|
|
||||||||
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Korea
b Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Bundang, Korea
c Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
Accepted for publication September 11, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Park, Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 300 Gumi-dong, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 463-707, Korea (Email: drkhpark{at}yahoo.co.kr).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) images of 122 patients who underwent conventional ascending with or without arch replacement for acute type I dissection were reviewed. Patency and width of false lumen and maximal diameter of the aorta were compared between early and last follow-up images. Changes were analyzed separately in the thoracic and abdominal segments.
Results: In early CT, thoracic false lumen was patent in 85 patients (69.7%), and abdominal false lumen was patent in 111 patients (91.0%). Among these, the false lumen remained patent after a mean interval of 33.6 months in 69 patients (81.1%) and 105 patients (94.6%), respectively. In 58 patients (47.5%), the descending aorta dilated by 1 cm or more. Dilatation occurred more frequently in the thoracic aorta and in patients with patent or wide false lumens, larger aortic diameter, Marfan syndrome, younger age, and male sex. Meanwhile, shrinkage of thoracic false lumen occurred in 36 patients (29.5%). Such shrinkage occurred in 23 of 24 patients (95.8%) who had thrombosed and narrow false lumens in the thoracic aorta.
Conclusions: Early postoperative characteristics of false lumen were helpful for predicting both dilation and regression. Our data show not only a high incidence of descending aortic dilatation after repair of acute type I dissection, but also shrinkage of thoracic false lumen in some patients. These findings can be used as control data for determining the benefit of more extensive or new surgical approaches.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There were 122 patients, 72 male and 50 female. The mean age was 52.0 years (range, 24 to 82). Twenty patients had phenotypic manifestations of Marfan syndrome. All operations were performed within 3 days after symptom onset. Aortic resection and distal anastomosis of the prosthetic graft were done under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in all patients. The extent of aortic replacement included the root in 39 patients (32.0%) and the transverse arch in 29 patients (23.8%). All intimal tears located in the arch were resected by replacing the entire or part of the arch (partial arch or hemiarch replacement). We did not insert an elephant trunk into the distal aorta during replacement of the arch.
Equipment and Protocol of CT Scan
The CT scan was done with a 16-slice (Mx 8000IDT; Philips Medical Systems, Best, the Netherlands) or 64-slice (Brilliance 64; Philips Medical Systems) multidetector row scanner. Images were acquired from the mandibular level to the level of acetabular roof at 5-mm intervals. To enhance the aorta, a bolus of 100 to 120 mL nonionic contrast material (Ultravist 370; Schering, Berlin, Germany) was intravenously injected at a flow rate of 4 mL/s, followed by flushing with 20 mL saline at the same flow rate. The enhanced image was acquired at 5 s after the signal density level in the ascending aorta reached the predefined threshold of 150 Hounsfield Units. Finally, additional 3-minute delay scanning was performed.
Review of CT Images and Data Analysis
For each patient, the early postoperative and the last of multiple follow-up images were reviewed. The interval between the surgery and the last CT examination ranged from 6 to 109 months (mean, 33.6; median, 26). False lumen patency was recorded at five levels in the early and the last images of each patient (Fig 1). Partially thrombosed false lumen was recorded as being patent. The five levels were grouped into two segments: thoracic (upper three levels) and abdominal (lower two levels). Thoracic aortic false lumen was recorded as patent if all or the upper two levels had patent false lumen. Abdominal aortic false lumen was recorded as patent if one of two levels had patent false lumen. Widths of true and false lumens were measured at the level where the external aortic diameter is largest in each segment. The review and the measurement were performed on the workstation provided with the CT scanner (Brilliance; Philips Medical Systems).
|
2 or the Fisher exact test was used for comparing categorical variables and the Student t test was used for comparison of numerical variables. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. | Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
In the thoracic aorta, shrinkage of the false lumen occurred in 36 patients (29.5%). Such regression was most frequently observed in the patients who had completely thrombosed and narrow false lumen in the early postoperative period (23 of 24; 95.8%). In the abdominal aorta, the false lumen regressed in all of the few patients in whom it had been thrombosed early after surgery. On the contrary, thrombosed thoracic false lumen became patent during the follow-up in some patients, especially if it was wider than the true lumen (8 of 37, 21.6%).
Dilatation of the Descending Aorta
Dilatation of the descending aorta, defined as increase of maximal diameter by 1 cm or more during the follow-up period, occurred in 58 patients (47.5%). In 50 of those patients, the proximal thoracic aorta was involved in aneurysmal dilatation. The extent of dilatation was thoracic in 14, infrarenal in 2, and thoracoabdominal in 42 patients (Fig 4). A second operation for the descending aortic aneurysm was recommended for 22 patients in whom the maximal aortic diameter exceeded 5.5 cm (5.0 cm in case of Marfan syndrome). Nineteen patients underwent a second operation, and 17 of them survived. In 8 patients, the interval between the first and second operations was less than 1 year.
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The higher incidence of aortic dilatation among younger patients of our series can be partly explained by the fact that 15 of the 20 patients with Marfan syndrome were younger than 40 years. In addition, considering that most of our patients needed long-term antihypertensive medications postoperatively, we speculate that the impact of hypertension on aortic dilatation is greater in younger patients. As for the duration of follow-up, it is remarkable that the aorta dilated by 1 cm or more in more than 40% of patients who were followed for less than 1 year. Eight of them underwent second surgery soon after the CT examination. Based on this observation, we assume that aortic dilatation may be biphasic in some patients, in other words, rapid expansion in the early period and slow, progressive dilatation later on.
Because residual intimal tear in the distal aorta is thought to be the major cause of continued false lumen patency [16, 23], some surgeons believe that more extensive aortic replacement could decrease the prevalence of patent false lumen. Some reported that the proximal thoracic false lumen was less frequently patent after arch replacement than after replacement of the ascending aorta only [2, 17, 24, 25]. In addition, some surgeons advocate insertion of a short elephant trunk during replacement of the arch to exclude small intimal tears adjacent to the anastomosis [16]. By this simple modification, complete thrombosis of the false channel in the proximal descending thoracic aorta could be achieved in 43.2% before discharge and in 100% at 3 years after surgery [18]. In the further modification, the elephant trunk is mounted on a self-expandable stent to allow insertion of a larger and longer prosthesis, thereby ensuring true lumen expansion and false lumen thrombosis [12]. It was reported that the so-called frozen elephant trunk technique resulted in complete thrombosis and shrinkage of the proximal thoracic false lumen in 90% to 100% and in 60% to 80% of cases, respectively [14, 15, 19].
However, the benefit of frozen elephant trunk has not been proven by randomized trials or case-control comparisons. For the present, the only way to assess the benefit would be a comparison with the historical data. We believe that our study provides control data for change of descending aortic false lumen after surgery performed in accordance with modern principles: open anastomosis under total circulatory arrest and resection of all arch tears. Some of our results back up the rationale of the frozen elephant trunk: (1) the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was patent and larger than the true lumen in nearly 70% of cases early after surgery; (2) patency of the false lumen was maintained later on in most of such cases; (3) aortic dilatation occurred frequently in them; and (4) the abdominal aorta remained relatively stable although the false lumen continued to be patent in most cases. In spite of such findings, we think that more data are needed about the rate and severity of complications [19, 26–28] before inserting frozen elephant trunk as a routine procedure because of our observation that nearly 20% of our patients had favorable false lumen characteristics early after surgery, namely, false lumen thrombosis and expansion of true lumen in the thoracic aorta. In most of them, false lumen regressed during the follow-up.
Our study has several limitations. First, we did not review CT images taken at the same interval after surgery, and subsequently could not present the cumulative rate of aortic dilatation or thrombosis of previously patent false lumen. Second, the follow-up duration was not long enough to show long-term change of the descending aorta that remained stable early after surgery. Third, we could not compare the results of ascending aortic replacement and arch replacement because of the relatively small number of patients who underwent arch replacement. Such comparison might have showed different rates of false lumen patency according to extent of aortic replacement [2, 17, 24, 25]. Lastly, we did not review the preoperative images and their relationship with postoperative findings. The quality and format of preoperative CT images taken at different referring hospitals were variable, and some images were unavailable at the time of review.
In conclusion, we confirmed the high incidence of descending aortic dilatation after repair of acute type I aortic dissection. However, we also found that the descending aortic lesion changed favorably in some patients. Early postoperative characteristics of the false lumen were helpful for predicting both favorable and unfavorable changes during later follow-up. Our results can be used as a control data for determining the benefit and indication of a more extensive or newer approach such as frozen elephant trunk.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. S. Bonser, A. M. Ranasinghe, M. Loubani, J. D. Evans, N. M. A. Thalji, J. E. Bachet, T. P. Carrel, M. Czerny, R. Di Bartolomeo, M. Grabenwoger, et al. Evidence, Lack of Evidence, Controversy, and Debate in the Provision and Performance of the Surgery of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 6, 2011; 58(24): 2455 - 2474. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Jazaeri, R. Gupta, P. J. Rochon, and T. B. Reece Endovascular Approaches and Perioperative Considerations in Acute Aortic Dissection Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2011; 15(4): 141 - 162. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Uchida, A. Katayama, K. Tamura, M. Sutoh, M. Kuraoka, and H. Ishihara Frozen elephant trunk technique and partial remodeling for acute type A aortic dissection Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2011; 40(5): 1066 - 1071. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsagakis, P. Tossios, M. Kamler, J. Benedik, D. Natour, H. Eggebrecht, J. Piotrowski, and H. Jakob The DeBakey classification exactly reflects late outcome and re-intervention probability in acute aortic dissection with a slightly modified type II definition Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, November 1, 2011; 40(5): 1078 - 1084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. D. Desai, A. Pochettino, W. Y. Szeto, G. W. Moser, P. J. Moeller, N. Sodhi, B. Jackson, E. Woo, R. M. Fairman, and J. Bavaria Thoracic endovascular aortic repair: Evolution of therapy, patterns of use, and results in a 10-year experience J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2011; 142(3): 587 - 594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ius, C. Hagl, A. Haverich, and M. Pichlmaier Elephant trunk procedure 27 years after Borst: what remains and what is new? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, July 1, 2011; 40(1): 1 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsagakis, D. Pacini, R. Di Bartolomeo, M. Gorlitzer, G. Weiss, M. Grabenwoger, C. A. Mestres, J. Benedik, S. Cerny, and H. Jakob Multicenter early experience with extended aortic repair in acute aortic dissection: Is simultaneous descending stent grafting justified? J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., December 1, 2010; 140(6_suppl): S116 - S120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Ius, I. Vendramin, E. Mazzaro, G. Piccoli, F. Bassi, D. Gasparini, and U. Livi Transluminal Stenting in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection: Does the Djumbodis System Have Any Impact on False Lumen Evolution? Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2010; 90(5): 1450 - 1456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Gorlitzer, G. Weiss, J. Meinhart, F. Waldenberger, M. Thalmann, S. Folkmann, R. Moidl, and M. Grabenwoeger Fate of the False Lumen After Combined Surgical and Endovascular Repair Treating Stanford Type A Aortic Dissections Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2010; 89(3): 794 - 799. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miyamoto Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 108 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |