|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:683-685
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
Accepted for publication November 9, 2006.
* Address correspondence to Dr Satur, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Princes Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 7LN United Kingdom (Email: christopher.satur{at}uhns.nhs.uk).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We have undertaken a pilot clinical study in which patients undergoing elective cardiac surgical procedures were screened to identify those at risk of postoperative respiratory difficulties. Peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) measurements (used as part of a nurse directed pre-admission clinic protocol) were used to detect these patients. Subsequently these patients were admitted to a program of pulmonary optimization prior to surgery. We share the positive impact of this novel approach on our practice in preventing postoperative respiratory morbidity.
| Technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods
A retrospective review of the prospectively collected data of patients who underwent the optimization therapy was analyzed. This study was discussed with the local ethics committee and was deemed not requiring ethical approval as it was seen as an outcome audit of the unit. Individual patient consent was not obtained as no patient is identified. The study was performed with departmental approval.
Patients entered into the pulmonary optimization program between July 2003 and October 2004 were identified, and outcome measures such as the length of postoperative ventilation, the period of intensive care unit management, occurrence of chest infection, and prolonged hospital stay were analyzed. The data was collected from individual patient notes and charts and the surgical database.
Outcomes
Of a total of 258 patients receiving coronary artery bypass grafting or valve surgery by a single surgeon (CMRS) during the period of the study, 14 patients (5.4%) were identified for targeted pulmonary optimization. The median age was 73 years (range, 53 to 79 years) with 9 males (64%).
Ten of the 14 patients were ex-smokers, 3 were smoking at the time of admission and 1 was a lifelong nonsmoker. They were admitted at a median of 6 days prior to surgery. The median preoperative PEFR was 300 L/min (range, 157 to 340 L/min), which a median 67% predicted for age, height, and sex (38% to 79%). After optimization the PEFR rose by 40% to a median value of 420 L/min (range, 400 to 520 L/min), which improved the values to 89% of predicted values (range, 68% to 108%) (Fig 1).
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The PEFR test was chosen to be readily reproducible at a busy a nurse-led clinic, and measurements were calculated and compared with predicted values according to the manufacturers guidelines [3]. The cut off value of 400 L/min was selected from normogram of normal reference values for age and sex as documented in the British Thoracic Society guidelines [4]. The value of 400 L/min was selected because it is significantly below all male normal values; thus it is an extreme by which patients could be judged requiring intervention. However, female values do overlap the value of 400 L/min in advancing ages. As this was a pilot study to identify a strategic mechanism to identify patients at risk of airway complications, the lowest level of the British Thoracic Society chart was chosen that was applicable in advanced ages. The reservation regarding the value of the numerator was that of women who have lower PEFR values, and there is potentially a broad spread of values around the norm. However, in support of this value was that most patients with lower values produced PEFR results that were significantly below, and subsequently demonstrated marked improvement. Second, the aim of the protocol management of this problem was to provide readily usable guidelines, which provide a simple trigger to commence medical intervention, which has proven to be such. However, this article can not prove whether patients with higher PEFR values would have also benefited from this therapy.
Nurse-directed preoperative assessment clinics have improved the cardiac services in the changing environment of the reduction in the working hours of the junior doctors due to implementation of the European working time directive [5]. The value of nurse-directed preoperative assessment clinics has reduced the cancellations and delays in surgical services [6]. However, the supporting role of nurses to the doctors in these areas requires comprehensive but not complicated protocols that provide guidance when working with the patients. Thus a simple measurement provides an addition to existing protocols that allows rapid evaluation of patients who require further assessment of respiratory function.
The main aim of preoperative optimization was to improve pulmonary function prior to surgery as we believed this would help the patients during the postoperative period by improving their pulmonary reserves. Cardiac surgery causes a significant decrease in the lung function with forced expiratory volume in 1 second dropping as much as 30% [7]. We have forestalled a composite of this decline and pulmonary compromise already experienced by patients. An integral component of the protocol is the utilization of inhaled high-dose steroids to provide stabilization of the reactive airways. Optimization requires a period of few days as the positive response of the PEFR to bronchodilators is temporary returning to baseline between the doses. Addition of inhaled steroids has a number of effects (ie, it prevents the recurrent decline after use of bronchodilators, it reduces the degree of decline, and it causes a steady improvement in maximum PEFR). The optimized pulmonary function reaches a plateau after surgery is undertaken.
The level of care required during preoperative optimization is significantly lower than that required in the intensive care unit [8]. Thus in spite of the increased preoperative stay, early discharge from the intensive care unit, avoidance of respiratory complications, and earlier discharge from the hospital may provide financial benefits.
In conclusion, our experience has demonstrated that a PEFR of 400 L/min is a useful trigger for admission of patients from a nurse directed pre-admission clinic for optimization of pulmonary function. These patients also experienced an improved pattern of recovery including a short period of ventilation, intensive care unit admission, and hospital stay after surgery.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. El Diasty, J. A. Gonzalez, J. Perez, F. Cid, V. Mosquera, J. Cuenca, and A. Juffe Early results of off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery using bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts in octogenarian patients during ten years Interactive CardioVascular and Thoracic Surgery, January 1, 2009; 8(1): 104 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. W. Ullery, J. C. Peterson, F. Milla, M. T. Wells, W. Briggs, L. N. Girardi, W. Ko, A. J. Tortolani, O. W. Isom, and K. H. Krieger Cardiac Surgery in Select Nonagenarians: Should We or Shouldn't We? Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 854 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |