|
|
||||||||
a Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
b Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
c Department of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
Accepted for publication June 10, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Beiras-Fernandez, Department of Cardiac Surgery, University Hospital Grosshadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, 81377, Germany (Email: andres.beiras{at}med.uni-muenchen.de).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 63-year-old man patient presented with acute coronary syndrome (anterior ST-segment elevation depression; negative myocardial laboratory markers) after a 6-day period of unstable angina. Cardiac catheterization showed a two-vessel coronary disease involving the left main, the left anterior descending, and the left circumflex coronary arteries. The patient was scheduled for coronary artery bypass grafting and infusion with heparin (1,000 IU/h) and tirofiban (initial infusion of 0.4 mg/h for 30 minutes followed by 0.1 mg/h) was started. Initial laboratory results revealed no remarkable findings (Table 1). The baseline platelet count was 223 x 109/L. Treatment with tirofiban and heparin was continued until surgery, which occurred 8 hours later. At this time, the platelet count was 226 x 109/L. The patient underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting by using the left internal thoracic artery to the left anterior descending artery and a single saphenous vein graft to the medial portion of the left circumflex artery. Anticoagulation was initially performed with 10,000 IU of unfractioned heparin and was carefully monitored with activated clotting time (>300 sec). Heparin was conventionally antagonized with protamine after the aortic anastomosis. However, the patient showed a severe diffuse bleeding. Intraoperative blood loss was 1,700 mL. Nine units of frozen fresh plasma, 1 unit of erythrocytes, and 1 unit of platelets were administered. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in stable condition with low pharmacologic support with norepinephrine (0.2 mg/h) and milrinone (0.4 mg/h).
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Differential diagnosis with other entities in patients receiving GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors and heparin is mandatory. Pseudo-thrombocytopenia is defined as an artifactual miscalculation of platelets because of clumping platelets in blood samples anti-coagulated with ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). In our case, pseudo-thrombocytopenia could be excluded after repeated platelet counts in blood anti-coagulated with citrate. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia could be excluded after a negative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin. Furthermore, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type I is associated with mild thrombocytopenia, and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II typically occurs 4 to 10 days after starting a therapy with heparin.
The profound thrombocytopenia observed in our patient was then most likely associated with tirofiban, considering the duration of the therapy (less than 24 h), the severity of the thrombocytopenia (1 x 109/L 6 hours after exposure), and the negative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay heparin-induced thrombocytopenia test. However, the mechanism of GPIIb/IIIa receptor antagonists associated with severe thrombocytopenia is not fully understood. One hypothesis suggests the induction of conformational changes in the thrombocyte receptors after therapy, which could react with pre-existing circulating antibodies [7].
Shanmugam and colleagues [8] reported that surgical revascularization could be safely performed in patients within a few hours of receiving tirofiban with little bleeding risk. However, acute profound thrombocytopenia after tirofiban can be life threatening in patients who will undergo coronary surgery, as it may increase the incidence of perioperative bleeding, thus potentially leading to reintervention. In our patient, acute thrombocytopenia presented 6 hours after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, and increased thrombocyte substitution therapy was needed to obtain sufficient hemostasis. We believe that no data regarding acute profound thrombocytopenia after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting have been published.
In our opinion, the thrombocyte count should be strictly monitored in patients presenting with an acute coronary syndrome needing coronary surgery, especially after administration of a GPIIb/IIIa receptor inhibitor. Furthermore, platelet's transfusion should be considered if presentation of the thrombocytopenia occurs in the early postoperative period, to reduce the bleeding risk.
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F. Bizzarri and G. Frati Acute Profound Thrombocytopenia After Treatment With Tirofiban and Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Is There a Paradox? Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1048 - 1048. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Beiras-Fernandez, M. Weis, and M. Schmoeckel Reply Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1048 - 1048. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |