|
|
||||||||
a Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West-German Heart Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
b Department of Cardiology, West-German Heart Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
Accepted for publication March 20, 2008.
* Address correspondence to Dr Jakob, Klinik für Thorax- und Kardiovaskuläre Chirurgie, Westdeutsches Herzzentrum Essen, Hufelandstr 55, Essen, D-45121, Germany (Email: heinz.jakob{at}uk-essen.de).
Presented at the Poster Session of the Forty-third Annual Meeting of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, San Diego, CA, Jan 29–31, 2007.
| Dr Jakob discloses that he has a financial relationship with Jotec GmbH.
|
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Between January 2001 and October 2007, of 71 consecutive patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD), 45 had DeBakey type I dissection and underwent emergency surgery within 24 hours after onset of symptoms. These patients were separated into group 1 (n = 23) undergoing conventional surgery, and group 2 (n = 22) undergoing combined repair with antegrade stent grafting.
Results: Patients were comparable for baseline characteristics, but more group 2 patients had severely compromised hemodynamics (p = 0.05) and cerebral malperfusion at arrival (p < 0.01). Intraoperative and postoperative characteristics were similar, with an overall hospital mortality of 16% (5 [22%] versus 2 [9%], group 1 versus group 2; p = 0.22). At a mean follow-up time of 48 months for group 1 versus 23 months for group 2 (p < 0.01), late mortality did not differ between groups (p = 0.38) and was mainly related to additional surgical procedures and persisting neurologic sequelae and not to the aortic pathology. Persisting distal false lumen patency was observed in 89% of group 1 versus 10% of group 2 patients (p < 0.01).
Conclusions: This hybrid approach to patients with type I acute aortic dissection is technically feasible without increasing the operative risk and offers the chance of persistent occlusion of the persistent graft distal false lumen.
Reported hospital mortality of surgical treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD) ranges between 15% and 30%, not very much changing over the last years [1–3]. In contrast to the medical treatment of such patients resulting in 58% mortality, the surgical results compare favorably, but do not satisfy [4].
Patient selection with optional deferral of operation might be one way to improve on surgical results, but does not meet our ethical intention to save our patients' lives [5]. In addition, patients surviving the classic surgical procedure consisting of ascending aortic replacement with or without arch replacement are facing a substantial risk of late complications such as aneurysm formation of the continuously perfused false lumen, rupture, malperfusion sequelae, and often require redo surgery [6–8]. Reoperation after previous AAAD surgery represents another surgical challenge with a complex situation either requiring a major surgical approach consisting of a one-stage operation with bilateral clamshell incision or a two-stage strategy, both associated with major surgical trauma and a substantial perioperative morbidity and mortality rate [9, 10].
Credit has to be given to Kato and others [11, 12], who developed a surgical strategy consisting of the combination of the radical surgical approach to replace the ascending aorta and the arch with antegrade descending aortic stent grafting not only in the chronic, but also in the acute situation already in the mid 1990s of the last century.
Over a 6-year period, we were confronted with a total of 17 cases of chronic problems such as abdominal malperfusion due to persisting false lumen collapse, and impending rupture of a false lumen aneurysm, all as a result of ascending aortic replacement for AAAD. This prompted a change in our philosophy, starting a program of the hybrid midline approach in June 2001 for chronic cases, and extension of this approach to AAAD in December 2002 [13].
Since DeBakey type II aortic dissection probably is cured by ascending aortic replacement with or without hemiarch replacement, treatment of the descending aorta is not indicated, thus obviating the use of a descending stent graft. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcome of the classic surgical treatment of acute DeBakey Type I aortic dissection with the more radical approach of combining the conventional surgical approach with hybrid stent grafting of the descending aorta, in regard to development of thrombosis within the thoracic false lumen, and morbidity and mortality at midterm follow-up.
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The use of either the Talent (Medtronic Inc, Minneapolis, MN) stent graft prosthesis (n = 4) or the E-vita Open (Jotec GmbH, Hechingen, Germany) hybrid graft (n = 18) for descending aorta endografting was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital of Essen. According to the specific emergency situation of the involved patients, the chairman of the Ethics Committee waived the need for patient consent for this study.
Baseline patient characteristics are given in Table 1. All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) upon arrival at our hospital, being awaited by a cardiologist, an anesthesiologist, and a cardiac surgeon in the operation theater to save time and to shorten the interval between symptoms and surgical treatment. From April 2004 on, the same team received the patient in our hybrid room (fully equipped catheterization laboratory/operative suite). In case of suspicion of coronary artery disease, a coronary angiography was immediately performed on the catheter laboratory operating table followed by surgery without time loss. Concomitant diseases as well as preoperative complicating factors are listed in Table 1. In case of abdominal malperfusion, angiography and a stenting/fenestration procedure performed by the cardiologist preceded surgery.
|
Surgery
All patients but the ones under cardiopulmonary resuscitation were operated upon with 3 arterial pressure lines (2 radials, 1 femoral) in place for malperfusion control. Right axillary artery cannulation was the arterial cannulation site of choice in 23 patients. In case of computed tomography–proven brachiocephalic trunc dissection, in cardiopulmonary resuscitation cases or extremely unstable patients, direct ascending aortic cannulation was performed in 22 patients, more recently after primary venous exsanguination and direct sight cannulation of the true lumen, as reported previously [15]. Core cooling to 25°C bladder temperature was begun. Aortic cross-clamping was performed early with the administration of cold, crystalloid cardioplegia (1,500 to 2,000 cc Custodiol solution [Dr Franz Köhler Chemie GmbH, Alsbach-Hähnlein, Germany]) into the coronary ostia after transecting the ascending aorta. Then proximal repair was started while cooling continued. After reaching the target temperature, a brief period of hypothermic circulatory arrest was initiated with removal of the cross-clamp and inspection of the arch. According to the principles of removing all reachable entry—or reentry—sites, the aortic arch was resected, and the proximal descending aorta was transected just beneath the often encountered reentry tear at the origin of the left subclavian artery. Then selective antegrade cerebral perfusion was started through the right axillary artery cannula after cross-clamping the proximal brachiocephalic trunk, and additional cannulation of the left common carotid artery was performed for bilateral perfusion, while the left subclavian artery was blocked proximally using a 6F Fogarty catheter. In case of primary direct aortic cannulation, the brachiocephalic trunk was cannulated separately. Perfusate temperature chosen was 18°C, at a flow rate of approximately 10 cc · kg–1 · min–1 to maintain a line pressure between 40 and 60 mm Hg.
In group 1 patients, a total arch, hemiarch, or isolated ascending aortic replacement was done in 13, 6, and 4 patients, respectively. In group 2 patients, the ascending aorta and aortic arch were resected and the previously placed guidewire was picked up, and sizing of the true lumen of the descending aorta was performed with specially designed highly bendable nitinol obturators (Fehling Instruments GmbH&Co.KG, Karlstein, Germany) to measure the real diameter of the true lumen and to avoid oversizing. Then the endograft was placed over the stiff guidewire and deployed in the descending aorta. After retraction of the introducer the unfolded stent graft ended around 1 cm below the proximal end of the cut off descending aortic stump. The elephant-trunklike inverted nonstented polyester tube was then pulled back approximately 5 mm for proximal suturing of the graft to the proximal descending aortic stump using a 3–0 polypropylene continuous sutureline stabilized externally with a Teflon (Impra Inc, subsidiary of L. R. Bard, Tempe, Arizona) felt before full withdrawal for creation of the cephalad island anastomosis and the ascending aortic anastomosis (Fig 1). Owing to its water permeability, the free polyester prosthesis was preclotted with a thin layer of fibrin glue (1.5 cc to 2 cc) for water tightness.
|
|
Between postoperative days 6 and 10, all surviving patients underwent computed tomography angiography, as well as after 3, 6, and 12 months, and annually thereafter. At these time intervals, patients were also seen in our outpatient clinic.
Data Analysis
Data were collected prospectively supported by our database for thoracic aortic surgery and studied retrospectively by team members. Follow-up was complete in all patients by end of October 2007. The SPSS 14.0 package (SPSS, Chicago, Illinois) was used for analysis. Univariate analysis was performed with Fisher's exact test for categorical and Student's t test for continuous variables.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Being confronted with several patients having complex thoracic aortic disease after previous aortic surgery for AAAD, we as well as others changed our surgical philosophy, integrating the reports of Japanese authors with improvised stent grafting of the descending aorta through a midline approach even in acute type A aortic dissection with our own experience with thoracic stent grafting primarily for complex thoracic aortic disease [18–20]. To get the patient operated on earlier in this "vicious cycle," in 2001, we began to await the patient with acute aortic syndrome with a team consisting of cardiologist, anesthesist, and cardiac surgeon for quick diagnosis and treatment, and from 2004 on, in a hybrid room, to shorten the interval from arrival to surgery. This practice resulted in a consecutive group of emergency patients, who all were operated upon within 24 hours after onset of symptoms, not denying the surgical option even in case of ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Comparing the severity of the preoperative clinical status and the operative procedures performed with the conventionally treated historic (control) group, there were more patients with severe hemodynamic compromise and cerebral malperfusion in the hybrid group. Taking this into consideration, hospital mortality improved in the hybrid group although not yet reaching statistical significance. This trend toward better outcome reflects both an advanced surgical experience as well as the safety of the procedure itself, although being more complex (Fig 2).
|
|
Limitations of the Study
Owing to its nature as an observational, retrospective study and to the small number of patients, limited conclusions can be drawn. It solely reflects our own efforts to improve on unsatisfactory results with emergency surgery of an unselected, heavily compromised group of type I AAAD patients.
The demonstrated approach tries to address the multifactorial scenario of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection by focusing on different variables: shortening the interval from time of diagnosis to surgery to operate before the advent of multiorgan failure; integration of diagnostic, interventional, and surgical methods using the hybrid room benefits; removing all reachable entry and reentry sites; and splinting the true lumen in the descending thoracic aorta simultaneously to avoid late problems with false lumen complications. Although this goal has not been fully reached yet, a new way to cope with this complex surgical problem has been demonstrated. Thus, these early results could probably serve as a discussion basis.
In conclusion, we believe that the demonstrated approach could be a step forward to preserve life and to treat the descending aortic false lumen simultaneously without increasing hospital mortality, eventually resulting in a remodeling of the entire thoracic aorta. Future technical improvement with primarily impervious graft material seems to offer a promising way toward risk reduction of massive proximal blood loss and later endoleakage within the grafted aortic area. Longer follow-up will show whether late complications within the thoracoabdominal aorta will be reduced or not, leaving the option for additional interventional treatment if necessary. Lastly, a multi-institutional, prospective, randomized trial is warranted to get a definite answer on this complex procedural challenge.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Murzi and M. Glauber Should an endovascular procedure be combined with resection for type a aortic dissection? Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1387 - 1388. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Jakob and K. Tsagakis Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., October 1, 2009; 88(4): 1388 - 1389. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tsagakis, M. Kamler, H. Kuehl, W. Kowalczyk, P. Tossios, M. Thielmann, B. Osswald, R. Erbel, H. Eggebrecht, and H. Jakob Avoidance of proximal endoleak using a hybrid stent graft in arch replacement and descending aorta stenting. Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 773 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Pochettino, W. T. Brinkman, P. Moeller, W. Y. Szeto, W. Moser, K. Cornelius, F. W. Bowen, Y. J. Woo, and J. E. Bavaria Antegrade thoracic stent grafting during repair of acute DeBakey I dissection prevents development of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 88(2): 482 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Miyamoto Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2009; 87(1): 108 - 108. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Y. Szeto Invited Commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2008; 86(1): 101 - 102. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |