ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1451-1456. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.07.006
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marco Ranucci
Marisa Di Donato
Lorenzo Menicanti
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelvecchio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Menicanti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelvecchio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Menicanti, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other


Original Articles: Adult Cardiac

Diabetes Mellitus and Long-Term Outcome in Heart Failure Patients After Surgical Ventricular Restoration

Serenella Castelvecchio, MDa,b,*, Marco Ranucci, MDb, Marisa Di Donato, MDc, Lorenzo Menicanti, MDa

a Department of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
b Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia & ICU, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
c Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Accepted for publication July 2, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr Castelvecchio, Department of Cardiac Surgery, IRCCS, Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, San Donato Milanese, Milan, 20097, Italy (Email: castelvecchio.serenella{at}gmail.com).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background: This study aimed to identify the impact of diabetes mellitus and related comorbidities on long-term survival of heart failure patients who had undergone surgical ventricular restoration. Surgical ventricular restoration is an optional therapeutic strategy for patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Reported prognostic predictors for late morbidity and mortality are predominantly related to cardiac conditions, whereas the prognostic impact of comorbidities still needs to be defined.

Methods: A total of 329 patients (234 nondiabetic and 95 diabetic) who survived the surgical ventricular restoration operation were admitted to this study. Cardiac mortality follow-up data were collected. Actuarial survival curves were calculated for the two groups; differences between groups and the impact of other comorbidities were established using a log-rank test and a Cox regression analysis.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 44 months. Diabetic patients had a significantly worse survival rate: at 5 years, their survival rate was 81%, versus 89% for nondiabetic patients (p = 0.019). Other comorbidities significantly associated with the survival rate were chronic renal failure, New York Heart Association class, and liver dysfunction. Diabetic patients without comorbidities had a survival rate similar to that of nondiabetic patients. Diabetic patients with at least one comorbidity had a significantly worse outcome. Diabetic patients with chronic renal failure had a 5-year survival rate of 40%, versus 85% for nondiabetic patients (p = 0.002).

Conclusions: Noncomplicated diabetes has no negative impact on long-term survival after surgical ventricular restoration. Conversely, complicated diabetes, namely the presence of chronic renal failure, carries a long-term cardiac mortality risk that is four times higher than the risk for nondiabetic patients.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The relationship between diabetes mellitus and heart failure (HF) has been well established [1–3]. Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for the development of HF [4–6], and it increases morbidity and mortality among patients with HF owing to ischemic heart disease [7–10]. Furthermore, 15% to 25% of patients with HF have diabetes [7, 10]. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) has been introduced for restoring left ventricular shape, size, and function in patients with ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and HF. In particular, SVR improves left ventricular systolic function by reducing ventricular volumes and increasing the ejection fraction, which in turn, along with an improvement in left ventricular mechanical synchrony, results in a more efficient myocardial pump function [11–14].

Data from previous, observational, nonrandomized studies report an acceptable 30-day mortality after SVR and good long-term survival [11–14]. Reported prognostic predictors for late morbidity and mortality are predominantly related to cardiac conditions [11, 13, 16], whereas few studies have assessed the prognostic impact of comorbidities [12]. Diabetes is a complex disease determining macrovascular and microvascular alterations. As a consequence, diabetic patients suffer from an increased morbidity due to either coronary artery disease, cardiovascular dysfunction, and congestive HF or hypertension or renal failure, which are secondary to microvascular disease. The impact of diabetes and related comorbidities, including chronic renal failure (CRF), low ejection fraction (EF), cerebrovascular accident, or peripheral vascular disease, has been investigated to a limited extent and restricted to patients surviving coronary artery bypass graft surgery [17, 18]. However, it is well known that diabetes has a greater impact on the incidence and prognosis of congestive HF than on that of coronary artery disease. We hypothesized that HF patients with diabetes and diabetes-related complications are at greater risk of cardiac death after SVR surgery.

Thus, the objective of the present study was to identify the impact of diabetes and related comorbidities on long-term survival of diabetic HF patients surviving SVR.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Study Population
Patient and operative information was reviewed from the computerized cardiac surgical database that was collected prospectively for all patients. We retrospectively analyzed data for all patients (n = 329) with diabetes and without diabetes who undergone SVR between January 2001 and June 2008 at the IRCCS Policlinico S. Donato. The local Ethics Committee approved this retrospective study design and waived the need for informed consent because the patients gave a general consent to the scientific treatment of their data in anonymous form at the time of hospitalization.

All patients received an SVR operation; coronary artery bypass graft surgery was associated in 310 patients (94.2% of the overall population). The mitral valve was repaired when indicated. Indications for surgery were heart failure or angina or a combination of both.

Patients with diabetes were identified as those receiving oral antidiabetic treatment or insulin, or both, at the time of surgery. Patients receiving nutritional modifications as the sole treatment for hyperglycemia were not considered as diabetic patients. Insulin treatment of transient postoperative hyperglycemia was not considered a criterion for being included in the diabetic group. During and after the operation, blood glucose levels were controlled by insulin infusion to maintain a level below 180 mg/dL. At the time of surgery, all patients were on state-of-the-art optimized medical therapy.

Preoperative laboratory assays included serum creatinine value (mg · dL–1); serum bilirubin value (mg · dL–1), and hematocrit (%).

Cardiac function was assessed by the left ventricular EF, measured before the operation with an echocardiographic assessment. In case of repeated, different measurements, the lowest value was used; an EF value less than 0.30 was defined as a low EF. Cardiac-related conditions assessed were New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class; hypertension (under medical treatment at the time of surgery); dyslipidemia (under medical treatment at the time of surgery); unstable angina (intravenous use of nitrates at the time of the operation); and previous myocardial infarction. The following comorbid conditions were recorded: obesity (body mass index greater than 30 kg · m–2); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (on medication at the time of surgery); previous cerebrovascular accident; CRF (serum creatinine value greater than 150 µmol · dL–1); chronic liver dysfunction (serum bilirubin value more than 2 mg · dL–1); anemia (hematocrit less than 36%); previous vascular surgery; and previous cardiac surgery.

Operative data recorded were associated mitral valve procedure; use of internal thoracic artery; number of distal anastomoses; cardiopulmonary bypass duration (minutes); aortic cross-clamp duration (minutes); and lowest temperature on cardiopulmonary bypass (°C).

Surgical Technique
Details of the surgical technique have been previously reported [13–15]. Briefly, the procedure was conducted on an arrested heart with antegrade blood cold cardioplegia. Complete coronary revascularization was performed first, almost always with the left internal thoracic artery on the left anterior descending artery and the sequential venous grafts on right and circumflex arteries when needed. When needed, the mitral valve was repaired through the ventricular opening with a posterior annuloplasty. Surgical vascular restoration was performed using a mannequin (TRISVR TM; Chase Medical, Richardson, TX) filled at 50 to 60 mL/m2 to optimize the size and shape of the new ventricle.

Operative Mortality and Follow-Up
Operative mortality was defined as death occurring during hospitalization or within 30 days from the operation. Long-term survival was assessed on the basis of the occurrence of all-cause or cardiac death during the follow-up period. Cardiac death was defined as any cardiac-related, sudden, or unknown cause of death. The follow-up was conducted during January 2009 by direct telephone contact with the patients or their relatives; date and cause of death were checked using data from the National Statistical Institute.

Statistical Analysis
Data are expressed as mean and standard deviation for continuous normally distributed variables, median and range for nonnormally distributed variables, and number and percentage for binary categorical variables. Differences between groups were tested using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher's exact test when appropriate. All tests were two-sided.

Dichotomization of continuous variables (EF, serum creatinine, serum bilirubin) was obtained using a locally weighted scatterplot smoothing technique (a method based on iterative weighted least squares applied to nonlinear regressions) or a receiver operating characteristics analysis, where adequate cut-off points were identified at the point where the sum of sensitivity and specificity was the highest, according to the Youden's index: (sensitivity + specificity) – 1.

Operative mortality was explored using a multivariable logistic regression analysis where all the factors being univariately associated with the outcome (p level < 0.1) were entered, producing a final model including only the independent predictors, with an odds ratio and 95% confidence interval. Late mortality was explored separately for all-cause or cardiac mortality.

Patients were censored at the time of last complete information collection. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to assess freedom from death. Differences between groups were tested using a log-rank test. Diabetes and the other comorbid conditions were explored separately for association with freedom from cardiac death using a Mantel-Cox analysis, producing hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.

All the factors that were associated (p < 0.1) with cardiac death during the follow-up period were entered into a multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis (stepwise forward), and a model including the independent predictors of cardiac death was produced, with HR and 95% confidence interval.

Proportionality assumption was checked by graphical representation using a plot of log-minus-log survival function. In the presence of a constant (vertical) difference between the curves, the hazards of subjects with different values for the independent variable were considered proportional over time.

For all statistical tests, a p value less than 0.05 was considered significant. Statistical calculations were performed using a computerized statistical program (SPSS 13.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL).


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Of our 329 study patients, 234 (71%; mean age 67.6 ± 9.6 years) were nondiabetic, and 95 (29%; mean age 68.9 ± 9.4 years) were diabetic at the time of the operation. Diabetic patients had a lower hematocrit and a higher serum creatinine value (Table 1). They received a more extensive coronary revascularization, but no differences were detected for the other operative variables (Table 2).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Demographics, Preoperative Data, and Comorbidities of the Patient Population
 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Operative Details
 
Follow-up data were obtained from 323 patients. Six patients were lost during follow-up. The follow-up was therefore 98.2% complete. The median follow-up time was 44 months (range, 1 to 96). Thirty-one patients (8.5%) died within 30 days from the operation; 23 (8.8%) were nondiabetic and 8 (7.5%) were diabetic (p = 0.686) Significant factors independently associated with operative mortality were NYHA class III or IV, preoperative anemia, and obesity (Table 3). All-cause long-term mortality was not significantly different for diabetic versus nondiabetic patients (Fig 1). Diabetic patients had a significantly worse long-term cardiac mortality than nondiabetic patients (Fig 2). Freedom from cardiac death at 5 years was 89% for nondiabetic patients and 81% for diabetic patients. Other factors that were associated (p < 0.1) with cardiac death were age, CRF, chronic liver dysfunction, anemia, previous cerebrovascular accident, dyslipidemia, unstable angina, and NYHA class III or IV (Table 4).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Univariate and Multivariate (Logistic Regression Analysis) Predictors of Operative Mortality
 

Figure 1
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (freedom from all-cause mortality) in the overall population (solid line) and in diabetic patients (dashed line) and nondiabetic patients (dotted line).

 

Figure 2
View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves (freedom from cardiac death) in the overall population (solid line) and in diabetic patients (dashed line) and nondiabetic patients (dotted line).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Univariate and Multivariate (Cox Proportional Hazard Analysis) Predictors of Cardiovascular Mortality at Follow-Up
 
At the multivariable Cox hazard ratio analysis, the factors independently associated with cardiac death were diabetes (HR 2.1), CRF (HR 2.5), chronic liver dysfunction (HR 5.7), and NYHA class III or IV (HR 2.0; Table 4). Freedom from cardiac death at 5 years was 83.4% for diabetic patients without comorbidities, and 40% for diabetic patients with CRF or chronic liver disease. For nondiabetic patients, freedom from cardiac death was 92% in the absence of comorbidities, and 85% in the presence of CRF or chronic liver disease.

Therefore, after adjustment for other potential confounders, diabetes carries a significantly increased risk for long-term cardiac mortality, and the presence of one comorbid condition may result in a four times increase of long-term cardiovascular mortality risk.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The major findings of this study are than (1) diabetic HF patients have a worse long-term outcome (cardiac mortality) than nondiabetic patients; (2) however, in the absence of comorbidities, diabetes does not determine a worse outcome; and (3) comorbidities seriously deteriorate the long-term outcome of diabetic HF patients, with CRF specifically having a significantly deleterious impact.

The impact of diabetes on long-term outcome after cardiac surgery is still controversial. Some studies have shown no deleterious effect of diabetes on intermediate and long-term mortality [18, 19]; others reported a significant negative effect of insulin requirement on long-term survival [20, 21]; and finally, others identified specific diabetes-related complications such as CRF, low EF, and peripheral vascular disease as independent risk factors for late mortality [17, 18]. Recently, Sartipy and associates [12] reported that diabetes, along with increasing age and mitral regurgitation grade III or IV, were associated with an increased risk for late mortality among HF patients after SVR surgery. Similarly, our diabetic HF patients treated with SVR had a significantly worse long-term outcome compared with nondiabetic patients in terms of cardiac mortality. It should be noted that the late mortality was acceptable for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, considering the high-risk profile of this patient population.

The increased late cardiac mortality among diabetic HF patients may be related to a more severe preoperative profile, characterized by a lower hematocrit count and worse renal function along with more severe and diffuse coronary artery disease (as demonstrated by the more extensive coronary artery revascularization performed). A number of factors independently associated with late cardiac death included CRF, chronic liver dysfunction, and previous cerebrovascular accident, and these comorbidities are frequently related to diabetes. In the presence of one or more of these factors, the long-term outcome becomes seriously worse; in particular, CRF is associated with a mortality risk at 5 years that is more than twice the value in patients without CRF. This increased risk is a highly clinically relevant finding, supporting the important concept of "complicated diabetes," as introduced by Senni and associates [22]. These authors proposed a new risk stratification model to predict the 1-year outcome in HF patients. Their cardiovascular medicine heart failure index included cardiac conditions and comorbidities. Within the variables assessed in the derivation cohort at the univariate analysis, uncomplicated diabetes mellitus was discarded, whereas complicated diabetes mellitus (defined as diabetes with retinopathy, neuropathy, or nephropathy) entered into a logistic regression model and was included in the cardiovascular medicine heart failure index, with an odds ratio for 1-year mortality of 2.41. Our findings for 5-year mortality confirm this value. The relationship between renal function, diabetes, and mortality is explained by the fact that the kidney is the most specific target organ in diabetic patients. When the damage is advanced, renal failure patients are immune-compromised, with an increased risk for postoperative infection [23], are chronically anemic because of reduced erythropoietin production by kidneys [24], and are more predisposed to thromboembolic events and stroke [25]. Along with the progression of the organ disease, the lack of the metabolic effect of the insulin, either for decreased release or for insulin resistance, leads to an increased concentration of lipids in the circulation and subsequent chronic liver dysfunction. In our study, chronic liver dysfunction was independently associated with late cardiac death (HR 5.7).

In a previous study [14], we could identify a low EF as a determinant of operative mortality in patients undergone a SVR operation. Conversely, this factor was not associated with a late cardiac mortality in the present study. This finding suggests that the well-known anatomical changes in left ventricle shape and the increased EF that is generally a result of SVR operation may deprive the preoperative EF of a predictive role for late cardiac mortality. More important seems to be the functional class: patients in NYHA class III or IV at the time of the operation demonstrated a worse long-term outcome, with an HR of 2.0 for cardiac mortality.

The present study does not compare the long-term survival after SVR operations with other possible strategies for treating diabetic HF patients. A recent large randomized controlled trial [26] did not show any long-term outcome difference between HF patients receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery either alone or with SVR. However, data analyzing specific subgroups of patients within this trial have not yet been reported.

Study Limitations
This study has some limitations. First, diabetes was not systematically assessed using standardized diagnostic criteria. Mean duration of diabetes was not available, and glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, or glycosylated hemoglobin levels were not evaluated, limiting the accuracy of our analysis. However, all the patients were followed by the referring clinician before being scheduled for the SVR operation, and the diagnosis of diabetes was known before the hospital admittance. Finally, the relatively small number of diabetic patient did not allow us to consider the study population separately regarding insulin- and noninsulin-dependent diabetic patients.

In conclusion, our study suggests that diabetes without comorbidities should not be considered a negative prognostic factor within the surgical decision process when considering SVR operations; conversely, for diabetic HF patients with preoperative CRF, surgeons should be aware of the poor long-term outcome of this operation.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Kannel WB, McGee DI. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: the Framingham study JAMA 1979;241:2035-2038.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Soläng L, Malmberg K, Ryden L. Diabetes mellitus and congestive heart failure: further knowledge needed Eur Heart J 1999;20:789-795.[Free Full Text]
  3. Nichols GA, Hillier TA, Erbey JR, Brown JB. Congestive heart failure in type 2 diabetes: prevalence, incidence and risk factors Diabetes Care 2001;24:1614-1619.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Thrainsdottir IS, Aspelund T, Thorgeirsson G, et al. The association between glucose abnormalities and heart failure in the population-based Reykjavik study Diabetes Care 2005;28:612-616.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. He J, Ogden LG, Bazzano LA, Vupputuri S, Loria C, Whelton PK. Risk factors for congestive heart failure in US men and women: NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study Arch Intern Med 2001;161:996-1002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP, et al. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study Am J Cardiol 1974;34:29-34.[Medline]
  7. Shindler DM, Kostis JB, Yusuf S, et al. Diabetes mellitus: a predictor of morbidity and mortality in the Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction (SOLVD) trials and registry Am J Cardiol 1996;77:1017-1020.[Medline]
  8. Dries DL, Sweitzer NK, Drazner MH, Stevenson LW, Gersh BJ. Prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure according to the etiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:421-428.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Domanski M, Krause-Steinrauf H, Deedwania P, et al. BEST Investigators The effect of diabetes on outcomes of patients with advanced heart failure in the BEST trial J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;42:914-922.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. De Groote P, Lamblin N, Mouquet F, et al. Impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term survival in patients with congestive heart failure Eur Heart J 2004;25:656-662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Mikleborough LL, Merchant N, Ivanov J, Rao V, Carson S. Left ventricular reconstruction: early and late results J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;128:27-37.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sartipy U, Albåge A, Lindblom D. Risk factors for mortality and hospital re-admission after surgical ventricular restoration Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2006;30:762-769.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Athanasuleas CL, Buckberg GD, Stanley AWH, et al. Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1439-1445.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Menicanti L, Castelvecchio S, Ranucci M, et al. Surgical therapy for ischemic heart failure: single-center experience with surgical anterior ventricular restoration J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;134:433-441.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Menicanti L, Di Donato M. The Dor procedure: What has changed after fifteen years of clinical practice? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;124:886-890.[Free Full Text]
  16. Di Donato M, Toso A, Maioli M, et al. Intermediate survival and predictors of death after surgical ventricular restoration Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13:468-475.[Medline]
  17. Calafiore AM, Di Mauro M, Di Giammarco G, et al. Effect of diabetes on early and late survival after isolated first coronary bypass surgery in multivessel disease J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:144-154.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Leavitt BJ, Sheppard L, Maloney C, et al. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group Effect of diabetes and associated conditions on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass graft surgery Circulation 2004;110(Suppl 1):41-44.
  19. Rajakaruna C, Rogers CA, Suranimala C, Angelini GD, Ascione R. The effect of diabetes mellitus on patients undergoing coronary surgery: a risk-adjusted analysis J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:802-810.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Thourani VH, Weintraub WS, Stein B, et al. Influence of diabetes mellitus on early and late outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting Ann Thorac Surg 1999;67:1045-1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. O'Keefe JH, Blackstone EH, Sergeant P, McCallister BD. The optimal mode of coronary revascularization for diabetics. A risk-adjusted long-term study comparing coronary angioplasty and coronary bypass surgery. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1696-1703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Senni M, Santilli G, Parrella P, et al. A novel prognostic index to determine the impact of cardiac conditions and comorbidities on one-year outcome in patients with heart failure Am J Cardiol 2006;98:1076-1082.[Medline]
  23. Johnson BL, Glickman MH, Bandyk DF, Esses GE. Failure of foot salvage in patients with end-stage renal disease after surgical revascularization J Vasc Surg 1995;22:280-285.[Medline]
  24. DeFoe GR, Ross CS, Olmstead EM, et al. Lowest hematocrit on bypass and adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study Group. Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:769-776.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. John R, Choudhri AF, Weinberg AD, et al. Multicenter review of preoperative risk factors for stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:30-35.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, et al. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction N Engl J Med 2009;360:1705-1717.[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Marco Ranucci
Marisa Di Donato
Lorenzo Menicanti
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castelvecchio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Menicanti, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castelvecchio, S.
Right arrow Articles by Menicanti, L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS