|
|
||||||||
a Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
b Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
Accepted for publication December 22, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Hyun Koo Kim, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, 97, Gurodong-gil, Guro-gu, Seoul, 152-703, Korea (Email: kimhyunkoo{at}korea.ac.kr).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Forty-six patients (mean age, 23.6 ± 10.47 years) each with a primary spontaneous pneumothorax underwent wedge resection with chemical and mechanical pleurodesis. Two-lung ventilation anesthesia was performed with a single-lumen endotracheal tube, and the tidal volume was reduced to 4 mL/kg; the respiratory rate was increased to 24 cycles/min. Airway pressure, end-tidal CO2, and the results of blood gas analysis were obtained right after endotracheal intubation and during the operation, and were compared.
Results: The tidal volume was 496.2 ± 94.33 mL at anesthesia induction, which decreased to 243.9 ± 34.43 mL during the two-lung ventilation. In 5 patients, the tidal volume was additionally decreased by 32.5 ± 12.58 mL (p = 0.014) to obtain an optimal working field. The differences between the airway pressure, pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide, and partial pressure of oxygen were significant between the two measurement times. However, all of the values of the arterial blood gas analysis were within normal range. The oxygen saturation (99.9% ± 0.69% versus 99.8 ± 0.72%; p = 0.160) and end-tidal CO2 (33.2 ± 3.74 mm Hg versus 34.1 ± 4.19 mm Hg; p = 0.157) were not significantly different. The time from intubation before the incision was 17.1 ± 4.18 minutes, the operation time was 31.9 ± 14.48 minutes, and the total anesthesia time was 65.8 ± 15.02 minutes.
Conclusions: Thoracoscopic surgery for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using two-lung ventilation with low tidal volume was technically feasible.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One-lung ventilation is a commonly used technique that facilitates surgical visualization during thoracic surgical procedures. In particular, during VATS, one-lung ventilation may play a pivotal role in the successful completion of a planned procedure [5, 6]. However, it has the disadvantages of causing hypoxemia, tracheobronchial trauma, and oxidative stress [7]. In addition to these complications, it may add additional time and cost because of the need to verify the proper position of the tube by fiberoptic bronchoscopy [8].
Recently, Cerfolio and colleagues [9] reported that in patents with a malignant pleural effusion or effusions of unknown cause, VATS with two-lung ventilation was possible and it afforded excellent visualization of the pleural space, allowing pleural biopsies and talc insufflation; as a result, it was recommended for use in cases requiring wedge resection of the lung for interstitial lung disease. We occasionally used two-lung ventilation during a VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax, during a one-lung ventilation procedure, to identify an air leak or collapsed bleb or bullae. At first, we partially clamped the bronchial lumen of the double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT), on the side undergoing surgery. Then, we placed the DLT but inflated both lungs and used a low tidal volume. Next, we started to place a single-lumen tube in all cases during the VATS for a primary spontaneous pneumothorax, starting in April 2007. In this study we evaluated the safety and feasibility of two-lung ventilation anesthesia with low tidal volume during VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.
| Material and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Anesthetic Techniques
General anesthesia was induced with 2.5% thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg (Choongwae Pharma Corporation, Hwasung, Gyeonggi, South Korea) and rocuronium 0.6 mg/kg (Zemuron; Organon Inc, Kenilworth, NJ). Soon after loss of consciousness was achieved, the radial artery was cannulated for intermittent arterial blood gas analysis. Patients were intubated with a single-lumen endotracheal tube (Sheridan/CF Tracheal Tubes; Hudson RCI, Durham, NC) and ventilated with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg and a respiratory rate of 12 cycles/min at a fraction of inspired oxygen of 0.5. The inspiratory-to-expiratory ratio was fixed at 1:2, and the flow rate of O2 and N2O were 1.5 mL/min. Positive end expiratory pressure was not used during the operation. Before entering the thoracic cavity, the tidal volume was reduced to 4 mL/kg, and the respiratory rate was increased to 24 cycles/min to maintain the same amount of minute volume as was present initially. Whenever the operator notified the anesthesiologist of an inadequate surgical field, the tidal volume was gradually reduced by 10 mL until the operator had adequate visualization for the surgery (Fig 1). During the surgery, the arterial blood gas analysis was performed two times at full (before the pleura was opened) and low tidal volumes (after the pleura was opened). We recorded the airway pressure, end-tidal CO2, and the oxygen saturation. When the patient was ventilated at low tidal volume, a pulse oximetry O2 saturation of 90% was considered the minimal level allowed. In addition, the time from intubation to the incision, the operation time, and total time for anesthesia were measured. For all procedures, we prepared the wire-guided endobronchial blocker (WEB, Arndt blocker; Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN) for one-lung ventilation in case we failed to obtain adequate surgical visualization with the low tidal volume used for the two-lung ventilation.
|
Data Collection and Analysis
The medical records were reviewed including the history of the primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Information on the duration of the operation and the postoperative hospital stay were also reviewed. Statistical analysis was carried out using statistical software (SPSS for Windows, release 12.0; SPSS; Chicago, IL). Probability values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The time from endotracheal intubation to the incision was 17.1 ± 4.18 minutes (range, 10 to 27 minutes), the operation time was 31.9 ± 14.48 minutes (range, 15 to 77 minutes), and the total time under anesthesia was 65.8 ± 15.02 minutes (range, 45 to 110 minutes). In all patients, thoracoscopic bleb resection with pleurodesis was performed successfully. Two patients with bilateral pneumothorax underwent thoracoscopic bilateral bleb resection using two-lung ventilation in the right and then left lateral decubitus position, respectively. Three patients had air leakage until the third day postoperatively, but the chest tube could be withdrawn by the fifth day after surgery by managing this complication with talcum pleurodesis. There were no wound infections, early recurrences, or readmissions. The chest tube was removed on average at postoperative day 3.5 ± 1.1 (range, 2 to 5 days), and patients were discharged from the hospital without complications on average at postoperative day 4.6 ± 1.2 (range, 3 to 6 days). During the follow-up period (11.2 ± 3.3 months, range 9 to 14 months), there was no recurrence on the side that underwent surgery.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
One-lung ventilation is almost always used for VATS. It is usually safe, and it provides superb visualization and an excellent working field for procedures involving the pleura, lung, and mediastinum after the appropriate collapse of the lung [9]. However, during one-lung ventilation, the lung undergoing surgery remains completely collapsed and unventilated; the lung with atelectasis is hypoperfused owing to hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction [13]. Therefore, when the one-lung ventilation is completed, the subsequent lung expansion along with tissue perfusion may produce oxygen free radicals [14], which causes reexpansion pulmonary edema [15].
There are several methods used to achieve one-lung ventilation, including the DLT (Broncho-cath, Mallinckrodt Medical, Athlone, Ireland), the Univent (Phycon, Tokyo, Japan), the single-lumen tube with wire-guided endobronchial blocker (WEB, Arndt blocker; Cook Critical Care), the Fogarty catheter (Edwards Lifesciences LLC, CA), and endobronchial intubation using a single-lumen tube. However, the DLT and Univent have some drawbacks such as an increased risk of airway trauma owing to the larger diameter of the tube [16], increasing air flow resistance and ventilation pressure [17], and technical difficulty [18]. For the WEB, it is hard to reposition or redirect the blocker [19]. For the Fogarty catheter, it has the potential risk of herniation of the balloon, airway damage [20], and the possibility of an allergic response to the latex [19]. For endobronchial intubation with a single-lumen tube, it can be difficult to secure an adequate seal for lung deflation [21].
In addition to the potential associated complications, one-lung ventilation requires additional time and cost. The cost of a single-lumen tube and placing it is $50, compared with the $375 cost of placing a DLT in the United States [9]. In our hospital, the price is higher for the DLT (US $98) and Univent (US $179) compared with the single-lumen tube (US $3.37). A bronchoscopic examination is mandatory to confirm the positioning of the endotracheal tube for one-lung ventilation; this adds additional time even in experienced hands [9]. Moreover, on occasion, we have to inflate the lung because of decreasing oxygen saturation, or because the lung remained expanded owing to a migrated or incorrectly positioned endotracheal tube during the one-lung ventilation [9]; these problems add additional time to the procedure. The complications, high cost, and increased time for one-lung ventilation add significant burdens to what is an otherwise very short and simple procedure.
Cerfolio and associates [9] reported that they could obtain an adequate working field with low tidal volumes while both lungs are ventilated during VATS for pleural biopsies and talc pleurodesis. On occasion we would use two-lung ventilation during a VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax during a one-lung ventilation procedure to find an air leak, collapsed bleb, or bullae. At first, we partially clamped the bronchial lumen of the DLT, on the side undergoing surgery, with normally set tidal volumes to continue ventilating the lung undergoing surgery. Partial clamping resulted in a substantial decrease in the tidal volume delivered to the operative lung and provided a better working field than the complete two-lung ventilation, without any significant stenosis of the breathing circuit or air trapping. The degree of clamping could not be evaluated because it depends on the practical experience of the anesthesiologist. After several cases with no problems, we placed the DLT but inflated both lungs and used a low tidal volume. Next, we started to place a single-lumen tube in all cases during the VATS for a primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The one-lung ventilation, with low tidal volume during VATS for primary pneumothorax, provided almost the same visibility, and the operation time was not increased compared with the one-lung ventilation procedure. There were only 5 patients in whom an adequate operative field was not achieved in this study; this problem was solved by additional decrease of the tidal volume. Cerfolio and coworkers [9] routinely decreased the tidal volume to 150 to 250 mL in their study. The results of this study showed that a tidal volume of 4 mL/kg was sufficient to obtain an adequate surgical field; this tidal volume maintained optimal pulmonary function without hypoxia or hypercapnia. The most important benefits of this anesthetic procedure were that the time from intubation to the incision was reduced and the cost was dramatically decreased because a bronchoscopy was not needed.
According to the analysis of the last 50 cases using one-lung ventilation in our hospital, the average time from anesthesia induction to incision, operation time, and total anesthesia time was around 40, 33 and 83 minutes, respectively. The total anesthesia time was reduced by placing only a single-lumen tube; the time from anesthesia induction to incision was reduced without increasing the operation time, which was offset by the time spent altering the tidal volumes to improve visualization.
The patients with moderate-to-severe pleural adhesions on chest roentgenograph or chest CT, before closed thoracostomy, were excluded; this was because these findings require a larger working field to perform the adhesiolysis and to identify the targeted blebs or bullae in detail. In addition, obese patients, those with a small chest, those or without emphysema have reduced working area; in such cases one-lung ventilation should be used.
During this study, we prepared the WEB for one-lung ventilation in case we failed to obtain adequate surgical visualization with low tidal volumes under two-lung ventilation. Under bronchoscopic guidance, the WEB can be inserted through the endotracheal tube with the patient in any position, even the lateral position. This procedure can be performed within 10 minutes at our hospital if VATS with one-lung ventilation failed, and open thoracotomy could be performed. However, there was no case in which two-lung ventilation was converted to one-lung ventilation.
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery can be performed on patients who are awake under local anesthesia [22]; however, this is very difficult to do because of tachypnea, anxiety, and poor analgesia [9]. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery also can be done with the use of CO2 insufflation; however, this can cause a situation resembling a tension pneumothorax in the closed chest cavity, with a fall in the systolic blood pressure [23, 24]. The results of this study suggest that for a relatively short and simple procedure such as bleb resection, the two-lung ventilation anesthesia with low tidal volume was safe and effective and could provide an alternative option. In addition, this approach might be considered for patients who require obligate one-lung ventilation owing to impaired contralateral (nonoperated) lung function.
Postoperative air leaks occur mainly at the staple lines as a result of stapling problems, the incomplete resection of blebs, emphysematous changes in the resected area, or the crossing of staple lines [25]. Cho and colleagues [26] reported a reinforcement of the visceral pleura around the staple line with fibrin sealant and cellulose mesh in 219 patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax; this procedure appears to be a reasonable way to prevent postoperative air leaks and recurrent pneumothorax by making visceral pleura thickened and fibrotic. In our hospital, we have performed this procedure routinely [26]. In this study, 3 patients had postoperative air leaks (6.5%), which was not better than in previous reports [27, 28]. However, there was no recurrence on the side that underwent surgery during the follow-up period.
In our hospital, bedside talc pleurodesis has been routinely performed to evaluate patients for postoperative air leaks and to monitor them for early complications such as arrhythmia, hypotension, infection, and respiratory failure [29]. However, the traditional method of treatment for postoperative air leaks, tube thoracostomy with large-bore chest tubes connected to continuous wall suction, requires hospitalization, is expensive, limits patient mobility, and can cause significant patient discomfort [30]. Ambulatory pleurodesis would be a feasible alternative to inpatient sclerosis, especially in patients with strong preferences for outpatient care [31].
Cerfolio and associates [9] reported that patents with a malignant pleural effusion or effusions of unknown cause are candidates for VATS with two-lung ventilation to perform pleural biopsies and talc insufflations. In addition, they recommended this procedure for cases requiring wedge resection of the lung for interstitial lung disease. In addition, it was thought that VATS for simple procedures such as a wedge resection of the lung as well as chemical and mechanical pleurodesis of the apex did not require two-lung ventilation in all patients, especially those who are tall and thin and have large barrel chests from emphysema.
In conclusion, the results of our study showed that VATS for primary spontaneous pneumothorax using two-lung ventilation anesthesia with low tidal volume was technically feasible compared with one-lung ventilation anesthesia.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
H. Kim, H. K. Kim, D.-Y. Kang, D.-K. Lee, Y. H. Choi, and S. H. Lim A comparative study of two- versus one-lung ventilation for needlescopic bleb resection Eur. Respir. J., May 1, 2011; 37(5): 1183 - 1188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |