ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:1036-1043. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.093
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arthur C. Coffey
John W. Fehrenbacher
Daniel J. Beckman
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanell, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meldrum, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanell, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meldrum, D. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology


Review

Proinflammatory Cytokine Effects on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for the Ischemic Heart

Aaron M. Abarbanell, MDb, Arthur C. Coffey, MDa, John W. Fehrenbacher, MDa, Daniel J. Beckman, MDa, Jeremy L. Herrmann, MDb, Brent Weil, MDb, Daniel R. Meldrum, MDa,b,c,d,*

a Clarian Cardiovascular Surgery, Methodist Hospital, Indianapolis, Indiana
b Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
c Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
d Center for Immunobiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana


Abbreviations and Acronyms HGF = hepatocyte growth factor; HMGB1 = high mobility group box 1; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IL = interleukin; I-R = ischemia–reperfusion injury; LAD = left anterior descending coronary artery; MI = myocardial infarction; MSC = mesenchymal stem cells; TGF-β1 = transforming growth factor-beta 1; TNF-{alpha} = tumor necrosis factor-alpha; TNFR1 = tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR2 = tumor necrosis factor receptor 2; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor


* Address correspondence to Dr Meldrum, 2017 Van Nuys Medical Science Building, 635 Barnhill Dr, Indianapolis, IN 46202 (Email: dmeldrum{at}iupui.edu).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) hold great promise for improving myocardial recovery after ischemia. The cardiothoracic surgeon is uniquely positioned to be at the forefront of any clinical application of this therapy. As such, a basic understanding of stem cells and the cytokines that affect stem cell function will be an essential component of the surgeon's ever-expanding knowledge base. This review provides: (1) a general overview of stem cells and MSCs in particular, (2) critically analyzes several cytokines known to alter MSC function, and (3) discusses methods to manipulate cytokine-activated MSCs to improve MSC function for potential clinical application.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cardiovascular disease, and in particular myocardial infarction with resultant left ventricular dysfunction, is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. In 2008, the American Heart Association predicted that the direct and indirect costs of cardiovascular disease, including heart failure, hypertension and coronary artery disease would exceed $260 billion per year in the United States alone. The expenditure for heart failure alone was projected to exceed $34 billion per year [1]. Although medical management slows the inevitable progression to heart failure after myocardial infarction, there is an increasing need to develop therapies that can arrest this process, improve heart function, or even regenerate the myocardium.

Stem cell therapy has the potential to be a key component in the field of regenerative cardiovascular medicine [2]. Mesenchymal stem cells, in particular, may be a leading candidate for cell-based therapy for the ischemic heart. These cells are a unique subset of stem cells that can be isolated from the bone marrow, adipose tissue, and even umbilical cord blood [3, 4]. The MSCs are multi-potent, and in response to ischemia–reperfusion injury (I-R) they secrete a variety of cytokines that are cardioprotective or angiogenic [5, 6]. In addition, MSCs engraft into injured myocardium and potentially differentiate into cardiac myocytes [5]. However, the engraftment and functional results are extremely variable in the literature and modest at best in a number of clinical trials [5, 7–12].

Cytokines likely affect the function of MSCs and represent one possible explanation for the variable results seen in the literature. Therefore, increasing our understanding of the cytokines that affect MSC function and the methods available to clinicians to modify MSCs ex vivo to capitalize on the positive or negative effects of cytokines may lead to future therapeutic gains.

This review provides: (1) a general overview of stem cells and MSCs in particular, (2) critically analyzes several cytokines known to alter MSC function, and (3) discusses methods to manipulate cytokine-activated MSCs to improve MSC function for potential clinical application.


    Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for articles in the English language using various combinations of the following key words: mesenchymal stem cells, myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, cytokines, growth factors, interleukins, and tumor necrosis factor. If the abstract was relevant to this review, the full article was retrieved. Reference citations from the extracted articles were checked for additional pertinent citations. For the most relevant articles, the Institute for Scientific Information Web of Knowledge was used to find other publications that cited the work of these previous articles.


    Stem Cell History and Terminology
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Two seminal discoveries launched the field of stem cell research more than 50 years ago. In 1954, Dr Stevens [13] published his work indicating that spontaneous mouse teratomas potentially "stem from pluripotent embryonic-type cells" [13]. Subsequently, in the early 1960s, Drs McCulloch and Till [14] reported spleen colony forming units that produced identical offspring in irradiated mice validating the concept of stem cells. These two findings laid the foundation for stem-cell related cardiovascular research and clinic trials that have increased our understanding of stem cells and their intrinsic biology at a seemingly exponential rate over the past two decades.

By definition, stem cells must possess two characteristics: self-renewal and the ability to differentiate. In other words, a stem cell undergoing mitosis will either form clonogenic offspring (replicas that retain the parent stem cell properties) or offspring that eventually enter terminal differentiation into specific cell lineages [15, 16]. With respect to differentiation potential, stem cells are classified as totipotent, pluripotent, or multipotent. Totipotent zygotes (fertilized eggs) have the ability to differentiate into all cell lineages including extraembryonic tissue. Pluripotent embryonic stem cells from the inner cell mass of the blastocyst form tissue from all three germ layers but not extraembryonic tissue. Multipotent stem cells differentiate into a limited number of cell types usually of the same germ layer [15, 17]. Stem cells are also characterized by plasticity [18]. Plasticity implies that stem cells may differentiate into mature cell types outside their original lineage in response to micro-environmental cues.

In general, stem cells can be classified as either embryonic stem cells or adult stem cells. Adult stem cells can be further categorized as skeletal myoblasts, resident cardiac stem cells, and bone marrow-derived stem cells. Bone marrow-derived stem cells currently encompass hematopoietic stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, and mesenchymal stem cells [19, 20].


    Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Mesenchymal stem cells can be cultured from multiple tissues such as bone marrow, adipose tissue, and umbilical cord blood. The literature uses variable terminology and definitions regarding MSCs [21]. Terms such as bone marrow-derived stem cells, bone marrow stromal cells, mesenchymal progenitor cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and others have been used. In an attempt to provide clarity to the research involving MSCs, the International Society for Cellular Therapy issued a position statement defining the minimum characteristics of MSCs [21, 22]. Per the society, MSCs adhere to the plastic culture surface, display a specific cell surface marker phenotype (CD73+, CD90+, CD105+, CD11b/14–, CD 34–, CD45–, CD19/79{alpha}–, HLA-DR1–), and with stimulation differentiate in vitro into osteoblasts, adipocytes, or chondroblasts [22]. Unless the preceding criteria are met, the society recommends the term mesenchymal stromal cell be used. However, the position statement endorses the use of the acronym MSCs for both mesenchymal stromal cells and mesenchymal stem cells, which unfortunately may lead to continued ambiguity in the literature. It is important to note that these are the minimal requirements, and caution must be used when applying these standards across different species as interspecies variations are known to exist with respect to cell surface markers [23].

From the clinical perspective, MSCs possess at least four attributes that make them attractive for cell-mediated cardiac transplantation: (1) paracrine signaling, (2) immunomodulation, (3) ease of ex vivo expansion, and (4) potential for cardiomyoplasty.

Paracrine Signaling
Caplan, Haynesworth, and their associates [24, 25] were among the first to describe the ability of MSCs to express cytokines. These cytokines were believed to exert "trophic" effects that assisted in tissue repair outside of any potential MSC differentiation [24, 25]. Supporting this concept, our group has shown that activated MSCs secrete a wide array of cytokines (eg, vascular endothelial growth factor, hepatocyte growth factor) that are associated with functional recovery of the heart after I-R [26–29]. This functional recovery is seen with acute injury, and thus is more likely associated with nongenomic signaling rather than long-term differentiation or engraftment.

Immunomodulation
Mesenchymal stem cells are believed to be a uniquely immuno-privileged cell type as they do not express MHC class II molecules or co-stimulatory surface markers for T-cell activation (CD40, CD80, and CD86) [30–32]. The lack of immunogenic cell surface markers lends itself to allogenic and xenotransplantation where MSCs potentially evade or even change the native immune system at the site of injury by exerting immunosuppressive effects on T-cells [32]. In vivo animal research in myocardial infarct models supports the immune privileged status of MSCs. Successful allogenic transplantation of MSCs after myocardial infarction has been described in immunocompetent animal models (ie, rodents, swine) without immunosuppression [33]. These unique immune properties even extend across species, as several studies have demonstrated the presence of murine MSCs in the infarcted rat heart without evidence of immune system activation [34, 35].

Cell Culture
Despite the fact that MSCs represent less than 0.01% of nucleated cells found in the bone marrow, MSCs can be easily cultured to the high numbers needed for transplantation [33, 36, 37]. In brief, bone-marrow derived MSCs are harvested from the iliac crest in humans or from the femurs or tibias of animals. The MSCs are selected from the heterogeneous cell populations from the bone marrow based on plastic adherence to the cell culture container, as well as cell-surface marker selection (positive or negative) with antibodies. Although in-depth details of MSC harvesting and culture are beyond the scope of this review, the reader is referred to excellent reviews by Meirelles da Silva and Nardi [36] and Alhadlaq and Mao [38].

Cellular Cardiomyoplasty
Cell-based cardiomyoplasty for the ischemic heart involves the implantation of MSCs into the injured myocardium in an attempt to regenerate myocardium. However, engraftment may be limited, in part, due to the mechanical stresses of the beating heart [5, 9, 12, 39]. These observations led to the supposition that the extracellular matrix may be a key component to improving progenitor or stem cell engraftment after acute myocardial injury. In other words, replacement of the extracellular matrix in the infarcted area may lead to improved MSC engraftment. The Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM) Trial of 2008 tested this hypothesis. The trial demonstrated the safety and feasibility of cellular cardiomyoplasty using autologous mononuclear bone marrow cells injected into the heart tissue followed by fixation of a bone-marrow, cell-seeded matrix over the epicardium [40]. The trial showed an increase in viable tissue within the infarct scar, decreased wall stress, and attenuated ventricular remodeling. These results will hopefully lead to a larger randomized control trial in the near future.


    Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal Stem Cell Function
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Cytokines are known to affect multiple cell types. It is likely that cytokines may modulate the efficacy of MSCs. Indeed the list of cytokines that affect MSC function continues to grow at a rapid rate as more researchers focus on designing improved MSCs for therapy for I-R. Here we highlight a subset of cytokines that have been shown to affect MSC function as these cytokines underscore the intricacies that make the use of MSCs for cellular therapy challenging (Fig 1). Specifically, the cytokines tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, high mobility group box 1, transforming growth factor-β1, hepatocyte growth factor, and insulin-like growth factor-1 are discussed.


Figure 1
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Selected cytokines and associated pathways that affect mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) function. Multiple cytokines alter MSC function. The known receptors and pathways are shown. Based on the known research, it is likely that crosstalk exists at multiple intracellular levels. (HGF = hepatocyte growth factor; HMGB1 = high mobility group box 1; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; MET = mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor; NF-{kappa}B = nuclear factor kappa-B; RAGE = receptor for advanced glycation end products; TGF-β1 = transforming growth factor-beta 1; TLR = toll-like receptor; TNF = tumor necrosis factor; TNFR1 = tumor necrosis factor receptor 1; TNFR2 = tumor necrosis factor receptor 2; VEGF = vascular endothelial growth factor.)

 
Tumor Necrosis Factor-{alpha}
The TNF-{alpha} is a pleiotrophic inflammatory cytokine [41–46] known to alter MSC cytokine production, increase human MSC proliferation, and induce MSC basement membrane invasion by activating nuclear factor kappa-B, which potentially improves MSC engraftment [47]. Conversely, TNF-{alpha} is known to inhibit chondrocyte and myocyte differentiation by activating nuclear factor kappa-B [48, 49]. In addition, TNF-{alpha} alters MSC cytokine expression. These multiple effects may in part be explained by differential signaling by the TNF-{alpha} associated receptors tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 (TNFR1 [55-kDa]) and tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (TNFR2 [75-kDa]).

Tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} is known to activate TNFR1, as well as the Fas receptor leading to increased apoptosis through cytosolic death domains in myocytes [41]. In addition to increased cell death, knockout of TNFR1 is associated with altered MSC cytokine production depending on the stimulus and gender of the stem cell. For example, TNF-{alpha} stimulation of TNFR1 knockout MSCs increases vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production, decreases production of TNF-{alpha}, and increases production of proinflammatory interleukin (IL)-6. Similarly, lipopolysaccharide stimulation of TNFR1 knockout MSCs increases VEGF and decreases TNF-{alpha}; however, IL-6 production is decreased [50]. The gender of the stem cell also plays a role in the effects of TNFR1 on MSCs, as cells derived from female mice appear to have innate resistance to TNFR1 signaling. We have shown that in female TNFR1 knockout MSCs, TNF-{alpha}, IL-6, and VEGF levels are the same as wild-type mice, unlike male MSCs [27]. These data indicate that: (1) the TNFR1 is associated with induction of apoptosis in response to TNF-{alpha}, and (2) the TNFR1 knockout MSCs alter cytokine production, depending on the stimulus and stem cell gender.

Tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 is associated with decreased MSC proinflammatory cytokine expression. In vitro, TNFR2 knockout MSCs after TNF-{alpha} stimulation produce less VEGF [50]. VEGF is believed to play a pivotal role in MSC transplantation, inducing neovascularization, stimulating migration of stem cells, and inhibiting apoptosis [51, 52]. Indeed, we have recently demonstrated that VEGF is a crucial factor in mediating MSC cardioprotection after acute I-R [29]. Therefore, TNFR2 signaling may be a potential cause for improved function in vivo. One study corroborates this hypothesis as MSCs transfected with TNFR2 improved left ventricular function and decreased proinflammatory cytokine production (TNF-{alpha}, IL-1β, IL-6) after permanent ligation of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) in rodents [53]. This study must be viewed with caution as the authors do not mention verification of TNFR2 overexpression after transfection.

Taken together, TNF-{alpha} alters MSC cytokine production by TNFR1 and TNFR2. There is some functional data indicating that TNFR2 overexpressing MSCs improve heart function after MI. However, further investigation is needed regarding the role of activated TNFR1 and TNFR2 on MSC function. This is an active area of research in our group.

High Mobility Group Box 1
High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) is a nuclear protein released by inflammatory cells and necrotic cells that acts as a proinflammatory cytokine signaling injury and leading to tissue repair by recruiting stem cells. Germani and colleagues recently demonstrated that HMGB1 administration in a murine model of myocardial infarction-activated cardiac stem cells and promoted differentiation into cardiomyocytes [54]. With respect to MSC function, extracellular HMGB1 suppresses proliferation and induces differentiation into osteocytes. Interestingly, HMGB1 treatment of MSCs increases MSC migration and does not affect the anti-proliferative effects of MSCs on T-cells [55]. High mobility group box 1 is also particularly interesting from a receptor standpoint as Toll-like receptors 2 and 4, as well as the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) are associated with HMGB1 signaling. Although it is not clear how much each pathway mediates the effects of HMGB1, it is clear that HMGB1 increases proinflammatory cytokines release, such as TNF-{alpha}, IL-1, and IL-6 from macrophages [56]. In short, although we know that HMGB1 improves MSC migration and does not appear to affect MSC immunomodulation, HMGB1 decreases MSC proliferation and induces MSC terminal differentiation into osteocytes. Counteracting the latter two effects and identifying the cytokines expressed by HMGB1-stimulated MSCs merits further investigation.

Transforming Growth Factor-β1
Transforming growth factor-β1 is a multipotent cytokine associated with angiogenesis and anti-inflammatory effects. In vitro, TGF-β1 in conjunction with bone morphogenetic protein-2 induces human MSC expression of cardiac surface markers [57] and increases MSC production of VEGF through the Akt pathway [58]. In vivo, TGF-β1 is significantly elevated after myocardial infarction [58] and is associated with decreased TNF-{alpha} levels [59, 60]. Although these results are encouraging, TGF-β1 overexpressing MSCs may not be a viable solution. Transforming growth factor-β1 is also associated with cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and fibroblast proliferation related to pressure overload as seen in the development of heart failure [59, 61]. This is potentially explained at the molecular level where TGF-β1 has two binding receptors (ie, types I and II with multiple subtypes). Transforming growth factor-β1 binds a heteromeric combination of the two receptors. The type 2 receptors transfer the signal to the type 1 receptor for intracellular messaging [62]. Transforming growth factor-β1 binding initiates signaling by Smad, which may mediate these long-term remodeling effects [59, 61]. The Smads are intracellular proteins that act as nuclear transcription factors [63]. In transgenic hamsters designed to develop cardiomyopathy, normalization of Smad 2 decreased the accelerated collagen turnover believed to lead to cardiomyopathy [64].

Taken together, TGF-β1 is a cytokine with the potential to induce neoangiogenesis, decrease inflammatory signaling, and induce MSC differentiation. However, the long-term effects of TGF-β1 on cardiac remodeling may need to be addressed if MSCs overexpressing TGF-β1 are believed to be of therapeutic value. Alternatively, preconditioning MSCs with TGF-β1 prior to injection into the ischemic heart may avoid the sequelae of chronic TGF-β1 exposure.

Hepatocyte Growth Factor
Hepatocyte growth factor is a cytokine of mesenchymal origin involved in cell migration, proliferation and survival. Forte and colleagues [65] demonstrated that HGF exposure resulted in MSC migration but inhibited proliferation. In addition, prolonged exposure to HGF (48 hours) induced cardiac surface marker expression on MSCs [65]. Similar to the other cytokines, HGF signals by multiple intracellular pathways. Hepatocyte growth factor activates the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) receptor on MSCs, which in turn signals through the ERK, p38, and P13K/Akt pathways. Although the full effects of each pathway are not known, it is known that the negative effect of HGF on MSC proliferation is reversed with a p38 inhibitor. It is also known that inhibition of P13K decreases MSC migration [65]. Nevertheless, despite the possible negative effects on proliferation, HGF overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells have been shown to engraft and improve myocardial function in a rodent LAD occlusion model [66].

Insulin-Like Growth Factor-1
Insulin-like growth factor-1 (formerly known as somatomedin C) is associated with cardiomyocyte cell survival in the setting of I-R by attenuating B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2)-associated X protein and caspase 3 activation [67]. This effect has not been studied in MSCs yet; however, IGF-1 is known to enhance the migration of MSCs. Li and colleagues [68] stimulated rat MSCs with IGF-1 and noted a marked increase in the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (the receptor for stromal cell derived factor-1). Upregulation of CXCR4 led to significantly improved response to stromal cell-derived factor-1 with resultant improvement in MSC migration. Li and colleagues [68] also demonstrated that this effect was mediated by PI3K. The role of IGF-1 on in vivo MSC function was recently explored by Haider and colleagues [69] who demonstrated that IGF-1 overexpressing MSCs improved survival and engraftment in the rodent LAD occlusion model. This increased MSC engraftment resulted in decreased infarct size and increased angiogenesis in the infracted heart. Finally, MSC pretreatment with IGF-1 prior to tail vein injection has been shown to improve stem cell engraftment after MI in a rodent model 4 weeks post-transplantation [70].


    Ex Vivo Strategies Alter the Impact of Cytokines On Stem Cell Function
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Given the preceding evidence that cytokines affect MSC function, the question then becomes: How can we alter the MSC ex vivo to minimize the negative effects of cytokines and capitalize on any beneficial effects? There are numerous strategies to modify stem cells ex vivo (see Haider and colleagues [71] for a comprehensive overview). However, three strategies are particularly relevant to the clinician seeking to understand how cytokines affect MSC function: (1) receptor modulation, (2) intracellular signaling modification, and (3) overexpression of the end product. In short, we can change the pathway from the initiation of cytokine signaling to secretion of the final product (Fig 2).


Figure 2
View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Schematic of three targets that modulate the effects of cytokines on mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) function. Cytokines affect MSC function. The effects of cytokine stimuli can be augmented or repressed at the receptor level or at the intracellular level in MSCs. Alternatively, MSCs can be modified to overexpress cytokines that may affect MSC function in vivo.

 
Receptor Modulation
From a simplistic point of view, the receptors that cytokines target can be permanently deleted, temporarily ablated, or overexpressed. These strategies can be chosen based on the model used and the investigator's predicted outcome regarding the cytokine of interest. Gene mutation leading to receptor deletion is mostly applicable to MSCs derived from mice that have short breeding time and a defined genome amenable to manipulation. Indeed, we have used murine TNF receptor knockout MSCs to demonstrate differential cytokine production in MSCs in response to TNF-{alpha} and lipopolysaccharide stimulation [27, 50]. This data has led to ongoing functional studies to determine which receptor is associated with myocardial protection after I-R. One drawback to permanent receptor deletion is that it requires germ cell mutations, which are not feasible in harvested human donor MSCs. Therefore, targeted receptor ablation with siRNA may be a potential option to modify human stem cell receptors ex vivo on a temporary basis. Although we have not used the technique to modify receptors, we have used siRNA to disrupt VEGF production and demonstrate the critical role of VEGF in myocardial recovery from I-R [29]. Finally, with respect to receptor overexpression, viral vectors (or potentially siRNA targeting an inhibitory pathway for receptor expression) can be used to overexpress receptors in MSCs. Bao and colleagues [53] recently overexpressed TNFR2 in MSCs and demonstrated improved myocardial function after LAD ligation in rats. Potentially, these short-term modifications of receptors with either siRNA or vectors may lead to improved MSC function with potential application in clinical trials.

Intracellular Messenger Modification
Modifying the MSC intracellular signaling cascade activated by a cytokine of interest is another technique that may be applied to stem cell-mediated cardiac therapy. As mentioned earlier, PI3K/Akt is associated with improved migration of MSCs. Recently, investigators created MSCs that overexpress Akt. This modification enhanced MSC survival and function. In addition, MSCs that overexpressed phosphorylated-Akt (activated form of Akt) were associated with improved cardiac function after myocardial infarction [72], likely in association with extracellular secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) [73]. Interestingly, wild-type MSC survival was similarly improved after treatment with conditioned media from the Akt overexpressing MSCs implying a significant role for paracrine signaling in stem cell-mediated cardioprotection [72]. Another group similarly overexpressed Bcl-2 in MSCs, as Bcl-2 is associated with decreased apoptosis through regulation of mitochondrial function, which is believed to lead to improved cardioprotection during ischemia. Indeed, rat MSCs that are genetically modified to overexpress Bcl-2 had improved capillary density in the infarct border zone, improved left ventricular function, and increased MSC engraftment after LAD ligation [74]. Taken together, these studies imply that genetic ex vivo modification of intracellular cascades linked to a known cytokine may allow us to increase the function of the MSC in response to external stimulation. It may also be possible that intracellular modification may obviate the need for the external cytokine stimulation.

Cytokine Overexpression
Given the evidence that cytokines can activate MSCs potentially leading to cytoprotective cytokine production, it stands to reason that overexpression of cytokines may lead to improved MSC function. Viral transfer of the coding regions for the cytokines for HGF, IGF-1, and VEGF has been successfully performed [66, 69, 75]. As previously discussed, overexpression of HGF or IGF improved MSC function in the setting of ischemia. Vascular endothelial growth factor overexpressing MSCs were similarly associated with smaller infarct sizes and improved cardiac function after LAD ligation in rodents [75]. It is unclear if the overexpression of the cytokine affects the MSC or the injured heart, or both. However, it is clear that overexpression of cytokines is a potential tool for MSC modification.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Mesenchymal stem cells have great potential for regenerative therapy after I-R or MI. There is a growing body of knowledge regarding the effects of various cytokines on the injured myocardium. These cytokines and their associated receptors and pathways affect MSC survival and function. These effects have been attenuated or accentuated to maximize the efficacy of MSCs as therapy for I-R in animal models. Certainly, these results are promising. However, we do not know the overall effects and relevance of these modifications. Clerk and colleagues [76] nicely frame this problem. They argue that studying singular pathways in response to an individual stimulus leads to the impression that numerous pathways are activated. Thus, it is difficult to ascertain which pathway has the greatest importance. In addition, cellular overexpression of cytokines or other genetic manipulations (ie, knockout, knock-in) may alter other aspects of cellular regulation [76]. Clearly, if the engraftment of MSCs is improved as a result, these methods must be examined with respect to long-term myocardial function, arrhythmias, and remodeling.

In summary, this review outlines some of the latest developments in MSC research for cell-based therapy for myocardial infarction and I-R. On the other hand, this review also highlights one of the major challenges that surgeon-scientists face, which is the inability to see the entire effects of one change (eg, knockout or genomic change) at the molecular level. Although the effects of modifying cytokine expression or receptors for myocardial therapy seem promising, the systematic consequences and the cross-talk among pathways must be further investigated prior to clinical application.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
This work was supported in part by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01GM070628, NIH R01HL085595, NIH K99/R00 HL0876077, NIH 1F32HL092718, NIH 1F32HL092719, American Heart Association Grant-in-Aid, and the American Heart Association Post-Doctoral Fellowship 0725663Z.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Methods
 Stem Cell History and...
 Mesenchymal Stem Cells
 Cytokines Affect Mesenchymal...
 Ex Vivo Strategies Alter...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Circulation 2008;117:e25-e146.[Free Full Text]
  2. Jolicoeur EM, Granger CB, Fakunding JL, et al. Bringing cardiovascular cell-based therapy to clinical application: perspectives based on a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Cell Therapy Working Group meeting Am Heart J 2007;153:732-742.[Medline]
  3. Kumar S, Chanda D, Ponnazhagan S. Therapeutic potential of genetically modified mesenchymal stem cells Gene Ther 2008;15:711-715.[Medline]
  4. Kestendjieva S, Kyurkchiev D, Tsvetkova G, et al. Characterization of mesenchymal stem cells isolated from the human umbilical cord Cell Biol Int 2008;32:724-732.[Medline]
  5. Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH, et al. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:11474-11479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kinnaird T, Stabile E, Burnett MS, et al. Marrow-derived stromal cells express genes encoding a broad spectrum of arteriogenic cytokines and promote in vitro and in vivo arteriogenesis through paracrine mechanisms Circ Res 2004;94:678-685.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Berry MF, Engler AJ, Woo YJ, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell injection after myocardial infarction improves myocardial compliance Am J Physiol 2006;290:H2196-H2203.
  8. Iso Y, Spees JL, Serrano C, et al. Multipotent human stromal cells improve cardiac function after myocardial infarction in mice without long-term engraftment Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;354:700-706.[Medline]
  9. Carr CA, Stuckey DJ, Tatton L, et al. Bone marrow-derived stromal cells home to and remain in the infarcted rat heart but fail to improve function: an in vivo cine-MRI study Am J Physiol 2008;295:H533-H542.
  10. Grauss RW, Winter EM, van Tuyn J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells from ischemic heart disease patients improve left ventricular function after acute myocardial infarction Am J Physiol 2007;293:H2438-H2447.
  11. Grauss RW, van Tuyn J, Steendijk P, et al. Forced myocardin expression enhances the therapeutic effect of human mesenchymal stem cells after transplantation in ischemic mouse hearts Stem Cells 2008;26:1083-1093.[Medline]
  12. Abdel-Latif A, Bolli R, Tleyjeh IM, et al. Adult bone marrow-derived cells for cardiac repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis Arch Intern Med 2007;167:989-997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Stevens LC, Little CC. Spontaneous testicular teratomas in an inbred strain of mice Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1954;40:1080-1087.[Free Full Text]
  14. Becker AJ, McCulloch CE, Till JE. Cytological demonstration of the clonal nature of spleen colonies derived from transplanted mouse marrow cells Nature 1963;197:452-454.[Medline]
  15. McCulloch EA, Till JE. Perspectives on the properties of stem cells Nat Med 2005;11:1026-1028.[Medline]
  16. Christoforou N, Gearhart JD. Stem cells and their potential in cell-based cardiac therapies Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2007;49:396-413.[Medline]
  17. Seydoux G, Braun RE. Pathway to totipotency: lessons from germ cells Cell 2006;127:891-904.[Medline]
  18. Filip S, Mokry J, English D, Vojacek J. Stem cell plasticity and issues of stem cell therapy Folia Biol (Praha) 2005;51:180-187.[Medline]
  19. Sanchez PL, Villa A, Sanz R, et al. Present and future of stem cells for cardiovascular therapy Ann Med 2007;39:412-427.[Medline]
  20. Segers VF, Lee RT. Stem-cell therapy for cardiac disease Nature 2008;451:937-942.[Medline]
  21. Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, et al. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement Cytotherapy 2005;7:393-395.[Medline]
  22. Dominici M, Blanc KL, Mueller I, et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006;8:315-317.[Medline]
  23. Kolf CM, Cho E, Tuan RS. Mesenchymal stromal cells. Biology of adult mesenchymal stem cells: regulation of niche, self-renewal and differentiation. Arthritis Res Ther 2007;9:204.[Medline]
  24. Haynesworth SE, Baber MA, Caplan AI. Cytokine expression by human marrow-derived mesenchymal progenitor cells in vitro: effects of dexamethasone and IL-1 alpha J Cell Physiol 1996;166:585-592.[Medline]
  25. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators J Cell Biochem 2006;98:1076-1084.[Medline]
  26. Crisostomo PR, Wang Y, Markel TA, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells stimulated by TNF-alpha, LPS, or hypoxia produce growth factors by an NF kappa B- but not JNK-dependent mechanism Am J Physiol 2008;294:C675-C682.
  27. Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Herring CM, et al. Gender differences in injury induced mesenchymal stem cell apoptosis and VEGF, TNF, IL-6 expression: role of the 55 kDa TNF receptor (TNFR1) J Mol Cell Cardiol 2007;42:142-149.[Medline]
  28. Wang M, Crisostomo PR, Herring C, Meldrum KK, Meldrum DR. Human progenitor cells from bone marrow or adipose tissue produce VEGF, HGF, and IGF-I in response to TNF by a p38 MAPK-dependent mechanism Am J Physiol 2006;291:R880-R884.
  29. Markel TA, Wang Y, Herrmann JL, et al. VEGF is critical for stem cell-mediated cardioprotection and a crucial paracrine factor for defining the age threshold in adult and neonatal stem cell function Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008;295:H2308-H2314.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Ryan JM, Barry FP, Murphy JM, Mahon BP. Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection J Inflamm (Lond) 2005;2:8.[Medline]
  31. Minguell JJ, Erices A. Mesenchymal stem cells and the treatment of cardiac disease Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 2006;231:39-49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Atoui R, Shum-Tim D, Chiu RC. Myocardial regenerative therapy: immunologic basis for the potential "universal donor cells" Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:327-334.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Pittenger MF, Martin BJ. Mesenchymal stem cells and their potential as cardiac therapeutics Circ Res 2004;95:9-20.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Saito T, Kuang JQ, Bittira B, Al-Khaldi A, Chiu RC. Xenotransplant cardiac chimera: immune tolerance of adult stem cells Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:19-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. MacDonald DJ, Luo J, Saito T, et al. Persistence of marrow stromal cells implanted into acutely infarcted myocardium: observations in a xenotransplant model J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1114-1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Meirelles da Silva L, Nardi NB. Murine marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell: isolation, in vitro expansion, and characterization Br J Haematol 2003;123:702-711.[Medline]
  37. Caplan AI, Bruder SP. Mesenchymal stem cells: building blocks for molecular medicine in the 21st century Trends Mol Med 2001;7:259-264.[Medline]
  38. Alhadlaq A, Mao JJ. Mesenchymal stem cells: isolation and therapeutics Stem Cells Dev 2004;13:436-448.[Medline]
  39. Teng CJ, Luo J, Chiu RC, Shum-Tim D. Massive mechanical loss of microspheres with direct intramyocardial injection in the beating heart: implications for cellular cardiomyoplasty J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2006;132:628-632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Chachques JC, Trainini JC, Lago N, et al. Myocardial Assistance by Grafting a New Bioartificial Upgraded Myocardium (MAGNUM trial): clinical feasibility study Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:901-908.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Meldrum DR. Tumor necrosis factor in the heart Am J Physiol 1998;274:R577-R595.[Medline]
  42. Sharma HS, Das DK. Role of cytokines in myocardial ischemia and reperfusion Mediators Inflamm 1997;6:175-183.[Medline]
  43. Meldrum DR, Meng X, Dinarello CA, et al. Human myocardial tissue TNFalpha expression following acute global ischemia in vivo J Mol Cell Cardiol 1998;30:1683-1689.[Medline]
  44. Tashiro H, Shimokawa H, Yamamoto K, et al. Monocyte-related cytokines in acute myocardial infarction Am Heart J 1995;130:446-452.[Medline]
  45. Deten A, Volz HC, Briest W, Zimmer HG. Differential cytokine expression in myocytes and non-myocytes after myocardial infarction in rats Mol Cell Biochem 2003;242:47-55.[Medline]
  46. Latini R, Bianchi M, Correale E, et al. Cytokines in acute myocardial infarction: selective increase in circulating tumor necrosis factor, its soluble receptor, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1994;23:1-6.[Medline]
  47. Bocker W, Docheva D, Prall WC, et al. IKK-2 is required for TNF-alpha-induced invasion and proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells J Mol Med 2008;86:1183-1192.[Medline]
  48. Sitcheran R, Cogswell PC, Baldwin Jr AS. NF-kappaB mediates inhibition of mesenchymal cell differentiation through a posttranscriptional gene silencing mechanism Genes Dev 2003;17:2368-2373.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Guttridge DC, Mayo MW, Madrid LV, Wang CY, Baldwin Jr AS. NF-kappaB-induced loss of MyoD messenger RNA: possible role in muscle decay and cachexia Science 2000;289:2363-2366.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Markel TA, Crisostomo PR, Wang M, Herring CM, Meldrum DR. Activation of individual tumor necrosis factor receptors differentially affects stem cell growth factor and cytokine production Am J Physiol 2007;293:G657-G662.
  51. Rehman J, Traktuev D, Li J, et al. Secretion of angiogenic and antiapoptotic factors by human adipose stromal cells Circulation 2004;109:1292-1298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Pepper MS. Transforming growth factor-beta: vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel wall integrity Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 1997;8:21-43.[Medline]
  53. Bao C, Guo J, Lin G, Hu M, Hu Z. TNFR gene-modified mesenchymal stem cells attenuate inflammation and cardiac dysfunction following MI Scand Cardiovasc J 2007:1-7.
  54. Germani A, Limana F, Capogrossi MC. Pivotal advances: high-mobility group box 1 protein—a cytokine with a role in cardiac repair J Leukoc Biol 2007;81:41-45.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Meng E, Guo Z, Wang H, et al. High mobility group box 1 protein inhibits the proliferation of human mesenchymal stem cells and promotes their migration and differentiation along osteoblastic pathway Stem Cells Dev 2008;17:805-813.[Medline]
  56. Yang H, Wang H, Czura CJ, Tracey KJ. The cytokine activity of HMGB1 J Leukoc Biol 2005;78:1-8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Chang SA, Lee EJ, Kang HJ, et al. Impact of myocardial infarct proteins and oscillating pressure on the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells: effect of acute myocardial infarction on stem cell differentiation Stem Cells 2008;26:1901-1912.[Medline]
  58. Wang XJ, Dong Z, Zhong XH, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor synthesis in mesenchymal stem cells Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008;365:548-554.[Medline]
  59. Hermonat PL, Li D, Yang B, Mehta JL. Mechanism of action and delivery possibilities for TGFbeta1 in the treatment of myocardial ischemia Cardiovasc Res 2007;74:235-243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  60. Lefer AM, Tsao P, Aoki N, Palladino Jr MA. Mediation of cardioprotection by transforming growth factor-beta Science 1990;249:61-64.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  61. Rosenkranz S. TGF-beta1 and angiotensin networking in cardiac remodeling Cardiovasc Res 2004;63:423-432.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Ross S, Hill CS. How the Smads regulate transcription Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008;40:383-408.[Medline]
  63. Derynck R, Zhang Y, Feng XH. Smads: transcriptional activators of TGF-beta responses Cell 1998;95:737-740.[Medline]
  64. Dixon IM, Hao J, Reid NL, Roth JC. Effect of chronic AT(1) receptor blockade on cardiac Smad overexpression in hereditary cardiomyopathic hamsters Cardiovasc Res 2000;46:286-297.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  65. Forte G, Minieri M, Cossa P, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor effects on mesenchymal stem cells: proliferation, migration, and differentiation Stem Cells 2006;24:23-33.[Medline]
  66. Duan HF, Wu CT, Wu DL, et al. Treatment of myocardial ischemia with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing hepatocyte growth factor Mol Ther 2003;8:467-474.[Medline]
  67. Davani EY, Brumme Z, Singhera GK, et al. Insulin-like growth factor-1 protects ischemic murine myocardium from ischemia/reperfusion associated injury Crit Care 2003;7:R176-R183.[Medline]
  68. Li Y, Yu X, Lin S, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 enhances the migratory capacity of mesenchymal stem cells Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2007;356:780-784.[Medline]
  69. Haider HK, Jiang S, Idris NM, Ashraf M. IGF-1-Overexpressing Mesenchymal Stem Cells Accelerate Bone Marrow Stem Cell Mobilization via Paracrine Activation of SDF-1{alpha}/CXCR4 Signaling to Promote Myocardial Repair Circ Res 2008;103:1300-1308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  70. Guo J, Lin G, Bao C, et al. Insulin-like growth factor 1 improves the efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in a rat model of myocardial infarction J Biomed Sci 2008;15:89-97.[Medline]
  71. Haider HK, Ashraf M. Strategies to promote donor cell survival: Combining preconditioning approach with stem cell transplantation J Mol Cell Cardiol 2008;45:554-566.[Medline]
  72. Gnecchi M, He H, Noiseux N, et al. Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt-modified mesenchymal stem cell-mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement Faseb J 2006;20:661-669.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Mirotsou M, Zhang Z, Deb A, et al. Secreted frizzled related protein 2 (Sfrp2) is the key Akt-mesenchymal stem cell-released paracrine factor mediating myocardial survival and repair Proc Natl Acad Sci 2007;104:1643-1648.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  74. Li W, Ma N, Ong LL, et al. Bcl-2 engineered MSCs inhibited apoptosis and improved heart function Stem Cells 2007;25:2118-2127.[Medline]
  75. Yang J, Zhou W, Zheng W, et al. Effects of myocardial transplantation of marrow mesenchymal stem cells transfected with vascular endothelial growth factor for the improvement of heart function and angiogenesis after myocardial infarction Cardiology 2007;107:17-29.[Medline]
  76. Clerk A, Cullingford TE, Fuller SJ, et al. Signaling pathways mediating cardiac myocyte gene expression in physiological and stress responses J Cell Physiol 2007;212:311-322.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. Suzuki, V. Iyer, T.-C. Lee, and J. M. Canty Jr
Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells Mobilize cKit+ and CD133+ Bone Marrow Progenitor Cells and Improve Regional Function in Hibernating Myocardium
Circ. Res., October 14, 2011; 109(9): 1044 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp Biol MedHome page
A. V. Schittini, P. F. Celedon, M. A. Stimamiglio, M. Krieger, P. Hansen, F. D. A. da Costa, S. Goldenberg, B. Dallagiovanna, and A. Correa
Human cardiac explant-conditioned medium: soluble factors and cardiomyogenic effect on mesenchymal stem cells
Exp Biol Med, August 1, 2010; 235(8): 1015 - 1024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
A. M. Abarbanell, Y. Wang, J. L. Herrmann, B. R. Weil, J. A. Poynter, M. C. Manukyan, and D. R. Meldrum
Toll-like receptor 2 mediates mesenchymal stem cell-associated myocardial recovery and VEGF production following acute ischemia-reperfusion injury
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, May 1, 2010; 298(5): H1529 - H1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Arthur C. Coffey
John W. Fehrenbacher
Daniel J. Beckman
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanell, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meldrum, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Abarbanell, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Meldrum, D. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS