ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2009;87:353-354. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.06.005
© 2009 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Vidyadhar S. Lad
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lad, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lad, V. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


Correspondence

Valve Size Does Matter in the Young: Letter 1

Vidyadhar S. Lad, MCh, FRCS

Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4 Canada

(Email: vidyadhar.lad{at}uhn.on.ca).

To the Editor:

I read with great interest the article by Yoshikawa and colleagues' [1] report of observations suggesting that a small St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve (St. Jude Medical Inc, St. Paul, MN) can be advantageously used in most Japanese patients because their body size is generally smaller than that of Western patients. The authors have reported actuarial survival at 10 years as 90.9% ± 8.7%, which drops to 25.2% ±21.0% at 20 years in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) using a 19-mm prosthesis. Although the authors emphasize that the deaths are not valve related, philosophically the patients are most concerned with not why they die, but the fact that they do die. Most published studies including this one [1] emphasize that patient–prosthesis mismatch (PPM) has no effect on survival after AVR, yet the majority of longest reported survival is 10 years [2, 3], which is reasonably good, but it certainly drops significantly as it extends beyond this time period [4, 5]. In addition, in these studies [1–5], the majority of the patients were elderly; they seem to be more tolerant to small aortic prostheses owing to less physical activity than younger patients.

With this background information, I wish to add a comment applicable to the practice of many cardiovascular surgeons in Asia. Juvenile rheumatic aortic stenosis (age ≤ 30 years) necessitating valve replacement is well known in the Indian subcontinent [6]. The patient population here is also typically small in size, with small aortic roots. In these individuals, with a longer life expectancy, I believe one can not be satisfied with a 25% survival at 20 years. In an earlier study, Pai and colleagues [7] showed that young rheumatics (mean age, 36 years; body surface area, 1.53 m2) with aortic stenosis, who were undergoing AVR using an SJM valve, mild PPM and moderate PPM in those receiving a 19-mm valve was poorly tolerated, even though the drop in trans-prosthetic gradient (TPG) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were maximum. At 6-month follow-up, the mean TPG was 48 mm Hg and the mean LVMI was 159 g/m2. Although it can be argued that if these patients been followed-up longer, then a decreasing trend could have been seen; it does not seem to happen. Sharma and colleagues [8] have shown that the drop in TPG and regression in LVMI reaches a stable value by 6 months after surgery. Persistently elevated left ventricular mass in these patients, as a result of a small prosthesis with obstructive gradients, may increase the risk of sudden death. Data from hypertension literature supports the concept of lowering the risk of sudden cardiac death by facilitating the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy [9].

Based on the available literature, it is difficult to establish the influence of small valves on the postoperative clinical outcome, yet it is clearly conceivable that a 19-mm valve that would be appropriate in an old patient should be avoided in young active patients in whom 20 to 30-year survival is a reasonable target. Add the growth of pannus to this on these small valves, further reducing the effective valve orifice area with years to follow. In these patients, surgical strategies should be considered to avoid PPM, such as aortic annular patch enlargement or homograft or autograft insertion. Of these, aortic annular patch enlargement may be the safest and most reproducible one, and allows insertion of a prosthetic valve one to two sizes larger, rather than with AVR alone [10].


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Yoshikawa K, Fukunaga S, Arinaga K, et al. Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with a small St. Jude valve in Japanese patients Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1303-1308.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Sawant D, Singh AK, Feng WC, Bert AA, Rotenberg F. Nineteen-millimeter aortic St. Jude medical heart valve prosthesis: Up to sixteen years' follow-up Ann Thorac Surg 1997;63:964-970.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Hanayama N, Christakis GT, Mallidi HR, et al. Patient prosthesis mismatch is rare after aortic valve replacement: valve size may be irrelevant Ann Thorac Surg 2002;73:1822-1829.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. He GW, Grunkemeier GL, Gately HL, Furnary AP, Starr A. Up to thirty-year survival after aortic valve replacement in the small aortic root Ann Thorac Surg 1995;59:1056-1062.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rao V, Jamieson E, Ivanov J, Armstrong S, David TE. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement Circulation 2000;102(Suppl III):III5-III9.[Medline]
  6. Vijayaraghavan G, Cherian G, Krishnaswami S, Sukumar IP, John S. Rheumatic aortic stenosis in young patients presenting with combined aortic and mitral stenosis Heart 1977;39:294-298.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Pai RK, Lad VS, Agarwal N, Khandeparkar J, Patwardhan A. Implications of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement; who tolerates and who does not? Ind J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;21:256-261.
  8. Sharma UC, Barenburg P, Pokharel S, et al. Systematic review of the outcome of aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis Ann Thorac Surg 2004;78:90-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Levy D. Clinical significance of left ventricular hypertrophy: insights from the Framingham study J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1991;17(Suppl 2):S1-S6.
  10. Peterson MD, Borger MA, Feindel CM, David TE. Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: Improving results with time Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2044-2049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Reply
Shuji Fukunaga and Kazuhiro Yoshikawa
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2009 87: 354-355. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Fukunaga and K. Yoshikawa
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 354 - 355.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Vidyadhar S. Lad
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lad, V. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lad, V. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS