ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;88:212-215. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.025
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Antonio D'Andrilli
Mohsen Ibrahim
Anna Maria Ciccone
Federico Venuta
Erino A. Rendina
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Andrilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rendina, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D'Andrilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rendina, E. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi


Original Articles: General Thoracic

Transdiaphragmatic Harvesting of the Omentum Through Thoracotomy for Bronchial Stump Reinforcement

Antonio D'Andrilli, MDa,*, Mohsen Ibrahim, MDa, Claudio Andreetti, MDa, Anna Maria Ciccone, MDa, Federico Venuta, MDb, Erino A. Rendina, MDa

a Department of Thoracic Surgery, "Sant'Andrea" Hospital, University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy
b Department of Thoracic Surgery, Policlinico "Umberto I," University of Rome "La Sapienza," Rome, Italy

Accepted for publication April 9, 2009.

* Address correspondence to Dr D'Andrilli, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Via di Grottarossa 1035, Rome, 00189, Italy (Email: adandrilli{at}hotmail.com).

Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, Jan 26–28, 2009.


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Background: We present our technique of omental flap transposition performed through a thoracotomy for bronchial stump protection, and employed over 11 years.

Methods: Between February 1997 and January 2008, the transdiaphragmatic harvesting of the omentum was performed, using an original technique through a thoracotomy approach, in 45 patients. Forty-three patients (29 male, 14 female), considered at high risk for bronchial dehiscence, simultaneously underwent pneumonectomy and 2 patients (1 male, 1 female) were treated for an early postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula by the standard thoracotomy route. The omental flap was mobilized through a radial incision in the diaphragm avoiding an additional laparotomy. The only contraindication for this technique was a previous abdominal intervention. Duration of follow-up ranged between 6 and 102 months (median, 46).

Results: There were no complications related to the omentoplasty. Major complications related to pneumonectomy occurred in 4 patients (9%). Perioperative mortality rate was 2.1% (1 of 45). The non-life threatening complication rate was 11.1% (5 of 45). Postoperative hospital stay ranged between 5 and 21 days (median, 8.3) in the 43 patients undergoing prophylactic omentoplasty and was 11 and 14 days, respectively, in the 2 patients receiving omentoplasty after bronchial dehiscence. No neoplastic recurrence on the bronchial stump or late fistula occurred during follow-up.

Conclusions: This technique of omental flap transposition for bronchial stump coverage through a thoracotomy is an effective method for the prevention and treatment of postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula. The amount of omentum obtained by this technique is appropriate for bronchial reinforcement but not for filling the pleural cavity. This procedure can be performed safely through thoracotomy access avoiding an additional laparotomy.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) represents one of the most serious life threatening complications after pneumonectomy with an incidence of 1% to 12% [1, 2]. Reinforcement of the bronchial stump by viable tissue flaps has been proven to reduce postpneumonectomy BPF rate for patients considered at high risk for bronchial stump dehiscence, especially when the flap is well-vascularized and provides a large amount of tissue [1, 3, 4].

Among the different biologic tissues employed with prophylactic intent in this setting (pleura, intercostal muscle, pericardium, major thoracic muscles, and diaphragm), pedicled omental flaps have been widely used showing optimal results, mainly due to the abundance of viable tissue and excellent vascularization.

However, omental flap transposition has the disadvantage of extending the thoracic operation into the abdomen. This aspect has partially limited its preference among surgeons and acceptance by patients. Therefore, we devised a transdiaphragmatic harvesting technique of the greater omentum which avoids a separate abdominal incision and is performed through the usual thoracotomy. We have used the omental flap to cover postpneumonectomy bronchial stumps in patients considered at increased risk for dehiscence. The same technique has been also used, more recently, in a few selected patients for the treatment of early BPF occurring after pneumonectomy. We present our 11-year experience with this newly devised surgical technique.


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
Between February 1997 and January 2008, the transdiaphragmatic harvesting of an omental flap for bronchial stump reinforcement was performed through our standard thoracotomy approach in 45 patients, out of a total of 204 having undergone pneumonectomy for lung cancer at our institution. Informed consent for the omentoplasty procedure and for inclusion in a prospective database was obtained before surgery from all the patients who were candidates for pneumonectomy and considered at high risk for bronchial dehiscence. The Ethics Committee approved this study and waived the requirement for individual patient consent for the retrospective study. In 43 patients (29 males, 14 females) considered at high risk for dehiscence, the omentoplasty was performed at the end of pneumonectomy with prophylactic intent. There were 28 right pneumonectomies and 15 left pneumonectomies. In 2 patients (1 male, 1 female) the omental flap transposition was employed for the treatment of a BPF developing early in the postoperative period. Both these patients had undergone right pneumonectomy.

The 43 patients, in whom the omentoplasty was used prophylactically, were considered at significantly increased risk for bronchial dehiscence because of the following conditions: previous irradiation (> 4,000 cGy) in 6 patients, high dose steroid therapy in 6, recent chemotherapy resulting in marked immunosuppression in 19, diabetes and right side pneumonectomy in 9, and recent chemotherapy and previous surgical exploration in 3 patients. The 3 patients who had undergone previous surgical exploration were considered unresectable at thoracotomy performed in other centers. In these patients we utilized the same incision from the previous operation. All the other operations were performed through a lateral muscle-sparing thoracotomy in the fifth intercostal space.

Bronchial stump closure was performed with a mechanical stapler (thoracoabdominal, 30 or 45 mm) in all the cases. Resection margins were free of tumor in all patients.

The only contraindication for this omentoplasty technique was a previous abdominal intervention. Candidates for a right pneumonectomy with significant hepatomegaly on computed tomography (CT) were not offered a transdiaphragmatic omental harvest, as the enlarged liver would limit access to the abdomen.

In the 2 patients receiving the omental flap transposition to treat an early right BPF, the operation was performed 5 and 8 days after pneumonectomy, respectively, within a few hours after the detection of the bronchial stump dehiscence. At the time of discharge, detailed information about the procedure was included in the clinical report supplied to all patients as our procedure may impact future abdominal operations.

Duration of follow-up ranged between 6 and 102 months (median, 46). Besides periodic clinical and radiologic surveillance, bronchoscopic examination of the bronchial stump was performed in all living patients once a year for the first 5 years.

Technique
Through our routine muscle sparing thoracotomy, lung resections were performed in the standard fashion. The diaphragm was than incised radially between its anterior insertion and the central tendon. The length of the incision is tailored in order to allow the surgeon's hand to slide through the diaphragm into the abdominal cavity (Fig 1). The hand is introduced into the abdomen and the greater omentum is identified by gentle palpation. When the most distal portion of the omentum is identified and recognized to be free of adhesions, this is gently retracted through the diaphragm into the chest. During this maneuver the transverse colon is identified and its omental insertion is divided as extensively as possible. In the chest the most distal omental extremity is identified by gentle traction and is subsequently isolated carefully respecting its vascular supply (Fig 2). After assuring that the flap reaches the bronchial stump (Fig 3) with no traction on the colon or stomach, the omentum is sutured to the bronchial stump in the usual fashion. The diaphragmatic incision is then closed with heavy silk sutures leaving a wide enough opening to prevent strangulation of the omentum. Tension on the omental flap is further relieved fixing it to the diaphragmatic opening with fine interrupted sutures (Fig 4). It is important to point out that the omentum harvested by this technique is only appropriate to reinforce the bronchial stump and can never be large enough to fill the pleural cavity.


Figure 1
View larger version (123K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Right lateral thoracotomy: enlargement of the radial incision on the diaphragm; the liver is visible through the diaphragm.

 

Figure 2
View larger version (134K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Right lateral thoracotomy: The omentum is retracted into the chest and dissected from the colon (arrow).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. Right lateral thoracotomy: The completely prepared omental flap.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. Postoperative computed tomography, showing the omental flap (arrows) covering the right main stem bronchus after right pneumonectomy.

 

    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
There were no complications related to the omentoplasty procedure. None of the patients reported digestive or abdominal symptoms. No herniation of abdominal organs into the chest occurred in any patient.

Major complications related to pneumonectomy occurred in 4 patients (9%). These included respiratory insufficiency due to pulmonary edema in 2 patients, myocardial infarction in 1 patient, and massive hemorrhage resulting in death in 1 patient. The perioperative mortality rate was 2.1% (1 of 45). Minor complications included atrial fibrillation in 3 patients, subcutaneous emphysema in 1 patient, and temporary renal failure in 1 patient. The non-life threatening complication rate was 11.1% (5 of 45). There was no recurrence of tumor on the bronchial stump and no development of late fistula was found during the follow-up period. In the 2 patients developing early BPF, there was no evidence of empyema and the microbiologic analysis of the pleural fluid revealed no bacterial colonization. Repair of the fistula was successful in both patients and no recurrence was observed. Primary closure of the chest at the end of the operation was possible in both cases. Postoperative hospital stay ranged between 5 and 21 days (median, 8.3) in the 43 patients undergoing prophylactic omentopexy, while it was 11 and 14 days, respectively, in the 2 patients undergoing omentoplasty to reinforce closure of a BPF.

Pathologic stage was the following: IB in 3 patients; IIA in11; IIB in 17; IIIA in 11; and IIIB in 3. At the date of last follow-up (30 June 2008), 21 patients had died as a result of their tumor, 4 patients had died of other causes, 18 patients are alive with no evidence of disease, and 2 are alive with distant recurrence.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 
The use of greater omental flaps has proven to be effective in the management of several complex thoracic surgical problems [3, 5–9]. It has been particularly successful in aiding the healing of bronchial stumps considered at high risk for dehiscence after pneumonectomy or as a means to reinforce the repair of a BPF especially in the presence of empyema. Although very satisfactory results have been obtained also with the use of muscular [4, 10, 11], pericardial [1, 12], and diaphragmatic [13] flaps, the omental tissue shows some peculiarities that promote its utilization in this setting. First, the omentum has a rich vascular supply assuring adequate oxygen and antibiotic delivery. Additionally, the omentum delivers potent angiogenic factors [14–16], which have been proven to improve neovascularization of the bronchial suture lines in animal models [17]. No such factors have been found in the muscle.

The immunologic action of the greater omentum is also well-known to increase local lymphocyte and other immunocompetent elements counts. Moreover, the omental transposition does not have the disadvantage of producing chest wall deformities and impairing the muscle function as seen with the use of major muscles flaps. Its amorphous shape and pliability allows perfect adaptation of the flap to the bronchial stump and hilar structures. However, omental flap transposition has the disadvantage of extending the surgical procedure into the abdomen requiring additional laparotomic access or enlargement of the thoracic incision.

Most often, the omentum is mobilized through an upper midline abdominal incision [3, 5–7] and transposed into the chest through an anterior transdiaphragmatic [3, 5–7] or substernal route [3, 5]. More rarely a paravertebral transdiaphragmatic route has been employed [3]. In the case of sternotomy, the midline thoracic incision is extended into the upper abdomen [3, 8]. Rare cases of omental transposition through a thoracoabdominal incision or subcostal incision have also been described [3].

The need for an additional surgical access into the abdomen and the concern for the potentially related additional complications (ileus, laparotomic dehiscence, herniation) have limited the proliferation of the omentoplasty among thoracic surgeons as well as its acceptance by the patients. Our technique, proven over a long period of time, allows the harvest of a sufficient amount of vascularized omental tissue without an additional laparotomy, by simply performing a radial incision in the diaphragm through the standard thoracotomy. For this reason our procedure is better accepted by patients and reduces operative time and trauma without increased morbidity. In particular, no associated abdominal and gastrointestinal complications or diaphragmatic herniation have been observed in our patients. We believe that fixing the omentum to the diaphragmatic opening is the most effective way to prevent potential intrathoracic herniation of abdominal organs.

It is important to point out that the amount of omental tissue harvested with this technique is not sufficient to fill the entire pleural cavity as required for the treatment of a postpneumonectomy empyema. This procedure is therefore not indicated in the presence of concomitant established infection. In these cases a standard laparotomy or videolaparocoscopic preparation of the omentum is required.

In conclusion, our technique, utilized over an 11-year period, allows omental harvesting safely through the thoracotomy without an additional laparotomy and provides excellent results whether employed prophylactically or for the treatment of early BPFs without associated empyema.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 References
 

  1. Taghavi S, Marta GM, Lang G, et al. Bronchial stump coverage with a pedicled pericardial flap: an effective method for prevention of postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:284-288.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Regnard JF, Alifano M, Puyo P, Fares E, Magdeleinat P, Levasseur P. Open window thoracostomy followed by intrathoracic flap transposition in the treatment of empyema complicating pulmonary resection J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:270-275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Shrager JB, Wain JC, Wright CD, et al. Omentum is highly effective in the management of complex cardiothoracic surgical problems J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;125:526-532.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Arnold PG, Pairolero PC. Intrathoracic muscle plaps: an account of their use in the management of 100 consecutive patients Ann Surg 1990;211:656-662.[Medline]
  5. Levashev YN, Akopov AL, Mosin IV. The possibilities of greater omentum usage in thoracic surgery Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:465-468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Yokomise H, Takahashi Y, Inui K, et al. Omentoplasty for postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistulas Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:122-124.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Duan M, Chen G, Wang T, et al. One-stage pedicled omentum majus transplantation into thoracic cavity for treatment of chronic persistent empyema with or without bronchopleural fistula Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;16:636-638.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Grunenwald DH, André F, Le Pechoux C, et al. Benefit of surgery after chemoradiotherapy in stage IIIB (T4 and/or N3) non-small cell lung cancer J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:796-802.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chichevatov D, Gorshenev A. Omentoplasty in treatment of early bronchopleural fistulas after pneumonectomy Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 2005;13:211-216.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Stamatis G, Freitag L, Wencker M, Greschuchna D. Omentopexy and muscle transposition: two alternative methods in the treatment of pleural empyema and mediastinitis Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1994;42:225-232.[Medline]
  11. Rendina EA, Venuta F, De Giacomo T, Ricci C. Intercostal pedicle flap in tracheobronchial surgery Ann Thorac Surg 1996;62:630-631.[Free Full Text]
  12. Kepletko W, Taghavi S, Perezlenyi A, et al. Impact of different coverage techniques on incidence of postpneumonectomy stump fistula Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1999;15:758-763.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mineo TC, Ambrogi V. Early closure of the postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula by pedicled diaphragmatic flaps Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:714-715.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Goldsmith HSHS, Griffith AL, Kupferman A, Catsinpoolas N. Lipid angiogenic factor from omentum JAMA 1987;252:2034-2036.
  15. Kanamori T, Watanabe G, Yasuda T, Nagamine H, Kamiya H, Koshida Y. Hybrid surgical angiogenesis: omentopexy can enhance myocardial angiogenesis induced by cell therapy Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:160-167.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Litbarg NO, Gudehithlu KP, Sethupathi P, Arruda JA, Dunea G, Singh AK. Activated omentum becomes rich in factors that promote healing and tissue regeneration Cell Tissue Res 2007;329:487-497.
  17. Morgan E, Lima O, Goldberg M, Ferdman A, Luk S, Cooper J. Successful revascularization of totally ischemic bronchial autografts with omental pedicle flaps in dogs J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1982;84:204-210.[Abstract]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Antonio D'Andrilli
Mohsen Ibrahim
Anna Maria Ciccone
Federico Venuta
Erino A. Rendina
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by D'Andrilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rendina, E. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by D'Andrilli, A.
Right arrow Articles by Rendina, E. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lung - cancer
Right arrow Trachea and bronchi


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS