ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:709. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.058
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Eric S. Weiss
John V. Conte
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prucz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prucz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


Correspondence

Reply

Roni Prucz, BSE, Eric S. Weiss, MD, John V. Conte, MD

Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, 600 North Wolfe St, Blalock 618, Baltimore, MD 21287-4618

(Email: jconte{at}csurg.jhmi.jhu.edu).

To the Editor:

The authors would like to thank Dr Nakamura [1] for the comments on our article [2] and insightful questions that highlight a few of the limitations of our study. Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) has consistently been shown to improve the symptoms of severe congestive heart failure and serve as a bridge-to-transplantation in the most challenging patient populations [3–7]. Prior studies attempting to compare SVR with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) used left ventricular size to create the comparison group [8]. However, as Dr Nakamura points out, the function of the left ventricle and not necessarily its size, serves as the main indicator for SVR. In our study, the "SVR-candidate" group was chosen based on the presence or absence of the following measurements: an anteroseptal infarct, left ventricular enlargement, akinesia or dyskinesia in the anterior wall, acceptable function of the basal portion of the heart and the lateral wall, and near normal right ventricular function. Although viability and myocardial reserve analysis data in the form of magnetic resonance imaging and dobutamine challenged echocardiography is routinely obtained in our SVR patient population, this data is not available for our standard CABG patients who comprised the "SVR-candidate" cohort. The senior author (masked to patient group) retrospectively identified "SVR-candidates" based on ventriculograms and echocardiography. Importantly, the candidate group was identical to our SVR patient cohort with respect to all available measurements, highlighting the importance of evaluation by an experienced physician.

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is a common finding in patients with severe congestive heart failure secondary to a dilated ventricle. The longitudinal and transverse elongation of the left ventricle laterally displaces the papillary muscles and increases the interpapillary distance [9]. Thus, the MR in these patients is the result of poor cardiac function and left ventricle dilatation, which are the surgical indications for an SVR procedure. The presence or absence of regurgitation itself has no impact at all on the decision to perform SVR or CABG alone. The SVR is not appropriate in the absence of the previously mentioned indications. We have published an article describing the impact of SVR on MR, in which we showed that patients with mild to moderate MR undergoing SVR were more likely to have an improvement in MR grade than patients undergoing CABG alone [10]. We agree with Dr Nakamura's [1] contention regarding the negative impact of MR and that is why we are aggressive in correcting it. If the degree of MR after the SVR and CABG procedures is greater than 2+, or if there is a component of MR due to annular dilation, our protocol is to re-initiate cardiopulmonary bypass to repair the valve. At the 1-year follow-up in those patients with a preoperative MR grade less than 1+ who did not receive a mitral valve operation, 50% of these patients (7 of 14) progressed to 2+ MR and 21% of these patients (3 of 14) progressed to 3+ MR within the SVR + CABG group. Comparatively, within the CABG group, 36% of patients (4 of 11) progressed to 2+ MR, and 27% of the patients (3 of 11) progressed to 3+ MR (p = 0.17). In addition, 5 patients within the SVR + CABG cohort and 7 patients within the CABG cohort had a preoperative MR grade ≥ 3+, but in both study groups, 4 patients had improved to mild-to-moderate (1+ to 2+) MR intraoperatively by transesophageal echocardiography and therefore no valve procedures were performed. At the 1-year follow-up, only 1 patient in the SVR + CABG group had an MR ≥ 3+ compared with the CABG group in which there were 2 deaths and 3 patients with MR ≥ 3+ [10].

On behalf of our co-authors, we would again like to thank Dr Nakamura and colleagues [1] for their critique of our article [2].


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Nakamura T. Surgical ventricular restoration: who really benefits?(letter) Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:708-709.[Free Full Text]
  2. Prucz RB, Weiss ES, Patel ND, Nwakanma LU, Baumgartner WA, Conte JV. Coronary artery bypass grafting with or without surgical ventricular restoration: a comparison Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:806-814.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Athanasuleas CL, Buckberg GD, Stanley AW, et al. Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;44:1439-1445.
  4. Di Donato M, Sabatier M, Montiglio F, et al. Outcome of left ventricular aneurysmectomy with patch repair in patients with severely depressed pump function JAMA 1995;76:557-561.
  5. Di Donato M, Toso A, Maioli M, RESTORE Group Intermediate survival and predictors of death after surgical ventricular restoration Sem Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;13:468-475.[Medline]
  6. Patel ND, Williams JA, Barreiro CJ, et al. Surgical ventricular remodeling for multiterritory myocardial infarction: defining a new patient population J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1698-1706.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Patel ND, Williams JA, Nwakanma LU, Waldron MM, Bluemke DA, Conte JV. Surgical ventricular restoration for advanced congestive heart failure: should pulmonary hypertension be a contraindication? Ann Thorac Surg 2006;82:879-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Maxey TS, Reece TB, Ellman PI, et al. Coronary artery bypass with ventricular restoration is superior to coronary artery bypass alone in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:428-434.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Kaul S. Mechanism of ischemic mitral regurgitation: an experimental evaluation Circulation 1991;84:2167-2180.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Prucz RB, Weiss ES, Patel ND, Nwakanma LU, Shah AS, Conte JV. The impact of surgical ventricular restoration on mitral valve regurgitation Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:726-734.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Surgical Ventricular Restoration: Who Really Benefits?
Teruya Nakamura
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 88: 708-709. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Eric S. Weiss
John V. Conte
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prucz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prucz, R.
Right arrow Articles by Conte, J. V.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS