ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1051. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.033
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Pean, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Pean, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article


Correspondence

Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Lung Surgery: Bronchial Colonization is the Critical Issue?

Jean-Baptiste Stern, MDa, Yves Pean, MDb

a Thoracic Department, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, 42 bd Jourdan, Paris, 75014 France
b Microbiology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, 75014 France

(Email: jean-baptiste.stern{at}imm.fr).

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the article of Schussler and colleagues [1] focusing on antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of postoperative pneumonia (POP) after lung resection. This meticulous analysis deserves some comments.

First, the rates of documented and undocumented POP of 25% in the first period of the study and 14% in the second period appear too high. Most experienced teams reporting large series show POP rates of less than 10% [2–4]. The observed high rates may artificially increase the reported benefit of the change in the antibiotic prophylaxis.

Second, the rationale to use a high dose of amoxicillin-clavulanate (6 g/24 h) in this study is unclear. Ten of 12 patients with POP had Streptococcus pneumoniae with minimum inhibitory concentrations exceeding 0.125 mg/mL, higher than usually found in France in pneumococcal isolates (44% in 2006) [5]. Recent French consensus conference recommend treating low- and intermediate-sensitivity S pneumoniae pneumonia with amoxicillin at 3 g/d [6]. Only 0.3% of strains isolated from pneumococcal bacteriemia have minimum inhibitory concentrations exceeding 2 mg/mL, which requires cefotaxime. In patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the recommendation is also amoxicillin-clavulanate at 3 g/d [6].

Third, it is disturbing to see that COPD was slightly less frequent in the cefamandole group (52%) than in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group (58%), and that smoking cessation within 60 days was significantly more frequent in the cefamandole group (52%) than in amoxicillin-clavulanate group (43%). Despite these facts, intrabronchial colonization was less frequent in the amoxicillin-clavulanate group than in the cefamandole group (22% vs 14%). These data suggest that patients were more appropriately prepared for their operation, or may have more frequently received a preoperative course of an antibiotic to partially explain these results. Whether patients received antibiotics preoperatively was not reported. In addition, the idea that a single dose of amoxicillin-clavulanate approximately 30 minutes before bronchial sampling may decrease bronchial colonization of COPD patients seems more theoretic than clinically pertinent.

Finally, the most important message of this study is that decreasing bronchial colonization before the operation may reduce POP. This may encourage physicians caring for such patients to detect high levels of bronchial colonization—but what is the critical level?—and to take adequate measures to decrease colonization before operation. Thus, we prefer to say, "Bronchial colonization is the critical issue."

For these reasons, the data provided by this interesting study are not sufficient to conclude that the change of antibiotic prophylaxis during the second period was by itself the only factor responsible for the observed decrease in POP rate. Thus, in the absence of a prospective randomized trial, it is difficult to recommend a routine dose of 6 g of amoxicillin-clavulanate as antibiotic prophylaxis in clinical practice.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Schussler O, Dermine H, Alifano M, et al. Should we change antibiotic prophylaxis for lung surgery?. Postoperative pneumonia is the critical issue. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1727-1733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Deslauriers J, Ginsberg RJ, Piantadosi S, et al. Prospective assessment of 30-day operative morbidity for surgical resections in lung cancer Chest 1994;106(6 suppl):329S-330S.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD, et al. Data from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;135:247-254.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Stephan F, Boucheseiche S, Hollande J, et al. Pulmonary complications following lung resection: a comprehensive analysis of incidence and possible risk factors Chest 2000;118:1263-1270.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Cndrd pneumocoque. Rapport d'activité. Available at: http://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/cnr/rapport_cnr_pneumo_2006.pdf 2006. Accessed July 20, 2009.
  6. SPILF: 13ème Conférence de consensus en pathologie infectieuse. Prise en charge des infections des voies respiratoires basses de l'adulte immunocompétent 2006. Available at: http://www.infectiologie.com/site/medias/_documents/consensus/inf_respir_long2006.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2009.

Related Article

Reply
Olivier Schussler, Herve Dermine, Marco Alifano, Nicolas Roche, Salvatore Strano, Anne Casetta, Alain Meunier, Sophie Coignard, Maurizio Salvi, Pierre Magdeleinat, Antoine Rabbat, and Jean François Regnard
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 1052. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
O. Schussler, H. Dermine, M. Alifano, N. Roche, S. Strano, A. Casetta, A. Meunier, S. Coignard, M. Salvi, P. Magdeleinat, et al.
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1052 - 1052.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stern, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Pean, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stern, J.-B.
Right arrow Articles by Pean, Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - other
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS