|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Second University of Naples, A.O. Monaldi, Via L. Bianchi, Napoli, 80131 Italy
(Email: gianantonio.nappi{at}unina2.it).
In their article, Panos and colleagues [1] claim a "novel technique for aortic arch surgery." The authors probably were unaware that our group has described exactly the same technique in detail on several occasions [2–4].
I have two comments for the authors. First, in our experience, perioperative, bilateral, transcranial Doppler monitoring of middle cerebral arterial flow is not required to monitor perfusion of the contralateral cerebral hemisphere. This procedure can be troublesome during an emergency operation for acute aortic dissection. The same information can be obtained by observing the amount of blood returning from the left carotid artery before clamping [3]. Second, we used an 8-mm cuffed endotracheal cannula, which is significantly smaller than that used by Panos and colleagues and has negligible effects by itself on the blood flowing through the cannulae to the descending thoracic aorta.
We believe that this is a simple, safe, and effective technique for aortic arch operations and ensures antegrade perfusion at full flow for the entire body during moderate hypothermia.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Panos Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2009; 87(5): 1650 - 1650. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |