ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:2006. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.02.026
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


Correspondence

Reply

Jonathan Golledge, MChir, Jun Parker

Department of Surgery, James Cook University, School of Medicine, Townsville, QLD, 4811 Australia

(Email: jonathan.golledge{at}jcu.edu.au).

To the Editor:

We thank Dr Khoynezhad [1] for the letter regarding our recent summary analysis [2]. The author raises an important issue regarding definitions in the context of aortic dissection. We agree that time-based definitions (based on ≤2 weeks from symptom onset) of dissection and the term complicated despite being currently employed widely are not the best way of classifying patients. Clearly one physician's definition of poorly controlled hypertension for example is likely to vary from another. In order to compare between groups more clearly, defined rationales for intervention are required. These could include criteria based on haemodynamic instability, sequelae of malperfusion and other less serious complications. We look to working parties on this area to develop agreed definitions of the common complications of aortic dissection that would normally indicate the need for intervention and their subsequent adoption in reported studies to aid summary analyses of the type we carried out.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Khoynezhad A. Comparing apples to oranges: endovascular management of complicated acute type B aortic dissection (letter) Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:2005-2006.[Free Full Text]
  2. Parker JD, Golledge J. Outcome of endovascular treatment of acute type B aortic dissection Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:1707-1712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Comparing Apples to Oranges: Endovascular Management of Complicated Acute Type B Aortic Dissection
Ali Khoynezhad
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 2005-2006. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Golledge, J.
Right arrow Articles by Parker, J.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS