|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:2087-2092
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Karolinska Institute, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Accepted for publication February 7, 2007.
* Address correspondence to Professor van der Linden, Karolinska Institute, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery and Anesthesiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, S-171 76, Sweden (Email: janvan{at}ki.se).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: The extent and location of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta and arch was assessed intraoperatively with epiaortic ultrasound and transesophageal echocardiography in 611 consecutive patients. They were followed for 5.5 ± 1.7 years (mean ± SE), amounting to 3,358 patient-years.
Results: The incidence of early postoperative (<30-day) stroke was 6.4% in patients with atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and 1.5% in those without (p = 0.004). The five-year stroke-free survival rates (>30 days after the operation) for patients without aortic disease, with less than 50%, and with greater than 50% of the ascending aorta affected, were 95.3 ± 0.9%, 91.8 ± 2.1%, and 65.0 ± 14.6%, respectively (p < 0.0001).
Conclusions: Atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta stands out as a predictor of late stroke. High risk is predominantly linked to atheromas in its distal part and lesser curvature.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
After induction of anesthesia, all patients were evaluated by an experienced anesthetist with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with a multiplane probe (Hewlett Packard Sono 1500, Andover, MA) according to a standard protocol. Apart from the study of the heart, special attention was paid to the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta with regard to atherosclerotic changes. After a median sternotomy, the surgeon carefully examined the ascending aorta by digital palpation and by epiaortic ultrasound. Epiaortic ultrasound was performed with an ultrasound scanner (Site-Rite II, 9.0 MHz, Dymax Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA) [6]. The TEE was not applied for visualization of plaques in the ascending aorta.
All operations were performed with conventional coronary artery bypass methods, including cannulation of the ascending aorta and right atrium, mildly hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass at a flow of 2.4 L/m2 or greater, and myocardial protection with antegrade and (or) retrograde blood cardioplegia. Bypass conduits included one or two internal thoracic arteries and vein grafts and all proximal anastomoses were placed on the ascending aorta. Various minor procedural changes were adopted on the basis of the findings of the epiaortic ultrasound. These included changes in the position of the aortic cross-clamp, the placing of the aortic and cardioplegia cannulas, and the site of the proximal anastomoses in order to avoid direct manipulation of atheromas. Clinical demographics were prospectively recorded.
For the mapping of the atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta, transverse and longitudinal images were obtained from the level of the aortic root to the level of the proximal arch, just distal to the innominate artery. The ascending aorta was divided into three equal transverse (proximal, middle, and distal third) and four equal longitudinal segments (anterior, posterior, right, and left). Extensions of atheromas into the proximal arch, beyond the origin of the innominate artery, were classified as aortic arch disease. The presence of ascending aortic atheroma (intimal thickening
0.5 mm) and calcification were recorded for every segment. Extent of disease was defined as the number of segments concomitantly involved.
The definitions and the diagnosis of postoperative stroke have earlier been described in detail [6]. Late stroke was defined as a stroke occurring greater than 30 days after coronary surgery. All 611 patients were followed up for late stroke by individual and systematic review of medical records of our hospital. After obtaining the permission from the Epidemiologic Center at the National Board of Health and Welfare and the Local Ethics Committee (Feb 2, 2003), follow-up information was retrieved from the National Swedish Database on mortality and stroke. A register of all hospital discharge diagnoses from all hospitals in Sweden was used to identify patients who were hospitalized outside Stockholm and treated for stroke (ICD-10; I63).
Statistical Analysis
The Kaplan-Maier with log-rank test and Cox multiple regression analysis (stepwise forward model with clinically relevant variables) were used to analyze follow-up data. Differences between groups were evaluated with one-way analysis of variance. The Student t test and
2 analysis were used when appropriate. Results were expressed as mean ± standard error. Odd ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated from number of events per patient-year. Differences were considered significant at a probability level of p less than 0.05. Data were analyzed with the SPSS version 10.0 statistical program (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
There were, in the whole patient sample, 16 cases of early (
30 days) and 34 of late postoperative (>30 days) stroke. The mean length of time elapsing between surgery and late stroke was 26.6 ± 2.9 months. The overall incidence of early postoperative stroke was 2.6%. Comparison of patients with and without atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta showed a highly significant difference. In these two groups the incidence of early postoperative stroke was 6.4% and 1.5%, respectively (p = 0.004). By contrast, there was no difference in the incidence of early stroke between patients with and without atherosclerotic disease in the aortic arch (3.1% vs 2.6%, respectively, p = 0.77). The incidence of late stroke was significantly higher in patients with atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta or arch than in those without. The five-year stroke-free survival rate was 88.7 ± 3% (1.75%/patient-year) in patients with atherosclerotic disease in the ascending aorta and 95.7 ± 3% (0.75%/patient-year) in patients without (OR 4.1, 95% CI 2.1 to 8.0, p = 0.005). The corresponding figures for patients with and without atherosclerosis in the aortic arch were 89.2 ± 2.7% (1.69%/patient-year) and 95.5 ± 1.1% (0.75%/patient-year), respectively (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.0, p = 0.007).
Cox regression analysis provided evidence that both atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta and atherosclerosis of the arch were strong predictors for late stroke (Table 3). Using the number of segments affected by the disease as an estimate of its extent, the strong association between extensive disease in the ascending aorta and a high incidence of late stroke stood out in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The five-year stroke-free survival rates for patients without ascending aortic disease, patients with less than 50%, and patients with more than 50% of the ascending aorta affected by atherosclerosis, were 95.3 ± 0.9%, 91.8 ± 2.1%, and 65.0 ± 14.6%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, the risk for stroke in the same period for patients with simultaneous disease in the ascending aorta and arch was 3.5-fold higher (p = 0.0008).
|
Topographic analysis of the ascending aorta for the risk of long-term stroke is shown in Table 4. The table gives data on the risk of long-term stroke associated with atherosclerosis in various parts of the aorta. The middle-left and distal-left segments of the ascending aorta were associated with an approximately fivefold increase and the distal-posterior and distal-right segments with an approximately 3.5-fold increase in the five-year stroke rate. By contrast, all segments of the proximal third and all anterior segments had odds ratios less than 2. A distinct pattern appeared with the lowest values in the proximal anterior segments and the highest values distal left. In Figure 1, the same variation in risk is displayed with colors ranging from dark blue for the "low risk," to dark red for the "high risk" zones. In our total sample of 611 patients there were 51 (8.3%), in whom at least one of the high-risk segments of the ascending aorta was affected by atherosclerosis. In this high-risk group the five-year stroke-free survival was 83.0 ± 5.5% while the corresponding figure for all other non-high-risk patients was 94.1 ± 1.4% (2.74% vs 0.75%/patient-year; OR 3.74, 95% CI 1.65 to 8.4, p = 0.0002). Thus, Cox regression analysis revealed that the presence of atherosclerosis in at least one of these high-risk zones was the strongest independent predictor for late stroke (Table 3).
|
|
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In all these studies the patient samples are of necessity selective. This seriously limits the value of comparisons and of extrapolations. But it does not affect the main finding of the present study that atherosclerosis in some segments of the aorta carries a greater risk than in others. For, even if the finding is considered valid only for patients with coronary sclerosis who are fit for surgery, such a restriction does not detract from its clinical significance. The reason is obvious. It is only in patients so selected that the finding is of clinical interest.
Our study confirms that the presence of the atherosclerosis increases the risk of late stroke. Its extent in the ascending aorta was found to be a strong predictor but the predictive value of the location of the disease was even greater. Location of the disease in the distal-left segment of the aorta (Fig 1) was found to be especially ominous and carried a fivefold higher risk for late stroke. Only slightly less dangerous was its location in the middle-left, distal-posterior, and distal-right segments. Thus, atherosclerosis in the middle and distal part of the ascending aorta, just before the origin of the innominate artery and especially on the left side, is mainly responsible for the association of the disease with late stroke. If this is correct, the group of patients at high risk for late stroke can be narrowed down to what, in our patient sample, are only 8% of coronary patients.
A focal area of atherosclerosis affecting the outer edges of a vessel bifurcation (here the innominate artery), where the disease is more severe and thus might carry a greater risk of stroke, is compatible with the idea of a predisposed area. In such an area the hemodynamic shear stress, the fractional force acting on the endothelial cell surface as a result of blood flow, is weaker than in protected areas [8].
The only earlier study of the influence of atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta [9] on the later occurrence of stroke used transient ischemic attack and stroke as its endpoint. The study found that atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta carried less risk than what others, using only stroke as their endpoint [35], had found for the arch. The present study using reliable, independently registered data on stroke as its endpoint, could not confirm this. Instead, multivariate analysis showed atherosclerosis in the ascending aorta to have an equivalent, if not better, predictive value than that in the arch.
How can this discrepancy be explained? In previous studies, atherosclerosis in the arch was diagnosed with transesophageal echocardiography, TEE [35], while epiaortic ultrasonography was used for the ascending aorta [9]. The known lower sensitivity of TEE [10] might have led to identification of only the more severe cases; ie, cases more prone to neurologic events later on. Moreover, due to insufficient visualization of the innominate artery with TEE [4, 5], plaques located at the junction of the ascending aorta and the aortic arch may erroneously have been assigned to the arch. Topography being our main interest, we complemented TEE with epiaortic ultrasonography to identify disease in the arch. This more meticulous approach may have resulted in the identification of less serious disease in the arch, which could explain the observed differences.
The present study can neither give information on the importance of atrial fibrillation, which was beyond its scope, nor on that of grading the thickness of the atheromas, which was beyond its range of interest. Its message is simple. Location of atherosclerosis in the distal part and lesser curvature of the aorta was mainly responsible for the association with late stroke.
Hypertension and diabetes mellitus have been identified as independent risk factors for late stroke after coronary bypass surgery in the present and previous studies [9, 1113]. The most likely mechanism for this is rapid progression of atherosclerosis in the aorta and the carotid arteries because aortic atherosclerosis has been found to be independently associated with hypertension [14] and the presence of both hypertension and diabetes accelerates the development of atherosclerosis more than either comorbid factor alone [15, 16]. Nevertheless, the exact mechanisms of stroke in hypertensive and diabetic patients deserve further investigation.
To date there is no clear guidance as to what is the optimal surgical approach for patients needing coronary surgery and suffering from atherosclerosis of the ascending aorta. Two opposing surgical strategies have been advocated for these patients. On the one hand, a number of studies have suggested that off-pump coronary surgery is associated with significantly less perioperative stroke [1720]. It is reasonable to assume, however, that this approach does not address the problem of late stroke. On the other hand, Rokkas and Kouchoukos [21] and Kouchoukos and colleagues [22] have suggested a radical surgical approach including the replacement of the ascending aorta. Although this method was associated with relatively higher perioperative mortality, it showed promising results regarding late stroke. In view of the findings in the present study, one may suggest that a more radical surgical approach should be reserved for a selected high-risk subgroup with disease in the specific areas shown in Figure 1. It is of surgical importance that the distal-anterior part of the ascending aorta is associated with neither early stroke [6] nor late stroke. Therefore, in case of replacement of the high-risk part of the ascending aorta, aortic cannulation can still be undertaken.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Catalan, R. Leta, A. Hidalgo, J. Montiel, X. Alomar, D. Vilades, A. Barros, S. Pujadas, F. Carreras, J. M. Padro, et al. Ruling Out Coronary Artery Disease with Noninvasive Coronary Multidetector CT Angiography before Noncoronary Cardiovascular Surgery Radiology, February 1, 2011; 258(2): 426 - 434. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Brizzio, A. Zapolanski, R. E. Shaw, J. S. Sperling, and B. P. Mindich Stroke-Related Mortality in Coronary Surgery Is Reduced by the Off-Pump Approach Ann. Thorac. Surg., January 1, 2010; 89(1): 19 - 23. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. S. Whitley and K. E. Glas An Argument for Routine Ultrasound Screening of the Thoracic Aorta in the Cardiac Surgery Population Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, December 1, 2008; 12(4): 290 - 297. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Filsoufi, P. B. Rahmanian, J. G. Castillo, D. Bronster, and D. H. Adams Incidence, Topography, Predictors and Long-Term Survival After Stroke in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 862 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. V. Bilfinger Invited commentary Ann. Thorac. Surg., June 1, 2007; 83(6): 2092 - 2092. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |