ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Filip P. Casselman
Ihsan Bakir
Francis Wellens
Ivan Degrieck
Frank Van Praet
Hugo Vanermen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1071-1072
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Correspondence

Reply

Filip P. Casselman, MD, PhD, Ihsan Bakir, MD, Francis Wellens, MD, Ivan Degrieck, MD, Frank Van Praet, MD, Hugo Vanermen, MD

Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, OLV Clinic, Moorselbaan 164, Aalst, 9300 Belgium

(Email: filip.casselman{at}olvz-aalst.be).

To the Editor:

We thank Nagy and Peterffy [1] for their interesting letter related to our previously published article on minimally invasive aortic valve replacement [2].

We agree that removing the air from the heart and potentially defibrillating the heart are important steps during the operation. Care should be taken to execute these steps very cautiously so as not to compromise the operative result.

The measures we take with regard to removal of the air are the following: The operative field is flooded with CO2 as soon as the aorta is opened. A small venting device is placed through the aortic valve into the left ventricle. However its aim is only to have a good view of the aortic valve and annulus (for valve excision, suture placement, and valve implantation). By no means do we aim to completely aspirate all blood from the left ventricle.

When the valve is tied down and the surgeon starts to close the aortotomy, blood is allowed to fill the left ventricle and eventually even cover the aortic valve prosthesis. Again, the only view that is needed at this point is the closure line of the aortotomy. Most of the surgeons in our group close the aorta in two layers (one Blalock suture over which another running suture is placed). Therefore, once the first layer is finished, filling of the heart and gentle suction on the aortic needle permits the blood to further fill the ascending aorta and aspirate potential air (or residual CO2). The CO2 is only stopped when the second suture line is completed. At this point further suction is applied to the aortic needle, the heart is completely filled, ventilation is resumed, and echocardiographic guidance indicates whether air or CO2 removal is complete. The aortic clamp is only removed when this is the case.

Using this strategy we have been very satisfied in removing the air from the heart, and we have not needed to use pulmonary artery venting.

It is correct that ventricular fibrillation can be hazardous since defibrillating paddles cannot be inserted through a mini-sternotomy. Therefore, if this occurs after release of the aortic cross-clamp, we have been injecting potassium chloride into the aortic root (20 meq-4 meq per mL solution-added to 5 mL of saline). This initiates a cardiac arrest which usually lasts less than one minute. Invariably, the heart resumes in a spontaneous cardiac rhythm once the effect of the potassium chloride is washed out.

Using these little tricks, we have been very satisfied with our minimally invasive technique and we continue to apply it in the overwhelming majority of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement.


    References
 Top
 References
 

  1. Nagy ZL, Peterffy A. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: a word of caution(letter) Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:1071.[Free Full Text]
  2. Bakir I, Casselman FP, Wellens F, et al. Minimally invasive versus standard approach aortic valve replacement: a study in 506 patients Ann Thorac Surg 2006;81:1599-1604.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Related Article

Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement: A Word of Caution
Zsolt L. Nagy and Arpad Peterffy
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 1071. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Filip P. Casselman
Ihsan Bakir
Francis Wellens
Ivan Degrieck
Frank Van Praet
Hugo Vanermen
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Casselman, F. P.
Right arrow Articles by Vanermen, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS