ATS
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ujjwal K. Chowdhury
Amber Malhotra
Panangipalli Venugopal
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chowdhury, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chowdhury, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other

Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1731-1736
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons


Original Articles: Cardiovascular

Novel Techniques for Tumor Thrombectomy for Renal Cell Carcinoma With Intraatrial Tumor Thrombus

Ujjwal K. Chowdhury, MCha,*, Anand K. Mishra, MSa, Amlesh Seth, MChb, Prem N. Dogra, MChb, Jayanth H.V. Honnakere, MCha, Ganapathy K. Subramaniam, MCha, Amber Malhotra, MSa, Poonam Malhotra, MDc, Neeti Makhija, MDc, Panangipalli Venugopal, MCha

a Departments of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
b Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
c Department of Cardiac Anaesthesia, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Accepted for publication December 27, 2006.

* Address correspondence to Dr Chowdhury, Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi-110029, India (Email: ujjwalchow{at}rediffmail.com).


    Abstract
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Background: Radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and level I to III thrombus extension is directly associated with an improved prognosis. However, radical surgery in patients with level IV thrombus extension is associated with high perioperative mortality, even if long-term survival is possible. In this report, we describe an alternative technique of vena caval and intraatrial tumor thrombectomy to decrease perioperative mortality and morbidity.

Methods: A cohort of 6 patients aged 46, 50, 53, 56, 54, and 52 years underwent radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy from the vena cava and right atrium under mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass and intermittent cross-clamping of the supraceliac abdominal aorta. Intraatrial tumor thrombectomy was performed on a beating, perfused heart in 4 patients and a hypothermic, cardioplegia-perfused heart in 2 patients.

Results: There were no early or late deaths. The aortic cross-clamp time was 12 and 15 minutes for patients 5 and 6, respectively. The cumulative hepatic and renal ischemic time was 16 minutes (range, 14 to 22 minutes) at 32°C. The mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 53.3 ± 8.9 minutes (range, 40 to 65 minutes). At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 24.6 months (range, 10 to 70 months), all patients are active and remain disease-free.

Conclusions: We conclude that radical nephrectomy and tumor thrombectomy in patients with level IV thrombi can be safely performed with cardiopulmonary bypass, mild hypothermia. and intermittent supraceliac abdominal aortic occlusion, avoiding potential hematologic, hepatic, renal, neurologic, and septic complications associated with circulatory arrest.


    Introduction
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and level I to III vena caval involvement is associated with a cancer-specific 5-year survival rate between 47% and 68% [1–6]. Transluminal tumor propagation into the inferior vena cava (IVC) occurs in 4% to 10% of patients undergoing surgery for renal cell carcinoma, and 14% to 39% of these patients exhibit suprahepatic extension to the right atrium (RA) [2–7].

Techniques of resection in patients with level IV thrombus extension have evolved during the years and now encompass a number of techniques with and without using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), hypothermia, and exsanguinations [1–12]. Most of these methods do not solve completely the problems of suboptimal thrombectomy, massive intraoperative bleeding, profound hypotension, the risk of tumor embolization, ischemic injury to the vital organs, and perioperative mortality [1–12]. Herein, we report novel techniques of tumor thrombectomy using CPB, mild hypothermia, and intermittent cross-clamping of the supraceliac intraabdominal aorta on 6 patients with suprahepatic intraatrial extension of tumor thrombus in an attempt to avoid or minimize the above-mentioned complications.


    Patients and Methods
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Between January 2000 and December 2005, 6 male patients aged 46, 50, 53, 56, 54, and 52 years with renal cell carcinoma invading the IVC and extending into the RA underwent radical nephrectomy with en bloc removal of tumor thrombus from the IVC, hepatic veins, and RA at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. All patients gave informed consent, and the study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of the institute. Patients number 1 through 5 presented with painless hematuria and had right-sided renal cell carcinoma. Patient number 6 underwent radical left nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma 3 years previously and presented with bilateral pedal edema, hepatomegaly, and pain in the hypochondrium. Routine hematologic and biochemical investigations showed no abnormality. Abdominal Doppler ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography demonstrated right-sided renal cell carcinoma with tumor thrombus extending into the RA (patients 1 through 5) and tumor thrombus involving the suprahepatic vena cava and RA cavity in patient 6. No distant metastases were seen on tomographic scans of the lung fields, liver, or retroperitoneal nodes. There was no evidence of aortic atherosclerosis on any patient. Magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the exact extent of thrombus invading the suprahepatic vena cava and extending beyond the inferior cavoatrial junction (Staehler’s level IV; Fig 1). The patients were prepared for a radical right nephrectomy, regional lymphadenectomy (patients 1 through 5), and tumor thrombectomy from the IVC and RA (n = 6).


Figure 1
View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 1. Case 2. Magnetic resonance image (coronal section; T1-weighted image) through inferior vena cava (IVC) shows tumor completely filling the intrahepatic inferior vena cava (white arrows) and the superior extent of level IV inferior vena caval thrombus within the right atrium (RA).

 
Operative Procedure
All patients were placed in the supine position, with both groins exposed. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography was performed on all patients using a Hewlett-Packard Sonos 5500 ultrasound system (Hewlett-Packard Co, Andover, MA) to assess the cephalad extent of caval thrombus and adherence of the same, if any. All patients underwent exploratory midline celiotomy, and resectability was determined, limiting dissection around the IVC as much as possible. There was no evidence of metastatic disease in any patient.

The laparotomy incision was extended cephalad with a median sternotomy. The apex of the tumor thrombus was palpated in the IVC and confirmed to extend within the RA in patients 1 through 4 and occupying almost half the cavity of the RA in patients 5 and 6. Mild hypothermic (32°C) CPB using angled venous cannulas into the superior vena cava, external iliac vein, and ascending aortic was performed in all patients (Fig 2). The first surgical step was to gain control above the cranial extreme of the thrombus by placing a tourniquet or a Satinsky clamp, and all manipulations to the tumor-bearing organs were kept to a minimum until proximal control was obtained to avoid tumor embolization. It was possible to isolate and control the cavoatrial junction above the tumor using umbilical tapes in patients 1 through 4 (Fig 3). However, in patients 5 and 6 with more extensive tumors extending cephalad into the cavity of the RA, the main pulmonary artery was dissected and looped to protect from a life-threatening pulmonary tumor embolism during assessment, palpation, and mobilization of the tumor-bearing organs (Fig 4).


Figure 2
View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 2. Circuit diagram showing external iliac vein (EIV), superior vena cava (SVC), and ascending aortic cannulation sites and pump circuit. Note the cross-clamp sites (CC) at the level of main pulmonary artery (MPA), supraceliac segment of the abdominal aorta (AA), and infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC). The supraceliac segment of the abdominal aorta has been exposed after dividing the right crus of the diaphragm (D).

 

Figure 3
View larger version (129K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 3. Case 2. (A) Intraoperative photograph demonstrating the surgical maneuvers necessary for a safe and effective method of removal all tumor thrombus. For level IV extension, under cardiopulmonary bypass, a Rummel tourniquet is applied loosely around the intrapericardial inferior vena cava (IVC) above the proximal tumor (white arrow). The supraceliac abdominal aorta is clamped, after which the distal inferior vena cava, the contralateral renal vein, and finally the intrathoracic vena cava are clamped, isolating the vena cava from all venous inflow except for pooled blood within the hepatic system (not shown). (B) The liver is mobilized after transection of the falciform, coronary, and triangular ligaments. With careful dissection, using endarterectomy instruments, the tumor thrombus (T) is removed through a proximal and distal vena cavotomy. (C) Repair of the atriocaval junction (J) in progress. The abdominal aortic clamp has been released (not shown). The venous return is getting picked up by a cardiotomy sucker (S).

 

Figure 4
View larger version (137K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Fig 4. Case 5. Intraoperative photograph showing opened up right atrium (RA) after cardioplegic arrest. Cardiopulmonary bypass was established through cannulas in the superior vena cava, right external iliac vein, and ascending aorta (not shown). After right atriotomy the intraatrial portion of the tumor (T) was visualized and excised. Using endarterectomy instruments and an index finger, the surgeon freed the tumor thrombus from the cavoatrial junction, hepatic veins, and inferior vena cava, and using gentle traction the surgeon delivered the tumor through the vena cavotomy.

 
During dissection of the right kidney (patients 1 through 5), the right and transverse colon, small bowel mesentry and duodenum were mobilized to the left to expose the retroperitoneal great vessels. The renal hilus was explored, and all suspicious nodes were biopsied. No nodal metastases were found on frozen section.

The liver was circumferentially mobilized to expose the retrohepatic vena cava by incising the falciform, triangular, and coronary ligaments. The diaphragm was split into the central tendon toward the IVC. Several short segmental veins between the dorsal surface of the liver and the vena cava were divided to expose the vena cava further. The hepatic artery and portal vein were exposed at the porta hepatis. The abdominal aorta was exposed at the supraceliac bare area by dividing the right crus of the diaphragm (Fig 2). The kidney was mobilized partially posteriorly, and the renal artery was ligated. This maneuver helps in minimizing significant shunting in many of the tumors. After division of the renal artery, dissection was carried superiorly to the right adrenal vein, which is usually higher and posterior.

The abdominal aorta was cross-clamped at the supraceliac bare area (Fig 2). The clamp was intermittently applied approximately every 5 to 7 minutes to minimize ischemia of the hepatic and contralateral renal vascular bed and the lower torso. The inferior cavoatrial junction was cross-clamped above the tumor. Then the vena cava was incised with an ellipse of cava around the renal vein ostium. The tumor thrombus was dissected using endarterectomy instruments and was extracted in continuity with the nephrectomy specimen. The individual hepatic veins and the IVC were completely cleared of thrombus. As soon as the tumor thrombus was removed en bloc, the aorta was released to restore circulation. A cardiotomy sucker was placed within the opened IVC, and the venous return was managed successfully. The IVC was flushed vigorously with cold saline solution. The cavotomy and the cavoatriotomy were repaired in two layers using 5-0 polypropylene. One patient (patient 2) required excision of a portion of IVC wall, which was later repaired using a pericardial patch. The tumor thrombus was occupying nearly half of the RA cavity in patients 5 and 6. They required aortic cross-clamping, cardioplegic arrest, and clamping of the pulmonary artery to avoid tumor embolization. Tumor thrombectomy was performed through two separate incisions in the infrahepatic IVC and RA. After removing the tumor, the right heart chambers including the opened IVC were vigorously flushed with cold saline solution with the pulmonary arterial clamp in situ to wash away any residual tumor material.

During intermittent supraceliac clamping at 32°C, the systemic flow rates were maintained between 2.0 and 2.2 L · min–1 · m–2 with a mean perfusion pressure between 60 and 80 mm Hg. Cardiopulmonary bypass was decreased and terminated after rewarming the patients, and heparin was reversed. We did not use an IVC clip or filter on any patient.


    Results
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
All patients survived the operation. There were no early or late deaths. The aortic cross-clamp time was 12 and 15 minutes for patients 5 and 6, respectively. The cumulative hepatic and renal ischemic time was 16 minutes and ranged from 14 to 22 minutes at 32°C. The mean CPB time was 53.3 ± 8.9 minutes (range, 40 to 65 minutes), and the mean operative duration was 3.55 ± 0.41 hours (range, 3.0 to 4.0 hours). The mean intraoperative blood loss was 492 ± 73.6 mL (range, 400 to 600 mL). Average amounts of blood products transfused in this group of patients were 3 units of blood, 2 units of platelets, and 3 units of fresh-frozen plasma. Hospital stay averaged 10 days (range, 8 to 14 days).

Pathologic examination revealed a well-differentiated clear cell carcinoma confined within the Gerota’s fascia. All lymph nodes and resection margins were free of tumor. Based on the Robson modification of the system of Flocks and Kadesky, all patients were classified as having stage III cancer. Convalescence was uneventful. Postoperative immunotherapy with interferon {alpha}2 was administered to all patients to improve survival. At a mean follow-up of 43 ± 24.6 months (range, 10 to 70 months; median, 50.0 months) all patients are active and remain disease-free.


    Comment
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
Despite transluminal tumor propagation into the IVC, radical nephrectomy with tumor thrombectomy in patients with renal cell carcinoma and level I to III thrombus extension is associated with a 5-year survival rate between 47% and 68% [1–6]. However, controversy exists regarding the best management protocol in patients with suprahepatic, intraatrial (level IV) tumor thrombi [1–12]. Some investigators have reported poor prognosis of these patients, with only a rare patient surviving 5 years [4]. Others have advocated profound hypothermia and circulatory arrest for complete removal of tumor thrombi, thereby possibly extending survival [5–7].

There are six basic principles involved in performing surgical removal of a suprahepatic intracardiac tumor thrombus. These principles are (1) isolate and control the IVC above and below the thrombus, (2) isolate and control the contralateral renal vein, (3) minimize hepatic and renal ischemia as much as possible, (4) incise the vena cava (suprahepatic and infrahepatic) or RA for combined manipulation and dissection, (5) remove the tumor thrombus en bloc including its intrahepatic extension along with a portion of the IVC wall around the renal vein ostium or the invaded vena caval wall, and (6) reconstruct the entire vena caval lumen with or without using a defatted pericardium in a relatively bloodless field.

The techniques described herein involve the use of CPB, mild hypothermia, and intermittent partial circulatory arrest of the lower torso by intermittent cross-clamping of the supraceliac abdominal aorta and addresses all the issues enunciated above.

Despite temporary occlusion of the suprahepatic vena cava, hepatic congestion could be reduced, retrohepatic dissection could be minimized, and back-bleeding from hepatic and lumbar veins could be avoided. There was no need for dissection and occlusion of the porta hepatis or ligation of multiple lumbar veins. Intermittent aortic occlusion allowed direct visual inspection of the entire vena caval lumen in a relatively bloodless field. An atriotomy could be performed easily, which permitted removal of not only the atrial thrombus but also friable or adherent pieces of the thrombus in the intrahepatic IVC. Thus, it allowed complete removal or reconstruction of the IVC (n = 1) with excellent exposure in a controlled operative setting. Our technique of obtaining proximal control above the cavoatrial junction or the main pulmonary artery in cases of massive intraatrial tumor thrombus avoided the problem of pulmonary tumor embolization. The procedure can be used for both right-sided and left-sided tumors and allows normal perfusion of the heart, lung, contralateral kidney, and brain with a consequent reduction in perfusion-related complications.

Although techniques of removal of infradiaphragmatic tumor are relatively straightforward, supradiaphragmatic extension presents more technical challenges and mandates an individualized management protocol. Analysis of the published literature documents various techniques of suprahepatic vena caval thrombectomy, including the use of a finger to push back the tumor thrombus under a tourniquet around the intrapericardial IVC [2], forceps [2, 13], Foley catheter [13], Fogarty catheter [14], and mobilization with or without resection of the caudate lobe of the liver [7, 15]. In 2001, we described a new technique of tumor thrombectomy on 2 patients with right-sided renal cell carcinoma with suprahepatic, supradiaphragmatic level IV tumor thrombus without using CPB through a right posterolateral thoracoabdominal incision [16]. Cerwinka and associates [17] have used a different approach of tumor extirpation through bilateral subcostal incision with superior midline T-extension. They performed right nephrectomy, an inferior vena cavectomy between the hepatic veins and the left renal vein, avoiding circulatory arrest altogether, and even CPB [17].

The use of venovenous bypass or vena caval–atrial bypass is limited to thrombi that can be milked inferior to the vena caval–atrial junction and extracted like level III thrombi [8–12]. One of the advantages of venovenous or vena caval–atrial bypass with an electromagnetic centrifugal pump and vacuum-assisted drainage is that full heparinization is not necessary and perioperative blood loss is possibly minimized [11, 12]. Janosko and associates [18] described a modified technique of venoatrial bypass that allows rapid conversion to total CPB if the thrombus cannot be mobilized under the tourniquet placed around the intrathoracic IVC. These non-CPB approaches are plagued by problems of profound intraoperative hypotension, suboptimal thrombectomy, risk of tumor embolization within the RA and pulmonary tree, disruption, the risk of unpredictable bleeding, and warm ischemic injury to the liver and kidneys [7–12, 15, 17–19]. Several reports of intraoperative massive pulmonary embolism requiring emergency pulmonary embolectomy have been published [19].

The application of CPB and hypothermia, initially introduced by Marshall and colleagues [14] in 1970s, to patients with suprahepatic vena caval thrombi from renal cell carcinoma has improved the safety and efficacy of a difficult surgical undertaking. The use of adjuncts like hypothermia, cardiac arrest, and temporary exsanguinations with CPB facilitates controlled dissection, provides a bloodless field, and reduces the risk of tumor embolization [5–7]. However, up to 40% risk of complications including renal failure, hepatic failure, and postoperative sepsis and up to 33% perioperative mortality after hypothermic circulatory arrest have been reported by various investigators [5–7, 20]. Risk of complications has been shown to be associated with endothelial dysfunction in the cerebral microvasculature, renal arteries, and pulmonary veins [20]. A state of relative coagulopathy is known to exist in these patients as a result of hepatic venous obstruction, congestive hepatomegaly, and depressed hepatic function [20]. Addition of systemic heparinization, prolonged CPB time, and adverse effects of hypothermic circulatory arrest compounds the magnitude of the procedure. Literature documents 1.7 to 9.1 L of blood loss using circulatory arrest to remove tumors with supradiaphragmatic extension [5–7]. It is noteworthy that no patients in this study experienced renal failure, hepatic failure, sepsis, cerebrovascular accidents, myocardial infarction, or pulmonary embolus.

For the surgical exposure, a midline, a thoracoabdominal, or a bilateral subcostal with superior midline T-extension approach have been advocated [1–12, 15–17]. A thoracoabdominal approach provides better access to the IVC but makes atrial and aortic cannulation difficult. However, the midline sternotomy and laparotomy provide satisfactory exposure of the kidney and excellent exposure of the heart [1–12, 15–17].

Accurate preoperative information regarding the presence and extent of an IVC tumor thrombus is essential to determine the appropriate operative approach. Although computed tomographic scanning and ultrasound detect gross renal vein and IVC tumor thrombus, they are unreliable in delineating the cephalad extent of a thrombus. Although inferior venacavography accurately detects the presence of IVC thrombi, a single antegrade study may be insufficient in patients with complete caval occlusion. A second retrograde injection of the IVC is needed in such cases to delineate the distal extent of the thrombus [21, 22].

Recent publications indicate that magnetic resonance imaging is an accurate noninvasive method for delineating the cephalad and caudal extent of IVC thrombi and now is the preferred caval imaging modality in our center. The major advantages of magnetic resonance imaging are that thrombosis versus patency in the vena cava can be determined without using intravenous contrast agent, and images of the tumor thrombus can be acquired in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes [21]. Inferior venacavography is reserved for patients in whom magnetic resonance imaging findings are equivocal or when magnetic resonance imaging is contraindicated, eg, in patients with claustrophobia, cardiac pacemakers, certain intracerebral vascular clips, cochlear implants, or intraocular foreign bodies [21]. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is very useful in delineating the cephalad extent of the tumor and detecting any adherence of the caval thrombus. Cerwinka and associates have described an entirely transabdominal approach, milking the tumor thrombus into the subdiaphragmatic IVC under transesophageal echocardiography control. Additionally, it is useful during the key portion of the operation and allows placement of a clamp in the RA to exclude the tumor [22].

We conclude that cardiopulmonary bypass, mild hypothermia, and intermittent occlusion of the supraceliac abdominal aorta represents an alternative modality in the evolutionary management of renal cell carcinoma with suprahepatic level IV neoplastic extension. Avoidance of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest reduces CPB time, and allows normal perfusion of the heart, lung, and brain with a consequent reduction in perfusion-related complications. Cardioplegic arrest allows removal of massive intraatrial thrombi, clamping of the pulmonary artery avoids the problem of pulmonary tumor embolization, and a combination of right atriotomy and infrahepatic vena cavotomy allows complete removal of extensive intracardiac and vena caval tumor thrombi.


    Acknowledgments
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 
The authors are grateful to Mr Shankar Sharma for preparation of the manuscript.


    References
 Top
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Patients and Methods
 Results
 Comment
 Acknowledgments
 References
 

  1. Staehler G, Brkovic D. The role of radical surgery for renal cell carcinoma with extension into the vena cava J Urol 2000;163:1671-1675.[Medline]
  2. Skinner DG, Pritchett TR, Lieskovsky G, Boyd SD, Stiles QR. Vena caval involvement by renal cell carcinoma Ann Surg 1989;210:387-392.[Medline]
  3. Glazer AA, Novick AC. Long-term follow-up after surgical treatment for renal cell carcinoma extending into the right atrium J Urol 1996;155:448-450.[Medline]
  4. Sosa RE, Muecke EC, Vaughan ED, McCarron Jr JP. Renal cell carcinoma extending into the inferior vena cava: the prognostic significance of the level of vena caval involvement J Urol 1984;132:1097-1100.[Medline]
  5. Shahian DM, Libertino JA, Zinman LN, Leonardi HK, Eyre RC. Resection of cavoatrial renal cell carcinoma employing total circulatory arrest Arch Surg 1990;125:727-732.[Abstract]
  6. Belis JA, Livinson ME, Pae WE. Complete radical nephrectomy and vena caval thrombectomy during circulatory arrest J Urol 2000;163:434-436.[Medline]
  7. Marshall FF, Reitz BA, Diamond DA. A new technique for management of renal cell carcinoma involving the right atrium: hypothermia and cardiac arrest J Urol 1984;131:103-107.[Medline]
  8. Attwood S, Lang DM, Goiti J, Grant J. Venous bypass for surgical resection of renal carcinoma invading the vena cava: a new approach Br J Urol 1988;61:402-405.[Medline]
  9. Foster RS, Mahomed Y, Bihrle R, et al. Use of a caval-atrial shunt for resection of a caval tumor thrombus in renal cell carcinoma J Urol 1988;140:1370-1371.[Medline]
  10. Burt M. Inferior vena caval involvement by renal cell carcinoma: use of veno-venous bypass as an adjunct during resection Urol Clin North Am 1991;18:437-444.[Medline]
  11. David IB, Diehl JT, Benak A, et al. Resection of retrohepatic inferior vena caval tumoursA new technique using the Biomedicus pump. Can J Surg 1988;31:219-220.[Medline]
  12. Moggio RA, Praeger PI, Sarabu MR, et al. Use of centrifugal flow pump for vena caval shunting Ann Thorac Surg 1990;50:146-148.[Abstract]
  13. Musiani U. Hypernephroma of the right kidney with inferior vena caval and right atrial thrombosis: A case study and successful removal J Urol 1977;118:472-476.[Medline]
  14. Marshall VF, Middleton RG, Holswade GR, Goldsmith EI. Surgery for renal cell carcinoma in the vena cava J Urol 1970;103:414-429.[Medline]
  15. Ohwada A, Satoh Y, Nakamura S, et al. Left-sided approach to renal cell carcinoma tumour thrombus extending into suprahepatic vena cava by resection of left caudate lobe Angiology 1997;48:629-635.[Medline]
  16. Gupta NP, Khaitan A, Chowdhury UK, Hemal AK, Nabi G. A modified approach for tumour thrombectomy for renal cell carcinoma with supradiaphragmatic extracardiac tumour thrombus Br J Urol Int 2001;88:644-648.
  17. Cerwinka WH, Ciancio G, Salerno TA, Soloway MS. Renal cell cancer with invasive atrial tumour thrombus excised off-pump Urology 2005;661319-e9–11.
  18. Janosko EO, Powell CS, Spence PA, et al. Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma with extensive intracaval involvement using venous bypass system suitable for rapid conversion to total cardiopulmonary bypass J Urol 1991;145:555-557.[Medline]
  19. Fukui K, Narita J, Takahashi S, et al. A case report of a massive pulmonary tumor embolism occurring during surgery for renal cell carcinoma Kyobu Geka 1992;45:529-532.[Medline]
  20. Cooper WA, Duarte IG, Thourani VH, et al. Hypothermic circulatory arrest causes multisystem vascular endothelial dysfunction and apoptosis Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69:696-703.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Goldfarb DA, Novick AC, Lorig R, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of vena caval tumour thrombi: a comparative study with vena cavography and CT scanning J Urol 1990;144:1100-1104.[Medline]
  22. Treiger BFG, Humphrey LS, Peterson Jr CV, et al. Transesophageal echocardiography in renal cell carcinoma: an accurate diagnostic technique for intracaval neoplastic extension J Urol 1991;145:1138-1140.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
VASC ENDOVASCULAR SURGHome page
G. J. Wang, J. P. Carpenter, R. M. Fairman, B. M. Jackson, B. Malkowicz, K. N. Van Arsdalen, and E. Y. Woo
Single-Center Experience of Caval Thrombectomy in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma With Tumor Thrombus Extension Into the Inferior Vena Cava
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, August 1, 2008; 42(4): 335 - 340.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
G. Ciancio and T. A. Salerno
Removal of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Thrombectomy With Intraatrial Tumor Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1145 - 1145.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
U. K. Chowdhury and A. Seth
Reply
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2008; 85(3): 1145 - 1146.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Personal Folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Author home page(s):
Ujjwal K. Chowdhury
Amber Malhotra
Panangipalli Venugopal
Right arrow Permission Requests
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chowdhury, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chowdhury, U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Venugopal, P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Cardiac - other


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
ANN THORAC SURG ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG
J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG ICVTS ALL CTSNet JOURNALS