ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Francesco Maisano
Steven F. Bolling
Ottavio Alfieri
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Votta, E.
Right arrow Articles by Redaelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Votta, E.
Right arrow Articles by Redaelli, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;84:92-101
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

The Geoform Disease-Specific Annuloplasty System: A Finite Element Study

Emiliano Votta, PhDa,*, Francesco Maisano, MDb, Steven F. Bolling, MDc, Ottavio Alfieri, MDb, Franco M. Montevecchi, MSd, Alberto Redaelli, PhDa

a Politecnico di Milano, Bioengineering Department, Milan, Italy
b Cardiac Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
c University of Michigan Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan
d Politecnico di Torino, Mechanics Department, Torino, Italy

Accepted for publication March 5, 2007.

* Address correspondence to Dr Votta, Dipartimento di Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, Milan, 20133, Italy (Email: emiliano.votta{at}polimi.it).


Drs Maisano, Bolling, Alfieri, and Redaelli disclose that they have a financial relationship with Edwards LifeSciences.

 

    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background: Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is the inability of mitral leaflets to coapt due to a combination of functional and geometrical factors. Valve competence is commonly restored by undersized annuloplasty, reducing the native annulus anteroposterior dimension. In case of severe FMR, this solution may be inadequate. The use of rings specific for the correction of FMR may lead to better results.

Methods: The performance of the Geoform ring, a recently designed FMR-specific prosthesis, was compared with that of a standard Physio annuloplasty ring. Finite element modeling was used to simulate dilated cordiomyopathy-related FMR and compare, at the systolic peak, the valve’s pathologic condition with the postoperative scenario corresponding to both devices. Three degrees of the pathology were simulated by progressively displacing papillary muscles apically, up to 5 mm. Three ring sizes were modeled.

Results: Regurgitant area, coaptation length, and stresses acting on valve structures were assessed. When the use of the Geoform was modeled, coaptation length was always longer than 7 mm. In the most unfavorable case, the regurgitant area reduction was 74% with respect to baseline, and leaflets stresses were reduced by 20% when undersizing was simulated. When Physio ring implantation was simulated, coaptation length maximum extent was equal to 4.3 mm, the maximum regurgitant area reduction was equal to 60%, and leaflet stress reduction was observed.

Conclusions: Disease-specific prostheses may allow for restoration of valve competence even for significant degrees of leaflets tethering and avoid the need for aggressive undersizing, thus leading to more durable results.

Undersized annuloplasty is the usual method to treat functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) [1–3]. It is aimed at promoting coaptation of tethered leaflets by reducing the anteroposterior distance at the annular level. Using conventional prostheses, however, all dimensions of the mitral valve are reduced. In some occasions, very small prostheses have to be implanted to obtain an anteroposterior dimension reduction sufficient to correct FMR. Although in general, early results of annuloplasty repair are satisfactory, late recurrence of FMR can be observed in a significant number of patients [4–7]. It is hypothesized that a remodeling repair resulting in increased coaptation lengths will be associated with more durable long-term results [8].

In a previous paper [9], we formulated the hypothesis that long-term annuloplasty durability could be improved by the adoption of prostheses with a highly reduced anteroposterior dimension of the ring in its central portion, supporting this statement with some preliminary mathematical modeling evidences. Recently, the Geoform ring (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) has been introduced into the market specifically for the correction of FMR characterized by symmetric papillary muscles dislocation and by regurgitant jets in the central portion of the valvular orifice. When compared with a traditional annuloplasty ring, the intercommissural (IC) dimension is equivalent; however, the anteroposterior distance is reduced by 41%. In addition, the ring has a three-dimensional shape with an elevated posterior (P2) segment, designed to pull the posterior leaflet and lateral ventricular wall upward (atrially) and inward (toward A2), to enhance A2-P2 coaptation (Fig 1).


Figure 1
View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. (Top) Characteristic dimensions of the Physio ring (left) and of the Geoform ring (right), indicated in a scheme of their front view. (IC = intercommissural distance; IT = intertrigonal distance; ITL = intertrigonal length, SL = septolateral distance, OA = orifice area [planar measure].) (Bottom) Real devices in their (a) top view, (b) front view, and (c) side view.

 
In the present study, the performance of the implantation of this new prosthesis in the setting of FMR has been compared, by using finite element modeling, with that of a conventional Physio Ring (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California).


    Material and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Three different annular configurations were analyzed through the same finite element model: a native valve with no ring inserted, characterized by a 32-mm IC distance, as baseline (configuration A); with a Physio ring (configuration B); and a Geoform ring (configuration C). The model includes all of the main substructures of the mitral complex: the annulus, the anterior and posterior leaflets, the chordae tendineae, and the papillary muscle tips [9].

Starting from the valve open geometry, valve closure in the three configurations was simulated adopting a consistent procedure, exemplified in Figure 2. In step 1, papillary muscles tips were pulled apically, in other words, away from the valve orifice and perpendicularly to it, to simulate FMR. In step 2, to obtain configurations B and C, the annulus was deformed by imposing proper nodal displacements, to fit with the profile of the tested rings, as taken from technical drawings provided by the manufacturer. In step 2, annular shape was modified hypothesising that the fibrous, namely, intertrigonal, and muscular tracts of the native annulus had to fit with the corresponding geometry of the prosthesis. In step 3, a pressure load linearly rising up to 120 mm Hg was applied to the ventricular face of the leaflets to simulate valve closure during systole. During valve closure, no further displacements were allowed to the nodes belonging to the valve annulus, namely, no annular contraction was included into the simulation. This assumption is well suited to the Geoform ring, given its high rigidity, whereas it is a simplification of the clinical scenario as far as the Physio ring is concerned. In the second case, the simulated prosthetic device is a complete flexible ring, which should allow some residual annular motion due to active contraction. However, no quantitative data are available specifically for the Physio ring, and in vivo studies on sheep have shown that all of the geometrical changes of the annulus are nearly absent after annuloplasty with complete flexible rings [10].


Figure 2
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Sequence of loading and boundary conditions adopted to evaluate the efficacy of the Geoform ring. Step 1: papillary muscles pulling to simulate functional mitral regurgitation. Step 2: distortion of the annulus to simulate ring’s implantation. Step 3: pressure as great as 120 mm Hg applied to simulate valve closure.

 
When simulating the closure of the pathologic valve, only steps 1 and 3 were performed.

Disease Model
In all configurations, to simulate mitral valve leaflets tethering, papillary muscle tips were displaced apically from the annular plane. Both papillary muscles were symmetrically displaced, as it is the case in dilated cardiomyopathy and in end-stage ischemic cardiomyopaty. No lateral displacement was imposed to simulate increase of the distance between the papillary muscles, as a simplification and because of the uncertainty of the role of the interpapillary distance in the pathogenesis of FMR [11]. Three different degrees of leaflet tethering were simulated, respectively corresponding to a papillary muscles apical displacement (PMD) equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm. For each kind of prosthesis, three different sizes were simulated, characterized by an intertrigonal distance of 28, 30, and 32 mm, respectively. Simulations were run under ABAQUS/Explicit, version 6.5-1 (ABAQUS, Providence, Rhode Island).

Mitral Valve Geometry
The baseline model of the mitral valve was developed to reproduce an average mitral valve. It was defined on the basis of experimental data from literature under the simplifying hypothesis of valve symmetry [12].

Annulus and leaflets
The annulus was modeled as a planar line, with no physical properties, that provides insertion for the leaflets. Its relevant geometrical data, attained through the procedure described in Appendix 1, are provided in Table 1. Leaflet free edge profile was generated from experimental data reported by Kunzelman and colleagues [13], accounting for all of the three cusps of the posterior leaflet: P1, P2, and P3. Both leaflets were assumed 0.8 mm thick all over their extent, with the exception of the area adjacent to their free edge (corresponding to the rough zone), where leaflet thickness was set equal to 1.1 mm, owing to the thickening associated with the presence of chordae tendineae insertions.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Characteristic Dimensions of the Modeled Annulus
 
Papillary muscles position
Using data published by Dagum and coworkers [14], papillary muscles were positioned symmetrically with respect to the symmetry plane, through the geometrical procedure described in Appendix 1. Their distance from the valve orifice was equal to 23.76 mm, this value being consistent with experimental data reported by Sakai and coworkers [15].

Chordae tendineae
Only marginal chordae were modeled, these being mainly responsible for counteracting the action of systolic ventricular pressure on the leaflets [14–16]. Fifty-two chordae were assumed initially straight and with a constant cross-sectional area of 0.4 mm2. Their average length was equal to 19.4 mm, having a standard deviation of 2.0 mm. Each chorda was discretized using six first-order truss elements.

Material Properties
All tissues were modeled as homogeneous and elastic, neglecting viscoelastic effects.

Leaflets
Leaflets tissue was assumed linear and orthotropic, thus neglecting its nonlinear response [17, 18]. Values of Young modulus, shear modulus, and Poisson ratio of each of the two leaflets, reported in Table 2, were set according to literature [16].


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Leaflets Mechanical Properties
 
Chordae tendineae
Chordae tendineae tissue was modeled as isotropic and nonlinear, by means of a quadratic polynomial strain energy function, defined through uniaxial test data from literature [19].

Contact interactions
Leaflets contact was modeled adopting a 0.05 friction coefficient for their tangential interaction. This value was chosen since it characterizes the contact between soft and wet surfaces, such as hydrogels or low-friction lubricated Teflon, whose surface behavior may be considered as a good approximation of that of the leaflets in absence of more specific experimental data. Moreover, leaflet interaction normal to their surface area was described through a penalty contact algorithm, which implies that leaflets start interacting just before actually touching each other and, in the contact process, a small viscous energy dissipation phenomena occurs. The rationale for this choice is twofold; first, it allows smoothing of abrupt contacts, avoiding potential convergence problems in the numerical simulations; second, it is justified in that in-vivo leaflets do actually start to interact before actually coapting, since just before actual contact a blood film is trapped between them and is moved away by the leaflets.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Effectiveness of rings was evaluated with respect to two different endpoints: restoration of valve competence and reduction of overstresses related to leaflet tethering.

Valve Competence
Regurgitant area (RA) as a function of PMD was estimated by means of a planar measure, as the one detectable in an echographic top view of the valve. For this purpose, the leaflets’ free edge was extracted at the systolic peak, by calculating the current position of the nodes belonging to it. It was then projected on the plane where the native annulus lies to obtain a planar contour, and finally, RA was estimated as the extent of the areas within the contour that were surrounded by tracts of the leaflets that did not coapt. An example is depicted in Figure 3, which shows the areas obtained for the baseline configuration (top panel, IC = 32) and for the postoperative one with a Geoform (middle panel) and a Physio (bottom panel) ring, both characterized by an IC distance of 30 mm. A qualitative analysis of the RA contours shows that Geoform ring enhances leaflets competence in the valve mid portion and in the subcommissural regions.


Figure 3
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. Example of regurgitation area contours obtained at the systolic peak. (Top) Pathologic valve (intercommissural distance = 32 mm) with no prosthesis (functional mitral regurgitation [FMR]). (Middle) Valve corrected with a Physio ring (size 30 mm). (Bottom) Valve corrected with a Geoform ring (size 30 mm). In each case, papillary muscles displacement increases from left to right.

 
A comprehensive analysis of the residual regurgitant area is plotted in Figure 4. When no annuloplasty correction was simulated, the calculated RA was equal to 36.6, 77.3, and 94.8 mm2 for a PMD value of 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively.


Figure 4
View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. Regurgitation area values versus papillary muscles displacement (PMD) value at the systolic peak. (Black bars = functional mitral regurgitation; dark gray hatched bars = Geoform 32; medium gray hatched bars = Geoform 30; white hatched bars = Geoform 28; dark gray dotted bars = Physio 32; medium gray dotted bars = Physio 30; white dotted bars = Physio 28.)

 
When annuloplasty with no undersizing was modeled (32-mm prostheses), the Physio ring slightly reduced RA (13%) for a PMD equal or greater than 3 mm; its implantation increased RA by 27% when a 1-mm PMD was simulated. Geoform ring implantation resulted in a RA reduction by 75%, 79%, and 74% for PMD equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively.

When a mild undersizing (30-mm prostheses) was simulated, the reduction of RA with the Physio ring was equal to 26%, 43%, and 33% for PMD equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm with respect to the baseline model, respectively. It was equal to 68%, 79%, and 84% for PMD equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively, when the implantation of the Geoform ring was simulated.

When a more aggressive undersizing (28-mm prostheses) was considered, RA reduction associated with Physio ring implantation was equal to 43%, 60%, and 57% for PMD equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively, as compared with the baseline model. It was equal to 77%, 81%, and 89% for PMD equal to 1, 3, and 5 mm, respectively, when the implantation of the Geoform ring was simulated.

Moreover, maximum coaptation length (Lmeasure) in the valve mid portion was measured as in clinical practice; in a view along the IC axis, the valve’s cross section at the SL diameter was considered (Fig 5, top panel), and Lmeasure was defined as the length of the line from the beginning of the coapting tract to the leaflet free edge (Fig 5, mid panel). Moreover, the measure was divided into two terms, usually indistinguishable in echocardiographic images (Fig 5, mid panel): the length of the tract where leaflets are actually in contact (Lcoapt) and the mismatch between the free margins of the two coapting leaflets (Lfm). Calculated values are plotted in the bottom panel of Figure 5. In pathologic conditions, no coaptation was obtained when the maximum PMD (5 mm) was simulated. For PMD equal to 1 and 3 mm, Lmeasure was 4.1 and 3.0 mm for PMD, respectively, but Lcoapt was always smaller than 1 mm.


Figure 5
View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 5. (Top) Cross-sections of the mitral valve when a 5-mm apical papillary muscles displacement (PMD) is simulated, in three different configurations: with no ring (functional mitral regurgitation [FMR]), corrected with a Physio ring and corrected with a Geoform one, both rings having a 30-mm intertrigonal distance. For each configuration, three cross sections along the intercommissural (IC) axis are depicted, as shown at the top of the panel. (Middle) Example of how coaptation length (Lcoapt) was estimated and divided in two terms: Lcoapt = extent of actual leaflets coaptation from the annular to the free margin regions is highlighted by the thick squared line; Lfm = difference between Lcoapt and the coaptation length as usually measured in clinical practice. (Bottom) Histograms representing maximum coaptation length at the valve midplane (x = 0) versus PMD at the systolic peak. In each histogram, Lcoapt and Lfm (dark gray top part of bars) are identified. (Black bars = functional mitral regurgitation; dark gray hatched bars = Geoform 32; medium gray hatched bars = Geoform 30; white hatched bars = Geoform 28; dark gray dotted bars = Physio 32; medium gray dotted bars = Physio 30; white dotted bars = Physio 28.)

 
When the implantation of a Physio ring was simulated, coaptation was partially restored. However, the maximum value of Lcoapt was equal to 4.3 mm and was observed for 1 mm PMD and a 28-mm prosthetic ring implanted, the corresponding value of Lmeasure being 7.5 mm; in all of the other cases, Lcoapt and Lmeasure extents were always smaller than 4.0 and 6.0 mm, respectively.

When the implantation of a Geoform annuloplasty ring was assumed, for every considered PMD value, Lcoapt ranged from 7.0 mm (28-mm ring, PMD = 5 mm) to 9.1 (28-mm ring, PMD = 1 mm). The Lmeasure was always greater than 8.9 mm.

Leaflets Stress Distributions
Stress data were gathered with reference to two aspects: first, location and entity of peak stresses on the leaflets; second, maximum stresses acting on the annular region of the leaflets. As far as the first aspect is concerned, Figure 6 reports an example of the obtained contours of maximum principal stresses (SI) acting on the leaflets for every considered degree of pathology, the value of PMD increasing from left to right. The pathologic configuration (top panel) and the postoperative configurations obtained with 30-mm prostheses (mid and bottom panels) are depicted. The most stressed areas are located close to the leaflet free edge, consistently with the fact that they experience abnormal stresses due to the transfer of concentrated loads from pretensioned chordae. These areas are in the fessural region when the lowest PMD value (1 mm) is considered and move to the commissural one when higher PMD values (3 and 5 mm) are simulated.


Figure 6
View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 6. The maximum principal stress (SI) contours on the leaflets. (Top) Pathologic valve (intercommissural distance = 32 mm) with no prosthesis (functional mitral regurgitation [FMR]. (Middle) Valve after correction with a Physio ring (intertrigonal distance = 30 mm). (Bottom) Valve after correction with a Geoform ring (IT = 30 mm). In each panel, papillary muscles displacement (PMD) increases from left to right. For clarity’s sake, a different color scale has been adopted for each PMD value and kept the same for the three annular configurations.

 
The SI maximum values are summarized in Table 3 and plotted in Figure 7. When the implantation of the Geoform ring was modeled, SI maximum value was always reduced with respect to pathologic conditions, with only one exception: when the maximum PMD was imposed and a 32-mm ring was considered (3% increase). Moreover, a trend is evident when ring performances versus PMD are analyzed; when PMD is set to 1 mm, the highest reduction ({dotminus}18%) is obtained with the biggest ring’s size (32 mm); when PMD is equal to 3 mm, the highest reduction ({dotminus}25%) is obtained with the intermediate ring’s size (30 mm); and when PMD is set to 5 mm, the highest reduction ({dotminus}20%) is obtained with the smallest ring’s size (28 mm).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Maximum Values of SI Maximum Principal Stresses Acting on Leaflets a
 

Figure 7
View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 7. Histograms of the maximum values of principal stresses (SI) acting on the leaflets at the systolic peak. (PMD = papillary muscles displacement; black bars = functional mitral regurgitation; dark gray hatched bars = Geoform 32; medium gray hatched bars = Geoform 30; white hatched bars = Geoform 28; dark gray dotted bars = Physio 32; medium gray dotted bars = Physio 30; white dotted bars = Physio 28.)

 
When the implantation of the Physio ring was modeled, SI maximum value was reduced only when PMD was equal to 3 mm and a 30-mm ring was considered, the reduction being by 14%.

As far as the maximum principal stresses SI acting on the leaflets annular region are concerned, for each simulated condition, four areas were analyzed, defined on the basis of the leaflet therein inserted: midanterior (anterior leaflet, A2 region), commissural, midposterior (P2 scallop), and lateral (P1 and P3 scallops). From a qualitative point of view, the peak values patterns were similar: the highest values were always observed in the commissural tract of the annulus, the lowest values were observed in the insertion of the midportion of the anterior leaflet and of the P1 and P3 scallops, while intermediate values were assessed at the insertion of the P2 scallop on the annulus. In any case, stresses are much lower than the ones calculated close to the leaflet free margin. However, the way the two prosthetic rings affect stresses in the different tracts is significantly different, as indicated by the quantitative data reported in Table 4 for the most severe simulated pathologic condition (PMD = 5 mm). In this pathologic condition, when the implantation of a Geoform ring was modeled, SI stresses in the midanterior tract were increased by 11% with respect to the preoperative condition when a 32-mm ring was considered, but were reduced by 22% and 28%, respectively, for a 30-mm and a 28-mm ring. The SI peak values increased by 12% to 19% in the commissural tract and by 5% to 11% at the annular insertion of the P1 and P3 scallops, depending on the ring’s size. At the annular insertion of the P2 posterior scallop, a relevant stress increase (from 53% to 121%) was assessed, the increase becoming more and more significant when progressively smaller rings were considered.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Peak Values of SI Maximum Principal Stresses Acting on Annular Region of Leaflets When a 5-mm Papillary Muscles Apical Displacement is Simulated a
 
When the insertion of the Physio ring was simulated, SI peak values in the midanterior tract decreased by 36% and by 20%, correspondingly, with respect to the preoperative condition when a 32-mm ring and a 30-mm one were considered, whereas they increased by 31% when a 28-mm prosthesis was modeled. The SI peak values were slightly increased (+12%) in the commissural tract for every considered ring size and barely changed (by –3% to +1%) at the insertion of P2 scallop with respect to the preoperative condition. As compared with the latter, at the insertion of the P1 and P3 scallops, stresses were increased by 14% when a 32-mm and a 30-mm ring were modeled and by 44% when the insertion of a 28-mm device was simulated.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
In this paper, two commercially available prostheses are compared: the Physio ring, which represents a paradigm of a standard commercial ring, and the Geoform ring, in which two concepts are merged: significant nonplanarity and selective reduction of the anteroposterior dimension to encourage leaflets coaptation in presence of FMR associated with dilated cardiomyopathy. Results obtained in the present study suggest that the Geoform ring is associated with enhanced performance in the correction of FMR as compared with standard prostheses.

As far as the rings’ capability to enhance leaflets coaptation is concerned, the following considerations might be pointed out. First, the Geoform ring, compared with the standard prosthesis, improves coaptation in FMR, and its effectiveness is resistant to papillary muscle displacement; in fact, RA only slightly increased when the maximum PMD (5 mm) was simulated.

Second, the Physio ring needs undersizing to induce coaptation; to halve RA extension with respect to the baseline model, a two-size undersizing was needed when the worst pathologic condition was simulated (PMD = 5 mm). On the contrary, the Geoform ring did not seem to require aggressive undersizing, at least for the degree of pathology herein considered. This result could have interesting implications with respect to the interaction between the mitral and the aortic valves through the fibrous part of the annulus. Current annuloplasty rings require aggressive undersizing; therefore, their insertion on the native mitral annulus implies an important shortening and distortion of its intertrigonal tract, potentially influencing the normal aortic valve mechanics. On the contrary, a prosthetic ring capable to enhance leaflet coaptation without aggressive shrinking is likely to be able to preserve it.

Third, when the implantation of the Geoform ring was simulated, the maximum extent of the actual coaptation length Lcoapt was at least doubled with respect to the one obtained for the corresponding Physio ring size for any analyzed configuration. Moreover, for every considered PMD value, a coaptation length (Lcoapt) of 7 mm or longer was observed in all cases. On the contrary, this value was never achieved when the presence of a Physio prosthesis was modeled.

Regarding the capability of the two rings to limit stresses induced on the leaflets by tethering, the stress distribution on the leaflets was similar in the pathologic valve configuration and in the postoperative ones. However, the two rings showed rather different characteristics in terms of peak stress reduction at the leaflet free edge and in terms of stresses induced by the annuloplasty procedure on the annular region of the leaflets and thus, likely, on the surrounding annulus fibrosus. As far as the first aspect is concerned, when the presence of Geoform prostheses was modeled, peak stresses were mainly reduced with respect to those observed when no ring was included in the model; only with severe FMR (5 mm PMD) and no undersizing, stresses were higher than those observed in the baseline model. On the other hand, the Physio ring becomes less and less effective in reducing stresses with the increase of FMR and, with the exception of the lowest degree of FMR (1 mm PMD), stresses were always higher than those attained with the Geoform ring. In general, for every combination of PMD value and ring size, stress reduction was suboptimal if compared with the one obtained by the Geoform ring.

When the stress analysis is focused on the leaflet annular region, the insertion of the two prosthetic devices has remarkably different mechanical effects. The Physio ring induces only slight increases of the stress peak values in this region; increases become significant, at the insertion of the anterior leaflet and of the P1 and P3 scallops, only when aggressive undersizing is performed. On the other hand, the Geoform ring highly augments stresses at the insertion of the P2 posterior scallop, their rise becoming more and more significant when progressively smaller rings are taken into consideration. Given the continuity between the abovementioned region and the surrounding structures, that is, the annulus and the myocardium, it is reasonable to presume that the observed stress increases reflect an increase of the tensions acting in the surrounding annulus and myocardium. This possibly detrimental effect of the Geoform ring is likely to be related to its narrowed and highly nonplanar profile in the midposterior tract, which induces a geometrical distortion of the corresponding part of the annulus and of the immediately adjacent anatomical structures.

In conclusion, the study herein discussed appears to confirm our previous computational findings concerning the possibility of obtaining better results in the correction of FMR by means of disease-specific annuloplasty devices [9], characterized by a narrowed profile in their midportion. However, the present work also highlights the potential drawback of such prostheses, related to the geometrical distortion they impose on the annulus and to the subsequent nonphysiologic tensile state of the adjacent tissues. This particular aspect could not be studied by means of the previous preliminary finite element model, which neglected the actual annular deformation associated with the annuloplasty procedure [9].

Limitations of the Study
The indications provided by the present study, although interesting, need to be carefully interpreted before any definitive conclusion with respect to clinical practice can be made. The adopted computational model is based on some assumptions that have to be stressed, although they are not likely to controvert the reliability of the obtained results:

1 Leaflets’ nonlinearity has been neglected, adopting a linear elastic constitutive model [16]. This assumption implies that stress values are overestimated, as suggested by recently published computational studies [20, 21]. However, stress overestimation affects all of the considered configurations and can hence be considered as a systematic error.
2 The model cannot be adopted as a tool to forecast long-term clinical results; it analyzes acute changes of the valve due to leaflets tethering and annuloplsty correction. It does not account for regional tissue alteration and possible valve remodeling before the correction, nor for tissue remodeling or damage in the postoperative scenario.
3 In this study, papillary muscle displacements as much as 5 mm have been considered, even though in chronic FMR, left ventricular geometry is frequently more corrupted with higher degrees of papillary muscle displacement. However, according to our simulations, mild degrees of papillary muscle displacement were associated with a sensible increase of mitral regurgitant area both when pathologic conditions and correction with a Physio ring were simulated. These results are consistent with the observations obtained during acute ischemia in a sheep model of acute FMR [22].
4 Papillary displacement was simulated as pure apical displacement. This is a simplification of the scenario observed in chronic functional MR, characterized also by lateral and posterior displacements. However, the changes of the papillary distance on the transverse axis plays a secondary role in the pathogenesis of leaflet tethering [11].
5 Papillary muscle displacement was symmetric; therefore, the results of the simulation may not apply in case of asymmetric papillary muscle displacement, as in the case of ischemic mitral regurgitation in presence of nondilated left ventricular chamber.
6 The papillary muscle distance to the annulus was modeled as a constant, and its contraction was neglected. Papillary muscle movement during ventricular contraction might influence regurgitant area measurements in the FMR and Physio ring simulation.
7 The annulus was modeled as a planar structure, and its contraction was neglected. Lim and coworkers [23] have recently demonstrated that accounting for the saddle shape of the annulus, its asymmetries, and its motion might lead to different stress patterns. Hence, this feature should be added to the model. However, Watanabe and colleagues [24] recently showed that evident annular flattening is associated with ischemic mitral regurgitation, even though annular profile does not become completely planar.


    Appendix
 
Geometrical Three-Dimensional Model of the Baseline Valve Configuration
Annular Geometry
The annulus was assumed planar and defined as a line in the cartesian xy plane. Its anterior and posterior portions were hypothesised semielliptical and shared a common axis along the x-direction, which corresponds to the intercommissural (IC) distance. This length was set on the basis of experimental data reported by Kunzelman and coworkers [13]. Data obtained were consistent with clinical observations of the annulus in diastole [25, 26].

The geometry of the resulting orifice area (OA) in the diastolic configuration was used to position the two trigones on the anterior portion of the annulus. According to the data reported by Timek and colleagues [27], the diastolic value of the intertrigonal length (ITL) for a sheep is equal to 33 mm, in valves with a 830 mm2 OA. This value was scaled by aFormula factor to obtain an ITL value (32.23 mm) feasible for the modeled valve and to position the trigones.

Leaflets
As in previous papers [9, 11], the profile of their free edge was generated according to data reported by Kunzelman and colleagues [13] for an excised porcine valve with an intercommissural distance of 28 mm, which were interpolated and scaled by a factor 32/28, according to the bigger dimensions of the modeled valve. The function adopted to interpolate the original data is:


Formula

where {omega} = 0.0356999, K = 6.0, a1 = 5.40814, a2 = 4.2918, a3 = 5.30630, a4 = 3.06855, a5 = –0.09161, a6 = –0.5986, a7 = –0.30913, a8 = –1.15527, a9 = 1.0269, a10 = 0.25297, a11 = –0.64712, and a12 = 0.11715.

The area of the anterior and posterior leaflets is equal to 664.4 mm2 and 518.6 mm2, respectively. Consistently with actual mitral valve anatomy, the extent of the anterior leaflet alone is comparable with the one of the valve orifice in systole, when the annulus contracts and an approximately 25% valve orifice area reduction occurs [25, 28, 29].

Leaflets were discretized by means of 12120 S4R four-nodes shell elements with reduced integration. Element’s numerical thickness was defined after scaling by 0.3 the actual thickness values, to reduce, by 91%, their bending stiffness and better resemble the actual bending response of the valve leaflets. Owing to the thickness scaling procedure applied to leaflets shell elements, real values of elastic modulus were divided by a 0.3 scaling factor to obtain the values to be provided as input to the finite element solver [16, 30, 31].

Papillary Muscles Position
Dagum and coworkers [14] reported the distance (average value ± SD) of each papillary muscle from the mid point of the posterior portion of the annulus, from a commissure and from a trigone. Papillary muscles tips position was set in the center of mass of the volume containing the points whose distance from each reference point on the annulus differed from the experimental data by less than the corresponding standard deviation.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
We gratefully acknowledge the help of Luigi Bertana, MS, from Edwards Lifesciences for his expert technical assistance. We also acknowledge the support of Edwards Lifesciences to the Bioengineering Department of Politecnico di Milano with an educational grant in 2004.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Material and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Bolling SF, Deeb GM, Brunsting LA, Bach DS. Early outcome of mitral valve reconstruction in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1995;109:676-682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Badhwar V, Bolling SF. Mitral valve surgery in the patient with left ventricular dysfunction Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;14:133-136.[Medline]
  3. Calafiore AM, Gallina S, Di Mauro M, et al. Mitral valve procedure in dilated cardiomyopathy: repair or replacement? Ann Thorac Surg 2001;71:1146-1152.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Gummert JF, Rahmel A, Bucerius J, et al. Mitral valve repair in patients with end stage cardiomyopathy: who benefits? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2003;23:1017-1022.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Gillinov AM, Wierup PN, Blackstone EH, et al. Is repair preferable to replacement for ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:1125-1141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Tahta SA, Oury JH, Maxwell JM, Hiro SP, Duran CM. Outcome after mitral valve repair for functional ischemic mitral regurgitation J Heart Valve Disease 2002;11:11-18.[Medline]
  7. Levine RA, Hung J, Otsuji Y, et al. Mechanistic insights into functional mitral regurgitation Curr Cardiol Rep 2002;4:125-129.[Medline]
  8. Yamauchi T, Taniguchi K, Kuki S, et al. Evaluation of the mitral valve leaflet morphology after mitral valve reconstruction with a concept "coaptation length index." J Card Surg 2005;20:432-435.[Medline]
  9. Maisano F, Redaelli A, Soncini M, Votta E, Arcobasso L, Alfieri O. An annular prosthesis for the treatment of functional mitral regurgitation: finite element model analysis of a dog bone-shaped ring prosthesis Ann Thorac Surg 2005;79:1268-1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dagum P, Timek T, Green GR, et al. Three-dimensional geometric comparison of partial and complete flexible mitral annuloplasty rings J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:665-673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tibayan FA, Rodriguez F, Langer F, et al. Annular or subvalvular approach to chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;129:1266-1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Votta E, Maisano F, Soncini M, Redaelli A, Montevecchi FM, Alfieri O. 3-D computational analysis of the stress distribution on the leaflets after edge-to-edge repair of mitral regurgitation J Heart Valve Dis 2002;11:810-822.[Medline]
  13. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP, Verrier ED, Eberhart RC. Anatomic basis for mitral valve modelling J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:491-496.[Medline]
  14. Dagum P, Timek TA, Green GR, et al. Coordinate free analysis of mitral valve dynamics in normal and ischemic hearts Circulation 2000;102(Suppl 3):62-69.
  15. Sakai T, Okita Y, Ueda Y, et al. Distance between mitral anulus and papillary muscles: anatomic study in normal human hearts J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:636-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP, Chuong C, Ring WS, Verrier ED, Eberhart RD. Finite element analysis of the mitral valve J Heart Valve Dis 1993;2:326-340.[Medline]
  17. Barber JE, Kasper FK, Ratliff NB. Mechanical properties of myxomatous mitral valves J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;122:955-962.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP. Stress/strain characteristics of porcine mitral valve tissue: parallel versus perpendicular collagen orientation J Card Surg 1992;7:71-78.[Medline]
  19. Kunzelman KS, Cochran RP. Mechanical properties of basal and marginal mitral valve chordae tendineae ASAIO Trans 1990;36:M405-M408.[Medline]
  20. Dal Pan F, Donzella G, Fucci C, Schreiber M. Structural effects of an innovative surgical technique to repair heart valve defects J Biomechan 2005;38:2460-2471.[Medline]
  21. Einstein DR, Kunzelman KS, Reinhall PG, Nicosia AN. Non-linear fluid-coupled computational model of the mitral valve J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:376-385.[Medline]
  22. Glasson JR, Komeda M, Daughters GT, et al. Early systolic mitral leaflet "loitering" during acute ischemic mitral regurgitation J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;116:193-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Lim HK, Yeo JH, Duran CMG. Three-dimensional asymmetrical modelling of the mitral valve: a finite element study with dynamic boundaries J Heart Valve Dis 2005;14:386-392.[Medline]
  24. Watanabe N, Ogasawara Y, Yamaura Y, et al. Mitral annulus flattens in ischemic mitral regurgitation: geometric differences between inferior and anterior myocardial infarctionA real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic study. Circulation 2005;112:I458-I462.[Medline]
  25. Ormiston JA, Shah PM, Tei C. Size and motion of the mitral valve annulus in man. I. A two-dimensional echocardiographic method and findings in normal subjects Circulation 1981;64:113-120.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Fyrenius A, Engvall J, Janerot-Sjoberg B. Major and minor axes of the normal mitral annulus J Heart Valve Dis 2001;10:146-152.[Medline]
  27. Timek TA, Green GR, Tibayan FA, Lai DT, Daughters GT. Aorto-mitral annular dynamics Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:1944-1950.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Komoda T, Hetzer R, Uyama C, et al. Mitral annular function assessed by 3D imaging for mitral valve surgery J Heart Valve Dis 1994;3:483-490.[Medline]
  29. Flachskampf FA, Chandra S, Gaddipatti A, et al. Analysis of shape and motion of mitral annulus in subjects with and without cardiomyopathy by echocardiographic 3-dimensional reconstruction Am Soc Echocardiogr 2000;13:277-287.
  30. Nicosia MA, Cochran RP, Einstein DR, Rutland CJ, Kunzelman KS. A coupled fluid-structure finite element model of the aortic valve and root J Heart Valve Dis 2003;12:781-789.[Medline]
  31. Grande KJ, Cochran RP, Reinhall PG, Kunzelman KS. Stress variations in the human aortic root and valve: the role of anatomic asymmetry Ann Biomed Eng 1998;26:534-545.[Medline]

Related Article

Invited commentary
Mark B. Ratcliffe
Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2007 84: 101-102. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
A. Itoh, D. B. Ennis, W. Bothe, J. C. Swanson, G. Krishnamurthy, T. C. Nguyen, N. B. Ingels Jr., and D. C. Miller
Mitral annular hinge motion contribution to changes in mitral septal-lateral dimension and annular area
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., November 1, 2009; 138(5): 1090 - 1099.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.Home page
F. Onorati, A. S. Rubino, D. Marturano, E. Pasceri, G. Mascaro, S. Zinzi, F. Serraino, and A. Renzulli
Mid-term echocardiographic results with different rings following restrictive mitral annuloplasty for ischaemic cardiomiopathy
Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., August 1, 2009; 36(2): 250 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
L. Weltert, R. De Paulis, R. Scaffa, D. Maselli, A. Bellisario, and S. D'Alessandro
Re-creation of a sinuslike graft expansion in Bentall procedure reduces stress at the coronary button anastomoses: A finite element study.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., May 1, 2009; 137(5): 1082 - 1087.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EchocardiogrHome page
T. A. Armen, R. Vandse, J. A. Crestanello, S. V. Raman, K. M. Bickle, and N. S. Nathan
Mechanisms of valve competency after mitral valve annuloplasty for ischaemic mitral regurgitation using the Geoform ring: insights from three-dimensional echocardiography
Eur J Echocardiogr, January 1, 2009; 10(1): 74 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Phil Trans R Soc AHome page
E. Votta, E. Caiani, F. Veronesi, M. Soncini, F. M. Montevecchi, and A. Redaelli
Mitral valve finite-element modelling from ultrasound data: a pilot study for a new approach to understand mitral function and clinical scenarios
Phil Trans R Soc A, September 28, 2008; 366(1879): 3411 - 3434.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.Home page
S. Gelsomino, R. Lorusso, S. Caciolli, I. Capecchi, C. Rostagno, M. Chioccioli, G. De Cicco, G. Bille, P. Stefano, and G. F. Gensini
Insights on left ventricular and valvular mechanisms of recurrent ischemic mitral regurgitation after restrictive annuloplasty and coronary artery bypass grafting.
J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., August 1, 2008; 136(2): 507 - 518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
S. Gelsomino, R. Lorusso, I. Capecchi, C. Rostagno, S. Romagnoli, G. Bille, G. De Cicco, C. Tetta, P. Stefano, and G. F. Gensini
Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling After Undersized Mitral Ring Annuloplasty in Patients With Ischemic Regurgitation
Ann. Thorac. Surg., April 1, 2008; 85(4): 1319 - 1330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. W.M. Fedak, P. M. McCarthy, and R. O. Bonow
Evolving Concepts and Technologies in Mitral Valve Repair
Circulation, February 19, 2008; 117(7): 963 - 974.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
M. B. Ratcliffe
Invited commentary
Ann. Thorac. Surg., July 1, 2007; 84(1): 101 - 102.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Francesco Maisano
Steven F. Bolling
Ottavio Alfieri
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Votta, E.
Right arrow Articles by Redaelli, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Votta, E.
Right arrow Articles by Redaelli, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Valve disease
Right arrowRelated Article


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS