ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1871-1876. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.074
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Giovanni Mariscalco
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Is Associated With Late Mortality After Coronary Surgery, but Not After Valvular Surgery

Giovanni Mariscalco, MD, PhDa,b,*, Karl Gunnar Engström, MD, PhDb

a Department of Surgical Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Unit, Varese University Hospital, Varese, Italy
b Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Heart Center, Cardiothoracic Division, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden

Accepted for publication July 23, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr Mariscalco, Department of Surgical Sciences, Cardiac Surgery Division, Varese University Hospital, University of Insubria, Viale Guicciardini, 7, Varese, I-21100, Italy (Email: giovannimariscalco{at}yahoo.it).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 
Background: Numerous studies have attempted to determine the etiology and prophylactic measures concerning atrial fibrillation (AF) after cardiac surgery. However, limited data are available analyzing the association between postoperative AF and late mortality. We sought to determine if AF after cardiac surgery affects postoperative survival.

Methods: All cardiac surgery patients (n = 9,495) undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1994 and December 2004 were studied. The study population comprised coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG [n = 7,621]), valvular surgeries (n = 995), and their combination (n = 879). Patients affected by postoperative AF were identified, and long-term survival was obtained from Swedish population registry and evaluated using Cox proportional hazards methods to adjust for baseline differences.

Results: The overall AF incidence was 26.7%, subdivided into 22.9%, 39.8%, and 45.2% for CABG, valve surgery, and combined procedures, respectively. The median follow-up for the entire study population was 7.9 years (maximum, 13.4). Postoperative AF independently affected long-term survival in CABG patients (hazard ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval: 1.08 to 1.37). For isolated valvular surgery or combined procedures, AF was not significantly associated with long-term survival (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval: 0.92 to 1.58; and hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval: 0.90 to 1.46, respectively).

Conclusions: Postoperative AF increases late mortality after isolated CABG surgery only. This finding was not statistically confirmed after isolated or combined valvular procedures. Our results draw the attention to possible AF recurrence after hospital discharge, indicating a strict postoperative surveillance.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common complication after cardiac surgery, with little change over the past 2 decades [1–6]. Postoperative AF increases hospital morbidity and mortality and has significant adverse effects on patient recovery [2–8]. The lengthening of hospital stay and the consequent burden caused by the occurrence of postoperative AF has led an extensive scrutiny of predisposing factor and preventive strategies [1, 2, 4]. Although the potential mechanisms and effects of AF have been excessively studied, there is scattered knowledge in support of an independent association between postoperative AF and late mortality. Therefore, determining the effects of AF after cardiac surgery on long-term survival is the objective of the present study.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 
Patient Population
A retrospective cohort design was used in which all patients undergoing cardiac surgery between January 1994 and December 2004 were identified using the computerized database at the Heart Center, Cardiothoracic Surgery Department, of Umeå University Hospital, Sweden. Patients scheduled for isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG), valvular surgery, or combined procedures were enrolled into the study. Valve procedures included aortic and mitral surgery, regardless of methods or duality. The database captured 100% of cardiac surgeries performed at this institution and remained consistent over the study period for the considered variables. All data were prospectively collected. Patients were eligible if they were in sinus rhythm before surgery. Elective, urgent or emergency procedures as well as reoperations were all included. Exclusion criteria were the presence of a pacemaker device, mortality in the operating room, or operations performed without cardiopulmonary bypass. The final study population included 9,495 patients, with an average age of 66.2 ± 9.5 years and contained 73.2% men. The study protocol was in accordance with the local Ethical Committee laws, and patient consent was waived.

Patient Management and Data Collection
Preoperative management, anesthetic, and surgical techniques were standardized for all patients and have been reported previously [5]. At the end of surgery, patients were transferred to an intensive care unit and managed according to the unit protocols [5, 6]. Atrial fibrillation management and definition were considered as previously described [5]. Briefly, the AF definition included arrhythmia successfully treated as well as that persistent at discharge. The arrhythmia, as defined by physician assessment, was always on the basis of a telemetry strip or from a 12-lead electrocardiogram recording. Patients were monitored by continuous electrocardiography during a minimum period of 48 hours postoperatively. Subsequently, the monitoring was by repeated daily observations by nurses and physicians, at least every 8 hours. In addition, during the study period, specific prophylaxis (beta-blockers, amiodarone, or sotalol) against AF were not adopted. Some of the extracted variables are summarized in the Appendix Table and their definitions have been previously reported and are in accordance with the recent guidelines (Tables 1 and 2) Go [5, 6]. Follow-up data on all-cause mortality were collected from the Swedish population registry, using the 10-digit national identification number. Patients of foreign nationality without traceable identity code and survival status were omitted (n = 6). Survival follow-up was closed on May 31, 2007.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Univariable Analysis With Reference to Preoperative, Intraoperative, and Postoperative Variables Between Patients Affected by Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation (AF) and Patients Without AF
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Multivariable Predictors of Mortality for Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Multivariable Predictors of Late Mortality for Patients Undergoing Isolated or Combined Valve Procedures
 
Statistical Analysis
Extracted database variables were tabulated using Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was computed using SPSS, release 13.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL). Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests were performed for the mortality rate comparison. Hazard ratios (HR) were generated by a Cox regression analysis. All univariable Cox predictors with a p value less than 0.15 were tested in multivariable mode. A stepwise approach was used and confirmed by backward and forward methods. Possible interactions among variables were considered in the models. A p value of 0.05 or less was considered significant.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 
In-Hospital Outcome
Of 9,495 enrolled patients, 7,621 underwent isolated CABG, 995 had isolated valve surgery, and 879 underwent simultaneous coronary and valve surgery. General demographic and operative data are listed in the Appendix with the univariable analysis concerning the main significant variables.

The overall incidence of postoperative AF was 26.7%, subdivided into 22.9%, 39.8%, and 45.2% for CABG, valve surgery, and combined procedures, respectively. Patients with AF had a longer hospital stay as compared with patients without the arrhythmia (11.9 ± 5.9 versus 9.8 ± 3.8 days, p < 0.001). For all patients considered collectively, hospital mortality was 0.7%, ranging from 0.5% for CABG patients and 0.4% for valve patients, to 2.0% for patients undergoing combined procedures.

Long-Term Outcome
Follow-up was completed for all 9,432 discharged patients, with a mean follow-up time of 7.9 ± 3.3 years (maximum 13.4). For all three analyzed groups, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a reduced survival for patients affected by AF with respect to patients without this complication (Fig 1). In particular for the CABG group, those patients not affected by AF had a 1-, 5-, and 10-year overall survival of 98%, 92%, and 78%, respectively, which compared with 96%, 87%, and 67% for patients with the arrhythmia (p < 0.001). In contrast, for patients exposed to valve procedures, the survival was modestly affected by AF in the early postoperative years (Fig 1). In multivariable analysis, AF independently affected long-term survival in the CABG group only (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.37). For isolated valve surgery or combined procedures AF did not have an independent effect on the long-term survival (HR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.92 to 1.58; and HR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.46, respectively). Independent predictors for late mortality in all three groups of surgeries are depicted in Tables 1 and 2. The analysis did not reveal an overall survival differences against time (e.g., the year when the procedure was conducted), and further, possible interactions (AF*age, AF*year of operation, AF and other preoperative variables) were also tested, without significant effects (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (6K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. The Kaplan-Meier actuarial survival curves for patients undergoing (A) isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, (B), isolated valvular procedures, and (C) combined operations. Data under the curves represent patients at risk. (AF = atrial fibrillation.)

 

    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 
Despite ongoing efforts to decrease its occurrence, AF remains the most frequent complication of cardiac surgery [1, 2, 7, 9, 11]. Postoperative AF occurs in 16% to 33% of the patients undergoing CABG and in more than 40% after valvular surgery [1, 2–10]. Because the impact of this arrhythmia on hospital resources is substantial, studies examining AF predictors and different prophylactic interventions exist in substantial numbers. Until recently, the prevailing opinion was that postoperative AF is transient and its clinical effect mostly benign [1, 12]. However, few data are available regarding the impact of postoperative AF on late mortality [3, 8–10]. Based on a maximum follow-up period of 13 years, our study showed that postoperative AF is associated with a decreased long-term survival after CABG operations, but not after isolated or combined valve surgery.

Almassi and coworkers [9] first observed a decreased 6-month survival for cardiac surgery patients affected by postoperative AF compared with patients without it (9.4% versus 4.2%, respectively). Similar data were subsequently confirmed by other studies analyzing patients undergoing isolated CABG [3, 8, 10, 12]; postoperative AF was an age-independent predictor for late mortality, with a 20% to 50% increased risk for death for patients affected by this arrhythmia [3, 8, 10, 12]. However, in the study of Mahoney and coworkers [8], AF had no effect on long-term survival (5-year mortality] in patients exposed to valve replacement or combination procedures with CABG. Accordingly, our study confirmed the negative survival AF effect for CABG patients. Of particular interest, in our study, the independent explanatory effect of AF was significant only in the long-term perspective. In the early period, AF was confounded by other factors, which possibly illustrate a dynamic influence on the survival after CABG surgery. However, the association between postoperative AF and late mortality in valve surgery patients was not observed in our study.

The possible mechanisms by which postoperative AF is associated with late mortality are different and complex. Despite attempts to account for confounding mechanisms, it remains distinctly possible that AF is associated with mortality because it occurs in patients with a more severe profile of comorbidities [13]. Many of the independent risk factors of AF also predict long-term mortality [5, 9, 10]. Therefore, distinguishing the intrinsic hazards in response to AF from its coexisting factors of AF etiology is a complex problem [13]. In our series of univariate analyses or with Kaplan-Meier method, AF occurrence in patients exposed to isolated or combined valve procedures revealed significantly increased mortality rates compared with patients without the arrhythmia. It is important to emphasize that this difference developed in the long-term perspective, whereas during the early postoperative years AF had no survival influence at all for patients undergoing isolated valve surgery. However, for valve patients, the survival effect of postoperative AF was not confirmed with multivariable Cox approach, suggesting that AF is a mirror of severe comorbidities exemplified by aging, diabetes mellitus, impaired ventricular function, and renal failure. This effect was in contrast to patients exposed to CABG surgery, among whom the predictive power of AF persisted after statistical adjustment for confounding variables through the Cox multivariable analysis.

Plausible mechanisms supporting a direct effect of postoperative AF include heart failure and the potential AF recurrence with attendant thromboembolic sequelae. Both animal and human studies have demonstrated that AF with rapid ventricular response can predispose to ventricular dilation and cardiac output reduction by the abolished atrial systolic contribution [14]. Moreover, AF promotes impaired hemodynamics from a reduced ventricular filling as well as a circulatory stasis in the left atrium, mechanisms that render patients susceptible to stroke and embolic events [15, 16]. In addition, the reduced cardiac output and impaired cerebral circulation predispose for noncardioembolic stroke [17]. As a matter of fact, recent studies corroborate the association between postoperative AF and late mortality because of stroke and heart failure [3, 12]. Ahlsson and coworkers [12] observed a doubled risk of dying from cerebral ischemia and heart failure among CABG patients affected by AF compared with patients without it (2.6% versus 0.5% and 6.7% versus 2.5%, respectively). A plausible explanation is an AF recurrence in the late period for patients already affected by it postoperatively. Loubani and colleagues [18] observed that 39% of postoperative AF patients had the same arrhythmia after 6 months, and this finding was recently confirmed, with a prevalence of the arrhythmia of 7% in the postoperative AF group [3].

Our data indirectly validate these referred hypotheses. An intriguing assumption might suggest that patients undergoing valve surgeries are subject to a better follow-up by means of echocardiographic examinations and regular clinical visits, compared with coronary surgery patients. Moreover, a subset of patients with mechanical valves are protected from embolic events by their anticoagulation therapy, which certainly must be considered as a mechanism to explain the lack of statistical influence of AF on the late mortality in the valve group of patients. The opposing interpretation implies that AF is a marker of comorbidity, being differently reflected in CABG patients compared with the patients receiving a valve. Hence, possibly, the underlying coronary disease provokes additional AF mechanisms compared with that in valve patients. This tentative theory is supported by the different incidence rates of AF between the groups of patients, and their partly different spectra of underlying AF risk factors [4, 5].

There are several limitations to current study. First, this study is limited by its interpretations from a single center only, and further by its retrospective design, although data were prospectively collected. Second, the study is also limited in statistical terms from the different number of observations among groups. A type II error cannot be surely excluded in view of the more limited numbers of patients in the valve groups, leading to a possible failure to identify postoperative AF as an independent factor for late mortality. However, no studies exist that analyze the impact of AF on postoperative survival in patients undergoing valvular surgery. The only published study describing the AF impact on late mortality was performed by Mahoney and colleagues [8]. However, the follow-up was 5 years only, and no data were provided for the possible univariable/multivariable predictors for late mortality [8]. The statistical role of postoperative AF during follow-up was not studied, aiming the researchers at investigating the cost-effectiveness of amiodarone to prevent AF [8]. Third, the present study does not provide a direct mechanistic explanation for late mortality, a difficulty shared by other researchers into the same topic [2, 4, 8–10].

The association observed between AF and late mortality does not necessarily indicate causation, although studies on the general population affected by chronic AF and studies reporting the outcome of CABG patients affected by postoperative AF revealed a direct AF effect in causing late mortality [3, 12, 15–18]. Cerebrovascular accidents and myocardial infarction because of embolic events are a direct causation of AF [3, 12, 15–18]. Certainly, our study does not provide autopsy details, and only all-cause mortality was considered. Moreover, postdischarge AF recurrence was not documented by our data, being limited to the hospital period only. The demonstrated AF recurrence could have clarified the causative mechanism by which AF after cardiac surgery affect postoperative survival. Because of these limitations, the mechanisms by which mortality is explained by postoperative AF remain at best speculative.

Lastly, another limitation is the lack of follow-up data concerning drug medication at discharge and during follow-up, and also cancer occurrence. The present study did not measure or control for the effect of drug administration at discharge and during follow-up, and the knowledge about the administration of antiarrhythmic medications and the long-term use of anticoagulation therapy during the postoperative period would have strengthened the results. However, similar designs were present in other studies, and our results are in consonance with previous reports [3, 8, 10, 12].

In conclusion, postoperative AF affected the late survival in patients undergoing isolated CABG. This finding was not statistically confirmed among patients operated on for isolated valve surgery or combined procedures, and it possibly indicates a difference between these groups. Although the mechanisms are unclear and the direct AF effect on postoperative survival was not explored by the present study, our data give the perspective on possible arrhythmia recurrence during the postoperative period among CABG patients. Isolated coronary surgery patients affected by AF may benefit from a more strict surveillance and prolonged anticoagulation or AF antiarrhythmic prophylaxis. Follow-up of patients undergoing valvular surgery who are affected by postoperative FA requires further attention and dedicated studies.


    Appendix Table 1
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Appendix Table 1
 References
 

  1. Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery Ann Intern Med 2001;135:1061-1073.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery JAMA 2004;291:1720-1729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Mariscalco G, Klersy C, Zanobini M, et al. Atrial fibrillation after isolated coronary surgery affects late survival Circulation 2008;118:1612-1618.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Mathew JP, Parks R, Savino JS, et al. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: predictors, outcomes, and resource utilization. MultiCenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. JAMA 1996;276:300-306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Mariscalco G, Engstrom KG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: risk factors and their temporal relationship in prophylactic drug strategy decision Int J Cardiol 2007;129:354-362.
  6. Mariscalco G, Cederlund B, Engström KG. The clinical noncompliance of oral sotalol/magnesium for prophylactic treatment of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting J Card Surg 2007;22:281-286.[Medline]
  7. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 1996;94:390-397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Mahoney EM, Thompson TD, Veledar E, Williams J, Weintraub WS. Cost-effectiveness of targeting patients undergoing cardiac surgery for therapy with intravenous amiodarone to prevent atrial fibrillation J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;40:737-745.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolosi AC, et al. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? Ann Surg 1997;226:501-513.[Medline]
  10. Villareal RP, Hariharan R, Liu BC, et al. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:742-748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Hogue CW, Hyder ML. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac operation: risks, mechanisms, and treatment Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:300-306.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Ahlsson A, Bodin L, Fengsrud E, Englund A. Patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation have a doubled cardiovascular mortality Scand Cardiovasc J 2009;12:1-7.
  13. Levy D, Kannel WB. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and mortality: do the risks merit changes in clinical practice? J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:749-751.[Free Full Text]
  14. Shinbane JS, Wood MA, Jensen DN, Ellenbogen KA, Fitzpatrick AP, Scheinman MM. Tachycardia-induced cardiomyopathy: a review of animal models and clinical studies J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:742-748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study Stroke 1991;22:983-988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Yamanouchi H, Tomonaga M, Shimada H, Matsushita S, Kuramoto K, Toyokura Y. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation as a cause of fatal massive cerebral infarction in the elderly Stroke 1989;20:1653-1656.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Petersen P, Kastrup J, Videbaek R, Boysen G. Cerebral blood flow before and after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1989;9:422-425.[Medline]
  18. Loubani M, Hickey MS, Spyt TJ, Galinanes M. Residual atrial fibrillation and clinical consequences following postoperative supraventricular arrhythmias Int J Cardiol 2000;74:125-132.[Medline]

Related Article

Invited Commentary
Lawrence L. Creswell
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 1876. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EuropaceHome page
B. Maesen, J. Nijs, J. Maessen, M. Allessie, and U. Schotten
Post-operative atrial fibrillation: a maze of mechanisms
Europace, February 1, 2012; 14(2): 159 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Bramer, A. H. M. van Straten, M. A. Soliman Hamad, K. C. van den Broek, J. G. Maessen, and E. Berreklouw
New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation Predicts Late Mortality After Mitral Valve Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2011; 92(6): 2091 - 2096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJ OpenHome page
N. Girerd, J. Magne, P. Pibarot, P. Voisine, F. Dagenais, and P. Mathieu
Postoperative atrial fibrillation predicts long-term survival after aortic-valve surgery but not after mitral-valve surgery: a retrospective study
BMJ Open, November 27, 2011; 1(2): e000385 - e000385.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
R. Kaw, A. V. Hernandez, I. Masood, A. M. Gillinov, W. Saliba, and E. H. Blackstone
Short- and long-term mortality associated with new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: A systematic review and meta-analysis
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2011; 141(5): 1305 - 1312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Interact CardioVasc Thorac SurgHome page
S. Attaran, M. Shaw, L. Bond, M. D. Pullan, and B. M. Fabri
Atrial fibrillation postcardiac surgery: a common but a morbid complication
Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, May 1, 2011; 12(5): 772 - 777.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
Y. Shingu, S. Kubota, S. Wakasa, N. Ebuoka, D. Mori, T. Ooka, T. Tachibana, and Y. Matsui
Left-ventricular electromechanical delay is prolonged in patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, May 1, 2011; 39(5): 684 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac CareHome page
P. E. Vardas, E. P. Koutalas, and E. N. Simantirakis
Chapter 54 Atrial fibrillation and supraventricular arrhythmias
The ESC Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care, December 1, 2010; 1(1): med-9780199584314-chapter - med-9780199584314-chapter.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Bramer, A. H. M. van Straten, M. A. Soliman Hamad, E. Berreklouw, E. J. Martens, and J. G. Maessen
The Impact of New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation on Mortality After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 443 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
T. B. Albacker
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 449 - 450.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Filardo, C. Hamilton, B. Hamman, R. F. Hebeler Jr, J. Adams, and P. Grayburn
New-Onset Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Long-Term Survival After Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 474 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. L. Creswell
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 479 - 480.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Filardo and J. Adams
Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation and Late Mortality After Valvular Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2010; 89(6): 2073 - 2073.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Mariscalco and K. G. Engstrom
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2010; 89(6): 2073 - 2074.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
L. L. Creswell
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2009; 88(6): 1876 - 1876.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Giovanni Mariscalco
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mariscalco, G.
Right arrow Articles by Engström, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS