNF? If you have, what were the results?

DR PASS: As you know, we do a lot of metastasectomies at the National Cancer Institute, and our criteria have been very liberal, despite trying to define prognostic factors. But these patients clearly were out of the bell curve, meaning that they averaged more than five metastases before we operated on them. So we essentially defined this as a group of patients in whom we believed we were not going to have any efficacy at multiple resections without taking a lot of lung also.

The second question, about doing an operation and then giving TNF afterward for large lesions, begs two answers. Number one, we do not know whether the larger lesions are going to be more responsive than the smaller lesions, because this may indeed be a vascular phenomenon, whereby larger lesions have more vessels and may actually have a greater chance of response. Number two, I do not think you should do a study like this until you have defined what the response rate is with the different agents. I would like to see response rates and have a good cocktail before we start thinking of using this in an adjuvant setting.

DR MARK J. KRASNA (Baltimore, MD): I have one quick question, Dr Pass. Regarding the use of hyperthermia and TNF combined with interferon, would you comment on the relative contribution of the hyperthermia? Obviously, you have not compared hyperthermia alone, but there are many reports both in pleural lavage and in pulmonary lavage using hyperthermic perfusion alone and with an additional agent.

DR PASS: These hyperthermic levels are really moderate. I do not think that we are seeing only a hyperthermic effect here, although that begs another study.

Interferon-{gamma} gives extremely low response rates in these patients. Certainly I do not think, in many studies that are done in patients using either interferon-{alpha} interferon-{gamma}, that you get significant response rates. Those response rates are in the 7% to 9% range.


Related Article

Isolated Lung Perfusion With Tumor Necrosis Factor for Pulmonary Metastases
Harvey I. Pass, Daphne J. Y. Mew, Karen C. Kranda, Barbara K. Temeck, Jessica S. Donington, and Steven A. Rosenberg
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996 61: 1609-1617. [Abstract] [Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS