|
|
||||||||
a Congenital Cardiac Centre, Southampton University Hospital Trust, Southampton, United Kingdom
b University College London, Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
Accepted for publication April 29, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Vettukattil, Congenital Cardiac Centre, Southampton University Hospital Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton, SO16 6YD, United Kingdom (Email: joseph.vettukattil{at}suht.swest.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Cross-sectional and 3D MPR echocardiography was performed in 300 patients with congenitally malformed hearts.
Results: Analysis in multiplanar mode was possible in all patients. New, clinically important information, which altered management or changed the principal diagnosis, was obtained in 32 (11%) cases. This determined suitability for biventricular repair in 11 patients, clarified the morphology of atrioventricular valves in 7, helped in assessment of aortic, mitral, or prosthetic valvar disease in 13, and identified a vascular ring in the other patient.
Conclusions: 3D MPR is feasible in the setting of the congenitally malformed heart, permitting focused and in-depth analysis. This substantially improves the understanding of functional morphology, above the information derived from cross-sectional echocardiography. We recommend the use of the 3D format with MPR for patients with complex congenital cardiac disease.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three-dimensional data sets may be analyzed in two main ways. First, "cropping," or three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, of the data set allows the clinician to slice into the data set to the region of interest, and to display intracardiac structures from a chosen, clinically useful, aspect. In this way; for example, one may display the "surgeon's view." The second method is analysis using the multiplanar review mode (MPR) (Fig 1). This mode allows the operator to view the moving 3D data set simultaneously in three orthogonal windows, and to review the image in infinite planes by moving each of the three planes through the data set.
|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Between October 2004 and December 2006, RT3DE data sets were acquired in 300 patients, including complex congenitally malformed hearts, in addition to routine cross-sectional studies. All patients were unsedated and spontaneously breathing. A commercial system for imaging (Philips Sonos 7500 or IE33; Philips Healthcare, Hamburg, Germany) with a 3 to 5 MHZ matrix phased array transducer was used to perform the standard cross-sectional echocardiographic assessment and to acquire RT3DE images. Images were acquired and analyzed prospectively, or retrospectively analyzed when additional data before surgery were requested. Stored full volume RT3DE data sets were assessed off-line using Qlab software version 4.1 (Philips Medical Systems) for the earlier patients, and version 5.0 when this became available. Cross-sectional findings were analyzed and reported according to our standard clinical practice, and the same operators subsequently performed analysis of the 3D data sets by MPR, and recorded additional findings. All decisions on intervention or change in management plan before or after RT3DE was taken at a joint clinical conference involving a minimum of 3 cardiologists and a surgeon.
Multiplanar Review
Multiplanar review analysis of RT3DE data was carried out as follows. The RT3DE data set was opened in the MPR facility. The MPR mode allows the operator to position each of the three planes through the structure of interest, in order to display intracardiac anatomy in an attitudinally appropriate manner. The operator may examine each structure of interest, for example, each valve, by "sliding" the 3 planes through the moving data set, and in this way may examine the entire heart.
Details of Patients
There were 300 patients in total. Their ages ranged from 1 day to 47 years. The main diagnoses are shown in Table 1.
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
In 5 patients who had previously been palliated with cavopulmonary anastomosis or Fontan circulation, 3D MPR established suitability for biventricular repair, which was achieved successfully in all. In 2 patients, one with severe Ebstein's malformation and one with atrioventricular septal defect and unbalanced ventricles, the technique revealed unsuitable morphology for biventricular repair.
Elucidation of atrioventricular valvar morphology in 7 patients
In 3 patients with atrioventricular septal defects, the technique provided new information regarding the structure of the left atrioventricular valve, which impacted on surgical management. In the other 4 patients the technique provided new information regarding the right atrioventricular valves. One of these patients having a ventricular septal defect, discordant ventriculo-arterial connections, and an abnormal tricuspid valve thought to be inadequate, one having Ebstein's malformation, in whom additional calcification of the mitral valve was demonstrated on 3D MPR but not 2D echocardiography, and two with dysplastic tricuspid valves.
Clarification of the mechanism of mitral regurgitation in 6 patients
In these patients, the mechanism of atrioventricular valve regurgitation was demonstrated and decisions regarding the need for surgical intervention were altered appropriately. For example, in one patient after surgical closure of a ventricular septal defect closure, cross-sectional interrogation had revealed apparently severe mitral regurgitation and reparative surgery had been scheduled. The MPR analysis revealed a fistulous connection between the left ventricle and the left atrium. In the others, by defining the severity of regurgitation or the mechanism of regurgitation, use of the technique either facilitated or avoided surgery.
Demonstration of the detailed anatomy of the aortic valve in 5 patients
In 3 of these patients, the mechanism of aortic regurgitation was unclear after cross-sectional imaging, but clarified by MPR analysis. In 2 patients, the level of obstruction within the left ventricular outflow tract could not be determined on multiple cross-sectional echocardiograms, but MPR clearly demonstrated the mechanism of obstruction. In one of these patients, obstruction was demonstrated at two distinct levels.
The mechanism of paraprosthetic valvar leak shown in 2 patients
In both these patients, MPR provided enough information to facilitate interventional catheter occlusion of the paravalvar leaks, including the demonstration of two discrete regurgitant orifices where cross-sectional interrogation had demonstrated only one.
Identification of a vascular ring in 1 patient
In this patient, multiplanar review demonstrated a double aortic arch, and the infant proceeded to surgery without the requirement for any further imaging.
Additional information regarding valvar morphology and intracardiac measurements was available in most cases, which clarified the functional anatomy and increased confidence in clinical decision-making, but did not substantially alter the direction of care. There were no patients in whom MPR findings were subsequently found to be erroneous, either on further echocardiographic studies or at surgery.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Evaluation of patients with complex malformed hearts has now become possible away from the bedside. Newer software such as Qlab and TomTec (TomTec, Munich, Germany) have incorporated techniques to reveal the morphology of the congenitally malformed heart in attitudinally appropriate planes, while retaining the ability to assess dynamic function. Although acquisition of the 3D data sets takes only seconds, MPR facilitates offline examination of the data set with retained coordinates and tissue characteristics, allowing repeated and detailed interrogation of the cardiac structure. Simultaneous visualization of the dissected anatomy in three orthogonal planes aids in the use of this modality as a transition between cross-sectional and 3D echocardiography. A further advantage of the technique is its utility in reconstructing a full 3D image from the planes cut in attitudinally appropriate fashion. The operator may choose the plane which best displays the anatomy, but avoids inadvertent cropping of structures or overlying of structures of interest. This helps in avoiding some of the artifact, which may be created by direct cropping of the data set.
During analysis by MPR, the data set is cut in three planes simultaneously, providing three sets of dynamic planes, each similar to a cross-sectional image (Fig 2). The operator may position the planes through the structures under study and while studying a valve, for example, may study each leaflet individually; thus establishing the relationship to each of the other leaflets. "Sliding" the planes across the whole width of the valve in each plane allows examination of the valve in its entirety. Our experience shows that such multiplanar analysis is of particular benefit in the examination of valvar morphology in congenitally malformed hearts, and also in demonstrating the mechanism of valvar regurgitation.
|
We have also found that MPR analysis is possible in most subjects in whom image quality is not adequate for 3D volume rendering or cropping. It is also far less sensitive to an artifact created by patient movement or respiration during acquisition.
We have often obtained information from MPR analysis of the 3D echocardiogram that has allowed us to proceed without obtaining other forms of imaging. For example, some of our patients had been scheduled for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, which in young children requires a general anesthetic, but MPR analysis of the 3D echocardiographic data set provided the information required to proceed with clinical management.
We routinely now use MPR analysis as an adjunct to cross-sectional imaging in assessment of certain complex abnormalities, such as to assess valvar morphology in those having atrioventricular septal defects with common atrioventricular junction. Three-dimensional echocardiography has been demonstrated to be of major benefit in this group, and to provide additional information over and above cross-sectional imaging in patients both before and after surgical repair [6, 17, 18]. We use MPR to aid in the assessment of borderline cases, such as those in whom the decision is difficult whether to pursue palliative surgery or biventricular repair, and as a routine part of our examination of patients with Ebstein's malformation. Obstruction of the left ventricular outflow tract is another clinical arena in which MPR is extremely valuable in demonstrating the site and nature of the obstruction. The patients in this series are not consecutive; our population is partially selected in that we did not conduct a randomized study, but rather this cohort was part of our early experience. It is possible that if MPR evaluation was carried out in a more targeted fashion, focusing on the patient groups suggested by this initial study, that it would generate clinically useful data on a higher proportion of patients than the 11% found in this group of patients.
With MPR as an established method of preoperative assessment, we find that it is unnecessary to perform transesophageal studies on our patients. It has already been shown that conventional 3D echocardiography can reduce operative time [19]. By contributing increased anatomic detail perioperatively, MPR could also contribute to reduction of operative time, albeit that this potential requires further research.
The MPR analysis of 3D data sets acquired transthoracically has a relatively short learning curve and is easily and rapidly applied to daily clinical practice. The data sets take but seconds to acquire and can be processed away from the bedside, a feature of particular benefit in the examination of children. Cross-sectional images can be reconstructed from the 3D images in multiple planes, independent of the site of acquisition of the data set.
In conclusion, use of the multiplanar mode is feasible in patients with congenitally malformed hearts. The technique provides additional information that substantially alters clinical management in many patients.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Riesenkampff, U. Rietdorf, I. Wolf, B. Schnackenburg, P. Ewert, M. Huebler, V. Alexi-Meskishvili, R. H. Anderson, N. Engel, H.-P. Meinzer, et al. The practical clinical value of three-dimensional models of complex congenitally malformed hearts J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., September 1, 2009; 138(3): 571 - 580. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Bharucha, K. S. Roman, R. H. Anderson, and J. J. Vettukattil Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 2007 - 2008. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Dragulescu, S. Khambadkone, I. Sullivan, and J. Marek Does Multiplanar Review of 3-D Data Alter Clinical Management? Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2009; 87(6): 2006 - 2007. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |