|
|
||||||||
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
b Division of Surgical Oncology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
d Department of Pathology, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
c Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, Davis, California
Accepted for publication May 10, 2010.
* Address correspondence to Dr Cooke, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Ste 2117, Sacramento, CA 95817 (Email: david.cooke{at}ucdavis.ucdmc.edu).
Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-sixth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, Jan 25–27, 2010.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: This is a retrospective study querying the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database to identify 872 surgical patients diagnosed with ASC, 7888 with SC, and 12,601 with AC of the lung from 1998 to 2002. Analysis characterized clinical variables to determine patterns of presentation and compared survival among the above three histologic groups after lobectomy for stage I and II disease.
Results: ASC represented 4.1% of the 21,361 patients examined. ASC tended toward right side (56.9%) laterality and upper lobe (60.0%) location. Compared with AC, patients with ASC and SC were more likely to be male (p < 0.0001), and ASC patients had worse histologic grade (p< 0.0001). Survival after lobectomy for stage I and II disease was significantly reduced in ASC and SC compared with AC (p < 0.0001). ASC had a significantly increased hazard ratio of 1.35 and 1.27 relative to AC and SC, respectively. Other significant negative predictors of survival included tumor grade of III and IV, stage II, age, and black ethnicity.
Conclusions: This large review demonstrates that ASC is an uncommon tumor with distinct clinical behavior and worse prognosis than AC and SC. Further insight into the molecular profile of ASC is needed to determine the cause of its biologic aggressiveness.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Database
This is a retrospective cohort analysis using the SEER database. The SEER database is managed by the National Cancer Institute and is a compilation of deidentified data on cancer incidence and survival from cancer registries representing 26% of the United States population [6].
Search Criteria
The SEER database was queried for lung cancer patients diagnosed in the years 1998 to 2002. The site and morphology code was "Lung and Bronchus." Patients who were evaluated carried the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology-3 SEER site/histology codes 8070/3 Squamous cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified; 8140/3 Adenocarcinoma, not otherwise specified; or 8560/3 Adenosquamous carcinoma, and underwent directed surgical intervention.
For analysis of early-stage outcomes, study cohorts were limited to patients undergoing lobectomy for early-stage, node-negative disease and who did not receive radiotherapy. Information on neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is not available through the SEER database. For the purposes of this study, we defined early stage using the 7th edition of the T N M lung cancer classification as pathologic (p) T1-3 N0 M0 [7]. In our analysis, the lesions in patients with stage I were pT1a-T2b N0 M0, and stage II lesions were pT2b-T3 N0 M0. According to the 7th edition of the T N M lung cancer classification, tumors by size are T1a, 20 mm or less; T1b, 20 to 30 mm; T2a, 30 to 50 mm; T2b, 50 to 70 mm, and T3, exceeding 70 mm. We did not analyze T3 lesions that are characterized by chest wall invasion or multiple nodules in the same lobe, or stage II tumors that were T1a-T2b N1 M0.
Survival was based on cause of death "Lung and Bronchus" or "Alive." The last date of follow-up was December 2006, and the median follow-up time was 5 years for AC and SC and 4.9 years for ASC.
Statistical Analysis
Our analyses consisted of two parts. Patient and tumor descriptive characteristics were collected, including demographic variables (age, ethnicity, and gender) and clinical variables, such as anatomic tumor characteristics (laterality and location), histologic characteristics (size, grade, number of positive nodes), and number of primaries. Patients with 1 or more positive nodes were considered as having positive lymph nodes. Comparison among carcinomas groups were based on analysis of variance for continuous variables and
2 testing for categoric variables.
The second part of our analysis focused on survival among early stage AC, SC and ASC. Early-stage patient characteristics and clinical variables for each group were analyzed as described. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method for each carcinoma type, and the log-rank statistic was used for the comparison of overall differences in survival distributions. Cox regression analysis was used to obtain hazard ratios of death for AC, SC, and ASC, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, laterality, tumor location, size, and grade. We checked departure from the proportional hazard assumption using graphic methods based on Schoenfeld residuals vs time as well as testing procedure based inclusion of time-dependent covariates.
Unadjusted survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier curves) was based on all data (N = 6186), and results are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). For the adjusted Cox regression model analysis, 237 patients (3.8%) were excluded because of missing covariate data. To examine the sensitivity of our conclusions to this missing data, we used multiple imputation methods for missing data and the results were no difference. Therefore, we presented results without imputation of missing data (N = 5949). Analyses were performed using SAS 9.1 software (SAS, Cary, NC). Results were considered statistically significant at p
0.05.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Early-Stage Patient Characteristics
We identified 5309 patients who underwent lobectomy for early-stage disease: 3223 patients (60.7%) had AC (stage I, 2958 patients; stage II, 265 patients), 1862 patients (35.1%) had SC (stage I, 1551 patients; stage II, 311 patients), and 224 patients (4.2%) had ASC (stage I, 192 patients; stage II, 32 patients). Tables 3 and 4
summarize the patient characteristics as well as tumor anatomic and histologic characteristics. The data mirrored the results for combined-stages data. Patients with SC were older than patients with AC and ASC (p < 0.0001), and fewer ASC patients were of white ethnicity than SC and AC patients (p < 0.0001).
|
|
Survival in Patients Undergoing Lobectomy for Early-Stage (I and II) Disease
Overall survival was significantly reduced in both ASC and SC compared with AC (p < 0.0001). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for combined stage I and II for the three groups (Fig 2A) indicated that ASC had the least favorable relative survival. The 5-year survival rates were 71.7% (95% CI, 70.9% to 72.6%) for AC, 66.1% (95% CI, 65.0% to 67.2%) for SC, and 59.4% (95% CI, 55.8% to 62.9%) for ASC (Fig 2A). Kaplan-Meier survival curves for stage I tumors (Fig 2B) also indicates that ASC has the least favorable survival. Five-year survival rates are 73.2% (95% CI, 71.5% to 75.0%) for AC, 69.2% (95% CI, 66.7% to 72.6%) for SC, and 62.0% (95% CI, 54.7% to 69.4%) for ASC (Fig 2B). For stage II, 5-year survival rates are 55.5% (95% CI, 49.1% to 61.9%) for AC, 50.8% (95% CI, 44.0% to 56.7%) for SC, and 41.5% (95% CI, 20.7 to 62.3%) for ASC (Fig 2C). Although ASC stage II tumors showed a trend toward worse survival, there was no statistical difference between the three groups (p = 0.11; Fig 2C). The observed survival was improved in the combined early-stage SC relative to ASC, but the difference in this unadjusted survival was not statistically significant (p = 0.187), potentially due to important confounders. Therefore, we next examined the relative survival among the three groups adjusted for important confounders.
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In regards to the more aggressive clinical and pathologic characteristics of ASC, Ruffini and colleagues [2] evaluated 1158 European patients who underwent resection for lung cancer. They found 33 patients (2.8%) with ASC. The ASC group presented with worse histologic grade, more advanced stage, and had a 3-year all-stage survival rate of 28% compared with 46% for patients with single histology. Gawrychowski and colleagues [4] examined data for 96 patients undergoing resection for ASC of the lung. The investigators found that the cumulative postoperative survival rates for patients with ASC at 5 and 10 years were 25.4% and 19.2%, compared with 42.5% and 39.1%, respectively, for a contemporaneous cohort of patients with AC. Nakagawa and colleagues [5] reviewed outcomes in 30 patients undergoing resection for ASC. The cumulative survival rate for patients with ASC and pathologic stages IA to IIB in their study population was similar to that of patients with stage IIIA AC or SC.
Similar to these studies, our analysis showed that patients with ASC presented with higher-grade tumors (grade III and IV) and an incidence of nodal-positive disease higher than SC, although lower than AC. Anatomic location and laterality for ASC were similar to AC and SC. The average size of ASC tumors was smaller than SC tumors but larger than AC tumors. In addition, our analysis found that ASC tumors carried a poorer prognosis than AC and SC. For combined early-stage disease, patients with ASC exhibited significantly reduced 5-year survival compared with AC and SC, and ASC was a significant risk factor for death compared with SC and AC after controlling for other available variables.
Although this study confirms the more aggressive clinical and pathologic characteristics of ASC compared with AC and SC, it does not explain why the tumor histology of ASC is more virulent. In our analysis, fewer ASC patients are of white ethnicity compared with AC and SC patients (p < 0.001). This suggests the potential of a genetic or other molecular etiology for the aggressive clinical and pathologic presentation of ASC.
Some groups have identified identical epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) abnormalities in ASC tumors that have been described in primary lung AC of Asian, female never-smokers [8–10]. Ohtsuka and colleagues [8] found EGFR tyrosine kinase-domain gene mutations in 2 of 4 patients with ASC, and in 0 of 24 patients with SC. Kang and colleagues [9] found identical EGFR mutations in both the AC and SC components of ASC tumors. The frequency of these EGFR mutations was similar to lung tumors in Asian patients with pure AC.
In our study, the subset analysis of the clinical variable "other" ethnicity demonstrated the ASC cohort had a higher percentage of Asian/Pacific Islander patients (6.42%) compared with AC (5.60%) and SC (3.85%) cohorts (data not shown). However, further investigative studies are needed to confirm that EGFR mutations are the etiology of the aggressive clinical and pathologic characteristics of ASC. In addition, multiple social confounders may complicate the use of information from a large national database to attribute ethnic predilection of tumors to genetic factors. As previous groups have reported, potential socioeconomic health care disparities lead to unequal access to surgical therapy. This may mean that the result of ASC patients more likely being nonwhite, and black ethnicity patients having poorer survival, could have less to do with the genetics of the disease process, but because fewer nonwhites are undergoing surgical resection, or if they are, then at a higher stage, therefore confounding the results [11, 12].
This large review evaluated the clinical and pathologic characteristics of ASC. Our study demonstrates that ASC is an uncommon tumor and confirms that ASC exhibits distinct clinical behavior and carries a poorer prognosis than AC and SC. The decreased survival of patients with early-stage ASC compared with single histology AC and SC suggests a role of clinical trials for adjuvant chemotherapy or targeted molecular therapy, or both, for patients with early-stage ASC.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
ski K, Malinowski E, Papla B. Prognosis and survival after radical resection of primary adenosquamous lung carcinoma Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:686-692.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Poullis, J. McShane, M. Shaw, M. Shackcloth, R. Page, N. Mediratta, and J. Gosney Smoking status at diagnosis and histology type as determinants of long-term outcomes of lung cancer patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2013; 43(5): 919 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Mordant, B. Grand, A. Cazes, C. Foucault, A. Dujon, F. Le Pimpec Barthes, and M. Riquet Adenosquamous Carcinoma of the Lung: Surgical Management, Pathologic Characteristics, and Prognostic Implications Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2013; 95(4): 1189 - 1195. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Maeda, A. Matsumura, T. Kawabata, T. Suito, O. Kawashima, T. Watanabe, K. Okabayashi, I. Kubota, and for the Japan National Hospital Organization Study Adenosquamous carcinoma of the lung: surgical results as compared with squamous cell and adenocarcinoma cases Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, February 1, 2012; 41(2): 357 - 361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |