|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1544-1545
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
b Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
c Department of Anesthesia, McGill University Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
Accepted for publication October 4, 2006.
* Address correspondence to Dr Lachapelle, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Ave West, Montréal, QC H3A 1A1, Canada (Email: kevin.lachapelle{at}muhc.mcgill.ca).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An otherwise healthy 53-year-old man with a history of familial hypertrophic restrictive cardiomyopathy (FHRC) presented to a peripheral hospital for pretransplantation work-up. This evaluation revealed profound right heart failure and end-stage liver failure (Child grade C). His history was negative for abusive alcohol consumption, and this evaluation revealed negative hepatitis serologies. Hemochromatosis was also ruled out. Echocardiography showed he had normal left-ventricular systolic function, but right heart catheterization revealed a severe restrictive diastolic pattern. A liver biopsy specimen was consistent with cryptogenic liver cirrhosis, and his end-stage liver disease was attributed to severe right-sided heart failure. In light of this assessment, he was referred to our institution for CHLT and listed for transplantation.
When ABO compatible, weight-matched organs became available, our liver and heart procurement teams were dispatched to the donor site. As the donor heart was being procured, the patient was taken to the operating theatre and appropriate monitoring lines were placed. Once the donor heart and liver were confirmed as "good fits," a midline sternotomy extending into bilateral subcostal incisions was performed. Abdominal dissection to isolate the structures, including the porta hepatitis and suprahepatic vena cava was done first, but without completing the hepatectomy. Preparation took place concurrently for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Bicaval cannulation was obtained via the superior vena cava (No. 24, metal tip) and femoral vein with a single-stage venous cannula (No. 21) going to the inferior vena cava and standard aortic cannulation (No. 24).
Once the donor heart arrived, the recipients heart was explanted and bicaval heart transplantation was performed in the usual fashion. During the reperfusion period (on full CPB with the femoral cannula withdrawn to the iliac vein), the recipient hepatectomy was completed, and donor liver was implanted, with the entire liver transplantation occurring on complete CPB.
After unclamping the portal and caval systems, the hepatic artery anastomosis was completed. At this time, the heart rate became unstable and peaked T waves were noted. Fortunately, this led to no deleterious consequences because the patient was on full CPB. Ten minutes after the hepatic artery was unclamped, the patient was easily weaned from CPB and decannulated. The common bile duct anastomosis was then done after reinitiation of hepatic artery flow. Anticoagulation was reversed using protamine sulfate and hemostasis was achieved. The CPB time was 197 minutes with a cross-clamp time of 73 minutes. The cardiac and hepatic ischemic times were 185 and 288 minutes respectively.
The patient had a completely uneventful recovery. He remained in the intensive care unit for 5 days and was then transferred to our dedicated cardiac surgery ward. He did not demonstrate any signs of pulmonary or renal dysfunction, and his postoperative course was free of arrhythmic episodes or signs of rejection. He was discharged home on postoperative day 14.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The surgical approach reported here is similar to the one described by Starzl and colleagues [1] in 1985. Other approaches include the sequential implantation of the heart and liver during two independent procedures, or the more frequently performed simultaneous implantation of both organs with the use of portal-systemic venovenous bypass [4] or inferior vena caval flow preservation [7]. We believe that the technique reported here could prove useful in preventing complications associated with previously described cases of combined heart and liver transplantation, including acute renal failure.
A priori, we decided to use this approach to save on the precious time required for cardiac reperfusion. Indeed, the hepatectomy having already begun before the implantation of the donor heart. Its final steps were performed very quickly and the liver team was able to go ahead with the liver implantation expeditiously.
It seems that the main attraction of this technique is that it uses the reperfusion time on CPB to implant the liver. The reperfusion stage is clearly longer, but the heart weans from bypass easily. Second, the metabolic derangements resulting from hepatic reperfusion, such as hyperkalemia, have a lesser effect on the patients hemodynamics because CPB support is still provided. This can potentially prevent an already weak heart from being affected by serious insults in the initial hours after implantation. Finally, this technique reduces the ischemia time of the liver.
This technique of CPB support for combined heart and liver transplantation seems to have been abandoned since Starzl and colleagues early accounts mostly because of the fear of coagulopathy and inflammatory response associated with the extended use of the CPB circuit. In the age of antifibrinolytic agents, this may be worth reconsidering. Second, the reperfusion time provides a period of hemodynamic stability helpful for the expeditious implantation of the liver in cases where the hepatectomy has been started before the heart explantation or the cannulation of the patient. This technique obviously requires great cooperation and communication between the various surgical teams involved. Although only a single case, it is interesting to note that our patient did not experience any renal dysfunction postoperatively, contrary to many of the recently reported cases of CHLT done without full CPB support.
In summary, CHLT should be considered a therapeutic option for FHRC patients with secondary end-stage liver failure. Furthermore, the technique of CPB-supported simultaneous combined heart and liver transplantation appears to be a valuable option to bring to the surgical armamentarium because it has the potential to facilitate the procedure and decrease the occurrence of complications associated with other techniques of CHLT.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
F.-U. Sack, A. Kristen, H. Goldschmidt, P. A. Schnabel, T. Dengler, A. Koch, and M. Karck Treatment options for severe cardiac amyloidosis: heart transplantation combined with chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation for patients with AL-amyloidosis and heart and liver transplantation for patients with ATTR-amyloidosis Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., February 1, 2008; 33(2): 257 - 262. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |