Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:427-428. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.12.010
© 2010 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Original Articles: Adult Cardiac
Invited Commentary
Linda Shore-Lesserson, MD
Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, 111 E 210 St, Bronx, NY 10467
(Email: lshore{at}montefiore.org).
Paparella and colleagues [1] have found no differences in coagulation indices when comparing two different heparin doses in off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) operations. It is interesting that the authors have chosen to pursue this question in OPCAB patients, for we do not even know the answer to this question in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), where contact activation and inflammation are at a maximum. The effects of inadequate doses [2] or excessive doses [3] of heparin in the setting of coated surfaces [4] are likely to have greater consequences in CPB than in OPCAB patients. The literature confirms that practice varies greatly and depends on institutional preferences rather than evidence-based medicine.
Studies have shown that OPCAB patients have less activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis than CPB patients, despite lower doses of heparin [5]. Coagulation is still activated but occurs later in the postoperative period, which is not measured in the current study [6, 7]. Paparella and colleagues' thrombin-activatable fibrinolytic inhibitor (TAFI) data support that coagulation activation occurs and is not affected by the heparin dose. This finding repeats itself throughout the literature: Thrombin inhibition must be achieved to minimize activation of cascades, and thrombin inhibition is not complete with heparin alone. Anticoagulation with the direct thrombin inhibitors has proven more complete and perhaps more protective against ischemic events [8, 9].
Surveys reveal a full range of heparin and protamine management strategies in OPCAB [10, 11]. Although the current study is small, it seems unlikely that OPCAB outcomes will be related to a consistent heparin dosing strategy. We may be barking up the wrong tree in trying to identify an optimal anticoagulation protocol using heparin as the anticoagulant. Because of the incomplete inhibition of thrombin rendered by heparin, it may be more productive to study the direct thrombin inhibitors or combination therapy for more maximal suppression of thrombin activation. This is not an insignificant goal, because the long-term patency [12] of OPCAB vein grafts is still not fully elucidated.
 |
References
|
|---|
- Paparella D, Semeraro F, Scrascia G, et al. Coagulation-fibrinolysis changes during off-pump bypass: effect of two heparin doses Ann Thorac Surg 2010;89:421-428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Despotis GJ, Joist JH, Hogue Jr CW, et al. More effective suppression of hemostatic system activation in patients undergoing cardiac surgery by heparin dosing based on heparin blood concentrations rather than ACT Thromb Haemost 1996;76:902-908.[Medline]
- Gravlee GP, Haddon WS, Rothberger HK, et al. Heparin dosing and monitoring for cardiopulmonary bypass. A comparison of techniques with measurement of subclinical plasma coagulation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:518-527.[Abstract]
- Aldea GS, O'Gara P, Shapira OM, et al. Effect of anticoagulation protocol on outcome in patients undergoing CABG with heparin-bonded cardiopulmonary bypass circuits Ann Thorac Surg 1998;65:425-433.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Englberger L, Immer FF, Eckstein FS, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass operation does not increase procoagulant and fibrinolytic activity: preliminary results Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1560-1566.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Tanaka KA, Thourani VH, Williams WH, et al. Heparin anticoagulation in patients undergoing off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery J Anesth 2007;21:297-303.[Medline]
- Lo B, Fijnheer R, Castigliego D, et al. Activation of hemostasis after coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass Anesth Analg 2004;99:634-640.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Merry AF, Raudkivi PJ, Middleton NG, et al. Bivalirudin versus heparin and protamine in off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:925-931discussion 931.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Singh S, Molnar J, Arora R. Efficacy and safety of bivalirudin versus heparins in reduction of cardiac outcomes in acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary interventions J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2007;12:283-291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Englberger L, Streich M, Tevaearai H, Carrel TP. Different anticoagulation strategies in off-pump coronary artery bypass operations: a European survey Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2008;7:378-382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
- Hansen KH, Hughes P, Steinbruchel DA. Antithrombotic- and anticoagulation regimens in OPCAB surgery. A Nordic survey. Scand Cardiovasc J 2005;39:369-374.[Medline]
- Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery N Engl J Med 2009;361:1827-1837.[Medline]
Related Article
-
Coagulation-Fibrinolysis Changes During Off-Pump Bypass: Effect of Two Heparin Doses
- Domenico Paparella, Fabrizio Semeraro, Giuseppe Scrascia, Antonella Galeone, Concetta T. Ammollo, Giorgios Kounakis, Luigi de Luca Tupputi Schinosa, Nicola Semeraro, and Mario Colucci
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2010 89: 421-427.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]