|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 1996;61:63-66
© 1996 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Escola Paulista de Medicina, Hospital São Paulo, Disciplina de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Accepted for publication July 26, 1995.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods. In a consecutive series of 8,751 patients operated on in our institution for coronary artery disease from 1981 to 1994, 1,274 patients received coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass.
Results. Results indicate that the operation can be performed with an acceptable mortality (2.5%), and that all types of arterial conduits can be used. Most commonly the left anterior descending and right coronary arteries were bypassed. The incidence of arrhythmias and of pulmonary and neurologic complications were significantly lower in this group of patients compared with patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. Most importantly, there was decreased cost when the procedure was used because no extracorporeal circulation, cardioplegia sets, or other cannulas were used.
Conclusions. We conclude that the continuing use of coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass is justified and that, with proper selection of patients, the procedure is safe and cost-effective.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
For editorial comment, see page 10.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The arterial blood pressure, electrocardiogram, central venous pressure, and urine output were monitored throughout the procedure. Anesthesia was induced and maintained using neuroleptic and analgesic agents. After median sternotomy, the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) was dissected simultaneously with harvesting of the long saphenous vein. Traction sutures were applied to the margins of the pericardium, displacing the heart superiorly. For exposure of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), the heart was luxated slightly medially and ventrally with a moist sponge placed behind its laterodorsal aspect. Exposure of the distal right coronary artery in the atrioventricular groove was achieved by displacement of the right ventricle medially at its marginal border. The patient was heparinized using half the dose normally used for CPB (2 mg/kg). Immediately before occlusion of the coronary artery, verapamil (5 mg) was administered intravenously to reduce the systemic blood pressure and the heart rate. A 5-0 Prolene (Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) suture was applied around the coronary artery proximal and distal to the site selected for the arteriotomy. The suture was snared with a thin silicone tube, thereby allowing for a dry operative field. A longitudinal incision (6 mm) was made and an anastomosis with saphenous vein, LIMA, or other conduit was performed using a running 7-0 Prolene suture. The time of coronary occlusion varied between 11 and 19 minutes. The proximal anastomoses were performed after a tangential clamp was applied to the ascending aorta using a continuous suture of 6-0 Prolene. In cases of multiple grafts, the coronary artery with the most severe stenosis or occlusion was bypassed first. After all anastomoses were completed, heparin was neutralized with protamine sulfate.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
cases Undoubtedly the procedure is technically more demanding and there is a learning curve. However, we have experienced lower morbidity/mortality, less use of blood, and decreased costs due to savings of operating room equipment, such as oxygenators, cardioplegic sets, and cannulas.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our on-going experience indicates that, with proper selection of patients, CABG without CPB is safe and effective. Arterial conduits, such as the LIMA, can be easily used, and most coronary arteries can be bypassed. The mortality rate was low (2.5%), and the incidences of serious complications such as arrhythmias, pulmonary sequelae, and neurologic sequelae were significantly lower than in patients undergoing CABG with CPB. The patency rate was similar to that in patients undergoing conventional CABG.
Further, at our institution, there was a cost saving of approximately US$3,000 per case due to decreased use of operating room equipment such as oxygenators, cardioplegic sets, cannulas, and others. There was also decreased stay in the intensive care unit and in the hospital. The management of these patients in terms of fluid, electrolyte, and respiratory care is simpler. In our institution, cardiologists currently favor CABG without CPB for single LAD lesions.
Undoubtedly the technique is more demanding, and there is a learning curve with this method of CABG. The surgeon, however, has the option of placing the patient on CPB should any problem occur.
In summary, in this large experience with CABG without CPB, the indications for operation with this method has been identified; the method can be used in approximately 25% of patients undergoing coronary revascularization. Arterial conduits can be used, and the patency rate is similar to that of conventional techniques. The mortality rate is acceptably low, and complication rates were lower compared with conventional techniques. In selected cases, the procedure is cost-effective due to lower use of hospital resources in the operating room, intensive care unit, and ward. The continuing use of this technique of coronary artery surgery is therefore justified.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ao de Barros, 715, 3 Andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 04024-002 Brazil. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Mannam, L. R Sajja, S. B. Dandu, S. N Pathuri, K. V. Saikiran, and S. Sompalli Off-Pump Coronary Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2008; 16(6): 473 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Turina Fifty years of cardiothoracic surgery through the looking glass and what the future holds. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2008; 136(5): 1117 - 1122. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Briffa Off pump coronary artery bypass: a passing fad or ready for prime time? Eur. Heart J., June 1, 2008; 29(11): 1346 - 1349. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. L. Hannan, C. Wu, C. R. Smith, R. S.D. Higgins, R. E. Carlson, A. T. Culliford, J. P. Gold, and R. H. Jones Off-Pump Versus On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: Differences in Short-Term Outcomes and in Long-Term Mortality and Need for Subsequent Revascularization Circulation, September 4, 2007; 116(10): 1145 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Guizilini, W. J. Gomes, S. M. Faresin, D. W. Bolzan, E. Buffolo, A. C. Carvalho, and A. A.V. De Paola Influence of Pleurotomy on Pulmonary Function After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2007; 84(3): 817 - 822. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Palmer, M. A. Herbert, S. L. Prince, J. L. Williams, M. J. Magee, P. Brown, M. Katz, and M. J. Mack Coronary Artery Revascularization (CARE) Registry: An Observational Study of On-Pump and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Revascularization Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2007; 83(3): 986 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Novitzky, A L. Shroyer, J. F Collins, G. O McDonald, J. Lucke, B. Hattler, E. Kozora, D. D Bradham, J. Baltz, F. L Grover, et al. A study design to assess the safety and efficacy of on-pump versus off-pump coronary bypass grafting: the ROOBY trial Clinical Trials, February 1, 2007; 4(1): 81 - 91. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Marx, G. Kalweit, U. Sunderdiek, T. W. Jax, R. M. Klein, S. Szabo, H. M. Hoffmeister, and H. Gulker Stress Doppler echocardiography of the internal thoracic artery - a new non-invasive approach for functional assessment after minimally invasive coronary bypass grafting Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, October 1, 2006; 5(5): 584 - 588. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Guida, G. Pecora, A. Bacalao, G. Munoz, P. Mendoza, and L. Rodriguez Multivessel Revascularization on the Beating Heart by Anterolateral Left Thoracotomy Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2006; 81(6): 2142 - 2146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. Guida Anterolateral thoracotomy for myocardial revascularization MMCTS, May 12, 2006; 2006(0512): 810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Buffolo, J. N. R. Branco, L. R. Gerola, L. F. Aguiar, C. A. Teles, J. H. Palma, and R. Catani Off-Pump Myocardial Revascularization: Critical Analysis of 23 Years' Experience in 3,866 Patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2006; 81(1): 85 - 89. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Gomes and E. Buffolo A Simple Device for Visualization in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2005; 80(4): 1567 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Inoue and T. Saga Concomitant Aortoaxillary Bypass and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, September 1, 2005; 13(3): 229 - 232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. L. Creswell, J. C. Alexander Jr., T. B. Ferguson Jr., A. Lisbon, and L. A. Fleisher Intraoperative Interventions: American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery Chest, August 1, 2005; 128(2_suppl): 28S - 35S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ohata, M. Kaneko, T. Kuratani, H. Ueda, and K. Shimamura Using the EuroSCORE to Assess Changes in the Risk Profiles of the Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Before and After the Introduction of Less Invasive Coronary Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2005; 80(1): 131 - 135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. D.L. Keenan, Y. Abu-Omar, and D. P. Taggart Bypassing the Pump: Changing Practices in Coronary Artery Surgery Chest, July 1, 2005; 128(1): 363 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mathisen, M. H. Andersen, P. K. Hol, P. S. Lingaas, R. Lundblad, K. A. Rein, T. I. Tonnessen, B. E. Mork, J.-L. Svennevig, A. K. Wahl, et al. Patient-Reported Outcome After Randomization to On-Pump Versus Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2005; 79(5): 1584 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A Black, S. Ghosh, K. Sin, T. Spyt, and R. Pillai Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2004; 12(4): 379 - 386. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Widimsky, Z. Straka, P. Stros, K. Jirasek, J. Dvorak, J. Votava, L. Lisa, T. Budesinsky, M. Kolesar, T. Vanek, et al. One-Year Coronary Bypass Graft Patency: A Randomized Comparison Between Off-Pump and On-Pump Surgery Angiographic Results of the PRAGUE-4 Trial Circulation, November 30, 2004; 110(22): 3418 - 3423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Mariani, A. D'Alfonso, and J. G. Grandjean Total Arterial Off-Pump Coronary Surgery: Time to Change Our Habits? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2004; 78(5): 1591 - 1597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.L. Kwak, Y.J. Oh, S.H. Kim, H.K. Shin, J.Y. Kim, and Y.W. Hong Efficacy of pre-emptive milrinone in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: comparison between patients with a low and normal pre-graft cardiac index Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2004; 26(4): 687 - 693. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G Raja and G. D Dreyfus Will off-pump coronary artery surgery replace conventional coronary artery surgery? J R Soc Med, June 1, 2004; 97(6): 275 - 278. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Reuthebuch, A. Kadner, M. Lachat, A. Kunzli, U. P. Schurr, and M. I. Turina Early bypass occlusion after deployment of Nitinol connector devices J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2004; 127(5): 1421 - 1426. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Kamiya, G. Watanabe, H. Takemura, S. Tomita, H. Nagamine, and T. Kanamori Total arterial revascularization with composite skeletonized gastroepiploic artery graft in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2004; 127(4): 1151 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Hakala, O. Pitkanen, and J. Hartikainen Cardioplegic arrest does not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., March 1, 2004; 25(3): 415 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.-G. Chassot, P. van der Linden, M. Zaugg, X. M. Mueller, and D. R. Spahn Off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: physiology and anaesthetic management{dagger} Br. J. Anaesth., March 1, 2004; 92(3): 400 - 413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-F. Legare, K. J. Buth, S. King, J. Wood, J. A. Sullivan, C. H. Friesen, J. Lee, K. Stewart, and G. M. Hirsch Coronary Bypass Surgery Performed off Pump Does Not Result in Lower In-Hospital Morbidity Than Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Performed on Pump Circulation, February 24, 2004; 109(7): 887 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Racz, E. L. Hannan, O. W. Isom, V. A. Subramanian, R. H. Jones, J. P. Gold, T. J. Ryan, A. Hartman, A. T. Culliford, E. Bennett, et al. A comparison of short- and long-term outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery with sternotomy J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., February 18, 2004; 43(4): 557 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Gerola, E. Buffolo, W. Jasbik, B. Botelho, J. Bosco, L. A. Brasil, and J. N. R. Branco Off-pump versus on-pump myocardial revascularization in low-risk patients with one or two vessel disease: perioperative results in a multicenter randomized controlled trial Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 569 - 573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Athanasiou, S. Al-Ruzzeh, P. Kumar, M.-C. Crossman, M. Amrani, J. R. Pepper, R. Del Stanbridge, R. Casula, and B. Glenville Off-pump myocardial revascularization is associated with less incidence of stroke in elderly patients Ann. Thorac. Surg., February 1, 2004; 77(2): 745 - 753. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. E. Khan, A. De Souza, R. Mister, M. Flather, J. Clague, S. Davies, P. Collins, D. Wang, U. Sigwart, and J. Pepper A Randomized Comparison of Off-Pump and On-Pump Multivessel Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery N. Engl. J. Med., January 1, 2004; 350(1): 21 - 28. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. Sabik, E. H. Blackstone, B. W. Lytle, P. L. Houghtaling, A. M. Gillinov, and D. M. Cosgrove Equivalent midterm outcomes after off-pump and on-pump coronary surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Mack, A. Pfister, D. Bachand, R. Emery, M. J. Magee, M. Connolly, and V. Subramanian Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with multivessel disease J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2004; 127(1): 167 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Al-Ruzzeh, T. Athanasiou, S. George, and M. Amrani Methodological approach in adopting off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in a British cardiothoracic unit: Harefield experience Perfusion, January 1, 2004; 19(1_suppl): S61 - S66. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. L. Ngaage Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: the myth, the logic and the science Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., October 1, 2003; 24(4): 557 - 570. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gaudino, F. Andreotti, R. Zamparelli, A. Di Castelnuovo, G. Nasso, F. Burzotta, L. Iacoviello, M. B. Donati, R. Schiavello, A. Maseri, et al. The -174G/C Interleukin-6 Polymorphism Influences Postoperative Interleukin-6 Levels and Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation. Is Atrial Fibrillation an Inflammatory Complication? Circulation, September 9, 2003; 108(90101): II-195 - 199. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Chong, C. R. Hampton, and E. D. Verrier Microvascular Inflammatory Response in Cardiac Surgery Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 2003; 7(3): 333 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P.P. Lunkenheimer, K. Redmann, J.C. Florek, H.H. Scheld, A. Hoffmeier, C.W. Cryer, R.V. Batista, J.J. Stanton, J.D. F. Filho, and R.H. Anderson Surgical reduction of ventricular radius by aspirated plication of the myocardial wall: an experimental study J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2003; 126(2): 592 - 596. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Karthik, G. Musleh, A. D. Grayson, D. J.M. Keenan, R. Hasan, D. M. Pullan, W. C. Dihmis, and B. M. Fabri Effect of avoiding cardiopulmonary bypass in non-elective coronary artery bypass surgery: a propensity score analysis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 66 - 71. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Goldstein, R. B. Beauford, B. Luk, R. Karanam, T. Prendergast, F. Sardari, P. Burns, and C. Saunders Multivessel off-pump revascularization in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., July 1, 2003; 24(1): 72 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|