|
|
||||||||
a Interventional Cardiology Unit, Emo Centro Cuore Columbus, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
b Interventional Cardiology Unit, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
c Department of Heart Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
Accepted for publication March 3, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Aranzulla, 48 Via Buonarroti, Milan, 20145, Italy (Email: aratizi{at}hotmail.com).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A 67-year-old man, former smoker, with hypertension, noninsulin dependent diabetes, obstructive pulmonary disease, and renal insufficiency underwent mitral valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis for rheumatic regurgitation. Two years later, a spontaneous thigh hematoma with associated sciatic nerve paralysis occurred and the mechanical valve was replaced with a bioprosthetic one to avoid further anticoagulation. Two months later, due to prosthesis detachment, a second redo was performed with another bioprosthesis.
Four months later, he was admitted for acute pulmonary edema. His abnormal laboratory findings were: creatinine, 2.21 mg/dL; hemoglobin, 9.6 g/dL; lactic dehydrogenase, 518 units/L. Urinalysis (urobilinogen, 2 mg/dL) and peripheral blood smear (schistocytes and polychromasia) were consistent with hemolytic anemia. Serial blood cultures were negative. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) (Fig 1) showed an anterolateral PVL close to the left atrium appendage, with a 4-mm fibrotic neck and a winding crescent-shaped course (maximum diameter, 8 mm), associated with severe periprosthetic regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension (PAPs, 80 mm Hg).
|
Vascular accesses were the right femoral artery (6-French sheath) and vein (10-French sheath). Transseptal catheterization was followed by PVL crossing with 0.035-inch Storq (Cordis Corp, Miami, FL) and 0.014-inch Ironman (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, CA; Guidant, Santa Clara, CA) guidewires. A 6-French multi-purpose guide catheter was advanced over both wires into the left ventricle across the leak. These wires were snared in the left ventricle with a Gooseneck (ev3 Inc, Plymouth, MN) and pulled into the right femoral artery to provide extra support (Fig 1A). The Storq wire was removed and the 12-mm diameter, 8-mm length AVP (AGA Medical Corp, Golden Valley, MN) was advanced through the multipurpose catheter and deployed across the leak under TEE and fluoroscopic guidance (Fig 1B).
Transesophageal echocardiography color flow mapping soon after deployment showed persistence of severe peri-prosthetic regurgitation (Fig 2A); however, after a few minutes, nearly a complete leak exclusion with normalized pulmonary artery pressures was demonstrated (Fig 2B).
|
|
Prolonged weaning from ventilation, worsening of renal insufficiency, and severe anemia requiring blood transfusions complicated the postoperative course. The patient was discharged 1 month after admission. After 6 months, the patient is asymptomatic. No further hospitalizations occurred.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Current criteria for sizing (the choice of an AVP, 30% to 50% larger than the target vascular district) were fully accomplished. Our surgeons reported a correct device position, as it happened in other reported failures [2, 4]. Nevertheless, correct sizing and positioning are not sufficient; the device should precisely fit the leak morphology to obtain its stable and complete exclusion. This is unlikely to be achieved within crescent-shaped defects. A practical strategy may be to oversize the device. However, the larger the pore size, the lower the likelihood of an occlusive thrombus forming. The use of additional coils either behind the AVP [3] or inserted inside it before deployment, may enhance device thrombogenicity. Furthermore, consideration about the cause of the leak (prior, recurrent infections) and the local tissue strength (ie, collagen disease) are relevant to decision making and anticipated outcomes.
Finally, we strongly recommend TEE. In a previous experience [5], device dislodgement was diagnosed after 2 months, but no mention is made if pre-discharge transthoracic echocardiography or TEE was performed. Therefore, we cannot exclude the possibility that device dislodgement had occurred earlier.
In conclusion, we advise restricting percutaneous PVL closure when contraindications to surgery exist. However, rather than concluding that "effort, expense, and expert maneuvering of a device in this situation are ... a futile exercise," [4] we aim to identify conditions enhancing the probability of a successful procedure.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Bogunovic, L. Faber, W. Scholtz, K. P. Mellwig, D. Horstkotte, and F. van Buuren Real-time three-dimensional transoesophageal echocardiography during percutaneous transcatheter occlusion of mitral periprosthetic paravalvular leak Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging, March 1, 2011; 12(3): E27 - E27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Signorotto, A. del Vecchio, M. Montorfano, F. Maisano, M. Giagnorio, R. Bellanca, A. Colombo, and R. Calandrino Dosimetric data and radiation risk analysis for new procedures in interventional cardiology Radiat Prot Dosimetry, December 1, 2010; 142(2-4): 201 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Castedo, S. Serrano-Fiz, J. F. Oteo, S. Ramis, P. Martinez, and J. Ugarte Failure of Percutaneous Closure of Prosthetic, Aortic Paravalvular Leak Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1327 - 1329. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |