|
|
||||||||
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany
Accepted for publication January 13, 2009.
* Address correspondence to Dr Conzelmann, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstr. 1, Mainz, 55131, Germany (Email: lars.conzelmann{at}gmx.de).
Presented at the Fifth Joint Meeting of the German, Austrian and Swiss Societies for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery in Innsbruck, Austria, Feb 2008.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: From April 2004 to August 2007, 29 patients (20 men, 9 women; mean age of 63.2 ± 12.6 years) underwent emergency operation for acute type A aortic dissection with direct true lumen cannulation. After venous drainage into the venous reservoir, the ascending aorta was completely transected in the region between the sinotubular junction and innominate artery. After visual and digital identification of the true lumen, the arterial cannula was directly inserted into the true lumen and secured with a ligature.
Results: Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 77.4 ± 28.3 minutes, and hypothermic circulatory arrest for the distal anastomosis was 10.4 ± 11.0 minutes. All patients survived the surgical procedure. No surgical problems were observed by applying this strategy. Mean intensive care unit stay was 4.0 ± 3.5 days. Postoperative mean ventilation time was 43.3 ± 41.3 hours. One patient had a prolonged postoperative course and required permanent ventilation. Two patients required temporary hemofiltration. Neurologic disorders occurred in 6 patients: 2 had severe cerebral hypoxia, and 4 had temporary hemiplegia under good regression. All patients were alive at discharge.
Conclusions: Direct true lumen cannulation is a promising surgical strategy for emergency operations in type A aortic dissection. It is a simple, quick, and safe method to provide antegrade flow through the true aortic lumen.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All of these cannulation sites have their disadvantages, however. First, these techniques are an additional surgical procedure requiring valuable time. Second, as with any cannulation method, inappropriate perfusion of the false lumen may result. Therefore, the optimal arterial cannulation site in acute type A aortic dissection is still controversial. More than a decade earlier, Borst and colleagues [12, 13] performed technique of direct true lumen cannulation of the ascending aorta when obstruction of the true lumen occurred at the commencement of retrograde perfusion. Recently, Jakob and colleagues [14] reported their good experience in 8 patients with this direct cannulation of the true lumen in acute type A aortic dissection.
Direct cannulation of the true aortic lumen after transection of the ascending aorta was used in our institution in surgical treatment of type A dissection. The present retrospective study was designed to provide perioperative data of this high-risk population and to prove the applicability of this technique.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Operative Procedure
After median sternotomy, the pericardium was opened. A Mersilene ligature tape (Johnson & Johnson Medical GmbH, Norderstedt, Germany) was placed around the ascending aorta for later snaring. The patient was ventilated using pure oxygen. The venous blood was drained rapidly through the right auricle by using a standard 50/36F two-stage cannula (Type V112, Sorin Group, München, Germany) into the venous reservoir until systolic pressure was lower than 30 mm Hg.
The patient was then put in Trendelenburg position, and the ascending aorta was transected in the region between the sinotubular junction and the innominate artery. Thus, the ascending aorta full of blood still could be inspected and the true lumen identified. A standard 2-hole 24F arterial cannula with a straight tip (HK46SM91V, Maquet, Hechingen, Germany) was directly inserted into the true lumen and secured with the Mersilene ligature tape (Fig 1). By using this technique, the jet of the blood stream is not directed against the aortic wall, thus probably preventing further damage to the aortic wall from the "fire hose" effect. This delicate procedure happened under normothermia and took less than 2 minutes, similar to Jakob and colleagues [14].
|
-stat method. Antegrade perfusion of the brain, the abdominal organs, and the lower extremities through the true lumen was guaranteed. The diseased tissue of the ascending aorta—usually up to the origin of the innominate artery—was resected, and cardioplegic solution was given directly into both coronary ostia. The aortic root was reconstructed by reinforcement with a 3- to 5-mm-wide Teflon felt strip (PTFE felt, Impra, Tempe, AZ), and if necessary, the aortic valve was reconstructed using commissural resuspension. The proximal anastomosis of the supracoronary graft replacement (tubular Dacron graft, Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) was done during the cooling phase. The felt strip was included into the anastomosis and the graft intussuscepted into the aortic stump. At the desired temperature, circulatory arrest was initiated, the arterial cannula was removed together with the dissected ascending aorta, and the aortic arch was inspected. If necessary, intimal tears were oversewn. The dissected distal downstream aorta was reconstructed by felt reinforcement similar to the root. The distal anastomosis was performed in the same intussuscepting fashion as the proximal anastomosis. Thereafter, the aortic cannula was placed directly into the tube graft, and antegrade perfusion was restored after appropriate air removal. After rewarming to normothermia, the patient was weaned from CPB.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Intraoperative Data
There were no technical problems with this method. Cannulation of the ascending aorta was safely performed in all cases, and no conversion of the cannulation site was required. No malperfusion by the technique of cannulation and perfusion became evident during CPB. Mean operative time was 269 ± 143 minutes. Mean time from skin incision to initiation of CPB was 22.2 ± 12.5 minutes, and CPB time was 139 ± 88 minutes. Mean aortic cross-clamp time was 77 ± 28 minutes. For distal anastomosis, circulatory arrest was 10.4 ± 11.0 minutes. Organ protection was performed under hypothermia of 27.4° ± 5.7°C. Detailed operative procedures are summarized in Table 2. No additional intraoperative progression of type A dissection was observed by transesophageal echocardiography. All patients survived the surgical procedure and were transferred to the intensive care unit for further observation (Table 2).
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The data presented here support the concept that direct true lumen cannulation may be used as a standard strategy for an emergency operation in type A aortic dissection. Because type A dissection is a dynamic disease, the preoperative diagnostic data may not reflect the problems of the patient at the time of operation. Hypothesizing that antegrade true lumen perfusion is beneficial, the surgeon has the option to control the pathoanatomic situation by placement of the arterial cannula into the true proximal aortic lumen.
Cannulation of the ascending aorta in acute type A aortic dissection has been avoided due to its poor results [2]. One study [6] used a Seldinger technique to cannulate the ascending aorta in addition to the femoral artery with satisfactory results. Just recently, direct true lumen cannulation was reported as a simple, safe, and quick alternative arterial cannulation site for the treatment of type A dissection [14]. A minor technical difference between this and our method is the way of securing the arterial cannula: Jakob and colleagues use a clamp; however, we snare the ascending aorta with a Mersilene tape. Both methods are similar to a former cannulation technique already described in the 1990s by Borst and colleagues, where a Y-piece with a second arterial line was used to be inserted into the true lumen of the proximal aorta [12, 13]. This approach was only used when obstruction of the true lumen occured at the commencement of retrograde perfusion.
In the present study, direct true lumen cannulation was technically feasible in all patients. There were no limitations, even in obese or atherosclerotic patients. No conversion to another cannulation site was necessary. Technical simplicity and speed by saving time to gain an additional arterial access are major advantages of this method. The mean time from skin incision to the beginning of extracorporeal circulation was 22 minutes. This led to prompt establishment of antegrade systemic perfusion, which has been described as being beneficial [3, 6]. The major advantage of direct true lumen cannulation is the remaining antegrade blood flow through the true lumen, which may avoid further dissection, cerebral embolization through mobilized calcified debris, and organ malperfusion. In peripheral cannulation sites, such as axillary, subclavian, or femoral arteries, the risk of false lumen cannulation still remains when the peripheral artery is involved in the dissection [10, 15]. This is relatively uncommon for the right subclavian/axillary artery [13]. Another disadvantage of peripheral approaches is the reported limited success rate of cannulation, about 95% for the axillary artery [16]. Furthermore, the pump flow may be affected in peripheral cannulation sites by potentially diminutive arteries in small patients [17].
Especially in patients with hemodynamic instability, peripheral arterial inflow may not be suitable for rapid establishment of CPB. Peripheral vascular disease and severe atherosclerosis are most widely considered as contraindications for peripheral cannulation techniques. In those patients, the true lumen approach can provide an excellent alternative.
Because this technique does not require an additional incision for peripheral cannulation, there were no additional site-specific intraoperative complications, such as blood loss or kinking of the cannula, or postoperative complications, such as wound healing disturbances, infections, brachial plexus injuries, or vascular compromise [17].
The in-hospital mortality rate of 0% after operations for acute type A aortic dissection in the present study is very satisfactory and in concordance with reported results [14]. Published mortality rates vary from 0% to 44% for these patients when different cannulation sites are used (Table 4) [18–26]. Independent from the cannulation technique, the operative mortality is determined by the preoperative hemodynamic instability. Patients in shock have a significantly higher operative mortality rate than cardiocirculatory stable patients [19].
|
The current study reports a preliminary experience with direct true lumen cannulation in surgical repair of acute type A aortic dissection. The limitations are the relatively small number of patients and the nonrandomized, retrospective design.
In conclusion, direct true lumen cannulation is a promising surgical cannulation technique for emergency surgery in type A aortic dissection with good results. It is a simple, quick, and safe method to provide antegrade flow through the true aortic lumen.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Bonser, A. M. Ranasinghe, M. Loubani, J. D. Evans, N. M. A. Thalji, J. E. Bachet, T. P. Carrel, M. Czerny, R. Di Bartolomeo, M. Grabenwoger, et al. Evidence, Lack of Evidence, Controversy, and Debate in the Provision and Performance of the Surgery of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2011; 58(24): 2455 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Inoue, R. Takahashi, T. Ueda, and R. Yozu Synchronized epiaortic two-dimensional and color Doppler echocardiographic guidance enables routine ascending aortic cannulation in type A acute aortic dissection. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., February 1, 2011; 141(2): 354 - 360. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Suzuki, T. Asai, K. Matsubayashi, A. Kambara, T. Kinoshita, N. Hiramatsu, and O. Nishimura Safety and efficacy of central cannulation through ascending aorta for type A aortic dissection Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, July 1, 2010; 11(1): 34 - 37. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Tiwari, M. Murzi, S. Bevilacqua, and M. Glauber Which cannulation (ascending aortic cannulation or peripheral arterial cannulation) is better for acute type A aortic dissection surgery? Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, May 1, 2010; 10(5): 797 - 802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. D. Lick and A. Kollar Direct True Lumen Cannulation in Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Is a Valuable but Risky Alternative Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1727 - 1727. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O. Conzelmann, N. Kayhan, U. Mehlhorn, E. Weigang, M. Dahm, and C. F. Vahl Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2009; 88(5): 1727 - 1728. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |