ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Ann Thorac Surg 2008;86:327-334. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.038
© 2008 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Rony Atoui
Dominique Shum-Tim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atoui, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, R. C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atoui, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, R. C.J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology


Review

Myocardial Regenerative Therapy: Immunologic Basis for the Potential "Universal Donor Cells"

Rony Atoui, MD, MSc, Dominique Shum-Tim, MD, MS, Ray C.J. Chiu, MD, PhD*

Division of Cardiac Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

* Address correspondence to Dr Chiu, The Montreal General Hospital, MUHC, Suite C9-169, 1650 Cedar Ave, Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4, Canada (Email: ray.chiu{at}mcgill.ca).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Stem cell transplantation is a promising approach for improving cardiac function after severe myocardial damage for which use of autologous donor cells have been preferred to avoid immune rejection. Recently however, rodent, porcine, and even human bone marrow stromal cells have been reported to be uniquely immune tolerant, both in the in vitro mixed lymphocyte co-culture studies and in the in vivo allo-transplant and xeno-transplant models. In this review, we explore the current understanding of the underlying immunologic mechanisms, which can facilitate the use of such cells as "universal donor cells" with fascinating therapeutic implications.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
A promising approach currently under intensive investigation is stem cell transplantation to improve the function of the injured myocardium through several mechanisms, including myogenesis [1], angiogenesis [2], and paracrine effects, which may attenuate left ventricular remodeling [3, 4]. Since the introduction of this concept in 1992 [5], several experimental models performed on rodents, sheep, dogs, swines, or monkeys have shown that the transplantation of a wide range of stem cells could contribute to the improvement in the cardiac function. Notable among such donor cells are the satellite cells derived from skeletal muscle [6, 7], embryonic stem cells [8], adult marrow stem cells (MSCs) [9], adipose stem cells [10], umbilical cord blood stem cells [11], fetal cardiomyocytes, and hematopoietic stem cells (CD34+). The observed beneficial effects of cell transplantation have led to numerous human clinical trials in the past several years [12].

In this emerging field of cell transplantation, it is generally taken for granted that such donor cells will behave immunologically like any other mature adult cells when transplanted into histocompatibility-mismatched recipients. Thus, the current preferred approach of using autologous stem cells aims to avoid immune rejection of donor cells, which can be expected after allogeneic or xenogeneic transplantation. Despite the promising early results, harvesting autologous cells from individual patients still poses logistic, economic, and timing constraints. Furthermore, most of the patients who could benefit from such therapy are elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities. Unfortunately, a number of recent studies have documented that MSCs obtained from elderly donors, and those with diabetes, renal failure, or severe ischemic heart disease demonstrated significantly reduced capacity for proliferation, differentiation, and neovascularization, with increased levels of apoptosis in vitro and in vivo [13, 14]. Such impaired autologous donor cells from sick elderly patients could therefore limit their therapeutic potential. Thus, there would be obvious clinical advantages if "universal donor cells" from healthy young donors could be used for stem cell allo-transplantation without the need for immunosuppressive therapies.

In the last several years, increasing experimental findings have pointed toward a unique immunomodulatory property of the MSCs both in the in vitro and in vivo settings [15]. One intriguing property of MSCs is their ability to escape immune recognition and even actively inhibit immune responses. Although the mechanisms underlying the immunosuppressive effects of MSCs are still not completely understood, their immunosuppressive properties have already been exploited in the clinical setting.

The objectives of this review are to critically discuss the evidence behind the role of MSCs in immunomodulation both in vitro and in vivo, and to describe our current understanding of the possible underlying mechanisms by which it occurs. We will also describe their potential clinical use in this context.


    The Proliferating Sources of Stem Cells
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
As previously mentioned, various types of stem cells have been administered to an ischemic myocardium. Studies by several groups have repeatedly documented the successful engraftment of these cells in the adult myocardium, as well as their contribution to the improvement in the overall cardiac function [1–9].

Stem cells are defined as cells capable of self-renewal and pluripotent differentiation into many phenotypes. One clear division in the stem cell family is between those found in the embryo, known as embryonic stem cells, and those found in adult somatic tissue, known as adult stem cells.

Embryonic stem cells are derived from the inner cell mass of pre-implantation embryos, and they are able to differentiate into tissue types from all three germ layers. Several issues hinder their clinical application, such as the associated ethical controversies, insufficient availability, and unpredictable electrical behavior, as well as the risk of tumor formation [8].

Also known as somatic stem cells, the first adult stem cells to be identified were the hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow, and most of our earlier knowledge regarding stem cells had been derived from studies of this cell population. Bone MSCs, also called stromal stem cells, marrow progenitor cells, marrow mononuclear cells, mesenchymal stem cells, or marrow-derived adult stem cells represent essentially a population of nonhematopoietic progenitor cells, which can be found in the bone marrow stroma and were previously believed to play only supportive roles for hematopoiesis. Cohnheim [16], in the 19th century, first suggested the presence of these cells in the blood and their possible role in wound repair [16]. Friedenstein and colleagues [17] were the first in the early 1970s to better describe them in a number of species, including mice, rats, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, and humans, showing their differentiation potential into cells of mesenchymal lineage including chondrocytes, osteoblasts, myocytes, and adipocytes. Isolation of MSCs was then undertaken by Caplan [18] who described a technique still used today by harvesting the cells that adhered to the bottom of the plates when the bone marrow cells are cultured in vitro. Marrow stem cells have also been successfully isolated from various mid-gestational fetal tissue, including umbilical cord blood [11], amniotic fluid [19], first-trimester and second-trimester fetal tissues [20], as well as umbilical cord mesenchyme [21]. Several in vivo and in vitro studies have confirmed the pluripotent potential of these cells, and have observed the presence of injected MSCs in host adipose tissue, lung, cartilage, central nervous system, liver, spleen, thymus, and skeletal muscle [22, 23]. Although the extent of their plasticity is still under investigation, studies within the last few years have demonstrated the capacity of these MSCs to differentiate into cells of lineages other than mesenchymal, such as hepatocytes, renal cells, and even early astrocytes [24]. Because these cells do not have the ethical or tumorigenicity problems of embryonic stem cells, their plasticity have generated much excitement, giving hope to their therapeutic use in a wide range of diseases.

Besides the bone marrow, several sources of adult stem cells are known. Zuk and colleagues [10] have demonstrated that adipose tissue contains both hematopoietic stem cells and MSCs. Peripheral blood is also a source of hematopoietic stem cells and endothelial progenitor cells that have been used for cellular transplantation [12]. Skeletal myoblasts have been isolated from adult muscle and expanded in culture. In 1992, Marelli and associates [5] reported the first cellular cardiomyoplasty by injecting satellite cells into the injured myocardium, which led to the first clinical trial by Menasche and colleagues in 2001 [25].


    MSCs and Their Immunotolerant Properties
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Recently there has been an explosive advance in our knowledge of adult stem cells for their use as donor cells for regenerative therapies. Associated with such advances are some unexpected and controversial findings that defy current scientific dogmas. One such dilemma is a series of observations indicating that MSCs are immunoprivileged, able to survive, and differentiate in immunocompatibilty-mismatched allogeneic or even xenogeneic transplant recipients [15]. Such findings challenge the traditional paradigm of immunological recognition concept initially promulgated by Billingham and Medawar [26] half a century ago.

Although there is continuous controversy surrounding the exact composition of major histocompatibility (MHC) markers on MSCs, most studies describe MSCs as MHC class I positive and MHC class II negative [22]. The expression of class I MHC is important because it protects these cells from natural killer (NK) cell-mediated deletion. As MHC class II proteins are potent allo-antigens, their lack of expression on MSCs allows them to escape recognition by effector CD4+ T-cells. In addition to this, MSCs do not seem to express Fas-ligand nor co-stimulatory molecules, such as B7-1, B7-2, or CD-40 for effector T-cell induction [22]. The presence of these cell surface markers, along with the findings that MSCs are customary residents of the bone marrow stroma, suggest that MSCs are hypo-immunogenic cells that may play an important role in the immunoregulation provided by the bone marrow microenvironment by evading the recognition of alloreactive cells [27–29].


    Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs in the In Vitro Studies
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
MSCs Modulate the Function of T Cells
Data supporting the view that MSCs avoid allogeneic response have come from a large body of in vitro experiments involving co-culture mixed lymphocyte reactions [15, 28, 30]. Evidence from these studies on human, baboon, and murine MSCs indicate that the use of mismatched MSCs does not provoke a proliferative T-cell response in allogeneic and xenogeneic co-culture studies [29, 31–33].

Increasing data has emerged that MSCs can interact directly with T cells to suppress their alloreactivity in a dose-dependent manner and direct CD4+ T cells to a suppressive phenotype [31, 33]. Although conflicting results have been reported, such suppression of mixed lymphocyte reactions in vitro seem to arise from both contact-dependent [34] and soluble factors [33, 35]. However, the exact profile of cytokines produced by MSCs is still provisional and is hindered by lack of standardization in isolation and culture conditions in various studies [27].

Several studies have shown that MSCs can secrete specific peptides, such as hepatocyte growth factor, which can contribute to the creation of a local immunosuppressive environment [31, 36]. Similarly, transforming growth factor-β1 is also involved in T-cell suppression by working with hepatocyte growth factor in promoting the allo-escaping phenotype [31]. In fact, Di Nicola and colleagues [31] showed that neutralizing antibodies to hepatocyte growth factor and transforming growth factor-β1 restored the proliferative response in mixed lymphocyte reactions [31]. Other suggested factors include interferon-{gamma} (INF-{gamma}), tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, and interleukin (IL)-2 [30, 33, 36]. Interleukin-10 also seems to be constitutively expressed by MSCs and has a well-documented role in T-cell regulation and in the promotion of the suppressor phenotype by antagonizing the action of IL-12 during induction of the inflammatory immune responses [27]. Furthermore, recent studies have demonstrated the contribution of histocompatibility leukocyte antigen-6 (HLA-6) protein and heme oxygenase-1 in the immunosuppressive effect of rat and human MSCs through various mechanisms, including suppression of T-cell proliferation and inhibition of cytotoxic T-cell activation [37, 38].

These immunosuppressive properties are retained even when co-stimulatory signals are added to the culture to upregulate the expression of MHC class II [35], or when T-cells are pre-cultured with INF-{gamma} or re-challenged by the same MSCs [29–33, 39]. This indicates that MSCs can preserve their suppressive functions, even within sites of inflammation where inflammatory mediators could upregulate the expression of MHC antigens [28].

One can perhaps speculate that MSCs may play a role in what Chiu called "immunologic homeostasis," because the signaling molecules secreted by these cells are predominantly anti-inflammatory cytokines. When there is tissue injury, such as in acute myocardial infarction, then inflammatory immune cells and cytokines are mobilized at the site of injury. It has been shown that excessive inflammatory response could aggravate the ventricular remodeling process. Mobilization of the MSCs with anti-inflammatory properties may then restore a measure of this immunologic homeostasis by attenuating the inflammatory damage to facilitate the regenerative process, which may be one of the evolutionary roles for these adult stem cells and may be part of the so called paracrine effect as postulated by several investigators [3, 4]. Of course, this hypothesis is highly speculative at present. However, a recent clinical report demonstrating a better prognosis for patients with ischemic heart disease when their anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory cytokine ratio was higher in their blood seems consistent with such hypothesis [40].

Several studies have also shown that these immunosuppressive properties of the MSCs have no immunological restriction, and remain effective whether the stimulation is specific or nonspecific [31–33, 41], across species [32, 41, 42], and across different populations of lymphocytes [36, 42, 43]. In fact, Djouad and associates [42] showed that both human MSCs and murine MSCs could suppress xenogeneic mixed lymphocyte reactions in-vitro. Together, these results suggest that these immunosuppressive mechanisms may even cross species barriers.

Others have suggested different mechanisms depending on the stimuli. The tryptophan catabolizing enzyme indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase has been suggested to play a role in the suppression of T-cell proliferation by MSCs [44]. When pre-treated by INF-{gamma}, MSCs express indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase activity that degrades essential tryptophan resulting in reduced lymphocyte proliferation. Nevertheless, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation is in disagreement with previous reports indicating that MSCs do not induce T-cells to undergo apoptosis [31, 33].

Marrow stem cells induced T-cell anergy has been proposed as another potential mechanism of immune suppression, partially attributed to the absence of co-stimulatory molecules on the MSCs [45]. Alternatively, MSCs can promote T-cell anergy by inducing their divisional arrest [46]. Glennie and colleagues [46] have shown that T cells stimulated in co-cultures with MSCs exhibited an extensive inhibition of cyclin-D2 and an upregulation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27kip1. However, the findings from different groups found that the unresponsiveness was only transient and relieved once MSCs were removed from the culture [31, 34]. The discrepancy between these studies may partially be due to different experimental conditions, the diverse stimuli used or the source of MSCs.

Furthermore, such immunosuppressive action had been shown to be partially mediated at another level through the generation of CD8+ regulatory cells (T-regs), which have potent suppressor activity [42, 43, 45, 47]. The mechanism of the induction of T-regs is still not well understood, involving different factors depending on the experimental conditions used [30].


    Interaction Between MSCs and Antigen-Presenting Cells
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Dendritic cells play key roles in both cell-mediated and humoral immunity [15]. Zhang and associates [48] provided evidence that MSCs interfere with dendritic cells maturation, differentiation, and function by down-regulating the expression of CD1a, CD40, CD80, CD86, and HLA-DR [48, 49]. These findings were confirmed by Beyth and colleagues [43] who suggested that human MSCs convert the dendritic cells into a suppressor cell, thus locking it into an immature state and thereby inducing peripheral tolerance [43]. Consistent with these findings, a decreased production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, INF-{gamma}, and IL-12, and an increased production of the anti-inflammatory mediators such as IL-10 was also observed [43, 45]. In addition, the preferential activations of regulatory T cells were also shown to contribute to the delayed maturation of dendritic cells [49]. All these results suggest that MSCs can mediate allogeneic tolerance by directing antigen-presenting cells toward a suppressor phenotype that ultimately results in an attenuated T-cell response [28].


    Interaction With NK Cells and Modulation of B-Cell Functions
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The role of MSCs on NK cells has also been addressed. The NK cells exhibit cytolytic activity that target cells lacking expression of HLA class I molecules. Despite some contradictory findings, there is evidence that MSCs suppress IL-2-driven or IL-15-driven NK-cell proliferation and INF-{gamma} production [35, 41, 50]. Transwell experiments have indicated that, although soluble factors are involved, cell-cell contact was also necessary to induce the observed inhibitory effect [51].

Finally, another level at which MSCs modulate immune responses is through the inhibition of B-cell proliferation, as well as their chemotactic behavior and antibody production [15, 52, 53]. Augello and colleagues [53] demonstrated the involvement of the programmed death-1 pathway in B-cell inhibition by MSCs [53]. Although the mechanisms are not yet fully understood, transwell experiments indicated that soluble factors are involved [52]. However, no in vivo evidence of the suppressive effect of MSCs on B cells is presently available.

Taken together, numerous studies provide strong evidence that MSCs are able to modulate the function of different immune cells in vitro through several interrelated mechanisms as summarized in Figure 1. In a recent review article, Aggarwal and Pittenger [45] reported that human MSCs constitutively secrete PGE2, hence altering the cytokine secretion profile of dendritic cells, naïve, and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, as well as NK cells, namely by inhibiting tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} and INF-{gamma}, and by stimulating IL-10 secretion to modulate the immune cell response. By doing so, they inhibit the maturation and migration of various antigen-presenting cells, they suppress B-cell activation, and they induce suppressor T-cell formation [45]. Furthermore, through the release of IL-4, they accelerate a shift from a majority of pro-inflammatory Th1 cells toward an increase in the anti-inflammatory Th2 cells [27].


Figure 1
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Proposed mechanisms of the immunomodulatory effects of MSCs in vitro. (Adapted with permission from Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells. Blood 2007;110(10):3499-506.) (CD = cluster of differentiation; DC = dendritic cells; IDO = indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase; IL = interleukin; MHC = major histocompatibility; MSC = marrow stem cells; NK = natural killer; PGE2 = prostaglandin E2; and TGFβ = transforming growth factor β; Th = T helper; TNF{alpha} = tumor necrosis factor {alpha}; T REGS = regulatory T cells.)

 
Despite the evidence pointing toward an immunosuppressive property of MSCs in vitro, the exact mechanisms are still unclear and several different, sometimes contradictory results have been proposed. The lack of standardized culture configuration together with variable experimental conditions and the use of different methods to detect the implanted cells make it difficult to compare the results from different studies. Once this issue is solved, many downstream signals could be the potential research targets, including IL-2 related suppressive signals. In addition to this, different phenotypes and sources of MSCs, and variable kinetics and types of stimuli might also partially explain the contradictory data [15, 30]. For instance, the inhibitory effect of MSCs on cytotoxic T lymphocytes is dose-dependent with marked inhibition, seen only when larger numbers of MSCs are present [30, 34, 36] and when MSCs are added at the beginning of the culture [31, 33, 35].


    Immunomodulation of MSCs In Vivo
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Although considerable data of in vitro findings support the nonimmunogenicity and immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, relatively little evidence is available on the immunogenicity of MSCs in vivo. Despite this, there is growing evidence that the previously mentioned in vitro observations may translate to the in vivo setting as well. Bartholomew and colleagues [32] group first demonstrated that the in vivo administration of allogeneic MSCs prolonged third party skin graft survival in immunocompetent baboons. This study, together with many others, paved the way for the clinical use of these cells in immune-mediated disorders [15, 30]. For instance, Koc and co-workers [54] showed no evidence of alloreactive T cells and no incidence of graft versus host disease when allogeneic MSCs were infused into patients with Hurler's syndrome or metachromatic leukodystrophy. Horwitz and colleagues [55] reported that donor MSCs contributed to bone remodeling after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in 3 children with osteogenesis imperfecta. Other groups have reported that MSCs can also prevent the rejection of allogeneic B16 mouse melanoma cells in immunocompetent mice [42], successfully engraft in brains of albino rats [56], induce peripheral tolerance in mice with autoimmune encephalomyelitis [57], and significantly attenuate the symptoms in humans with grade IV acute graft versus host disease [58]. Currently, a multicenter, prospective clinical trial investigating the use of expanded MSCs for graft versus host disease has been started in Europe [59]. Studies are also underway exploring the use of MSCs to enhance engraftment of cord blood and hematopoietic transplants [30]. It is important to note that several mechanisms involving specific soluble factors have been proposed, mostly on the basis of in vitro experiments, but a clear consensus, based on in vivo experiments specifically targeting these molecules is still lacking.

Allogeneic MSCs transplants into ischemic myocardium of immunocompetent porcine recipients were reported by Caparrelli and colleagues [60] and Makkar and colleagues [61]. The implanted cells remained viable and differentiated without being rejected. In a swine and a rat model, Amado and colleagues [62] and Dai and associates [3], respectively reported the survival of allogeneic MSCs in infarcted myocardium without immunosuppression. Moreover, these cells were shown to differentiate and contribute to the functional improvement of the host myocardium. However, these findings were recently contradicted when Poncelet and colleagues [63] demonstrated that swine allogeneic MSCs did elicit a complete immune response accompanied with an increased concentration of allo-antibodies when injected into ischemic myocardium.

In November 2000, a fascinating study by Liechty and colleagues [64] was published in Nature Medicine. Well-characterized human MSCs were implanted into fetal sheep early in gestation. In this xenogeneic system, the human MSCs engrafted and persisted in multiple tissues for as long as 13 months after transplantation, even after maturation of the fetal immune system. Furthermore, these cells underwent site-specific differentiation into multiple cell lineages, including cardiomyocytes. Nevertheless, these experiments were carried out in fetal recipients.

In a series of studies at our laboratory, Saito and associates [65] injected intravenously labeled mice MSCs into immunocompetent adult rats, successfully producing stable cardiac chimeras for at least 12 weeks without any immunosuppression and with no evidence of rejection. It was confirmed that within days these mouse cells had homed into the bone marrow of the rats and after coronary artery ligation they were recruited to the peri-infarcted myocardium. In the following 4 to 6 weeks, the labeled cells were seen to differentiate into various phenotypes. In subsequent studies, MacDonald and colleagues [66] showed that not only stable chimeras were formed, but also the overall ventricular function was significantly improved. More recently, Atoui and associates [67] were able to confirm the engraftment of human MSCs within the rat myocardium for at least 8 weeks after myocardial infarction, and without the use of any immunosuppression. Such xenotransplant significantly contributed to the improvement in the overall cardiac function and in attenuating left ventricular remodeling.

However, tolerance of MSCs across the MHC barrier might not be absolute. Grinnemo and colleagues [68] demonstrated that although MSCs successfully engraft across allogeneic barriers, rejection occurs when a xenotransplant model is used in vivo. In this study, human MSCs could not be detected 1 week after implantation, and a massive infiltration was observed in the immunocompetent rats. Furthermore, peripheral lymphocytes of rats injected with human MSCs proliferated after re-stimulation with adult MSCs in vitro, suggesting cellular immunization. In their follow-up study, the same group demonstrated that the survival of human MSCs into ischemic rat myocardium is possible only when immunosuppression or immuno-incompetent hosts are used [69]. However, there seems to be some subtle differences in their experimental designs. For example, in their study, MSCs were harvested from the sternum of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. These cells were previously shown to have a lower capacity for differentiation, survival, and proliferation [13, 14]. It is of interest to note that in the in vitro studies, human MSCs used were harvested from young healthy donors [29, 45]. Still, further studies to clarify reasons for such contradictory findings will be highly desirable. Similar contradictory findings were also reported showing that despite retaining their immunosuppressive properties in vitro, allogeneic murine MSCs can be immunogenic in immunocompetent animals [70, 71]. Unexpectedly, these studies have also suggested that depending on the level of INF-{gamma}, MSCs might also act as antigen-presenting cells [72]. The discrepancy observed could be explained by differences in the experimental conditions as a function of time, different stages of differentiation, or species diversity. For instance, several studies have described that the amount of fetal calf serum present in culture media can induce a significant immune response against cultured cells, even after an autologous transplantation [73]. In addition, it is clear that species-specific differences exist that may prevent engraftment of allogeneic or xenogeneic cells [30]. For example, MSCs derived from Balb-c mice do not express allo-antigens, whereas C57BL-6 mice are positive for MHC class I [34]. Transfer of C57BL-6-derived MSCs to Balb-c mice elicited an immune response, resulting in rejection [70]. By contrast, the immortalized C3 cell line survived in four different immunocompetent murine strains [42]. Finally, it should be mentioned that murine and human MSCs differ in the immunosuppressive potential. In fact, it was shown that the immunosuppressive effect of human MSCs, at least in vitro, is much stronger than that of murine MSCs [31, 36].


    The Immune Tolerance of MSCs After Differentiation
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Although the immunomodulatory effects of multipotent MSCs are now well-documented, it provides no explanation as to why such tolerance persists even after implanted xeno-allogeneic stem cells differentiated into their targeted tissue phenotypes. In an attempt to explain this phenomenon, Chiu proposed the "stealth immune tolerance" hypothesis [74], which is in fact an application of the "danger model" theory described earlier by Matzinger [75], who suggested that the immune rejection of a transplanted organ is not due to the mismatch of MHC antigens alone, but also due to the presence of a "danger signal" serving as a co-stimulant factor. Molecules released as the result of tissue injury, such as those after an invasive surgical procedure, can be recognized by the Toll-like receptor (TLR) associated with our innate immunity. This can then lead to the production of co-stimulant molecules, which are presented by the antigen-presenting cells to activate effector T cells [76]. Thus, although it is still hypothetical, the "stealth immune tolerance" hypothesis is based on the fact that the expression of new foreign recognition antigens (ie, MHC antigens) on the gradually differentiating and maturing cells is dissociated in timing from the "danger signals" derived from the injury inflicted by the invasive implantation procedure. In other words, it takes weeks for the implanted cells to mature and fully express their MHC antigens. Thus, by the time these implanted cells differentiate, the effects to tissue injury would have subsided, so that the immune synapsis receives only the first "recognition" signal without the second "activation" signal [74]. According to the two-signal theory for immune synapsis, recognition without activation could then lead to T-cell anergy, such that the implanted cells, now fully differentiated, are tolerated and allowed to survive. It is important to note that presently this view remains hypothetical, and needs to be further confirmed.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Despite the substantive body of evidence from the in vitro literature confirming the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, their importance in the in vivo setting remains controversial. Nevertheless, MSCs have already been introduced to clinical practice, especially in the autoimmune and hematological fields.

Although still not well defined, three broad mechanisms seem to contribute to this immuno-tolerance property. First, MSCs are hypo-immunogenic, expressing low levels or absence of MHC and co-stimulant molecules, as described earlier. Second, these stem cells inhibit T-cell responses directly by disrupting NK as well as CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell function, and indirectly through the modulation of B cells and antigen-presenting cells. Third, MSCs induce a local immunosuppressive environment through the production of prostaglandins and anti-inflammatory cytokines. It is possible that some of the beneficial effects of MSCs might reflect, in part, the protective and immunosuppressive activities they exert on injured tissues [30]. It is of interest to note that some mechanisms previously described have recently been implicated in the survival of the fetal allograft [77].

Based on these clinical and experimental data that have been previously discussed, the Food and Drug Administration recently approved an phase I, multicenter clinical trial sponsored by Osiris Inc (Baltimore, MD) in which allogeneic human MSCs were given intravenously without immunosuppression to patients after an acute myocardial infarction. The preliminary results recently presented were highly encouraging [78].

The potential importance of these findings for the treatment of ischemic heart disease is apparent. Due to their immunotolerance property, the establishment of MSCs as effective "universal donor cells" [67] could dramatically expand the therapeutic potential for cellular cardiomyoplasty. From a clinical perspective, these cells could be isolated and expanded from donors irrespective of their MHC haplotype, tested for their functional capabilities well in advance, and stored as an "off-the-shelf" cell population for immediate use when needed on any patient after an acute myocardial infarction. Such medical and logistic advantages are not available with the use of autologous MSCs, which is currently the cell source of choice. Perhaps more importantly, because such allogeneic MSCs can be obtained from young healthy donors, they could be of great value in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies and in elderly patients with multiple medical comorbidities whose own MSCs could be dysfunctional.

Despite the exciting preliminary results, however, further investigations are required to address many of the remaining controversial findings and better assess the efficacy and safety of allogeneic MSCs, as well as the important question of chronic rejection after cell transplantation. Furthermore, further mechanistic studies related to the observed improvement in ventricular function and more quantitative assessment of MSCs engraftment are still needed before the therapeutic promise of these cells can be fully achieved [15].


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We thank Marc Kandalaft for his help with the figure illustration and Isabelle Carignan for her editorial assistance in the preparation of this article. This work was supported in part by the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Quebec (HSFQ) and Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec (FRSQ).


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 The Proliferating Sources of...
 MSCs and Their Immunotolerant...
 Immunomodulatory Role of MSCs...
 Interaction Between MSCs and...
 Interaction With NK Cells...
 Immunomodulation of MSCs In...
 The Immune Tolerance of...
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Orlic D, Kajstura T, Chimenti S, Bodine BM, Leri A, Anversa P. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium Nature 2001;401:701-705.
  2. Davani S, Marandin A, Mersin N, et al. Mesenchymal progenitor cells differentiate into an endothelial phenotype, enhance vascular density, and improve heart function in a rat cellular cardiomyoplasty model Circulation 2003;108II:253-258.[Free Full Text]
  3. Dai W, Hale S, Martin B, et al. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short and long-term effects Circulation 2005;112:214-223.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tang Y, Zhao Q, Qin X, et al. Paracrine action enhances the effects of autologous mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on vascular regeneration in rat model of myocardial infarction Ann Thorac Surg 2005;80:229-237.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Marelli D, Desrosiers C, El-Alfy M, Kao RL, Chiu RCJ. Cell transplantation for myocardial repair: An experimental approach Cell Transplant 1992;1:383-390.[Medline]
  6. Chiu RCJ, Zibaitis A, Kao RL. Cellular cardiomyoplasty: myocardial regeneration with satellite cell implantation Ann. Thorac Surg 1995;60:12-18.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Chachques JC, Acar C, Herreros J, et al. Cellular cardiomyoplasty: clinical application Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1121-1130.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Hodgson DM, Behfar A, Zingman LV, et al. Stable benefit of embryonic stem cell therapy in myocardial infarction Am J Physiol 2004;287:H471-H479.
  9. Wang JS, Shum-Tim D, Galipeau J, et al. Marrow stromal cells for cellular cardiomyoplasty: feasibility and clinical advantages J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2000;120:999-1006.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Zuk P, Zhu M, Ashjian P, et al. Human adipose tissue is a source of multipotent stem cells Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:4279-4295.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lee OK, Kuo TK, Chen WM, Lee KD, Hsieh SL, Chen TH. Isolation of multipotent mesenchymal stem cells from umbilical cord blood Blood 2004;103:1669-1675.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Schachinger V, Erbs S, Elsasser A, et al. Intracoronary bone-marrow derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction N Engl J Med 2006;355:1210-1221.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Heeschen C, Lehmann R, Honold J, et al. Profoundly reduced neovascularization capacity of bone marrow mononuclear cells derived from patients with chronic ischemic heart disease Circulation 2004;109:1615-1622.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Stolzing A, Scutt A. Age-related impairment of mesenchymal progenitor cell function Aging cell 2006;1:1-12.
  15. Nauta AJ, Fibbe WE. Immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stromal cells Blood 2007;110(10):3499-3506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Cohnheim J. Ueber entzündung und eiterung Arch Path Anato Physiol Klin Med 1867;40:1.
  17. Friedenstein AJ, Petrakova KV, Kurolesova AI, Frolova GP. Heterotopic of bone marrow. Analysis of precursor cells for osteogenic and hematopoietic tissues. Transplantation 1968;6:230-247.[Medline]
  18. Caplan AI. Adult mesenchymal stem cells for tissue engineering versus regenerative medicine J. Cell Physiol 2007;213:341-347.[Medline]
  19. De Coppi P, Bartasch G, Siddiqui MM, et al. Isolation of amniotic stem cell lines with potential for therapy Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:100-106.[Medline]
  20. In't Anker PS, Noort WA, Scherjon SA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in human second-trimester bone marrow, liver, lung and spleen exhibit a similar immunophenotype but a heterogeneous multilineage differentiation potential Haematologica 2003;88:845-852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Yen BL, Huang HI, Chien CC, et al. Isolation of multipotent cells from human term placenta Stem Cells 2005;23:3-9.[Medline]
  22. Pittenger MF, MacKay AM, Beck SC, et al. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells Science 1999;284:143-147.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dezawa M, Ishikawa H, Itokazu Y, et al. Bone marrow stromal cells generate muscle cells and repair muscle degeneration Science 2005;309:314-317.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Brazelton TR, Rossi FM, Keshet GI, et al. From marrow to brain: expression of neuronal phenotypes in adult mice Science 2000;290:1775-1779.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Menasche P, Hagege AA, Vilquin JT, et al. Autologous skeletal myoblast transplantation for severe postinfarction left ventricular dysfunction J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41:1078-1083.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Billingham RE, Medawar PB. The technique of free skin grafting in mammals J Exp Biol 1951;28:385-402.[Abstract]
  27. Ryan J, Barry F, Murphy J, Mahon B. Mesenchymal stem cells avoid allogeneic rejection J of Inflammation 2005;2:1-11.
  28. Rasmusson I. Immune modulation by mesenchymal stem cells Exp Cell Res 2006;312:2169-2179.[Medline]
  29. Le Blanc K, Tammik C, Rosendahl K, Zetterberg E, Ringden O. HLA expression and immunologic properties of differentiated and undifferentiated mesenchymal stem cells Exp Hematol 2003;31:890-896.[Medline]
  30. Leblanc K, Ringden O. Immunomodulation by mesenchymal stem cells and clinical experience J Intern Med 2007;262:509-525.[Medline]
  31. Di Nicola M, Carlo-Stella C, Magni M, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cells suppress T lymphocyte proliferation induced by cellular or non-specific mitogenic stimuli Blood 2002;99:3838-3843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Bartholomew A, Sturgeon C, Satskas M, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells suppress lymphocyte proliferation in vitro and prolong skin graft survival in vivo Exp Hematol 2002;30:42-48.[Medline]
  33. Tse WT, Pendleton JD, Beyer WM, Egalka MC, Guinan EC. Suppression of allogeneic T-cell proliferation by human marrow stromal cells: implications in transplantation Transplantation 2003;75:389-397.[Medline]
  34. Krampera M, Glennie S, Dyson J, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the response of naïve and memory antigen-specific T cells to their cognate peptide Blood 2003;101:3722-3729.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Rasmusson I, Ringden O, Sundberg B, LeBlanc K. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit the formation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but not activated cytotoxic T lymphocytes or natural killer cells Transplantation 2003;76:1208-1213.[Medline]
  36. LeBlanc K, Tammik L, Sundberg B, Haynesworth SE, Ringden O. Mesenchymal stem cells inhibit and stimulate mixed lymphocyte cultures and mitogenic responses independently of the major histocompatibility complex Scand J Immunol 2003;57:11-20.[Medline]
  37. Nasef A, Mathieu N, Chapel A. Immunosuppressive effects of mesenchymal stem cells: involvement of HLA-G Transplantation 2007;84:231-237.[Medline]
  38. Chabannes D, Hill M, Merieau E. A role of heme oxygenase-1 in the immunosuppressive effect of adult rat and human mesenchymal stem cells Blood 2007;110:3691-3694.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ryan JM, Barry F, Murphy JM, Mahon BP. Interferon-{gamma} does not break, but promotes the immunosuppressive capacity of adult mesenchymal stem cells Clinic Exp Immunol 2007;149:353-363.
  40. Anguera I, Miranda-Guardiola F, Bosch X, et al. Elevation of serum levels of anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin-10 and decreased risks of coronary events in patients with unstable angina Am Heart J 2002;144:811-817.[Medline]
  41. Maccario R, Podesta M, Moretta A, et al. Interaction of human mesenchymal stem cells with cells involved in alloantigen-specific immune response favors the differentiation of CD4+ T-cell subsets expressing a regulatory/suppressive phenotype Haematologica 2005;90:516-525.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Djouad F, Plence P, Bony C, et al. Immunosuppressive effect of mesenchymal stem cells favors tumor growth in allogeneic animals Blood 2003;102:3837-3844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Beyth S, Borovsky Z, Mevorach D, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells alter antigen-presenting cell maturation and induce T cell unresponsiveness Blood 2005;105:2214-2219.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Meisel R, Zibert A, Laryea M, et al. Human bone marrow stromal cells inhibit allogeneic T-cell responses by indoleamine 2,3-deoxygenase-mediated tryptophan degradation Blood 2004;103:4465-4472.
  45. Aggarwal S, Pittenger M. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate allogeneic immune cell responses Blood 2005;105:1815-1822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Glennie S, Soeiro I, Dyson PJ, Lam EW, Dazzi F. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells induce division arrest anergy of activated T cells Blood 2005;105:2821-2827.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Prevosto C, Zancolli M, Canevali P, Zocchi MR, Poggi A. Generation of CD4+ or CD8+ regulatory T cells upon mesenchymal stem cell-lymphocyte interaction Haematologica 2007;92:881-888.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Zhang W, Ge W, Li C, et al. Effects of mesenchymal stem cells on differentiation, maturation, and function of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells Stem Cell Dev 2004;13:263-271.
  49. Chen XI, Armstrong MA, Li G. Mesenchymal stem cells in immunoregulation Immunol Cell Biol 2006;84:413-421.[Medline]
  50. Spaggiari GM, Capobianco A, Becchetti S, Mingari MC, Moretta L. Mesenchymal stem cell-natural killer cell interactions: evidence that activated NK cells are capable of killing MSCs, whereas MSCs can inhibit IL-2 induced NK-cell proliferation Blood 2006;107:1484-1490.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Sotiropoulo PA, Serez SA, Gritzapis AS, Baxevanis CN, Papamichail M. Interactions between human mesenchymal stem cells and natural killer cells Stem Cells 2006;24:74-85.[Medline]
  52. Corcione A, Benvenuto F, Ferreti E, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells modulate B cell functions Blood 2006;107:367-372.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Augello A, Tasso R, Negrini SM, et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal progenitor cells inhibit lymphocyte proliferation by activation of the programmed death 1 pathway Eur J Immunol 2005;35:1482-1490.[Medline]
  54. Koc ON, Day J, Nieder M, Gerson L, Lazarus H, Krivit W. Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell infusion for treatment of metachromatic leukodystrophy and Hurler syndrome Bone Marrow Transplant 2002;30:215-222.[Medline]
  55. Horwitz EM, Gordon PL, Koo WK, et al. Isolated allogeneic bone marrow-derived mesenchymal cells engraft and stimulate growth in children with osteogenesis imperfecta: implications for cell therapy of bone Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:8932-8937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  56. Azizi SA, Stokes D, Augelli BJ, DiGirolamo C, Prockop DJ. Engraftment and migration of human bone marrow stromal cells implanted in the brains of albino rats: similarities to astrocyte grafts Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:3908-3913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  57. Zappia E, Casazza S, Pedemonte E, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells ameliorate experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis inducing T-cell anergy Blood 2005;106:1755-1761.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. LeBlanc K, Rasmusson J, Sundberg B, et al. Treatment of severe acute graft-versus-host disease with third party haploidentical mesenchymal stem cells Lancet 2004;363:1439-1441.[Medline]
  59. Tian Y, Deng YB, Huang YJ, Wang Y. Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells decrease acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells transplantation Immunol Invest 2008;37:29-42.[Medline]
  60. Caparrelli DJ, Cattaneo S, Shake JG, et al. Cellular cardiomyoplasty with allogeneic mesenchymal Stem cells results in improved cardiac performance in a swine model of myocardial infarction Circulation 2001;104(Suppl II):II-599.
  61. Makkar RR, Price M, Lill M. Multilineage differentiation of transplanted allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells in a porcine model of recent myocardial infarction improves left ventricular function Circulation 2002;106(Suppl II):II-34.
  62. Amado LC, Saliaris AP, Schuleri KH, et al. Cardiac repair with intramyocardial injection of allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells after myocardial infarction PNAS 2005;102:11474-11479.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  63. Poncelet A, Vercruysse J, Saliez A, Gianello P. Although pig allogeneic mesenchymal stem cells are not immunogenic in vitro, intracardiac injection elicits an immune response in vivo Transplantation 2007;83:783-790.[Medline]
  64. Liechty KW, Mackenzie TC, Shaaban AF, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells engraft and demonstrate site-specific differentiation after in utero transplantation in sheep Nat Med 2000;11:1282-1286.
  65. Saito T, Kuang JQ, Bittira B, Al-Khaldi A, Chiu RCJ. Xenotransplant cardiac chimera: immune tolerance of adult stem cells Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:19-24.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  66. MacDonald D, Saito T, Shum-Tim D, Bernier PL, Chiu RCJ. Persistence of marrow stromal cells implanted into acutely infarcted myocardium: observations in a xenotransplant model J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;130:1114-1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  67. Atoui R, Asenjo JF, Duong M, Guangyong C, Chiu R, Shum-Tim D. Marrow stromal cells as "universal donor cells" for myocardial regenerative therapy: their unique immune tolerance Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:571-580.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  68. Grinnemo K, Mansson A, Dellgren D, et al. Xenoreactivity and engraftment of human mesenchymal stem cells transplanted into infarcted rat myocardium J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:1293-1300.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  69. Grinnemo KH, Mansson-Broberg A, Leblanc, et al. Human mesenchymal stem cells do not differentiate into cardiomyocytes in a cardiac ischemic xenomodel Ann Med 2006;38:144-153.[Medline]
  70. Eliopoulos N, Stagg J, Lejeune L, Pommey S, Galipeau J. Allogeneic marrow stromal cells are immune rejected by MHC class I- and class II-mismatched recipient mice Blood 2005;106:4057-4065.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  71. Nauta AJ, Westerhuis G, Kruisselbrink AB, Lurvink EG, Willemze R, Fibbe WE. Donor-derived mesenchymal stem cells are immunogenic in an allogeneic host and stimulate donor graft rejection in a nonmyeloablative setting Blood 2006;108:2114-2120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  72. Stagg J, Pommey S, Eliopoulos N, Galipeau J. Interferon-{gamma}-stimuated marrow stromal cells; a new type of nonhematopoietic antigen-presenting cell Blood 2006;107:2570-2577.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  73. Javazon EH, Beggs KJ, Flake AW. Mesenchymal stem cells: paradoxes of passaging Exp Hematol 2004;32:414-425.[Medline]
  74. Chiu R. "Stealth immune tolerance" in stem cell transplantation: potential for "universal donors" in myocardial regenerative therapy J Heart Lung Transplant 2005;24:511-516.[Medline]
  75. Matzinger P. The danger model: a renewed sense of self Science 2002;296:301-305.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  76. Frantz S, Ertl G, Bauersachs J. Mechanisms of disease: toll-like receptors in cardiovascular disease Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2007;4:444-454.[Medline]
  77. Barry FP, Murphy JM, English K, Mahon BP. Immunogenicity of adult mesenchymal stem cells: lessons from the fetal allograft Stem Cells Dev 2005;14:252-265.[Medline]
  78. Zambrano J, Traverse J, Henry T, et al. The impact of intravenous human mesenchymal stem cells (ProvacelTM) on ejection fraction in patients with myocardial infarction Circ Suppl 2007;116:II-202.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Shafy, T. Lavergne, C. Latremouille, M. Cortes-Morichetti, A. Carpentier, and J. C. Chachques
Association of electrostimulation with cell transplantation in ischemic heart disease
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., October 1, 2009; 138(4): 994 - 1001.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. M. Abarbanell, A. C. Coffey, J. W. Fehrenbacher, D. J. Beckman, J. L. Herrmann, B. Weil, and D. R. Meldrum
Proinflammatory cytokine effects on mesenchymal stem cell therapy for the ischemic heart.
Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2009; 88(3): 1036 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
G. Valen
Extracardiac approaches to protecting the heart
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., April 1, 2009; 35(4): 651 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
Q. Zhao, Y. Sun, L. Xia, A. Chen, and Z. Wang
Randomized Study of Mononuclear Bone Marrow Cell Transplantation in Patients With Coronary Surgery
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1833 - 1840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
R. C.J. Chiu
Invited Commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., December 1, 2008; 86(6): 1848 - 1848.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Rony Atoui
Dominique Shum-Tim
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Atoui, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, R. C.J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Atoui, R.
Right arrow Articles by Chiu, R. C.J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular biology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS