|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1924
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
Clinique de Chirurgie Thoracique, Clinique dAnesthésie Cardio-Thoracique, Clinique des Maladies Respiratories, Hôpital Calmette-CHU Lille, 1, Bd du Prof Leclercq, Lille, 59037 France
(Email: m-conti{at}chru-lille.fr).
We read with interest the article by Mercadante and colleagues [1] regarding the conservative management of a major post-intubation tracheobonchial rupture (TBR). A 7-cm tracheal tear due to double lumen intubation was successfully treated by conservative treatment. This favorable outcome is not surprising and is consistent with the burden of evidence that accumulates in the literature. Recently, Gomez-Caro Andres and colleagues [2], in a large series of patients successfully treated by conservative management, considered that outcome was independent of the tracheobronchial length. Between June 1993 and July 2005, 30 patients presenting iatrogenic TBR were treated in our institution [3]. Sixteen were secondary to intubation for elective surgery and 14 to intubation for medical emergencies. Their TBR length measured 4.5 ± 1.5 (range, 1 to 7.5 cm). Fifteen patients not requiring mechanical ventilation underwent simple conservative management. Eight of them showed full thickness rupture with frank anterior intraluminal protrusion of the esophagus. In 3 patients, transient noninvasive ventilatory support (NIV) was necessary. All lesions healed without sequelae. Two patients on mechanical ventilation underwent surgical repair and died. Thirteen patients on mechanical ventilation were considered at high surgical risk and TBR bridging was attempted as salvage therapy. Complete bridging was achieved in 5 patients by simply advancing the endotracheal tube distal to the injury. Separate bilateral mainstem endobronchial intubation was necessary in 6 patients whose TBR was too close to the carina [4]. Nine of 13 (69%) ventilated patients treated conservatively completely recovered. Our findings question the classical criteria for surgical repair. We disagree with the authors conclusion (ie, "... surgery remains the treatment of choice of these iatrogenic lesions ... Nevertheless, non surgical management should be considered a viable option in high risk patients"). We recommend conservative nonoperative therapy as the best approach to post-intubation TBR in patients who are (1) on spontaneous ventilation, or (2) when extubation is scheduled within 24 hours from the time of diagnosis, or (3) for patients who will require continued ventilation to treat their underlying respiratory status. Surgical repair should be reserved for cases where NIV or bridging the lesion is technically not feasible or for injuries diagnosed during thoracic surgery.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Related Article
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mercadante, C. Giovannini, and M. Carlini Reply. Ann. Thorac. Surg., May 1, 2007; 83(5): 1925 - 1925. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |