ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2011;92:762-769. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.03.133
© 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marshall L. Jacobs
Constantine Mavroudis
David L.S. Morales
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Charles D. Fraser, Jr
Joseph W. Turek
John E. Mayer
Christo Tchervenkov
John Conte
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional affairs


Report From STS Workforce on Congenital Heart Surgery

Report of the 2010 Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Practice and Manpower Survey

Marshall L. Jacobs, MDa,*, Megan Daniel, BSa, Constantine Mavroudis, MDa, David L.S. Morales, MDb, Jeffrey P. Jacobs, MDc, Charles D. Fraser, Jr, MDb, Joseph W. Turek, MD, PhDd, John E. Mayer, MDe, Christo Tchervenkov, MDf, John Conte, MDg

a Department of Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
b Division of Congenital Heart Surgery, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
c The Congenital Heart Institute of Florida, Saint Petersburg and Tampa, Florida
d Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
e Department of Cardiac Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
f Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
g Division of Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland

Accepted for publication March 28, 2011.

* Address correspondence to Dr Jacobs, 6019 Goshen Rd, Newtown Square, PA 19073 (Email: marshall.jacobs{at}comcast.net).

Presented at the Forty-seventh Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 31–Feb 2, 2011.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
Background: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Workforce on Congenital Heart Surgery undertook a second subspecialty Practice and Manpower Survey (2005, 2010) to obtain contemporary data.

Methods: Preliminary research suggested a potential target group of 273 congenital heart surgeons, including 258 at 125 US centers and 15 at 8 Canadian centers. The web-based survey was sent to these surgeons, plus all individuals listing pediatric cardiac surgery on CTSNet.

Results: Two hundred forty-six responders included 213 active congenital heart surgeons, 16 retired congenital heart surgeons, and 17 surgeons in training. Retirement age was 63.5 ± 7.5 years. Two hundred thirteen active congenital heart surgeon responders represent 78% of the original estimate. Their responses generated the following data: The mean age was 49.2 ± 8.5 (range, 35 to 75 years). American medical school graduates included 159 of 201 respondents (79%). Years of postgraduate training was 9.7 ± 1.7. One hundred ninety-seven (92%) respondents were certified in thoracic surgery by the American Board of Thoracic Surgery (ABTS). Twenty-eight of 200 (14%) received their congenital heart surgery training outside the United States or Canada. One hundred forty-three of 190 respondents (75%) perform exclusively congenital heart operations; 31 (16%) perform exclusively pediatric heart operations. Of 186 respondents, 54 (29%) perform fewer than 100 major congenital heart operations per year, 78 (42%) perform 100 to 199 procedures, and 54 (29%) perform 200 procedures or more. Active congenital heart surgeons have been in their current positions for 9.3 ± 8.6 years. Eight respondents are in their first year of practice. For 203 respondents, mean anticipated years to retirement is 16.1 ± 7.6. Twenty-eight anticipate retirement within 5 years; 31 in 6 to 10 years.

Conclusions: These data should help facilitate rational plans to meet workforce needs for an expanding patient population.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
The 2005 Society of Thoracic Surgeons' (STS) Congenital Heart Surgery Practice and Manpower Survey provided unprecedented insights concerning the subspecialty, including flux into and out of the workforce through training and retirement [1]. Several factors justified a second survey in 2010. In 2006, the American Board of Thoracic Surgery (ABTS) received approval to offer congenital cardiac surgery subspecialty certification [2]. Subspecialty certification and training requirements were developed in conjunction with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) Residency Review Committee for Thoracic Surgery. Certification pathways were established for (1) candidates trained on or after July 1, 2008 in an ACGME-accredited congenital heart surgery residency and (2) those who entered practice or trained in congenital heart surgery before July 1, 2008. A second factor was the recognition of the growing population of patients with congenital heart disease. Children with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood face ongoing needs for appropriately specialized surgical services [3]. Finally, in 2009 Grover and associates [4] projected that the United States will face a severe overall shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons within 10 years. That report did not specifically address congenital heart surgery.

The 2010 Congenital Heart Surgery Practice and Manpower Survey was undertaken to obtain contemporary data that may help to anticipate and address workforce needs to serve an expanding patient population.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
A primary objective was to achieve a reliable estimate of the number of practicing congenital heart surgeons in the United States and Canada and to characterize the group of surgeons performing the vast majority of cases. Based on the 2005 survey, we hypothesized that approximately 250 to 300 surgeons account for the large majority of congenital heart operations in both children and adults. Initial efforts to identify all practicing congenital heart surgeons used the same methodology as was used for the 2005 survey [1] as well as review of the 2005 list of respondents. The resultant list was cross-referenced with an independently generated list from a directory entitled "United States and Canada Pediatric Cardiologists, Congenital Heart Surgeons in Hospitals Providing Open Heart Surgery for Children 2008/2009" [5].

These preliminary investigations suggested a potential target group of 273 practicing congenital heart surgeons, including 258 at 125 US centers and 15 at 8 Canadian centers. Finally, to ensure that no practicing congenital heart surgeon was overlooked, the list was expanded using data available on the Internet at CTSNet (www.CTSNet.org), which was searched by state/Canadian province. Names found on CTSNet, but not identified by the earlier methods, were added to the distribution list.

A self-administered questionnaire was created, similar in format to the 2005 survey instrument. New questions were included in sections for trainees and retirees and in a module related to adult congenital heart disease. Estimated time for completion of the survey was 20 minutes. Respondents were urged to refer to institutional databases to ensure accuracy of case volume numbers. Questions were designed to distinguish individuals actively engaged in the practice of congenital heart surgery from those in training and retirees. Responses from individuals not meeting these criteria were excluded from analysis. The initial broad inclusion, followed by these exclusions, was intended to achieve the closest approximation to the target group of active cardiothoracic surgeons who perform congenital heart operations.

The survey questionnaire was reviewed and approved by the STS Executive Committee and the Institutional Review Board of the Cleveland Clinic. It was converted to a web-based instrument. Invitation to participate was by e-mail to the entire distribution list. E-mail communication identified the study as an STS survey and included an introductory description explaining the research and how the information would be used. The e-mail also included a link to the online survey instrument at www.surveymonkey.com. E-mail solicitation commenced in January 2010. The survey was announced at the 46th Meeting of the STS during Congenital Heart Surgery sessions. Repeat solicitations went by e-mail to nonresponders through April 2010. The final portion of the survey requested names of professional associates and other congenital heart surgeons in the same geographic region. When a survey was returned listing names not previously included in the distribution list, the e-mail invitation to participate was sent to those additional surgeons. Before the dataset was considered complete, at least 2 e-mails were sent to every name on the original distribution list and 3 additional batch e-mails went to nonresponders and newly acquired names.

This approach yielded a total of 246 eligible completed surveys. The secondary group identified through CTSNet was made up mostly of "ineligible" individuals not actively engaged in the practice of congenital heart surgery. Some were physician/scientists not practicing surgery. Some were from outside the United States and Canada. The web-based survey instrument featured skip logic; those who identified themselves as retirees or trainees were directed to specific modules and not to the remainder of the survey questions. The 246 eligible completed surveys were all from surgeons in the United States or Canada, including 213 from active congenital heart surgeons (representing 78% of the initial target group), 16 from retirees, and 17 from individuals in training. Further responses were not pursued after May 2010. Responses were checked for inconsistencies and errors. Only data entered into the survey instrument by respondents in the United States or Canada actively engaged in the practice of congenital heart surgery, in training, or retired were extracted and analyzed. No information from other sources, including the preliminary investigations to identify congenital heart surgeons, was analyzed. Data were downloaded to Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft, Seattle, WA) and imported into SPSS (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL) for analysis. Percentages are reported as the percent of the actual number of respondents, which varied from question to question.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
Demographics
Two hundred forty-six responders included 213 active congenital heart surgeons, 16 retired congenital heart surgeons, and 17 individuals in training. Of the 246 surgeons, 17 (6.9%) were women. Of those currently in active practice or in training, 14 of 230 (6.1%) are women. Fully trained surgeons actively engaged in congenital heart surgery practice (n = 213) ranged in age from 35 to 75 years (mean, 49.2 ± 8.5). Respondents were from 40 states, the District of Columbia, and 5 Canadian provinces.

Education and Postgraduate Training
Of 201 active congenital heart surgeons who provided responses, 159 (79.1%) graduated from medical schools in the United States, 10 (5.0%) graduated from medical schools in Canada, 10 (5.0%) graduated from medical schools in Europe, 12 (6.0%) graduated from medical schools in Asia, and 10 (5.0%) graduated from medical schools elsewhere. The average years of training after medical school graduation was 9.7 ± 1.7 years (range, 6 to 15 years; median, 9 years). Of the 200 active congenital heart surgeons who responded, 152 (76%) undertook the major portion of their congenital heart surgery training in the United States; 23 (11.5%) in Europe, and 20 (10%) in Canada. The remaining 2.5% listed Asia, Australia, or New Zealand.

One hundred ninety-seven of the 213 actively practicing congenital heart surgeons reported certification by the ABTS. One hundred six (53.5%) have recertified 1 or more times, 39 (19.7%) 2 or more times, and 11 (5.6%) 3 or more times. (No alternative choice was offered to indicate certification in cardiothoracic surgery by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada). Of 198 respondents, 17 (8.6%) held the ABTS Certificate of Specialization in Congenital Heart Surgery. Thirty-one (15.7%) indicated that they were not yet certified but had taken the examination and were awaiting results, 100 (50.5%) indicated that they plan to take the examination, and 50 (25.3%) indicated that they did not plan to take the examination.

Current Practice
Years in practice
The number of years that respondents (n = 202) have been engaged in the practice of congenital heart surgery is: 0 to 5 years, 43 (21%) respondents; 6 to 10 years, 36 (18%) respondents; 11 to 15 years, 42 (21%) respondents; and greater than 15 years, 81 (40%) respondents, of which 22 individuals have practiced for greater than 25 years. Active congenital heart surgeons have been in their current positions for 9.3 ± 8.6 years. Eight respondents were in their first year of practice.

Practice characteristics and case volume
Concerning the makeup of their current practice (congenital heart surgery, pediatric, adult, and other), 190 active surgeons provided responses. The data is summarized in Figure 1 . One hundred forty-three of 190 respondents (75.3%) perform exclusively congenital heart surgery. A total of 161 (84.7%) respondents perform exclusively or mostly congenital heart surgery.


Figure 1
View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Summary of responses to "Which of the following best describes your personal current caseload?" One hundred ninety of 213 eligible survey participants provided responses to the question. A = Virtually exclusively congenital heart surgery, pediatric only; B = virtually exclusively congenital heart surgery, pediatric and adult; C = virtually exclusively congenital heart surgery, primarily adult; D = mostly congenital heart surgery, some surgery for acquired heart disease or some general thoracic surgery, or both; E = mostly other than congenital heart surgery; F = congenital heart surgery and a significant amount of noncardiac pediatric surgery.

 
Survey participants were asked to indicate the total number of congenital heart operations they perform per year, as averaged over the past 2 years. The query specified index cases on which the respondent was the surgeon of record (primary operating surgeon or supervising teaching surgeon). Data from the 186 responses are depicted in Figure 2 . One hundred thirty-two of 186 respondents (71%) reported performing 100 or more congenital heart surgery operations (index cases) per year. One hundred one of 186 respondents (54%) reported performing 150 or more operations. Participants were asked to respond True or False to the statement: "I currently perform fewer than 25 major congenital heart operations per year." Responses were True: 18 (9.5%); False: 171 (90.5%).


Figure 2
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Summary of responses to "Number of congenital heart surgery operations (index cases) performed per year, as surgeon of record." One hundred eighty-six of 213 eligible survey participants provided responses to the question.

 
Participants were asked to estimate the percentages of their surgical volume that fell into each of several categories. Responses (n = 187) are summarized in Figure 3 . For 139 of 187 respondents (74%), pediatric congenital heart surgery constitutes more than 70% of their practice volume. For most respondents, adult congenital heart surgery reportedly accounts for less than 10% of their practice volume.


Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. Summary of responses to "Of the total number of operations that you perform per year, estimate the percentage that fall into each of the following categories: pediatric congenital heart surgery, adult congenital heart surgery, vascular surgery, transplantation procedures, primary surgery for atrial fibrillation, insertion of artificial cardiac devices (ventricular assist devices), and other." One hundred eighty-seven of 213 eligible survey participants provided responses to the question.

 
Of 167 participants who reported performing adult congenital heart surgical procedure, 11 reported performing 50 or more per year. Nine reported performing 40 to 49 per year. Eighteen reported performing 30 to 39 per year. Respondents were asked to estimate the total number of adult congenital heart operations performed per year at their institution (calculated as the average per year, over the past 2 years). There were 183 responses. Responses are summarized in Table 1.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Summary of Responses to "Please Estimate the Total Number of Adult Congenital Heart Operations Performed Per Year at Your Institution (Average Per Year Over the Past 2 Years)"
 
Participants were asked "who performed the majority of adult congenital heart surgery operations at their institution?" The 184 responses were as follows: A dedicated congenital heart surgeon, the majority of whose operations are performed on adults with congenital heart disease, 18 (10%); a dedicated congenital heart surgeon, the majority of whose operations are performed on pediatric patients with congenital heart disease, 130 (71%); a primarily adult cardiac surgeon, the majority of whose operations are performed for acquired heart disease but who performs some operations for congenital heart disease, 21 (11%); adult congenital heart surgical operations are not performed at my institution, 6 (3%); other, 9 (5%). When asked their opinion as to who should perform adult congenital heart operations, 109 (59.2% of respondents) selected the following response: "a dedicated congenital heart surgeon, despite the fact that the majority of his/her operations are performed on children." In all, 97% chose either this response or one stipulating that it should be surgeons who have completed formal training in congenital heart surgery, regardless of their type of practice (adult, pediatric, or both).

Of 188 respondents, 84 (45%) indicated that their overall caseload of congenital heart operations (pediatric and adult) was smaller than they would like. Another 96 (51%) thought it was just right, and 8 (4%) said it was too large. Ninety-eight of 185 (53%) respondents said their caseload of congenital heart operations was relatively stable from year to year. Twenty-two (12%) said it was declining because of the growth of interventional procedures, whereas 65 (35%) said it was growing despite the growth of interventional procedures. A significant majority (134 of 187 [72%]) reported that the number of congenital heart surgery cases per year for which they serve as first assistant to another attending surgeon is fewer than 50. Only 17 respondents (9%) served as first assistant to another attending congenital heart surgeon for 100 or more cases per year. Participants were asked to indicate who most often serves as first assistant when they are the surgeon of record for congenital heart operations. Responses (n = 190) are summarized in Table 2.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Summary of Responses to "When You Are the Surgeon of Record for Congenital Heart Operations, Please Describe the Individual Who Most Often Serves As the First Assistant"
 
Of 187 respondents, 46 (25%) report working more than 80 hours per week; 53 (28%) work 71 to 80 hours per week; and 58 (31%) work 61 to 70 hours per week. Just 30 of 187 respondents (16%) work 60 hours per week or less. For 104 surgeons (53% of 196 respondents), their practice was primarily at a designated children's hospital; for 73 surgeons (37%), it was primarily at a combined adult and pediatric medical center; and for 19 surgeons (10%) their practice was divided between 2 or more hospitals. Nearly three fourths of respondents (138 [73%]) indicated that 70% or more of their professional time and effort went to their clinical practice. The remainder was divided roughly evenly between research and administration.

Pattern of referrals
Most surgeons operate primarily on patients from within their own state or province. Fifty-five of 185 respondents (30%) report that greater than 10% of their cases were from contiguous states or provinces. Twenty (11%) report that greater than 10% of their cases were from noncontiguous states or provinces or from foreign countries.

Miscellaneous
Most respondents work in groups of 2 or 3 congenital heart surgeons. Thirty-three (17%) are solo practitioners of congenital heart surgery. Twenty-five (16%) work in groups of 4 or more congenital heart surgeons. The vast majority of respondents reported using minimally invasive techniques for less than 5% of congenital heart operations. Twenty-six (14%) respondents used minimally invasive techniques for 5% to 10% of cases, and 13 (7%) respondents used such techniques for greater than 10% of cases. Five respondents (2.7%) used robotic techniques: 4 surgeons for 1% or less of cases and 1 surgeon for 1% to 5% of cases.

Academics and Teaching
One hundred fifty-four respondents (75%) have a full-time academic appointment. One hundred sixty-two of 189 respondents (86%) engage in clinical research, with 85 (45%) reporting that they participate in clinical trials or protocol-driven investigations. Sixty-two (33%) engage in laboratory research, whereas 11 (6%) report no participation in any research. Compensation was primarily fee for service for just 21 of 196 respondents (11%); it was primarily salary for 109 (56%) respondents, and it was salary plus incentives for 66 (34%) respondents.

Of 213 surgeons who responded, 116 participate in training of residents in an ACGME-accredited ABTS-approved cardiothoracic surgery residency (or Canadian equivalent). Thirty-three participate in training of congenital heart surgery subspecialty residents in an ACGME-accredited congenital heart surgery training program, and 50 participate in the training of postgraduate fellows who have not completed an ABTS-approved cardiothoracic residency (or the Canadian equivalent).

Retirement
Two hundred two active congenital heart surgeons indicated an estimated number of years until their anticipated retirement. Data are summarized in Table 3. Mean anticipated years to retirement is 16.1 ± 7.6 (range, 1 to 40 years).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Summary of Responses to "Please Indicate, As Accurately As Possible, the Number of Years Until Your Anticipated Retirement From Active Clinical Surgery"
 
Of 16 currently retired congenital heart surgeons, age at retirement ranged from 47 to 74 years (median, 65 years; mean, 63.5 ± 7.5 years). Reasons for retirement are listed in Table 4. At the time of retirement, overall job satisfaction was high. Ten (63%) respondents were extremely satisfied and 3 (19%) were very satisfied. No respondent expressed dissatisfaction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Summary of Responses to "What Was the Reason for Your Retirement? Check All That Apply"
 
Workforce Opinions
The question of career satisfaction was also addressed to actively practicing congenital heart surgeons. The 204 responses are summarized in Figure 4 . When asked about the number of congenital heart surgeons in their own geographic region, 108 (57%) responded that the number was appropriate, 72 (38%) thought that there were too many, and 9 (5%) thought that there were too few. Twenty-four indicated no response. Practicing congenital heart surgeons were asked, "How many congenital heart operations should a surgeon perform each year to maintain the skills and expertise necessary to practice congenital heart surgery?" One hundred eighty-nine responded; 24 did not respond. Responses are summarized in Figure 5 .


Figure 4
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. Summary of responses to "Overall, how would you rate your career satisfaction?" Two hundred four of 213 eligible survey participants provided responses to the question.

 

Figure 5
View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 5. Summary of responses to "How many congenital heart operations should a surgeon perform each year in order to maintain the skills and expertise necessary to practice congenital heart surgery?" One hundred eighty nine of 213 eligible survey participants provided responses to the question.

 
Finally, 197 of 213 respondents in active practice provided their identification and practice location. These data, together with the preliminary research described earlier, were useful in reaching an overall estimate of 125 US centers and 8 Canadian centers for pediatric and congenital heart surgery.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
We do not think that data from a survey such as this provides the basis for any rigorous statistical analyses. In particular, reliable characterization of nonrespondents is not possible, so analysis of the similarities or differences between respondents and nonrespondents (eg, with respect to age, case volume, anticipated retirement) is not practical.

Our research suggests that the majority of congenital heart operations are performed by approximately 273 surgeons at 125 centers in the United States and 15 surgeons at 8 centers in Canada, with 54% doing 150 or more index cases per year. The estimated survey response rate (213 of 273 [78%]) is similar to the 80% rate for the 2005 survey. Our overall numbers of surgeons and centers are very similar to those in another recent report [5]. Although survey results can never be assumed to be completely representative, the response rates of close to 80% are encouraging. Using case numbers provided by respondents (based on midpoint of ranges) and multiplying by a factor of 273/186 = 1.47 (186 respondents provided index case volume estimates) yields an overall annual congenital heart surgical procedure case volume estimate for the United States and Canada of approximately 40,000. A different model, based on yearly average numbers of congenital heart operations in both the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database [6] and the STS Adult Cardiac Database [7], yields a similar overall estimate of around 40,000 per year. These must be considered very rough estimates. Both are based on assumptions that are simple but not validated. The precise number of surgeons doing these operations is unknown, as our methods cannot determine the number doing occasional operations for congenital heart disease, particularly in adults.

Comparison of the results of the current survey to those of the initial survey in 2005 reveal that the percentage of respondents doing fewer than 100 index congenital heart operations per year has trended downward. The first survey report indicated that 37% of responding surgeons had annual congenital heart operation case volumes of less than 100. In the current report, 29% of responding surgeons had annual congenital case volumes of less than 100. We do not feel however that these data lend themselves to rigorous statistical comparisons.

Studies that predict an overall workforce shortage in cardiothoracic surgery in the coming decades did not include analyses specific to congenital heart surgery. It is important however to consider the statement from Dr. Richard Jonas' 2010 Presidential Address to the Congenital Heart Surgeons Society [8] that "congenital cardiac surgeons are at the end of this training pipeline, so our supply of potential recruits is likely to be seriously affected." Our ability to project and meet the needs of a growing population of patients with congenital heart disease should ultimately be enhanced by awareness of current trends and numbers describing flux into and out of the workforce. The 2005 and 2010 survey respondents included 11 and 8 individuals, respectively, in their first year of practice. Responses to the 2010 survey suggest that a minimum of 59 practicing congenital heart surgeons plan to retire over the next 10 years, and a total of 106 plan to retire over the next 15 years, for an average of about 7 per year. This is a minimum estimate that does not consider those who did not respond to the survey or did not answer the specific question. It also does not include projections of unplanned retirement for reasons of health, which were cited by 7 of 16 retired congenital heart surgeons who participated in the 2010 survey. The 2005 Survey Report indicated that at that time, 65 practitioners anticipated leaving the workforce through retirement during the coming decade [1].

We reported previously that in 2005 there were 39 fellows who anticipated completing congenital heart surgery training within the following 12 months. Of those, 19 were expecting to seek practice positions in North America [1]. At present, there are 10 ACGME-accredited training programs in the United States, which may graduate 1 congenital heart surgeon per year. In April 2010, the Thoracic Surgery Directors Association In-Service Training Examination Survey was taken by 299 thoracic surgery residents as a prerequisite to the mandatory Thoracic Surgery Directors Association In-Service Training Examination [9]. Twelve residents expressed intent to pursue a congenital heart surgery residency for 2010 to 2011, and 11 additional residents for 2011 to 2012 [10]. In the 2009 American Board of Surgery In-Service Examination Survey, 11 of 1,034 (1.1%) fifth-year general surgery residents indicated an intent to pursue careers in congenital heart surgery [11].

In years past, there was a general tendency to equate surgery for congenital heart disease with pediatric cardiac surgery. The expanding population of patients with congenital heart disease surviving into adulthood and the increasing recognition of the frequency and breadth of surgical needs of those patients has led to a more general consideration of congenital heart surgery from infancy to adulthood. A limitation of the present study is the difficulty in determining the number of surgeons who perform operations for congenital heart disease infrequently, particularly in adult patients. In responses to the 2010 American Association for Thoracic Surgery/STS Practice Survey (for all branches of cardiothoracic surgery), more than 500 respondents indicated that they performed at least 1 operation per year for congenital heart disease in either adults or infants and children. Clearly congenital heart operations, often in small numbers, continue to be performed by surgeons who do not specialize in the treatment of congenital heart disease, despite the recognition by the ACGME and ABTS that congenital heart surgery is a specialty for which dedicated training with a specialized curriculum is appropriate. It is likely that over time, the fraction of adult congenital heart surgical cases performed by surgeons not formally trained as congenital heart surgeons will diminish.

The hope and intent of the authors and of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Workforce on Congenital Heart Surgery is that data from this study will help to facilitate rational plans to meet future workforce needs, including evolving policies regarding training and certification of surgeons treating congenital heart disease.


    Discussion
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 
DR THOMAS SPRAY (Philadelphia, PA): This second 5-year survey of the Congenital Heart Surgery Workforce that has been sponsored by the STS gives us a slightly different picture but is actually remarkably consistent with the original survey in 2005. Although still predominantly male, it does appear that we are attracting more females into the specialty, and the percentage of female surgeons has increased in the most recent survey. It is now about 6%, and I suspect at the next survey it may reach 10%.

Surgeons in training positions are really the major thing that has changed between these 2 surveys. In the last survey there were, I think, 39 congenital heart surgeons in training in that survey and now it is down to 17 in training in this survey and, as was just mentioned, the recently approved ACGME fellowship certification in congenital heart surgery has currently 10 approved programs, each with 1 resident in the program, so the number has decreased. Unfortunately that number of trainees is still higher than the anticipated number of open positions each year in congenital heart surgery, at least in the United States and Canada, so it is still a problem for us and will be an issue in the future.

I think of particular note is the relative underutilization of the current Congenital Heart Surgery Workforce. Almost a third of the practicing congenital heart surgeons perform fewer than 100 cases a year and 10% of practicing surgeons perform fewer than 25 cases a year. These are probably surgeons who are part of a larger adult practice. I am sort of predicting that, but I would assume that is the case. Fully 45% of the congenital heart surgeons that were surveyed felt that their caseload was inadequate, was too low for what they desired.

So I have 2 questions. One of these actually is a methodologic question. I am sure you can take care of that easily for me. However despite the rigorous follow-up that you used in trying to find all the congenital heart surgeons, I noted that only 40 of 50 states were represented in the survey, and I just wondered if you went back and looked at that 20% of states that did not have an identifiable congenital heart program whether that was truly accurate or you could find some that night have been lost in the survey?

DR JACOBS: Thank you, Dr Spray. It is a pertinent question, and while I had prepared a map with the distribution of survey respondents, it would not really have represented the entire workforce. It would have represented only the large percentage that responded. Of the states from which we had no respondents, we identified at least 3 in which we were quite certain that there were dedicated congenital heart surgeons practicing. In addition, we identified 4 states in which we were quite confident that there were not dedicated congenital heart surgeons. Those are states not all the way in the Pacific Northwest but in the northern central region, just south of the Canadian border. In general, the map showed that the distribution of congenital heart surgeons matched up quite closely with the density of population by states, which is not surprising.

DR SPRAY: One area of potential growth in case volume obviously is the adult congenital heart population, as you have already mentioned, and 81% of the congenital heart surgeons that were surveyed here do adult congenital surgery as part of their practice. However it is interesting that the American Board of Thoracic Surgery, when it set up the congenital heart surgery certification process, did not include adult congenital heart patients in the cases that are required for certification, and in fact they are specifically discriminated against. Surgeons who would have an interest and specific expertise in adult congenital heart surgery might even be excluded from taking the examination because they wouldn't have the index cases that are required for certification.

This I think is a real issue for the future, and I just wonder if you believe that the Residency Review Committee and the American Board of Thoracic Surgery should make adult congenital heart surgery a requirement for certification in the future and perhaps even adjust the case volume requirements to reflect this?

DR JACOBS: Well, it is an important and a provocative question, and I am going to resist being placed on the hot seat in terms of providing a response. I will say, Dr Spray, that you noted from the manuscript that 1 of the fundamental differences compared with 2005 was that we included a large module of questions related to adult congenital heart disease, and we did that specifically for the reason you stated. One of the major developments in the interim is the subspecialty training certification, and 1 of the major phenomena that we recognized is the expanding adult congenital heart surgery population. So as you suggested with the important question, we hope that the data we have provided from this survey may assist those who plan the training programs and certification requirements in our field in relation to that population. Thank you.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Discussion
 References
 

  1. Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, Jacobs JP, et al. Report of the 2005 STS Congenital Heart Surgery Practice and Manpower Survey Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:1152-11581159e1-5.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. American Board of Thoracic Surgery Booklet of Information, Congenital Heart Surgery Subspecialty Certification, Office of the Board, Chicago, Illinois, 2010www.abts.org 2006Accessed December 19, 2010.
  3. Marelli AJ, Therrien J, Mackie AS, et al. Planning the specialized care of adult congenital heart disease patients: from numbers to guidelines; an epidemiologic approach Am Heart J 2009;157:1-8.[Medline]
  4. Grover A, Gorman K, Dall TM, et al. Shortage of cardiothoracic surgeons is likely by 2020 Circulation 2009;120:488-494.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Bhatt DR, Jue K, Stilwell J. United States and Canada Pediatric Cardiologists, Congenital Heart Surgeons in Hospitals Providing Open Heart Surgery for Children, 2008/2009, Revision 1bPublished by Congenital Cardiology Today, Potomac, MDwww.CongenitalCardiologyToday.com 2009Accessed January 14, 2010.
  6. Jacobs JP, Jacobs ML, Mavroudis C, et al. Executive Summary: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database Thirteenth Harvest—(July 1, 2006–June 30, 2010)The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) and Duke Clinical Research Institute (DCRI), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States, Spring 2010 Harvesthttp://www.sts.org/national-database/database-managers/congenital-heart-surgery-database 2009Accessed April 25, 2011.
  7. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Executive Summary: Ten Years STS Period Ending June 30, 2010. "Incidence of Other Procedures Distribution". http://www.sts.org/sites/default/files/documents/pdf/ndb2010/3rdHarvestExecutiveSummary2010.pdf 2009Accessed December 19, 2010.
  8. Jonas RA. Presidential address: accomplishments and challenges ahead for congenital heart surgery World J Pediatr Congenital Heart Surg 2011;2:202-210.
  9. Thoracic Surgery Directors Association In-Training Examinationhttp://www.tsda.org/sections/in-training%20exam/index.html 2011Accessed December 28, 2010.
  10. 2010 Thoracic Surgery Directors Association In-Service Training Examination Surveyhttp://www.tsda.org/documents/PDF/ITE/2010%20ITE/Residents_Survey_Results.10.pdf 2011Accessed December 28, 2010.
  11. 2009 American Board of Surgery In-Service Examination Surveyhttp://home.absurgery.org/default.jsp?certabsite 2011Accessed December 28, 2010.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
HeartHome page
D. M. Shahian, J. P. Jacobs, F. H. Edwards, J. M. Brennan, R. S. Dokholyan, R. L. Prager, C. D. Wright, E. D. Peterson, D. E. McDonald, and F. L. Grover
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database
Heart, January 18, 2013; (2013) heartjnl-2012-303456v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. M. Ungerleider, S. K. Pasquali, K. F. Welke, A. S. Wallace, Y. Ootaki, M. D. Quartermain, D. A. Williams, and J. P. Jacobs
Contemporary patterns of surgery and outcomes for aortic coarctation: An analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., January 1, 2013; 145(1): 150 - 158.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. J. DiBardino, S. K. Pasquali, J. C. Hirsch, D. K. Benjamin, K. C. Kleeman, J. D. Salazar, M. L. Jacobs, J. E. Mayer, and J. P. Jacobs
Effect of Sex and Race on Outcome in Patients Undergoing Congenital Heart Surgery: An Analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2012; 94(6): 2054 - 2060.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
D. F. Vener, N. Guzzetta, J. P. Jacobs, and G. D. Williams
Development and Implementation of a New Data Registry in Congenital Cardiac Anesthesia
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2012; 94(6): 2159 - 2165.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
J. P. Jacobs, M. L. Jacobs, B. Maruszewski, F. G. Lacour-Gayet, C. I. Tchervenkov, Z. Tobota, G. Stellin, H. Kurosawa, A. Murakami, J. W. Gaynor, et al.
Initial application in the EACTS and STS Congenital Heart Surgery Databases of an empirically derived methodology of complexity adjustment to evaluate surgical case mix and results
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2012; 42(5): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. K. Pasquali, X. He, J. P. Jacobs, M. L. Jacobs, S. M. O'Brien, and J. W. Gaynor
Evaluation of Failure to Rescue as a Quality Metric in Pediatric Heart Surgery: An Analysis of The STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2012; 94(2): 573 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. D. Stewart, S. K. Pasquali, J. P. Jacobs, D. K. Benjamin, J. Jaggers, J. Cheng, C. Mavroudis, and M. L. Jacobs
Contemporary Fontan Operation: Association Between Early Outcome and Type of Cavopulmonary Connection
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2012; 93(4): 1254 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marshall L. Jacobs
Constantine Mavroudis
David L.S. Morales
Jeffrey P. Jacobs
Charles D. Fraser, Jr
Joseph W. Turek
John E. Mayer
Christo Tchervenkov
John Conte
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jacobs, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Professional affairs


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS