ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:2021. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.01.069
© 2011 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gaetano Rocco
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article


Correspondence

Reply

Gaetano Rocco, MD, FRCSEd

Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, Division of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Institute, Pascale Foundation, Via M Semmola, 81, 80131 Naples, Italy

(Email: gaetano.rocco{at}btopenworld.com).

To the Editor:


Dr Rocco discloses that he has a financial relationship with Covidien.

 

Assouad and colleagues [1] should be commended for rightfully raising the point of how to expand the practice of uniportal videoscopic assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). However, although the indications for single-port VATS to manage pleural disease (ie, single incision VATS to obtain diagnosis and divide loculations) have been known since the inception of thoracoscopic surgery, operative uniportal VATS (ie, single incision VATS pulmonary resection) often requires interchangeability of the reciprocal position of the necessary instrumentation to address different areas in the chest cavity [2]. Accordingly, in the description of the original technique of uniportal VATS pulmonary resection [2], the use of a trocar was not contemplated to avoid space impediments.

In this setting, the single-incision laparoscopic surgical (SILS) port (Covidien, Mansfield, MA) is a U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved device for laparoscopic use that enables the surgeon to perform single-port laparoscopic procedures while establishing and maintaining the pneumoperitoneum. Once again, thoracic surgeons should rely on laparoscopic instruments adapted for thoracic surgical use. Indeed, the adaptation of this laparoscopic soft port duplicates the idea of introducing more instruments though a single incision introduced by operative uniportal VATS [2]. Along with flexing the patient's trunk by increasing the intercostal space width, SILS could represent an additional protective factor against intercostal nerve injury—the latter significantly reduced compared with the traditional 3-port VATS if the uniportal VATS technique is carefully adhered to [3]—but I suspect it may also hinder maneuverability [4].

I am convinced Assouad and colleagues' contribution will help clarify this issue in a future report of a larger institutional experience with SILS where more details about stapler introduction and specimen removal through SILS will be given. In the meantime, I would envisage the use of SILS in uniportal VATS to avoid or reduce tedious blood dripping on the thoracoscope lens, which is common if no port is used.

In conclusion, I agree with Assouad and coworkers that specific instruments for operative uniportal VATS should be devised because the operative uniportal VATS technique is based on a totally different intrathoracic approach to the target lesion in the chest compared with conventional 3-port VATS [2–4]. Moreover, unlike 3-port operative VATS, the contribution of articulating instrumentation is fundamental for operative uniportal VATS [2–4]. In this setting, it is important to define a clear-cut distinction between uniportal operative vs diagnostic VATS, with the latter certainly benefitting from the use of SILS.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Assouad J, Vignes S, Nakad J, Grunenwald D. Single incision video-assisted thoracic surgery using a laparoscopic port (letter) Ann Thorac Surg 2011;91:2020-2021.[Free Full Text]
  2. Rocco G, Martin-Ucar A, Passera E. Uniportal VATS wedge pulmonary resections Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:726-728.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Jutley RS, Khalil MW, Rocco G. Uniportal vs standard three-port VATS technique for spontaneous pneumothorax: comparison of post-operative pain and residual paraesthesia Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;28:43-46.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Rocco G, Romano V, Accardo R, et al. Awake single-access (uniportal) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for peripheral pulmonary nodules in a complete ambulatory setting Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1625-1627.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Single Incision Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Using a Laparoscopic Port
Jalal Assouad, Stéphane Vignes, Joseph Nakad, and Dominique Grunenwald
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011 91: 2020-2021. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Gaetano Rocco
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rocco, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS