|
|
||||||||
a Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
b Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
c Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
d Department of Laboratory Medicine and Clinical Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
e Department of Outcomes Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
Accepted for publication April 14, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr McGrath, Department of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia (G-3), Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195 (Email: mcgratt{at}ccf.org).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: A total of 32,298 patients underwent on-pump isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), an isolated valve, or a combined CABG and valve procedure between January 1, 1993 and January 1, 2006. Regression analysis and propensity methodology was employed to assess the association between platelet transfusion and morbidity.
Results: Univariate comparisons demonstrated that patients who received platelet transfusions had increased morbidity. After risk adjustment with both multivariable regression and propensity methods, platelet transfusion was not significantly associated with in-hospital mortality: odds ratio (OR) 0.74 confidence limits 0.58, 0.95, p = 0.017 and 2.05% vs 3.06%, p = 0.017, respectively. Among 2,774 propensity matched-pairs, platelet transfusion was associated with similar or reduced morbidity, platelets versus no platelets: cardiac 2.42% vs 1.77%, p = 0.09; pulmonary 8.94% vs 9.88%, p = 0.23; renal 1.33% vs 1.48%, p = 0.65; neurologic 2.27% vs 3.21%, p = 0.033; serious infection 4.15% vs 5.34%, p = 0.037; and composite outcome 15.0% vs 17.2%, p = 0.024. Among a propensity-matched subgroup of patients never administered a concomitant RBC transfusion, platelet transfusion was not associated with increased morbidity: 4.49% vs 2.99%, p = 0.31.
Conclusions: Platelet transfusion was not found to increase morbid risk after cardiac surgery. Our results should not be interpreted as advocating platelet transfusions in cardiac surgery; rather, platelet transfusion empirically in the setting of persistent microvascular bleeding is not associated with increased morbid risk.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our institution typically transfuses platelet concentrates empirically if microvascular bleeding persists after adequate reversal of heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The clinical threshold is further reduced for those patients on preoperative antiplatelet medications. Recently, disparate findings have been reported regarding whether platelet transfusions are associated with adverse outcomes after cardiac surgery [5–9]. In light of observations from our prior investigations [10, 11] and others [5–9], our objective was to examine the relationship between platelet transfusion and morbid outcomes after cardiac surgery, controlling for a number of patient, operative, and perioperative transfusion-related variables.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endpoints
Outcome variables included in-hospital mortality, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and neurologic morbidities, serious infection, and re-exploration for bleeding. Cardiac morbidity was defined as a low cardiac index (<1.8 L · min–1
· m–2) despite adequate fluid replacement and inotropic support for greater than 4 hours or a postoperative myocardial infarction with at least one of the following: preoperative or perioperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) placement, intraoperative ventricular assist device (VAD) placement, or return to the operating room for IABP, VAD, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO) placement. Myocardial infarction was diagnosed based on electrocardiogram and cardiac isoenzymes. Pulmonary morbidity was characterized as mechanical ventilatory support requiring intubation for 72 or greater hours postoperatively. Renal morbidity was defined as new-onset renal failure requiring dialysis. Neurologic morbidity included new global or focal neurologic deficits or death without awakening. Serious infection morbidity was defined as pneumonia, mediastinitis, or sepsis with the diagnosis of sepsis requiring organisms isolated from culture(s) in conjunction with elevated temperature and white blood cell counts. Reexploration for bleeding was defined as a return to the operating room specifically for bleeding. A composite outcome of adverse events consisted of in-hospital mortality, cardiac morbidity, respiratory insufficiency, renal morbidity, serious infection, and neurologic morbidity. There were less than 3% missing values for the data set; missing values were deleted from the data set prior to analysis.
Statistical Analysis
We examined the impact of platelet transfusion on morbid outcomes after cardiac surgery with three approaches. Our first approach involved use of propensity methodology. Demographics, comorbidity, operative, and transfusion variables noted in Table 1
were used for development of a propensity score. The propensity score was obtained by calculating the predicted probability of receiving platelet transfusion for each patient from a logistic model [12]. Greedy 1:1 matching techniques were then used to select patients who received a platelet transfusion with those that did not by choosing the patients with the nearest propensity score [13]. Comparisons of morbid outcomes were made between the propensity-matched patients with the
2 or Fisher exact test where appropriate. Among the 32,298 patients, 2,811 received fresh frozen plasma (FFP) or cryoprecipitate and were excluded from propensity analysis due to an inability to adequately propensity match these patients. Hence, propensity methodology was applied to the data set of 29,487 patients.
|
Finally, similar propensity methodology was used to further examine morbid outcomes by platelet transfusion status only for the subset of patients who did not receive RBC transfusion.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our prior investigations [10, 11] and that of others [14] have suggested that perioperative RBC transfusion is the single risk factor most reliably associated with increased incidence of postoperative morbid events after isolated CABG. While platelet transfusion status alone in our study appears to identify a group of cardiac surgical patients at very high risk for morbid events (see Table 2), results of this current investigation suggest that platelet transfusions are associated with similar or lower postoperative morbidity or mortality when RBC and other confounding variables are appropriately adjusted (see Table 2 versus Table 4). Our ability to adjust for units of RBC transfused as well as other preoperative, comorbid, and operative variables in our propensity-matched pairs serves as one of the strengths of this study evaluating the impact of platelet transfusions on morbidity and mortality in cardiac surgery.
Five prior retrospective investigations evaluated the impact of platelet transfusions on various adverse outcomes in cardiac surgery. The results of these studies yielded conflicting results concerning the association between platelet transfusions and morbid events.
Vamvakas and Carven [5] examined the association between volumes of various allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) products and prolonged postoperative ventilation in 416 low-risk patients undergoing CABG. After risk adjustment, the authors concluded that while the volume of administered RBC supernatant correlated with an increased likelihood of prolonged postoperative mechanical ventilation, the volume of platelet, plasma (including FFP and cryoprecipitate), or total blood product supernatant did not.
Spiess and colleagues [6] published a retrospective multicenter examination of platelet transfusions and adverse outcomes in 1,720 CABG patients. These patients were part of randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled studies in the phase III trial for licensure of aprotinin. Among these patients, 284 (14%) of the 1,720 patients received a platelet transfusion, 88% of patients transfused with platelets also received RBC transfusions, and patients receiving three or more RBC transfusions also received more platelet transfusions. Various CABG-related adverse events relative to platelet transfusion were analyzed with the finding that platelet transfusion was associated with increased operative time and bleeding, more RBC transfusions, more surgical reoperations for bleeding, prolonged hospital duration, and an increased likelihood of postoperative infection, stroke, and death. Limitations of the authors' reported findings included their inability to adjust for confounding relative to preoperative variables (eg, patients receiving platelet transfusions had significantly more prior MIs and worse systolic dysfunction), concomitant RBC transfusions, and aprotinin administration, which the authors acknowledged by noting platelet transfusion may rather serve as a surrogate marker for more critically ill patients and subsequent adverse outcomes.
In 2005, Sreeram and colleagues [7] examined the rate of infectious complications in 2,657 adult primary CABG patients who received perioperative non-leukoreduced RBCs, FFP, and platelets. The authors concluded that while infectious complications were not increased by non-leukoreduced platelet or FFP transfusions, non-leukoreduced RBC transfusions conferred an increased risk of infectious morbidity.
In 2006, Karkouti and colleagues [8] assessed whether leukoreduced platelet transfusions were associated with morbid events (low cardiac output syndrome, MI, stroke, renal failure, and sepsis) or mortality in their review of 11,459 patients undergoing a range of cardiac surgical procedures from 1999 to 2004. Despite measured adverse events being higher in the patients who received more platelet transfusions, there was no evident association between leukoreduced platelet transfusions and increased morbidity or mortality after risk adjustment.
Finally, in 2007, Vamvakas [9] reported observational outcome data on the impact of non-leukoreduced platelet transfusions relative to postoperative infections on their previously published cohort of 416 low-risk patients undergoing CABG noted above. In contrast to Spiess and colleagues' study, which suggested non-leukoreduced platelet transfusions were associated with an increased likelihood of postoperative infection, Vamvakas' findings did not imply a relationship between non-leukoreduced platelet transfusions and increased postoperative infections.
Our results suggest that platelet transfusion in cardiac surgery does not confer increased risk for morbidity or mortality congruent with four of these prior investigations [5, 7–9] and in contrast to the results of Spiess and colleagues [6]. Although our study is similar to previous investigations examining the role of platelet transfusions and adverse events in cardiac surgery, there are multiple key differences to highlight. First, in contrast to four of these prior studies, which limited their cohort to CABG patients only, our investigation involves the largest diverse cohort undergoing CABG and valve procedures to date. Second, a greater number and diverse set of potential confounders were appropriately adjusted for in our analysis. The number of RBC units transfused was not only appropriately balanced between the propensity-matched pairs by platelet transfusion status but also adjusted for in the multivariable modeling.
Potential confounders of FFP and cryoprecipitate transfusions demonstrated significant risk for mortality in our multivariable regression model; these variables were eliminated from the propensity matching due to an inability to match patients on FFP and cryoprecipitate status. Given recent findings suggesting aprotinin use is associated with increased risk of renal dysfunction, MI or heart failure, stroke or encephalopathy, and long-term mortality after CABG surgery [15–17], our investigation is not confounded by the use of aprotinin compared with previous platelet transfusion outcomes studies [6, 8] because aprotinin was administered in less than one percent of the entire population under investigation. Third, more morbid outcomes in the setting of platelet transfusion status were examined in our investigation.
Lack of an increased serious infection morbidity based on platelet transfusion status is an intriguing finding in our study. Negating the known potential infectious risks of platelets due to bacterial contamination, platelets play an integral role not only in hemostasis but also a prominent if not decisive role in wound healing. For example, upon activation, platelets secrete a myriad of proteins (eg, platelet-derived growth factor, transforming growth factor-β) that cause a complex interplay of intracellular and extracellular events to occur including cellular chemotaxis, proliferation and differentiation, tissue debris elimination, angiogenesis, and collagen synthesis [18–21]. All of these cellular events in turn promote adequate wound healing long after fibrinolysis has occurred. In a review highlighting the uses of platelet-rich plasma, application of platelet-rich plasma or platelet releasate to oral, maxillofacial, plastic, and orthopedic surgery patients has been demonstrated to enhance significantly hard- and soft-tissue healing, and potentially even decrease postoperative infection rates [22]. Prior studies [23, 24] assessing use of platelet-rich plasma or gel in cardiac surgery focused not on infectious outcomes but rather on the impact of reducing bleeding and blood transfusions with conflicting results. While we clearly are not able to demonstrate a direct salutary effect of platelet transfusions in reducing postoperative infection in this nonrandomized study, platelet transfusions do not appear to increase the overall risk of postoperative infection.
In contrast to RBC transfusions being the single most important risk factor associated with morbidity after isolated CABG [10, 11, 14], results of our study suggest platelet transfusions in cardiac surgery do not appear to represent a risk factor for adverse outcomes although the possibility of platelet transfusions serving as a surrogate marker for more critically ill patients cannot be excluded. Whether platelet transfusions confer equivocal adverse outcomes versus an actual benefit relative to reducing morbid outcomes remains indeterminate. It also remains unclear whether leukoreduction of platelets versus RBCs may also modify the transfusion risks of these respective ABT products: conflicting data in the cardiac surgical population regarding the effects of leukoreduction has been reported [25–27] and the purported benefits of leukoreduction decreasing infections, organ dysfunction, or mortality have yet to be proven clinically [28]. Our center instituted universal leukoreduction in 2002.
Due to the ethical concerns of randomizing platelet transfusions to cardiac surgical patients at risk for, or experiencing, active bleeding, this cohort investigation served as the next best approach to examine potential relationships between platelet transfusion and adverse clinical outcomes in cardiac surgery. However, inherent to nonrandomized studies, the inability to capture every intraoperative and postoperative process-of-care events and the potential for unobserved or unknown confounders may have influenced our reported findings. Many events and outcomes, however, are captured and adjusted for with "surrogate" variables. For example, increasing CPB times may reflect more challenging surgery; massive RBC transfusion may be associated with problems with sternal reentry or dissection. Platelet transfusion is not typically administered in response to complications per se but rather to microvascular bleeding after heparin reversal. Without an ability to randomize patients to platelet transfusion, we have attempted to control for variables known to be associated with adverse outcomes in the cardiac surgery population. Although unidentified variables may have changed over the 13-year period of this patient population under investigation, date of surgery was adjusted for in both propensity-matched pairs and multivariable regression model.
Another limitation intrinsic to all cohort investigations concerns that association or correlation does not prove causality. Conversely, lack of association between platelet transfusions and the outcomes we examined does not prove platelet transfusions are risk free.
We also did not have sufficient detailed information regarding preoperative platelet counts, preoperative antiplatelet medication administration and specific sources, types, and volume of platelets administered to each individual patient (eg, single versus pooled donors, strictly leukoreduced, non-leukoreduced, or a combination thereof). Whether there exists a dose-dependent phenomenon effect of platelet transfusion volume or donor exposures relative to beneficial versus adverse outcomes remains unknown.
In general, patients with thrombocytopenia and those receiving antiplatelet medications have a "lowered threshold" for platelet transfusion in the setting of microvascular bleeding in the post-CPB period. Platelet transfusion is not based on specific measure of platelet function testing in our institution. A low platelet count with normal function is rarely a problem but rather on-going microvascular bleeding is the primary reason for platelet transfusion in our institution. Nevertheless, even if platelet transfusions were administered more often to patients with thrombocytopenia or thrombocytopathies secondary to antiplatelet medications in our study, there was no evident significant increased adverse outcome with platelet transfusion despite those patients transfused with platelets undergoing an increased frequency of surgical reexploration for bleeding.
After risk adjustment, platelet transfusions did not confer any additional morbidity or mortality in this large cardiac surgical cohort. Our results should not be interpreted as advocating platelet transfusions in cardiac surgery; rather, platelet transfusions are not associated with morbidity in cardiac surgical patients when transfused empirically in the setting of persistent abnormal microvascular bleeding after heparin reversal. Whether there are potential benefits of platelet transfusion remains unknown and requires cautious and systematic exploration. Moreover, given that platelet transfusions are expensive and continue to be utilized often empirically in significant quantities in the cardiac surgical setting where a number of coagulation disorders can contribute to persistent postoperative bleeding, future studies should also entail standardizing perioperative point-of-care platelet function testing in order to establish more objective evidence-based platelet transfusion guidelines in the setting of abnormal microvascular bleeding and to direct more efficient platelet concentrate utilization in the cardiac surgical population.
| Appendix |
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C.-J. Jakobsen, P. K. Ryhammer, M. Tang, J. J. Andreasen, and P. E. Mortensen Transfusion of blood during cardiac surgery is associated with higher long-term mortality in low-risk patients Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, January 12, 2012; (2012) ezr242v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. P. Zalunardo, C. Thalmann, B. Seifert, J. D'Cunja, W. Weder, A. Boehler, and D. R. Spahn Impact of preoperative right-ventricular function and platelet transfusion on outcome after lung transplantation Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, April 1, 2011; 39(4): 538 - 542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. J. Andreasen, C. Dethlefsen, I. S. Modrau, J. Baech, H. C. Schonheyder, J. K. Moeller, S. P. Johnsen, and for the North-West Denmark Transfusion Study Group Storage time of allogeneic red blood cells is associated with risk of severe postoperative infection after coronary artery bypass grafting Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, March 1, 2011; 39(3): 329 - 334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Nixon, K. Gunn, T. Main, Y. Young, and J. McCall Platelets and Survival After Liver Transplantation Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2009; 108(4): 1354 - 1355. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Szekely, Z. Cserep, E. Sapi, T. Breuer, C. A. Nagy, P. Vargha, I. Hartyanszky, A. Szatmari, and A. Treszl Risks and Predictors of Blood Transfusion in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Open Heart Operations Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 187 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |