|
|
||||||||
Ann Thorac Surg 2007;83:1158-1161
© 2007 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
a Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario "Luigi Sacco," Milan, Italy
b Department of Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario "Luigi Sacco," Milan, Italy
c Laboratorio di Emodinamica e Radiologia Cardiovascolare Istituto Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Italy
Accepted for publication July 6, 2006.
* Address correspondence to Dr Vanelli, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Polo Universitario "Luigi Sacco" Via G.B. Grassi, 74 20157 Milan, Italy (Email: p.vanelli{at}hsacco.it).
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Description: We report a less invasive approach in 4 patients presenting an aortic arch aneurysm. We performed a hybrid procedure that is a combination of different techniques: a mid-sternotomy is performed, followed by transposition of the supra-aortic vessels, and neck reshaping with a proximal banding of the aortic arch. In particular, we banded the aorta to facilitate and optimize the endovascular fixation of the graft, reducing postoperative type-1 endoleaks.
Evaluation: The four procedures were uneventful with 1-day intensive care unit recovery. The postoperative and the 1-year follow-up CT scan did not reveal any endoleaks.
Conclusions: Hybrid technique, combined with banding of proximal aortic arch and endovascular grafting are an alternative technique to the conventional open aortic repair. A polyester cloth banding of the ascending and proximal aortic arch allow the neck reshaping of the aorta optimizing the fixation of the endovascular stent graft.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Technology |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Technique |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From January to June 2004, 3 male and 1 female patients were admitted to our hospital with an aneurysm of the aortic arch.
Preoperative Evaluation
Digital subtraction angiography, including cerebral four-vessel angiography and cerebral computed tomography was performed on all patients undergoing this procedure. The patency of the internal mammary arteries was detected by angiography. Iliac and femoral arteries were assessed for endovascular access suitability.
Surgical Technique
Standard general anesthesia was performed. Right and left radial arterial pressures were monitored simultaneously to assess adequate cerebral and upper limb perfusion. Transesophageal echocardiography was routinely used to assess whether atherosclerotic or calcified plaques were present in the ascending aorta or the aortic arch. In the third patient an aortic valvuloplasty was performed through a complete median sternotomy, including the replacement of the ascending aortic arch and its branches. Blood pressure was maintained at an average systolic pressure of 80 mm Hg by infusion of nitrates or administration of isoflurane. Systemic heparinization (3 mg/kg) was continued during implantation and anastomoses. After side clamping the ascending aorta, a double branched vascular prosthesis (14 x 7 x 7 mm Uni-Graft K-DV [Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany]) was sutured end-to-side in the mid-portion of the ascending aorta. The side clamp was then removed and the first limb of the prosthesis was anastomosed end-to-end to the innominate artery with a 5-0 monofilament running suture. The second limb was anastomosed to the left common carotid artery in the same fashion. The left subclavian artery was left open in the first patient for later embolization, because of aneurysm involvement. In the second case the left subclavian artery was anastomosed to a third limb of the prosthesis. We completed the procedures by banding the aorta with a vascular prosthesis (Hemashield Gold [Meadox Medical Inc, Oakland, NJ]), opened longitudinally then wrapped around the aorta, obtaining a mean outer diameter of 32 mm. This provided a cylindrical shaped, nonexpandable, and easily recognizable, proximal landing zone, which allowed for a better fixation of the endograft. This area should ideally be approximately 3 to 4 cm long and located distally to the aortic anastomosis of the branched vascular prosthesis. To visualize the proximal and distal parts of the banding (the landing zone) later, we marked each site with a radiopaque wire passed around the aorta (Figs 13).
|
|
|
Postoperative Evaluation
Angiographic control was done immediately after the endovascular placement to demonstrate the total exclusion of the aneurysm and the absence of the endoleak. The final result was evaluated by an angiographic computed tomography with 3-dimensional reconstruction before hospital discharge (Fig 3).
| Clinical Experience |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Patient 2
A 56-year-old man was evaluated for dysphonia with a standard anterior-posterior roentgenogram of the thorax that revealed a dilatation of the aortic arch. The subsequent CT scan showed an aneurysm of the aortic arch with a maximum transverse diameter of 68 mm in the distal section that involved the left subclavian artery, including a stenosis of the proximal left common carotid artery. He had a history of lung empyema, being previously operated on for abdominal aortic aneurysm, peripheral arterial obstruction disease, and right coronary stenosis. The calculated Euroscore was 8 with a logistic risk of 10.4%.
Patient 3
A 67-year-old woman was referred to us by another hospital. She had a severe regurgitation of the aortic valve and an aneurysm of the ascending aorta. A CT scan demonstrated an enlarged ascending aorta and the aortic arch exceeded 55 mm. The Euroscore was 9 with a logistic risk of 16%.
Patient 4
A 72-year-old man had received surgical resection of an abdominal aortic aneurysm 7 years prior. A thoracic-abdominal aortic aneurysm was detected by a CT scan with a proximal neck in the middle of the arch. He also presented with severe chronic pulmonary disease. The Euroscore was 9 with a logistic risk of 16%.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Follow-Up
The mean follow-up period was 451.5 ± 102.7 days. All patients were well and reported a complete regression of pains or dysphonia. The CT scans were scheduled every 6 months for the first year, then once every other year thereafter. We were able to demonstrate the absence of endoleak, the exclusion of the aneurysms, the patency of the epiaortic vessels, and the endograft did not show any migration or fracture.
| Comment |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aortic banding technique that we have presented offers many advantages for proximal graft fixation: (1) it creates a nonexpandable zone to land the endograft, (2) provides a long, linear, and cylindrical neck next to the aneurysm, (3) provides a radiopaque reference marker that can easily point out the landing zone, and (4) prevents further dilation of the aorta. The first two points are very important to reduce the risks of endoleak and migration of the graft. We used the full median sternotomy approach to transplant the epiaortic vessels, even if less invasive procedures of extra-anatomic bypass are described. We believe that the banding technique is most important to optimize the landing zone in the part of the aorta where the proximal part of the stent graft will be exposed to strong pulsatile stress, and it should always be performed in all patients. We think that with this approach the overall cerebrovascular accident occurrence is reduced when compared with traditional surgical methods. The banding technique could facilitate endovascular aortic arch repair providing an alternative means of treatment to the more conventional surgical repairs or dedicated endovascular procedures. The effectiveness and potential advantages of the hybrid aortic arch repair technique need to be validated in a larger patient sample with long-term follow-up.
| Disclosures and Freedom of Investigation |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Lin, Q. Lu, M. Liao, M. Guo, J. Gong, and Z. Jing Endovascular repair of the half aortic arch in pigs with an improved, single-branched stent graft system for the brachiocephalic trunk Vascular, October 1, 2011; 19(5): 242 - 249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Lioupis and C. Z. Abraham Results and Challenges for the Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Aneurysms Perspectives in Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, September 1, 2011; 23(3): 202 - 213. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Koullias and G. H. Wheatley III State-of-the-Art of Hybrid Procedures for the Aortic Arch: A Meta-Analysis Ann. Thorac. Surg., August 1, 2010; 90(2): 689 - 697. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Uchida, H. Shibamura, A. Katayama, M. Sutoh, M. Kuraoka, and H. Ishihara Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk technique for the extensive arteriosclerotic aneurysm J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., April 1, 2010; 139(4): 913 - 917. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Xydas, B. Wei, H. Takayama, M. Russo, M. Bacchetta, C. R. Smith, and A. Stewart Use of carotid-subclavian arterial bypass and thoracic endovascular aortic repair to minimize cerebral ischemia in total aortic arch reconstruction J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg., March 1, 2010; 139(3): 717 - 722. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gottardi, M. Funovics, N. Eggers, A. Hirner, M. Dorfmeister, J. Holfeld, D. Zimpfer, M. Schoder, K. Donas, E. Weigang, et al. Supra-aortic Transposition for Combined Vascular and Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Pathology Ann. Thorac. Surg., November 1, 2008; 86(5): 1524 - 1529. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Shah, A. L. Estrera, C. C. Miller III, T.-Y. Lee, A. D. Irani, R. Meada, and H. J. Safi Analysis of Ascending and Transverse Aortic Arch Repair in Octogenarians Ann. Thorac. Surg., September 1, 2008; 86(3): 774 - 779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Marzban Hybrid endovascular procedure for high risk elderly patients Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg, June 1, 2008; 7(3): 429 - 429. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Karck and H. Kamiya Progress of the treatment for extended aortic aneurysms; is the frozen elephant trunk technique the next standard in the treatment of complex aortic disease including the arch? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, June 1, 2008; 33(6): 1007 - 1013. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| ANN THORAC SURG | ASIAN CARDIOVASC THORAC ANN | EUR J CARDIOTHORAC SURG |
| J THORAC CARDIOVASC SURG | ICVTS | ALL CTSNet JOURNALS |