ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1487-1488. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.001
© 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Anthony P. Furnary
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrowRelated Article


Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Invited Commentary

Anthony P. Furnary, MD

Starr-Wood Cardiac Group, Providence St. Vincent Hospital, 9155 SW Barnes Rd, Ste 240, Portland, OR 97225

(Email: tfurnary{at}starrwood.com).

Diabetes is one of the most important and prevalent comorbidities cardiac surgeons face in their patients. At 31%, diabetes ranks as the fourth most common disease state in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database, falling in rank order only behind coronary artery disease (73%), dyslipidemia (69%), and hypertension (68%) [1]. Most cardiac surgical patients with diabetes have type II or adult-onset, insulin-resistant diabetes, which develops slowly over the years with gradually rising glucose levels over time. The diagnosis of type II diabetes has traditionally required the observation of elevated glucose levels that rise above a specified point that denotes pathologic glucose concentrations—those that cause a significant increase in microvascular complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy.

However, because it is chronic hyperglycemia that induces the diabetes-specific pathologic microvascular complications that are correlated with its diagnosis and stratification, it follows that a simple marker of long-term glycemic exposure, such as hemoglobin (Hb) A1c, should be sufficient to definitively diagnose the presence of diabetes and grade its severity. Several studies have shown that the optimal cut point for detecting moderate retinopathy and other microvascular complications is an HbA1c value of 6.5%.

As such, the American Diabetes Association recently declared that the diagnosis of diabetes is definitively made if the HbA1c is greater than 6.5% [2]. Patients with an A1c between 6.0% and 6.5% should be considered at risk for developing diabetes, and preventative measures should be undertaken in patients with these values. It has further recommended that the terms previously used to describe subdiabetic glycemia—impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, prediabetes, and borderline diabetes—be phased out of use as clinical diagnostic states in favor of simple HbA1c measurements (Table 1).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Glycemic Metrics: Thresholds for Diabetes-Related Diagnoses
 
This article by Tekumit and colleagues [3] confirms this near-definitive relationship between HbA1c exceeding 6.0% and the diagnosis of diabetes in the cardiac surgery population. But why should this all matter to us? Well, it turns out that it matters for in-hospital care as well as for follow-up care. By now we all (hopefully) know that at least 3 postoperative days of tight glycemic control with intravenous insulin infusions minimizes adverse outcomes such as death, renal failure, infections, and length of stay in diabetic patients undergoing cardiac operations [4]. Therefore, measurements of HbA1c levels should be ordered preoperatively on all patients admitted for open heart operations.

Those patients who do not carry the diagnosis of diabetes on admission, but have a high preoperative predictive probability of having newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus (fasting plasma glucose level > 126 mg/dL or an HbA1c > 6.0%) should be aggressively treated in the hospital the same as those who are admitted with the diagnosis of diabetes—with tight glycemic control for 3 full postoperative days. These patients should be referred to an endocrinologist or an astute primary care physician for glycemic testing, education, and management after discharge.

Those who have HbA1c values of 6.5% or higher should be told that they have diabetes and properly educated about the disease before leaving the hospital. Those patients who do not meet the diabetes threshold of 6.5%, but have elevated HbA1c levels of between 6.0% and 6.5% should receive preventative education and be placed on demonstratively effective therapeutic interventions after discharge designed to stop or delay the progression of their disease to frank diabetes. Those with HbA1c levels between 5.5% and 6.0% should be educated about their risks of progression to diabetes [2]. Open heart surgical patients who do not have diabetes (HbA1c < 5.5%) do not need to have their glucose levels managed or monitored after discharge.

The importance of this study, and the American Diabetes Association expert committee report on the role of HbA1c, is that they help us rapidly determine what to do, both in the hospital and after discharge, when hyperglycemia develops in patients who present for heart operations without the diagnosis of diabetes. It is important to our patients with diabetes, and impending diabetes, that we not ignore this important disease state. We should therefore manage dysglycemia with the same voracity as we currently manage hypertension and hypercholesterolemia after cardiac operations.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database Executive summary, fall 2005http://www.sts.org/documents/pdf/STS-ExecutiveSummaryFall2005.pdf.
  2. International Expert Committee International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes Diabetes Care 2009;32:1327-1334.[Free Full Text]
  3. Tekumit H, Cenal AR, Polat A, Uzun K, Tataroglu C, Akinci E. Diagnostic value of hemoglobin A1c and fasting plasma glucose levels in coronary artery bypass grafting patients with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:1482-1488.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Society of Thoracic Surgeons Blood Glucose Guideline Task Force The Society of Thoracic Surgeons practice guideline series: blood glucose management during adult cardiac surgery Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:663-669.[Free Full Text]

Related Article

Diagnostic Value of Hemoglobin A1c and Fasting Plasma Glucose Levels in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients With Undiagnosed Diabetes Mellitus
Hayrettin Tekumit, Ali Riza Cenal, Adil Polat, Kemal Uzun, Cenk Tataroglu, and Esat Akinci
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010 89: 1482-1487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Anthony P. Furnary
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Furnary, A. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS