ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1725-1726. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.136
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galiñanes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galiñanes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


Correspondence

A Patent Left Internal Thoracic Artery Should Not Be Dissected or Clamped During Reoperative Cardiac Surgery

Manuel Galiñanes, MD, PhD, Andrej Sosnowski, MD

Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, Groby Rd, Leicester, LE3 9QP United Kingdom

(Email: mg50{at}le.ac.uk).

To the Editor:

The issue of what to do with a patent left internal thoracic artery (LITA) during cardiac reoperations is of paramount importance because it may affect the complexity of the surgical procedure to be carried out, the quality of the myocardial protection obtained, and as a result, the operative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we have read with great interest the article by Smith and colleagues [1] in which they question whether a patent LITA needs to be clamped in reoperative cardiac surgery. This was a prospective, nonrandomized study, and although the authors tested the fitness of the statistical analysis performed, the choice of clamping the LITA graft or not was probably determined by the degree of adhesions and the difficulty of the dissection, thus introducing a selection bias that could be crucial for the interpretation of the results. By investigating the outcome on perioperative mortality only, this study is also limited in scope, and the crucial question on whether the clamping of the LITA affects myocardial protection remains unanswered. These shortcomings are recognized by the authors who then propose to undertake more elaborate and rigorously performed evaluations.

In our opinion, the dogma of the need for clamping the graft for better myocardial protection is unjustified and for more than 12 years we have adopted the policy of not dissecting and not clamping the LITA, as suggested by Lytle and colleagues [2], with excellent clinical results. Contrary to this dogma, greater myocardial ischemic injury would be expected if the LITA is clamped when most or all of the blood supply to the left anterior wall of the left ventricle completely relies on a patent LITA (eg, occlusion or severe obstruction on the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery) so that cardioplegia delivered through the aortic root cannot be homogenously distributed. In experimental animal studies we have demonstrated that the heterogeneous distribution of cardioplegia determined by the presence of severe coronary artery stenoses or occlusions results in reduced myocardial protection rendering the heart more susceptible to ischemic injury [3]. Also, the clinical experience with redo aortic and mitral valve surgery in the presence of a patent LITA supports the view that leaving the LITA undissected and unclamped is associated with good results [4, 5]. Furthermore, because the myocardium is constantly perfused by the opened LITA during aortic cross clamp, there will not be the need for additional protective interventions, such as deep hypothermia or retrograde coronary sinus infusion of cardioplegia. Based on the same principle, a similar approach can be used for other patent coronary bypass grafts. In summary, we advocate that patent LITA grafts should not be dissected and clamped during redo cardiac surgery, and that no special measures are needed to protect the myocardium that is adequately perfused. With the present evidence and knowledge, one wonders whether it is reasonable and justifiable to carry out more randomized studies subjecting patients to the potential risks of graft injury, inadequate myocardial protection, and greater mortality.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Smith RL, Ellman PI, Thompson PW, et al. Do you need to clamp a patent left internal thoracic artery-left anterior descending graft in reoperative cardiac surgery? Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:742-747.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Lytle BW, McElroy D, McCarthy P, et al. Influence of arterial coronary bypass grafts on the mortality in coronary reoperations J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;107:675-683.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Galiñanes M, Wilson ANA, Hearse DJ. Impaired cardioplegic delivery and loss of cardioprotection: a role for preconditioning? J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997;29:849-854.[Medline]
  4. Byrne JG, Karavas AN, Filsoufi F, et al. Aortic valve surgery after previous coronary artery bypass grafting with functioning internal mammary artery grafts Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:779-784.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Byrne JG, Aranki SF, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, Cohn LH. Mitral valve surgery after previous CABG with functioning IMA grafts Ann Thorac Surg 1999;68:2243-2247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Cardiothorac SurgHome page
C. B. Park, R. M. Suri, H. M. Burkhart, K. L. Greason, J. A. Dearani, H. V. Schaff, and T. M. Sundt III
What is the optimal myocardial preservation strategy at re-operation for aortic valve replacement in the presence of a patent internal thoracic artery?
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2011; 39(6): 861 - 865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galiñanes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galiñanes, M.
Right arrow Articles by Sosnowski, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Coronary disease


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS