|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, 762-1 Nagasawa, Shimizu-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8611 Japan
(Email: kfgth973{at}ybb.ne.jp).
On the basis of intraoperative findings, Park and associates [1] showed that the prevalence of intimal tear in the ascending aorta or arch is high (73.0%) in the patients who were diagnosed as Stanford type A acute aortic intramural hematoma (IMH) by conventional definition (ie, the presence of concentric space in the ascending aortic wall that was not enhanced by a contrast agent in the computed tomographic scan taken within 48 hours after symptom onset). Generally it is believed that IMH is caused by rupture of the vasa vasorum in the media without intimal tear in accidents [2, 3], since it was first proposed by Krukenberg [4] in 1920. Meanwhile, in Japan, the term thrombosed-type acute aortic dissection (AAD) [5–7] has been preferably substituted for IMH. Unlike the hypothesis of vasa vasorum rupture without intimal tear, it has been considered that thrombosed-type AAD is caused by false lumen thrombosis immediately after the intimal tear (entry) develops the same as in classic AAD because of static flow in it, probably due to the absence of any re-entry. As a piece of evidence to support the thrombosed-type hypothesis, besides ulcer-like projection (a trace of entry according to the hypothesis) mentioned by Park and colleagues [1], we could display the false lumen compressing the true lumen in IMH on computed tomographic scan (Fig 1). If vasa vasorum rupture without intimal tear caused the false lumen, the false lumen pressure equivalent to the vasa vasorum pressure would be much lower than the true lumen pressure equal to the aortic pressure, and the false lumen would never compress the true lumen. According to the thrombosed-type hypothesis, the false lumen (even though it is thrombosed) is directly exposed to the aortic pressure through the entry because it is a dead-end due to the absence of any re entry, which could compress the true lumen. The thrombosed-type hypothesis supports Park and coworkers' [1] conclusion that a large proportion of IMH may have a similar pathogenic mechanism as classic AAD, and the conventional definition of IMH should be changed. Furthermore, regarding IMH with ulcer-like projection or the false lumen compressing true lumen, we would like to propose that the terms of thrombosed-type AAD be substituted for that of acute aortic IMH.
|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K.-H. Park Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1389 - 1390. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |