|
|
||||||||
a Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
b Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
c Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
d The Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
Accepted for publication December 29, 2010.
* Address correspondence to Dr Gottesman, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N Wolfe St, Meyer 6-113, Baltimore, MD 21287 (Email: rgottesm{at}jhmi.edu).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Individuals who had sustained a clinical postoperative stroke (cases) were matched 1:2 with controls by age, sex, surgical procedure, and year of operation. In 617 patients, conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze associations between hemoglobin levels before and after CPB, and stroke.
Results: After adjustment for potentially confounding vascular risk factors, lower hemoglobin after CPB was associated with a higher risk of stroke, even after adjustment for the amount of packed red blood cells transfused (adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.00 to 1.64, per point of lower hemoglobin level; adjusted odds ratio for stroke per higher quartile of packed red blood cells transfused in this model, 1.37; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 1.83). Similar associations were not found for hemoglobin concentrations preoperatively nor change in hemoglobin from before to after CPB. A post-CPB hemoglobin level below the median was associated with 37% increased odds of a postoperative stroke occurring (p = 0.02).
Conclusions: Lower postoperative hemoglobin levels and higher intraoperative transfusion requirements are each independently associated with a higher risk of stroke. Reduced cerebral oxygen delivery due to anemia may contribute to cerebral injury after coronary artery bypass grafting.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology:
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member or an individual non-member subscription to the journal.
|
Individuals who undergo cardiac operations are often exposed to large fluctuations in blood volume, both as a result of blood loss and infusion of large volumes of fluid. Recent literature has focused on anemia as a potential marker of adverse neurologic outcomes, but the nature of this relationship, and whether it is purely a marker of poor outcomes or is a cause of these outcomes is still not well understood [1].
Preoperative anemia has been associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac operations. Individuals who are anemic preoperatively have an increased risk of postoperative kidney failure [2] and death, among other postoperative complications [3, 4], although other studies have failed to find similar results [5]. Some studies have emphasized the importance of the preoperative hemoglobin level [6] in predicting postoperative complications, with others emphasizing the nadir hematocrit level [7] as being the most important. In other studies, a low hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has been associated with higher odds of postoperative stroke [1].
In this case-control study of cardiac surgical patients, we compared hemoglobin levels before and after CPB in individuals with and without stroke. We hypothesized that hemoglobin level would be a predictor of postoperative stroke and specifically hypothesized that change in hemoglobin would predict postoperative stroke more strongly than either value at the start or the end of CPB.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Records were reviewed for 689 patients (cases and controls) who had undergone any form of cardiac operation with CPB at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 2001 to 2006. Demographics, vascular history (peripheral vascular disease, myocardial infarction, prior stroke or transient ischemic attack, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, morbid obesity, smoking history, and hypertension), and intraoperative factors (CPB time) were recorded from hospital records, perfusion records, and electronic databases.
Statistical Analyses
The primary independent variable was hemoglobin level before the initiation of CPB (pre-CPB), after stopping CPB (post-CPB), and the difference between the pre-CPB and post-CPB values. Hemoglobin level was also dichotomized at its median (8.8 g/dL), for separate analyses. Descriptive statistics were completed using
2 statistics for categoric variables and t tests for continuous variables. Potential confounders (see covariates listed above) were included in the multivariate model; a backwards stepwise regression was used with a significance level of p < 0.10 for inclusion. Age was included both as a linear and quadratic variable. Conditional logistic regression was used to determine the independent effects of these variables on case status (stroke vs no stroke). Model goodness-of-fit of the standard logistic regression models of the variables was checked using the Hosmer-Lemeshow statistic.
Separate models were created analyzing the association between stroke status and (1) pre-CPB hemoglobin, (2) post-CPB hemoglobin, (3) hemoglobin level change, and (4) below vs above the median hemoglobin values, each. All models were repeated with and without adjustment for number of packed red blood cells (pRBC) transfused during the operation. Number of pRBC transfused was categorized into quartiles as 0 to 1 units, 2 to 3 units, 4 units, or 5 or more units. Stata 10.0 software (StataCorp, College Station, TX) was used for the analyses.
Secondary Analyses
Anemia was defined based on pre-CPB values (<12 g/dL for women, <13 g/DL for men), and analyzed as a predictor of stroke. In addition, hemoglobin values were analyzed both as linear and nonlinear predictors. Finally, the lower of the two hemoglobin values (before and after CPB) was used as a predictor in a secondary analysis.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Multivariate Analyses
A stepwise multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis was performed using the variables listed in Table 1. The final multivariate analysis included variables that, in a stepwise regression, were significant at p < 0.10 (Table 3
): first (model 1), without inclusion of transfusion, and second (model 2), with inclusion of pRBC transfusion quartile. The association between post-CPB hemoglobin level and stroke is partially attenuated, but the association remains significant (p < 0.05). Quartile of pRBC transfused remains significant in all models. Results were similar when number of units transfused was entered instead of pRBC quartile.
|
|
Analyzing hemoglobin with nonlinear techniques (eg, cubic splines) did not improve the models.
Lowest Hemoglobin Level as Predictor
When the lower of the two hemoglobin values (before or after CPB) was used as the predictor, quartile of pRBC transfusion remained significant (adjusted OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.81), but this new variable, "lower" hemoglobin, did not (adjusted OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.99 to 1.60).
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our study found that transfusion was an important predictor of stroke and attenuated the relationship between post-CPB hemoglobin and stroke but did not eliminate the association. There was a suggestion that transfusion was a stronger predictor of stroke when the post-CPB hemoglobin level was below the median. Although having lower post-CPB hemoglobin levels is certainly associated with higher transfusion requirements, the combination of the two may be more important. This may be because individuals with low post-CPB hemoglobin values who have also received a higher amount of transfused units of pRBC actually had an even lower hemoglobin nadir during the operation.
A low hemoglobin level may be important in risk for stroke because of resultant cerebral hypoperfusion resulting directly from the low hemoglobin and reduced cerebral oxygenation, or because it may be a reflection of a higher acuity patient, with the need for more transfusions, [8] or a more complicated operative course. Similarly, it may reflect hemodilution from bypass. The typical response to anemia is an increase in cardiac output, with additional cerebral vasodilation in an attempt to maintain adequate cerebral blood flow and oxygen transport [9]. Ultimately, these compensations may fail and ischemia can result.
We hypothesize that inadequate oxygen transport might be the mechanism of cerebral injury resulting from intraoperative anemia. Our results showed a relatively modest association, however, and thus do not strongly support a particular mechanism of injury. We hypothesize, however, that a relatively small injury, whether from embolization or hypoperfusion, might be associated with a surrounding ischemic penumbra of at-risk brain tissue, and the presence of lower hemoglobin levels would be associated with expansion of the infarct. Many very small embolic lesions to the brain might not be clinically detected, but if these infarcts expand, they might be associated with clinical symptoms and thus be clinically identified as strokes in our sample.
Our findings were in contrast to prior findings [5] emphasizing the importance of change from baseline of hemoglobin values in predicting postoperative complications. Similarly, a number of studies have identified the importance of intraoperative hemoglobin values, or extent of hemodilution, in predicting risk of major postoperative complications, including renal failure [10, 11]. One study demonstrated that patients maintained during CPB at a hematocrit of less than 24% had a greater likelihood of renal injury and failure, and the effects were even more severe with intraoperative transfusion and prolonged CPB [12]. Similarly, a study by Swaminathan and colleagues [13] concluded that lower intraoperative hematocrit levels might contribute to postoperative renal injury after cardiac operations.
Independent of the hemoglobin level, the number of pRBC transfused was associated with a higher risk of postoperative stroke. Determining the exact relationship between hemoglobin level and transfusion in the association with adverse outcomes is difficult. Most other studies assessing the role of transfusion during cardiac operations use transfusion as a surrogate for blood loss and thus identify adverse outcomes associated with transfusion [14, 15]. This may partially explain our results as well, but our finding that hemoglobin level is associated with stroke independent of transfusion amount suggests this is not the full nature of the relationship. Transfusions are associated with increased death after cardiac operations [16] and in nonsurgical populations [17]. Data are still lacking on the utility of pRBC transfusion in individuals with otherwise equivalent operative courses or hematocrit values.
The formal recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists include routine transfusion at a hemoglobin level below 7 g/dL [18]. When we analyzed this cutoff as a predictor for stroke, although the odds for stroke was increased among individuals with a hemoglobin level (either pre-CPB or post-CPB) below 7, it was nonsignificant based on small numbers of individuals with values in this range, probably because transfusing to a higher level is already part of standard practice.
In a small randomized trial of 54 coronary artery bypass grafting patients, in which individuals received transfusions to maintain a hematocrit above 25% vs 20%, no differences in clinical outcomes nor oxygen delivery were found [19]. In another study of 428 coronary artery bypass graft patients randomized to transfusion for goal hemoglobin exceeding 8 g/dL vs exceeding 9 g/dL, clinical outcomes and mortality did not differ between the groups [8].
Only one study to our knowledge, The Erythropoietin NeuroProtective Effect: Assessment in CABG Surgery trial, in which patients were given erythropoietin preoperatively rather than transfusions, suggested improved postoperative neurologic outcomes, with slightly lower rates of neurocognitive dysfunction at 2 months postoperatively, among those individuals given the study drug compared with placebo [20]. This is one of very few published studies showing that correction of a low hemoglobin level might actually reduce adverse postoperative outcomes. Johnson and colleagues randomized patients into two different blood transfusion groups, one "liberal" (goal hematocrit > 32%) and the other "conservative" (goal hematocrit > 25%), and found no difference in adverse outcomes between these two groups [21].
Our study has several limitations. Potential unmeasured confounders could have influenced our results. Low postoperative hemoglobin and higher transfusion requirements may both be markers of sicker patients or of more complex surgical courses. In addition, the low hemoglobin values could reflect a greater need for fluid resuscitation, as might occur for an individual undergoing hemodynamic instability, such as a drop in blood pressure, which could be associated with certain types of strokes [22]. The stroke patients also had longer CPB times, which are associated with more hemodilution and therefore lower hemoglobin values (although duration of CPB time was adjusted for in the multivariate analysis).
Another limitation is the definition of strokes. These were all defined clinically, and patients were only referred for a postoperative neurologic assessment if clinical symptoms suggested a neurologic complication. It is likely that our stroke ascertainment was not complete, and it is also possible that some of the controls actually had some neurologic injury or even undiagnosed stroke.
Because transfusion is such an important factor in any analysis of the association between hemoglobin level and stroke, any limitations in data pertaining to transfusion will limit our primary results. We only included analysis of transfusion during the procedure itself. This does not fully account for the whole time range of potential neurologic injury: the early postoperative period, when individuals are often unstable and experiencing bleeding complications in the recovery room or intensive care unit, is a likely time when transfusion might be related to postoperative stroke. In addition, more hemoglobin level fluctuations might take place beyond what is reflected in two values, one before and one after CPB. Further studies will need to examine these two aspects (transfusion and the range of hemoglobin levels) in more detail to elucidate this association.
Finally, our sample size was relatively modest, so we may not have had the power to detect associations between the preoperative hemoglobin or change in hemoglobin levels and stroke. Larger prospective studies including standardized neurologic assessment, as well as neuroimaging, would help address some of these concerns.
Despite these limitations, our study is strengthened by the matching of our controls. Owing to the large volume of cardiac operations done at our institution, we were able to match by specific procedure and year of procedure. In addition, the cardiac anesthesiologists record hemoglobin values before and after CPB. These values were directly recorded from the anesthesiologists' and perfusionists' paperwork to assure comparability. Our use of multivariate adjustment also accounts for many major confounders, minimizing the likelihood of bias accounting for the results.
In conclusion, our findings suggest that cardiac surgical patients with lower post-CPB hemoglobin values have a greater likelihood of postoperative stroke. Each percentage drop in post-CPB hemoglobin level was independently associated with higher odds of postoperative stroke, independent of transfusion requirements. Further studies are needed to determine whether interventions to raise postoperative hemoglobin levels could reduce stroke rates and whether similar relationships are present with other forms of neurologic injury. In addition, studies with an emphasis on neuroimaging to further elucidate the mechanism of the injury associated with lower hemoglobin levels are needed.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Loor, C. G. Koch, J. F. Sabik III, L. Li, and E. H. Blackstone Implications and management of anemia in cardiac surgery: Current state of knowledge J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2012; 144(3): 538 - 546. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Shander, M. Javidroozi, S. Ozawa, and G. M. T. Hare What is really dangerous: anaemia or transfusion? Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2011; 107(suppl_1): i41 - i59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ranucci Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2011; 91(4): 1118 - 1119. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |