|
|
||||||||
a Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
b Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
c The Cardiac Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Accepted for publication October 23, 2009.
* Address correspondence to Dr Seliem, Division of Cardiology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th St & Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104 (Email: seliem{at}email.chop.edu).
| PEDIATRIC CARDIAC SURGERY:
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery CME Program is located online at http://cme.ctsnetjournals.org. To take the CME activity related to this article, you must have either an STS member or an individual non-member subscription to the journal.
|
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Retrospective review of IOTEE reports of 690 consecutive patients with VSD (isolated or part of a complex lesion) was undertaken. Those were compared with transthoracic echocardiographic reports of these patients before their discharge from the hospital, and the most recent transthoracic echocardiographic examination. Positive and negative predictive values, sensitivity, and specificity of such diagnoses were then calculated from predischarge and from follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic data.
Results: There were 260 of 690 patients with a residual VSD on IOTEE; 24 required repeat cardiopulmonary bypass for complete closure. There were 573 patients with predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examination; 296 had residual VSDs (125 not detected by IOTEE), and 13 defects required reoperation during the same hospitalization, 5 of which were detected by IOTEE. The positive and negative predictive values were 78% and 65%, respectively. Follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examination of 383 local patients showed residual VSD in 57 (37 not detected by IOTEE), with positive and negative predictive values of 15% and 83%, respectively.
Conclusions: Although IOTEE is sensitive enough to detect residual VSD shunts in many patients (37% of this cohort), the majority of these defects are trivial and resolve spontaneously, with a positive predictive value of only 15% on follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examination and a rare need for reoperation.
Transesophageal echocardiographic imaging is currently a standard modality for intraoperative monitoring of infants and children during repair of congenital heart disease [1–5]. This is especially rewarding during repair of specific lesions including septal defects and atrioventricular and semilunar valves.
Many residual defects or findings on the intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (IOTEE) change significantly on the subsequent transthoracic echocardiographic imaging with changing hemodynamic status of the patients from intraoperative to predischarge and then to a stable ambulatory status.
The temporal history of these residual findings in septal defects is not well documented in a large cohort of patients with these defects whether isolated or as a part of more complex lesions, especially with regard to the need for reoperation or bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis. Delineation of such temporal history was the main purpose for that retrospective analysis of these patients.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study was approved by our institutional review board. The patients' echocardiographic reports were anonymously reviewed.
Echocardiographic Examinations
All IOTEE and subsequent transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were performed using Phillips Sonos 5500, 7500, and IE 33 ultrasound systems (Phillips, Andover, MA). The biplane and multiplane pediatric transesophageal transducers were used with the former mostly used in patients who weigh less than 5 kg. All echocardiographic reports were part of each patient cardiology file. Predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were available in 573 patients and performed at a mean of 6.7 postoperative days (median, 5; standard deviation, 4.8; range, 1 to 27 days). Remote follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were available in 383 patients and performed at a mean of 3.2 years (median, 2.8; standard deviation, 1.7; range, 0.8 to 7 years). A residual VSD was considered small if it is described as "tiny," "trivial," or "small," or has a color flow jet of 1 to 2 mm in width as measured on the left ventricular septal side. A moderate defect would be described as such or measured 3 to 5 mm in diameter of color flow jet width, whereas a large defect was any defect measuring equal to or more than 5 mm of color jet width or by the intraoperative estimate of pulmonary to systemic blood flow ratio by oximetry.
Statistical Analysis
Positive and negative predictive values were calculated from the data available on the IOTEE, predischarge, and late follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Patients who had a residual VSD detected on the IOTEE that was still present on their predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations are considered true positives, those with a VSD on the IOTEE and no VSD on the transthoracic echocardiographic examinations are the false positives, those with no VSD on the IOTEE and no VSD on the transthoracic echocardiographic examinations are the true negatives, those with no VSD on the IOTEE and a VSD on the transthoracic echocardiographic examinations are the false negatives. The same was applied between the transthoracic echocardiographic examinations studies done on predischarge and remote outpatient studies, ie, patients who had a VSD detected on the predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations that was still present on their remote follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations are considered true positives, and so on. The following variable were calculated: positive predictive value = true positive/(true positive + false positive); negative predictive value = true negative/(true negative + false negative); sensitivity = true positive/(true positive + false negative); and specificity = true negative/(true negative + false positive). All patients who did not have a predischarge or a late follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations, ie, a study at all three periods, were not considered for such calculations.
Comparison between the different anatomic subgroups was performed using the
2 analysis, with a probability value of less than 0.05 being significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Remote follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations as an outpatient procedure was available in 383 patients (Fig 2C). This detected a residual VSD in 57 patients (15%), of whom 20 patients were detected on the IOTEE, and 5 of them required reoperation for the same defect (5 of 383; 1.3%). With these follow-up data on the 383 patients, the positive predictive value decreased to 15% and the negative predictive value increased to 83, with sensitivity and specificity of 35% and 65%, respectively.
For further evaluation of the effect of the size of the residual VSD, as determined by the IOTEE, on the long-term temporal course, the records of the 260 patients with residual VSD were examined in more detail. There were 210 patients with a small VSD, of which 134 were still seen on the predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations (positive predictive value, 63%), and only 16 were still seen on long-term follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations (positive predictive value, 12%). Forty-two patients had a moderate size VSD on their IOTEE, of which 33 were still seen on the predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations (positive predictive value, 88%), and only 3 were still seen on long-term follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations (positive predictive value, 10%). Eight patients had a large VSD on their IOTEE, of which 4 were still seen on the predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations (positive predictive value, 50%), and only 1 was still seen on long-term follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examination (positive predictive value, 25%).
The incidence of a residual shunt at the VSD repair site was not different on IOTEE among these anatomic types except in the muscular group in which the incidence was higher (12 of 20; 60%).
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The main objective of this study is to longitudinally follow up on the fate of residual shunts detected at the site of a repaired VSD in a large cohort of patients, and to determine the predictive values of the IOTEE on long-term follow-up of these patients. These data will be important in counseling the patients' families about these residual shunts, in addition to determining the need for bacterial endocarditic prophylaxis in light of the new American Heart/American College recommendations.
The detection of a residual shunt after the cardiac repair is fairly common, occurring in 37% of all patients on the intraoperative IOTEE (Fig 2A). However, on longitudinal follow-up of these patients, predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations were available in 573 patients and a residual defect was still detected in 296 patients or 52%, of which there were 125 patients whose residual defects were not detected by the intraoperative IOTEE (Fig 2B). These data are more or less similar to those reported by Yang and colleagues [6], with an incidence of a residual VSD on IOTEE in 33% of patients, two thirds of whose defects disappeared on predischarge transthoracic echocardiographic examinations. Of almost 200 patients who had no VSD on intraoperative IOTEE, 15 were found to have a small, hemodynamically insignificant VSD on remote outpatient follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examination (approximately 8%).
Several factors might have contributed to missing these defects in 125 patients, including hemodynamic factors (eg, tachycardia and hypovolemia after coming off cardiopulmonary bypass, masking a small defect by turbulence caused by many indwelling cannulas, sutures, or patch material), the duration given to the examiner to complete the echocardiographic examination, the experience of the examiner, and so forth. The discrepancy between the findings of the intraoperative IOTEE and the follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations has been reported by other groups. Khatami and associatesl [7] reported residual VSD findings in 21% in the IOTEE, which increased to 36% as detected by transthoracic echocardiographic examinations before discharge from the hospital, and dropped to approximately 10% on long-term outpatient follow-up. All small residual VSDs did not require any intervention, and spontaneous closure was not different among different diagnoses. Other groups reported an incidence of 6% to 8% on long-term follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examinations [8, 9]. On the other hand, our findings were not affected by the number of patients who required reoperation during the same hospitalization as we used the predischarge and remote transthoracic echocardiographic examinations for calculation of the predictive values.
Among different anatomic subtypes, the incidence of a residual shunt was higher only with muscular VSD owing to the difficulty of finding these defects intraoperatively and eliminating the shunt totally. A special type of these residual VSDs detected either by IOTEE or transthoracic echocardiographic examination is the so-called intramural residual VSD (Fig 3), which usually occurs after repair of conotruncal defects, and may be missed during the IOTEE [10].
|
The majority of the residual VSDs detected on the IOTEE were considered small (210 of 260; 81%), although moderate (42 patients; 16%) and large defects (8 patients; 3%) were uncommon. The predictive valve for the small and moderate residual defects (97% of all cases) was not different from that of the entire group (12% and 10%, respectively), whereas that for the large defects was higher (25%).
Furthermore, among the patients who required reoperation for their VSD after discharge (n = 5), 4 were considered small on the IOTEE and 1 was large, whereas on the latest transthoracic echocardiographic examination, 4 were found to be moderate and remained large. These numbers, however, were too small to draw meaningful statistical significance within the entire group.
In conclusion, the detection of a residual shunt at the repaired VSD site carries a positive predictive value of only 15%, regardless of the type of the VSD, in the long run, assuming that such a shunt was considered hemodynamically insignificant either intraoperatively or before discharge from the hospital. Such residual defects need surgical intervention only rarely, and probably do not require bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis as long as the patient observes good dental hygiene [11].
In terms of limitations, this study was a retrospective review with all inherent deficiencies of such studies. Echocardiographic examinations were not available in all 690 patients, with approximately 17% missing a study at discharge, and only 44% had a study at all three periods (IOTEE, predischarge, and remote transthoracic echocardiographic examinations). This was mostly related to the referral nature of these patients who did not have their remote follow-up at our institution. Although statistical calculations used in this cohort excluded all these patients, the numbers of the remaining patients at all three periods were large enough for the required statistical power.
The examiner who performed the IOTEE was not necessary the same one who performed the transthoracic echocardiographic examination later on, which may raise a concern regarding interobserver variability. However, the majority of these patients was followed up at our institution and underwent several studies during that follow-up period, which confirmed these findings. The same argument, ie, redundancy of the follow-up echocardiographic examinations, also applies to the fact that the study involved review of the echocardiographic reports and not actual review of the images on each patient.
Although we used the term false positive on those cases in which a VSD was detected on the IOTEE and not on the follow-up transthoracic echocardiographic examination, it should be realized that it is possible that these cases did have a trivial prepatch shunting that was seen on the IOTEE and disappeared before discharge and thus was not detected by the transthoracic echocardiographic examination. This classification, however, seems appropriate for the sake of discussing the significance of such findings during the operative procedure.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Motta and W. C. Miller-Hance Transesophageal Echocardiography in Tetralogy of Fallot Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, June 1, 2012; 16(2): 70 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. P. Bichell Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2010; 89(4): 1237 - 1238. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |