|
|
||||||||
Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
Accepted for publication May 21, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Fukunaga, Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi, Kurume, 830-0011, Japan (Email: shuji{at}med.kurume-u.ac.jp).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: From September 1994 to December 2006, 244 patients who underwent mitral valve surgery were enrolled in this study. The maze procedure or pulmonary vein isolation was concomitantly performed in 147 patients, while the remaining 97 patients were not surgically treated for AF. The patients were divided into 3 groups based on their cardiac rhythm at discharge from the hospital: the sinus group (108 patients), the intractable AF group (39 patients), and the untreated AF group (97 patients). The clinical features and late results of patients were compared among these groups.
Results: Early mortality rate was 0.7% and no major morbid events had occurred. Follow-up was completed in 95.6% of the patients and the mean follow-up period was 6.03 years. Actuarial survival was not significant between the sinus and AF groups. Actuarial freedom from thromboembolism at 5 and 10 years was 96.5% in the sinus group, 82.4% and 78.1%, respectively, in the intractable AF group, and 93.4% and 89.1%, respectively, in the untreated AF group; statistical significance was observed among the 3 groups (p = 0.01). By means of multivariate analysis, intractable AF was found to be the only risk factor for thromboembolism and other complications.
Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation associated with mitral valve disease should be treated, because restoration of the sinus rhythm might lead to a lower incidence of thromboembolism and valve-related complications in the later period.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Atrial fibrillation is one of the major risk factors involved in stroke or peripheral embolism, and eliminating AF may prevent such embolic events. There have been many reports on the efficacy of the maze procedure associated with mitral valve disease [1–3], but the influence of postoperative cardiac rhythm on an embolic event remains unclear. We hereby report our midterm results of AF surgery combined with mitral valve surgery and the influence of cardiac rhythms on postoperative embolic events.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patients
From September 1994 to December 2006, 244 patients with mitral valve disease and chronic AF underwent surgery at the Kurume University Hospital. There were 101 men and 143 women with a mean age of 62.3 years (range, 29 to 80 years). The etiologies of mitral valve disease were mitral valve stenosis in 119 patients, mitral valve regurgitation in 117 patients, and prosthetic valve failure in 8 patients. Of them, 27 (11.1%) patients had a history of stroke. The mean duration of having AF was 6.2 years (range, 3 months to 40 years).
Mitral valve replacement was performed in 169 patients (mechanical prosthesis was used in 155 patients and biologic prosthesis, 14 patients), and mitral valve repair was performed in 75 patients. Concomitant tricuspid annuloplasty was performed in 142 patients. Surgical intervention for AF was carried out concomitantly due to the patients' clinical condition, the surgeon's preference, or due to the following indications: (1) an AF history of less than 20 years; (2) a cardiothoracic ratio of less than 70%; (3) a left atrial dimension of less than 70 mm; and (4) f-wave voltage at the V1 lead of more than 0.1 mV. As a result, AF was surgically treated in 147 patients, and the remaining 97 patients were untreated. Preoperative patient characteristics are listed in Table 1. Informed consent was obtained from all patients for examinations and surgical procedures.
|
The surgical technique for AF was as follows. In all patients, standard cardiopulmonary bypass with bicaval cannulation was used. Incision and cryoablation lines were created as Kosakai's modification [4]. Briefly, a temporary transection of the superior vena cava was performed for good exposure of the left atrium. Cryoablation was used to avoid cutting the sinus node artery, which may result in sick sinus syndrome. The excess left atrial tissue was trimmed to approximately 4 cm. All of the right atrial appendage and a part of the left atrial appendage were preserved.
In candidates for the left atrial procedure, all 4 pulmonary veins were isolated as a box formation by using a cut and saw technique. In patients with a left atrial dimension of more than 55 mm, the left atrial appendage was closed from the left atrial side or resected along with the surrounding left atrial tissue [5]. No additional cutting or cryoablation was performed in these patients.
Evaluations and Follow-Up
Preoperative and perioperative data were collected from medical records, and follow-up data were obtained from our outpatient clinic records or by correspondence with referring physicians. The condition of the patients, cardiac rhythm depicted on an electrocardiogram, and medications at follow-up were analyzed. The endpoint for analysis was either the patient's death or completion of the study (June 30, 2007).
All patients were administered warfarin for 3 months after surgery. The target range of the prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR) was 1.8 to 2.5. Warfarin administration was continued if the patient's cardiac rhythm exhibited AF at 3 months after surgery or the patient had a mechanical valve implant. Definitions of cardiac or noncardiac death were in accordance with the guidelines of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery [7].
In order to analyze the influence of cardiac rhythm and the effects of AF surgery, the patients were divided into 3 groups based on their cardiac rhythm at discharge: (1) Sinus group: patients who had their sinus rhythm restored after AF surgery; (2) intractable AF group: patients who continued to exhibit AF despite AF surgery; (3) untreated AF group: patients who were not surgically treated for AF.
Statistical Methods
Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The characteristics of the 3 groups were compared by using
2 analysis for nominal variables and a nonparametric analysis of variance test for continuous or ordinal variables. Survivals and freedom from late complications were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival curves were compared using a log-rank test. The risk factors for late death, embolic events, and cardiac complications were analyzed by using both univariate and multivariate analysis with the Cox proportional hazards model.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Among the 147 patients who underwent AF surgery, 108 (73.5%) had their sinus rhythm restored until discharge from the hospital. The Cox maze procedure was performed in 10 patients, while the Kosakai maze procedure was performed in 104 patients. A left atrial procedure was performed in 33 patients. Based on the procedures, the sinus rhythm restoration rate was 71.9% (82 of 114 patients) with maze procedure and 78.8% (26 of 33 patients) with the left atrial procedure. None of the patients underwent pacemaker implantation during their hospital stay.
Based on the postoperative cardiac rhythm recorded, the patients were divided into the 3 groups mentioned above: 108 patients belonged to the sinus group; 39 to the intractable AF group; 97 to the untreated AF group.
Late Outcome
Follow-up was completed in 234 patients (97.9% of operative survivors), with a mean duration of 6.03 years (range, 4 months to 12.8 years). There were 28 (11.5%) late deaths during the follow-up period. Valve-related deaths occurred in 13 patients, including stroke in 4 patients, anticoagulation related cerebral bleeding in 3 patients, prosthetic valve endocarditis in 1 patient, and sudden or unexplained death in 5 patients. Cardiac death as well as valve-related death was observed in 17 patients. An additional 4 patients died of congestive heart failure with well-functional operated valves. At the follow-up, AF rhythm developed in 3 patients (2.9%) of the sinus group, sinus rhythm was restored in 1 patient (2.6%) of the intractable AF group, and AF rhythm developed in 8 patients (8.2%) of the untreated AF group. However, these patients had no complications during follow-up. Among the patients with a sinus rhythm, 4 died due to cardiac-related causes (anticoagulation-related cerebral bleeding in 2 patients, congestive heart failure in 1 patient, and sudden death in 1 patient), and 6 died due to noncardiac causes. In patients with AF rhythm, 13 died due to cardiac-related causes (stroke in 4 patients, congestive heart failure in 4 patients, anticoagulation-related cerebral bleeding in 1 patient, and sudden-unknown death in 4 patients) and 5 patients died due to noncardiac causes. Actuarial survival in the patients with sinus rhythm at 5 and 10 years was 91.6% and 90.1%, respectively, while that in the AF patients was 85.8% and 76.5%, respectively (Fig 1). There was no statistical significance between the sinus and AF rhythm groups (p = 0.053). Actuarial freedom from cardiac death in patients with sinus rhythm at 5 and 10 years was 95.3% and 93.7%, respectively, while that in patients with AF was 88.6% and 81.5%, respectively. There was a statistical significance between the sinus and AF rhythm groups (p = 0.033).
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has been reported that maintaining sinus rhythm by AF surgery had a superior effect, even combined with mitral valve surgery [1, 3, 12, 13]. Despite the longer durations for cross-clamp and cardiopulmonary bypass, it has been reported that the mortality and morbidity early after surgery do not differ significantly whether the maze procedure was carried out concomitantly with mitral valve surgery or not [1, 2, 12]. In this study, the mortality of AF surgery combined with mitral valve surgery was 0.7%, and no major morbid events occurred early after surgery. Itoh and colleagues [12] reported that early mortality after the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery was 2.1% with a low morbidity in 521 patients. From these results, it was considered that AF surgery could be carried out safely even in combination with mitral valve surgery. It has also been reported that after the maze procedure, the late survival rate was significantly better in patients with sinus rhythm than in those with AF rhythm. In this study, there was no significant difference in the late survival rate between patients with sinus rhythm and those with AF rhythm; however, there was a strong trend toward better survival in patients with sinus rhythm, reaching a p value of 0.053. In addition, the main causes of late death in patients with the sinus group were noncardiac reasons in contrast with the AF rhythm group.
Atrial fibrillation itself is a strong factor that causes thromboembolism. Furthermore, in age-matched patients, it caused a fivefold increase in the risk of thromboembolism [14]. Therefore, it has been suggested that treating AF may prevent such complications. The Cox maze procedure is ideal for treating AF. Ad and Cox [15] have reported that maze procedures significantly reduce the incidence of late stroke. In addition, it has also been reported that the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery also reduces the incidence of stroke [1, 12, 16. Despite anticoagulation therapy, thromboembolism occurs at a rate of 2% to 3% per year after mitral valve replacement. In order to solve this problem, Bando and colleagues [13] have reported combined therapy of the maze procedure and mitral valve replacement and they found that restoration of the sinus rhythm significantly reduces the incidence of stroke; this led them to conclude that persistent AF is the most significant risk factor involved in early and late stroke after mitral valve replacement.
The present results reveal that freedom from thromboembolism is significantly higher in patients with sinus rhythm than in those with AF rhythm. Furthermore, patients in the intractable AF group were found to exhibit a higher incidence of thromboembolism even after AF surgery. This result cannot be definitively reasoned, but the difference between the intractable AF group and the untreated AF group may arise due to the incision lines in the atrium. The maze procedure requires multiple incision lines, which is disadvantageous for atrial contraction. Feinberg and colleagues [17] have reported that the percent atrial filling fraction of the left atrium after the maze procedure was smaller in operated patients than in normal controls. Their results suggest that although the maze procedure restores atrial contraction, normal values are not achieved due to multiple incision lines. On the other hand, AF patients do not exhibit effective atrial contraction and AF itself is one of the biggest risk factors for thromboembolism. Furthermore, intractable AF patients may exhibit decreased atrial mobility because of the multiple incision lines, sutures, subsequent scarring, and a tethering of the posterior wall of the left atrium by the suture line. This may explain why the intractable AF group displayed a higher incidence of thromboembolism in this study.
Recent match-controlled studies have indicated that the maze procedure combined with mitral valve surgery is favorable for reducing the incidence of late stroke after surgery [16]. Our results also suggest that restoration of the sinus rhythm by AF surgery is effective in reducing the incidence of thromboembolism. However, a higher incidence of thromboembolism was observed in the intractable AF group than in the untreated AF group. These results suggest that the indications for AF surgery should be stringent. Recent advances in endocardial and intraoperative mapping systems have allowed the detection of the cause of AF [18], and some patients with AF have been operated by using "map-guided surgery" with satisfactory results [19]. However, the mapping system cannot be easily introduced in every institution; therefore, we employed transesophageal electrocardiography to easily obtain electrical information on the atrium [20]. With this system, it is possible to select the appropriate procedure and thereby increase the rate of restoration to sinus rhythm.
The limitations of this study are as follows. First, this study is not randomized. The AF surgery is performed in our hospital since 1994, but it did not immediately materialize as a routine procedure for all AF patients in the early period. Therefore, there might have been some bias during follow-up between patients who underwent AF surgery and those who did not. Second, various procedures were employed for AF surgery and mitral valve surgery. It is possible that this diversity in procedures may have affected the results, although the main purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of cardiac rhythms on postoperative embolic events. In addition, it is well known that the cardiac rhythm varies over time after surgery. In this study, there were a few patients with altered cardiac rhythms, but they had no complications during follow-up. It was difficult to divide these patients into groups; hence, we conducted this study by analyzing the rhythm at discharge.
In conclusion, AF associated with mitral valve disease should be treated because restoration of the sinus rhythm might lead to a lower incidence of thromboembolism and valve-related complications in the later period.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Wong and K. Mak Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2008; 86(4): 1217 - 1218. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |