|
|
||||||||
a Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
b Division of Thoracic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland
Accepted for publication March 6, 2009.
* Address correspondence to Dr Baumgartner, Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Blalock 618, 600 N Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287 (Email: wbaumgar{at}jhmi.edu).
Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-fifth Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Francisco, CA, Jan 26–28, 2009.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: In 2003, we began a program providing an introduction to cardiothoracic laboratory research and surgery for medical students. Students are competitively selected for our three-part 8-week summer program. First, students are paired with a cardiothoracic surgery attending for shadowing in clinic and the operating room. Second, students actively participate in large-animal operations in the laboratory. Finally, students complete a clinical research project under the direction of a laboratory resident and faculty mentor. These projects are the students' own. They are responsible for presenting their findings to the division of cardiac surgery at the end of the program.
Results: Since 2003, 18 students have completed the program. Each one has completed a project, collectively resulting in 39 peer-reviewed manuscripts. One student has published 28 peer-reviewed manuscripts. Of 10 students eligible for residency, 8 have applied in general surgery or surgical subspecialty (3 general, 2 plastic, 2 cardiothoracic, and 1 neurosurgery).
Conclusions: Implementing a program to introduce medical students to clinical and laboratory surgery has been successful, as measured by academic productivity. Eighty percent of eligible students entered a surgical field. Programs like these serve to stimulate interest in our specialty.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Concomitant, and likely associated, with these changes has been a sharp decline in the number of general surgery applicants applying to CT residencies, such that in 2005, for the first time, there were fewer applicants than positions available [1]. The number of applicants has continued to steadily decline since that time. According to National Residency Match Program data, in the 2008 application cycle there were only 87 matches of 96 applicants for a total of 130 positions; leaving 36 thoracic surgery programs only partially matched [3].
These disturbing trends are accompanied by numerous articles asserting the difficulties of recent CT graduates in finding employment, dissatisfaction with their career choice, and opinions that the total number of CT residency spots should be decreased [1, 2, 4]. It is also clear that recent years have witnessed a distinct change in both the demographics and values of medical students and residents. Each year brings continued increases in the number of female medical school graduates, a smaller percentage of who seek training in surgical subspecialties [5]. As well, new doctors are increasingly placing a greater importance on life outside of the hospital [6, 7].
All of these facts serve to further dissuade medical students from pursuing CT surgery. Moreover, the length of CT training (on average 8.6 years [1]), serves to further discourage medical students who now focus overwhelmingly on shorter training and better lifestyles when choosing their area of specialty [6, 7]. Pilot programs now exist for integrated 6-year CT residencies that match directly out of medical school. However, the difficulty in attracting top-quality applicants to these, as well as traditional CT fellowship positions, remains.
Despite the evident decline in the popularity of CT surgery as a specialty among general surgery residents, the need for CT surgeons appears to be on the rise. Many have predicted a coming shortage of CT surgeons in the near future [4, 8]. This prediction is related both to the advanced age of many practicing CT surgeons and the progression of the baby-boomer population into older age.
In the context of these turbulent times, we first began a program designed to attract medical and premedical students to surgery, and specifically to the specialty of CT surgery [9]. Since 2003, undergraduates and medical students have participated in structured curricula that expose them to CT surgery in the context of clinical practice, clinical research, operative skills training and large-animal operations, and active mentorship with our faculty, residents, and fellows. In 2006, we presented details of this program in this journal [9]. Herein, we present early results from the first 5 years of our medical student CT research program.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The program accepts 3 medical students annually in the spring after a competitive application process facilitated by the current CT surgery research fellows. Interest is generated by our previous years' students giving positive feedback to the current first-year class and through e-mails to the first-year class describing the details of the program. Projects are developed by the faculty and research fellows to address a defined question using retrospective clinical data gathered continuously by our Cardiac Surgery Data Center. Each of the students is paired with a faculty mentor who helps to guide their clinical projects. After being accepted into the program, students meet with their mentors to discuss what background reading and literature searches will be helpful for their specific project. It is the policy of our division that students have the opportunity to be first author on any publication that arises directly from their work, and further, be allowed to present their findings at national meetings. These projects are therefore truly the students' own, with the faculty and fellows providing guidance along the way. Both institutional review board approval for clinical projects and animal care and use committee approval for animal projects are obtained before the beginning of the summer program.
As outlined in Figure 1, the 8 weeks of the program are quite intensive and focused around completion of the clinical project, including database construction, statistical methodology, and preparation of their oral presentation and manuscript. However, interspersed into the student's experience is the daily work of the CT laboratory. This involves the students being trained in basic operative skills and assisting with large-animal operations, as well as attending lectures and journal clubs focused on research methodology and various topics in CT surgery.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Academic Productivity
The productivity of our students has far exceeded our expectations. Although the total numbers of peer-reviewed journal articles (n = 39) and abstracts presented at national meetings (n = 41) are dominated by one outstanding individual (N.P.; Table 1), the percentage of students who presented or published a journal article is significant at 80% (when excluding students from summer 2008, as noted above). In these numbers, we included all those papers and abstracts that the students have coauthored in the field of CT surgery during medical school. This accounts for the impact of their continued involvement in the Divisions of Cardiac and Thoracic surgery, inspired by their initial experiences in our summer program. This is also illustrative of the ongoing mentorship by our faculty and fellows, which is an integral part of guiding medical students into surgery.
An important component to the academic productivity of our students is the motivation provided by experiencing the publication of their own work, in most cases for the first time. The laboratory is committed to having first-authorship responsibility and recognition lie with the student for his or her own project. We have been successful in this endeavor for the most part. Because shepherding an article through the publication process inevitably involves more time than the 8-week program allows, the ongoing involvement of students with the fellows and faculty is highly encouraged and has been successful.
Career Choices
With the imminent shift of CT surgical training from a fellowship of general surgery to an independent integrated program (applied to directly from medical school), attracting promising medical students to CT surgery becomes even more crucial. In this aspect, our program has also had tremendous success, with 80% of our students applying in some field of surgery and 20% applying specifically in CT surgery. This is a marked increase over National Residency Matching Program data from 2008 in which a total of 13.5% of US senior medical students applied in surgery or a surgical subspecialty [10]. Although we certainly do not believe that our program is the sole motivating factor for these students choosing surgical paths, we believe that their positive experiences augment their own internal motivations. We do, however, believe that some of these students would not have chosen surgical careers were it not for the experience they had working in our CT surgery summer program.
Attracting Students to Surgical Careers
The success of our program in stimulating students to pursue surgical careers has allowed us to reflect on those factors that may be important for motivating students to enter into surgical fields. Those of us who are surgeons know firsthand what a challenging, rewarding, intellectually stimulating, and genuinely fun field it is. The impact that surgeons have on their patients' lives is profound, and the earlier students learn this, the more motivated they will be to choose surgery. The influence that a dedicated mentor can have on the career decisions of a medical student is unparalleled. By receiving guidance from both CT surgical faculty as well as our laboratory general surgery residents, the students gain a broad perspective on surgery as a whole. This early immersion into surgery is an incredibly valuable experience, and we encourage other programs to seek out means to engage students during their early medical school experience.
Importance
Attracting the best medical students to CT surgery is more important than ever. Given the paradigm shift in CT training on the horizon and the ever-shrinking exposure of general surgery residents to cardiac surgery, it is critical to expose medical students to the possibility of CT surgery early in their preclinical years. The shortage of CT surgeons predicted by many in the next decade makes this issue of recruitment even more pressing.
Cardiothoracic surgery continues to evolve to encompass operations for more-complex patients and pathologic processes. The world of device-driven interventions for heart failure, minimally invasive valvular techniques, and transplants require a surgeon with not only excellent technical skills but a facile and scientific mind capable of objectively evaluating new techniques and disseminating knowledge to other medical professionals. As the field continues to evolve, we must have surgeons who can evolve with it. As William Stewart Halsted once wrote, we need "surgeons of the highest type, men who will stimulate the first youths of our country to study surgery and devote their energy and lives to raising the standard of surgical science" [11]. Programs such as this one, which capture the interest of medical students early in their education, can help to accomplish this goal.
Conclusions
In this report, we have presented the early results from a cohort of medical students who have participated in our program to expose them to academic CT surgery and clinical research. Programs aimed at encouraging medical students into CT surgery through active mentorship, operative skills training, and individual academic pursuits can be successful at inspiring medical students into surgical careers. We have had success in these pursuits, as demonstrated by the high academic productivity of our students and their 80% matriculation rate to surgical residencies.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Kitsis Shining a Light on Shadowing JAMA, March 9, 2011; 305(10): 1029 - 1030. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Tesche, R. H. Feins, M. M. Dedmon, K. N. Newton, T. M. Egan, B. E. Haithcock, N. K. Veeramachaneni, and M. E. Bowdish Simulation Experience Enhances Medical Students' Interest in Cardiothoracic Surgery Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2010; 90(6): 1967 - 1974. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Kim, R. M. Reddy, R. S. D. Higgins, and Joint Council for Thoracic Surgical Education Subc "Back to the future": Recruiting the best and brightest into cardiothoracic surgery J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2010; 140(3): 503 - 504. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ouzounian, A. Hassan, C. J. Teng, G. H. Tang, S. A. Vanderby, T. B. Latham, and C. M. Feindel The Cardiac Surgery Workforce: A Survey of Recent Graduates of Canadian Training Programs Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 460 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |